I'm looking at a 4K scan of a 1977 theatrical print of STAR WARS. This was done by the fan restorationist team called team negative 1.

The print has been cleaned and run through a variety of filters to reduce the flicker and lines and flashes. Some scenes look incredibly sharp and crisp.

https://i.ibb.co/DYtmQVs/death-star-1.jpg

Some are so muddy and grainy that it goes beyond normal film grain. This looks like it's because many shots had multiple layers of film to add in special effects and composite shots which would either double or triple the amount of grain.

https://i.ibb.co/7yMhzJd/obi-wan-1.jpg

There's definitely a bit of work for Disney to do after scanning a theatrical print if the original negative has been destroyed, but STAR WARS from theatrical prints is a viable path to a 4K release of the unaltered versions.

Likely, an AI process can run through all this grain to render it into proper 4K detail. This 35mm image was meant to be cast through a projector, a form of theatrical presentation that softens the look of grain. On backlit displays, that grain looks like static.

I was rewatching STAR WARS Despecialized on my 55 inch 4K TV. The TV was big when I bought it, now it's average. The Despecialized Edition by Petr Harmacek was great when first released in 2011, removing all the special edition changes, but it doesn't work as well on bigger, higher resolutions. The video quality keeps jumping back and forth from strong 720p quality to poor 480p quality that's been stretched to 720p.

The issue: Harmacek started with the HD blu-rays and the below-SD DVDs. The sub-SD-DVDs are unaltered, but they were released in a resolution that's only 640x480, so the video actually exists in 640x270 pixels instead of the full 720x480 of a DVD.

Harmacek rebuilt a cut of the original version with the blu-ray versions and reversed the odd colour alterations made to it, using a 16mm film scan as reference. Harmacek then intricately transferred the unaltered effect shots from the DVD version onto the blu-ray version. This means that entire shots or rotoscoped portions of shots are stretched, sub-standard definition effects on top of the HD shot.

Over time, Harmacek made a lot of improvements: he and other fan collectors and restorationists located scans of the original matte paintings as well as original 16mm, 35mm and 70mm negative prints of the original films. Harmacek was able to a good chunk of the DVD-sourced SD effects with HD scans.

However, these scans, done on second generation film prints that weren't well stored, are only a small upgrade from the fuzzy subSD-DVD effects; they're still not entirely matched to the underlying blu-ray quality.

Watched on a 1080p TV in the 32 - 40 inch range, the despecialized STAR WARS looked fantastic to me. The mismatches weren't really very glaring and if you're caught up in the film, it doesn't matter. But watching it on a bigger and higher-resolution TV, the despecialized versions are really distracting in how the film quality jumps from sharp blu-ray to fuzzier digital scans of old film.

I think the despecialized fan restorationist stuff was great from 2011 - 2021, but now, it's time Disney did its job and released the unaltered original trilogy. I suspect that George Lucas destroyed the original film masters that would allow Disney to rescan and rebuild each shot and each scene in a true remastering; I've read that the only master film negatives available with all the complete effects is the SPECIAL EDITIONS.

However, Disney has plenty of options: they can AI-upscale the unaltered, low-res DVD release of 2006. They can secure a theatrical print of the film, clean it up physically, scan it at 8K, and then subject it to AI-cleanup for dirt and lines and scanning issues. Given their resources, this shouldn't take more than a week for an AI-upscale of the 2006 DVDs or a year for a new scan.

Footnote: The blu-ray/special edition of EMPIRE STRIKES BACK is fine. The additions were so minimal. The light level conversion isn't great, but given the 1080p detail, it's acceptable.

1,443

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Then Diggle shows up again, unexpectedly, talking to Thawne.  And Thawne helps him open the box with promises of cosmic adventures.  And...

...it's something else entirely?  And now that arc is over?  And now Diggle can teach young people about justice in his own non-Green Lantern spinoff?  What is this?

I thought I saw the Green Lantern emblem in the glow of the box that Diggle threw. I thought the point was that Diggle had decided to reject the GL ring because it would take him away from his wife and children.

Apparently, the script for this was written at a time when THE FLASH had no Season 9 renewal, so the showrunner decided to end the Diggle arc as he'd learned that it wouldn't continue on SUPERMAN AND LOIS (different universe) and that BATWOMAN and LEGENDS were also facing a risk of cancellation (that became confirmed).

Caution: this post suggests a Crossover for a SLIDERS revival series premiere (dun dun dunhhhhh!).

What if... the QUANTUM LEAP revival had an episode that served as a backdoor pilot for SLIDERS? What would it be like?

What if... Dr. Ben Seong needs an outside perspective on Project Quantum Leap? What if he decides to go to his local Doppler Computer Chain and talk to the Repair Squad clerk behind the counter, an awkward grad school dropout named Quinn Mallory (played either by Jerry O'Connell or... I dunno, Corey Fogelmanis (genius eccentric on GIRL MEETS WORLD) if it's a young version).

What if Dr. Seong think fondly of his old classmate Quinn as a brilliant, clever scientist who was more interested in practical engineering than quantum mechanics?

What if we learn that Quinn was a well-regarded grad student until his foolhardy effort to build a quantization field generator in the faculty basement accidentally burned the building down, but Dr. Seong still likes to meet up with Quinn now and then and bounce ideas off him and offer him freelance work (as Quinn's lack of credentials has reduced him to fixing computers at the Doppler Electronics chain for minimum wage).

Perhaps Quinn alludes to his own projects that he's been working on.

Perhaps Quinn brings Dr. Seong back home to The Basement show him his attempts at anti-gravity to solve an immediate problem Seong is having in trying to retrieve the long-missing Sam Beckett.

Perhaps Quinn's demonstration knocks out the power to half of the Western coastal area of America.

Perhaps the last we see of Quinn on the QUANTUM LEAP revival, Dr. Seong is grimly waving goodbye to Quinn as the police march Quinn out of The Basement.

Perhaps later, Dr. Seong realizes Quinn's idea sparked something in him that lets him resolve the issue of the week, and in gratitude, Seong has Project Quantum Leap pay off Quinn's legal bills and get him out of jail.

Perhaps Project Quantum Leap Administration declares that Seong is to never involve Quinn in Project Quantum Leap again and pre-emptively declares that Quinn will be shot on sight should he ever be within half a city block of the building. (Shot with paint, but still.)

Perhaps this leads into a SLIDERS pilot where Quinn is further disgraced in the scientific community and now hated by his neighbours (he knocked out the power during an important game of sportsball, I'm sorry, I don't know sports, but people seem to care about them). Quinn helps his neighbour, Stephanie, retrieve her runaway dog. Stephanie proceeds to set her dog on Quinn because Quinn made her miss the super... plate... something. (I am sorry. I don't know sports, but people really care about them.)

Perhaps after a mild mauling, Quinn is now ready to give up on science, take everything in the basement to a landfill and call it a day on Science.

Perhaps, as Quinn is packing up, he accidentally reboots his hardware and then something appears in Quinn's basement. A burst of light. A light that does not fade but remains suspended in the air. The light begins to widen. What could it be?

Perhaps it is split in the very skin of reality itself. A split that becomes a gateway.

And perhaps the adventure begins again...

1,445

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I finished the finale. It was okay. We've seen it all before: a faceoff with Thawne, increased powers, another victory, Barry's present and future family gathering. At this point, they could just mix and match Season 7 footage with Season 8 and the drama would be about as impactful.

I looked up Cobalt Blue. The character was apparently created during the Wally West era by FLASH visionary writer Mark Waid and debuted during the Wally era in a storyline called "Chain Lightning". I somehow missed this block of issues back in the 90s. I should read it on the DC Infinite app and see if TF is right that it's awful. Mark Waid is a genius, but Waid left the title a year after "Chain Lightning" due to what he described as burnout, so it wouldn't surprise me if "Chain Lightning" is where it started to go downhill.

It's interesting. Waid loved writing THE FLASH because he was a very impatient person and identified with the character. But eight years after he started, Waid said that he had become a more patient person and could no longer write the Flash.

1,446

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I am as caught up with THE FLASH as I can be. The Season 8 finale isn't on Netflix until tomorrow for me.

I guess... the episodes are okay. They're trying to give Grant Gustin less to do, so the supporting cast is coming to the forefront. It's weird that Season 7 was all about Barry and Iris nonsensically addressing the grown adults who were the "Forces" as their children and accepting them and loving them; now the Forces are villains and none of them have costumes.

When Thawne returned at the end of Episode 19, Barry had a bleak, resigned look on his face like he was once again facing down that annoying uncle who keeps showing up at family dinners and it'll be up to Barry to steal his car keys so he can't drive drunk and to lock him in a bedroom to sleep it off before he starts a fight. Thawne is just that obnoxious relative with whom Barry has developed a grim acceptance in knowing he'll never truly be rid of him while noting that this relative is too inept and clumsy to ever do any more damage at this point.

1,447

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I am hoping to catch up with THE FLASH in the next few days. But it's funny. In Seasons 1 - 2, Eobard Thawne was the nightmare who haunted Barry's life. By Season 5, Thawne had become the mildly psychotic uncle whom you could expect to pop up at various points throughout the year, regularly dropping by for bizarre conversations tinged with malice and malevolence that would inevitably end in (a) a draw and (b) a promise to be back in 6 - 8 months. And Barry at this point isn't afraid of Thawne as much as resigned to Thawne passing in and out of his life a couple times a year.

**

Was Cobalt Blue pre or post Wally West in the 80s and 90s? I regret I'm not actually very familiar with the comic  book Barry, only Wally West.

**

SUPERMAN AND LOIS was meant to be in the Arrowverse. A crossover with BATWOMAN was mandated by the studio and network (with BATWOMAN showrunner Caroline Dries learning she was being ordered to do one in the press). The pilot script for S&L had Clark having a difficult time connecting with his sons because he remembered his pre-CRISIS life where he only had one son and Jonathan was a baby. Melissa Benoist's photo was supposed to be on Clark's desk in the Daily Planet. They were trying to see if they could have her at Martha Kent's funeral.

But then the pandemic hit. The BATWOMAN crossover was cancelled. Melissa Benoist couldn't guest-star on SUPERMAN AND LOIS as a featured player or even in a cameo, so rather than draw attention to it, they removed the prop photo. SUPERMAN AND LOIS also couldn't use the SUPERGIRL Fortress set, so they made their own and theirs was more expensive and looked nothing like the Supergirl version.

SUPERMAN AND LOIS, operating on a lengthier production schedule (and a bigger budget) than the other Arrowverse shows, couldn't sync up its storylines with SUPERGIRL, THE FLASH, BATWOMAN or LEGENDS. The writers had no idea what was going on with Diggle (but it sounds like no writer did). Then SUPERGIRL announced it was on its last season; SUPERMAN AND LOIS would never be able to do a crossover with SUPERGIRL even if pandemic restrictions eased.

By Season 2, THE FLASH was sure to be ending next year, BATWOMAN and LEGENDS were either cancelled this year or next year, pandemic restrictions were less strict but still restrictive for actors, and SUPERMAN AND LOIS couldn't tie into its now concluded parent show, SUPERGIRL. The Armageddon crossover on FLASH was so narrowly scheduled  that S&L couldn't connect. S&L had had minimal connection to LEGENDS and had no connection to the second-generation BATWOMAN lead.

There was no worthwhile reason to crossover with any of these shows, especially with all the risks to the actors and the strain of scheduling them to alleviate risks.

SUPERMAN AND LOIS had, purely through circumstance rather than decision, drifted away from the Arrowverse. So, as they reached the end of Season 2, they accepted it and declared that the other shows were in a parallel universe. They played the hand that COVID dealt them.

In 1971, George Lucas couldn't imagine what steps would exist after the telephone, civilian band radio, and fax machines that would take us to spaceships and laser blasters. In 2022, it's hard to imagine that an interstellar civilization could have built a spacefaring, galaxy-wide Republic or Empire without wireless data transmission to coordinate construction, resources, supplies, transportation, etc.. But STAR WARS is using space opera equivalents of landlines, radio and fax.

If one had to rationalize it based on the Original Trilogy alone, the explanation might be that there was once a STAR TREK-level of technological achievement that was society wide, but then some devastating, apocalyptic war reduced everyone to using only what scraps remained of the previous generation. Perhaps that series of Clone Wars that Luke refers to. But the prequels dismissed that notion.

STAR WARS was imagined as a legally-dissimilar FLASH GORDON. It was meant to be a science fiction technological universe. But the Force, in addition to making STAR WARS safe from copyright infringement by disassociating from FLASH GORDON, repositioned STAR WARS as a mystical fantasy universe.

George Lucas was not faithful to STAR WARS as (techo)mystical fantasy, introducing midichlorians as a pseudoscientific explanation for the Force, emphasizing machines over magic. He didn't really think through the mythology of his universe; he just focused on the cool visual moment and then the next one after that. The cool visual moment was generally driven by machines (pod races, hoverboards).

But I think a lot of the oddities of STAR WARS from inconsistent technological development to droids would make a lot more sense if it were technomystical like, say, the videogame FINAL FANTASY VII.

In FF7, all the technology of FF7 draws on the "Lifestream", a river of spiritual and metaphysical energy that is the Lifeforce of the planet which people with the right talent can tap into to perform superhuman feats. The Lifestream can also be exploited by technology with FF7's machines, weapons, power plants drawing on Lifestream.

It might make sense to someday reveal that STAR WARS technology is powered by the Force. It would explain a lot. For example: why do the droids have personalities? What computer programmer would create a machine to do a task, but then give that machine fear, reluctance, hesitation and all the emotions that prevent C3PO from doing his job?

Why would a computer programmer take the time to create an artificial intelligence that can experience fear; wouldn't the task of programming a droid to translate or hack computers or fight intruders be enough work?

It could be explained that all machines in STAR WARS draw on Force energy, a living, collective entity and each droid is a unique expression of the life of the Force; droids are lifeforce in a mechanical body. The specific 'magic' of the Force could then be tailored to whatever limitations are needed to maintain a recognizable version of the STAR WARS universe.

Why isn't there galaxy-wide data transmission? Because communications tech that uses Force energy generates electromagnetic interference with engineers being blind to the Force as a psychic and telepathic power. Do people in the STAR WARS universe recognize that all their fuel and power is actually different forms of the Force and that their use of it strictly in terms of physical fuel is self-limiting?

My guess is there's an underlying zero point energy technology in STAR WARS that few understand, all of it copied or replicated from an original source blueprint, the origins of which are lost and long forgotten, and because all power sources in the STAR WARS universe are copies of copies of copies, the technology that makes it to remote places like Tatooine and Jakku is the bottom of the barrel.

That's my fan theory. But as for why the Jedi are government appointees known to the public in THE PHANTOM MENACE but urban legends dismissed by Han Solo in A NEW HOPE... well, I like Slider_Quinn21's theory that the Jedi were not well-known outside of the galactic capital.

1,449

(58 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

A number of posters, myself included, have experienced Internal Server Errors when trying to post. I've spoken with the hosting service. It seems that their highly protective security measures would incorrectly flag various post submissions as an HTTPS Smuggling Request Attack. The hosting service has created the necessary exceptions in their security functions for our posts, so we shouldn't be getting these error messages anymore. If it happens again, let me know at ireactions (at) gmail.com

I understand why Grizzlor would note all the absurdities of the STAR WARS universe. We all have different thresholds for suspension of disbelief. However, I have to point out: STAR WARS is a fictional universe created in 1971 and released in 1977. OBI-WAN is set in this 1971-1977 derived world.

George Lucas wrote STAR WARS in 1971 when communication across distances was done by postal lettermail. Long distance phonecalls. Teletype machines. STAR WARS presents a spacefaring, AI-producing, laser blaster firing society that has no galaxy-wide internet, just as 1971 had no planet-wide internet.

In the STAR WARS universe, long distance communication is only in terms of wireless voice transmission and fuzzy video. This limited infrastructure doesn't allow bulk data transfer, hence Death Star plans being sent by datatape and droid. R2D2 can't wirelessly connect to computers, he has to physically plug in. This is 1971 - 1977 technical limitations scaled to a space opera scale, but the limitations still stand even if the distance covered is interstellar rather than global.

In 1971 - 1977 America, General Obi-Wan Kenobi could complete his discharge papers, leave his home town of Chicago, move to Madrid, New Mexico, change his first name to Ben, and never be found again. There'd be no decentralized, accessible-from-anywhere computer network of government ID or credit history or social media or facial recognition databases to track him. And in this 1971-conceived interstellar society, Darth Vader can send all the Obi-Wan Kenobi wanted posters he can print, but the Imperial postal service doesn't get to Tatooine. This galaxy is still operating on the galaxy equivalent of snail mail.

STAR WARS is always going to ask you to pretend that it is 1971-1984 while you watch it. And period pieces aren't for everyone.

1,451

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

SUPERMAN AND LOIS is confirmed to not be set in the Arrowverse but a parallel Earth.
https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/superman-l … -revealed/

Nothing wrong with disliking OBI-WAN. The reviews, as I said, were average to poor. However. It's unfair to mock OBI-WAN for Ben not changing his last name. That is a plothole created by A NEW HOPE and REVENGE OF THE SITH, neither of which were OBI-WAN or produced by OBI-WAN's team.

Bringing up a 2005 complaint about a 2005 movie but turning it to a 2022 production is an odd choice in delayed targeting.

Also, A NEW HOPE was written in the pre-internet era when personal records and social media data weren't so readily available; you couldn't imagine Googling Kenobi in 1977. The internet still doesn't appear to be a thing even by the time of RISE OF SKYWALKER.

As for Darth Vader, he is is Palpatine's slave, forever plotting Palpatine's overthrow, seething with hatred. In A NEW HOPE, Vader tried to choke a subordinate to death and was constantly lashing out at the Rebel soldiers. And rather than command some fighter pilots, he got into a TIE Fighter himself to be hands on.  In EMPIRE, Vader wanted Luke to help him kill the emperor; Vader is a deeply disgruntled employee. And in EMPIRE, Vader repeatedly executes personnel in fits of rage.

Darth Vader is the antithesis of self-control. Any indication of 'control' is the suit keeping him alive, not the burn patient trapped inside it. Darth Vader is the poster child for anger management issues and is ridiculously theatrical.
Watch EMPIRE and ask yourself how much advance planning and rehearsal Vader had to do to plan the scene where Han walks into a dining room to find Vader waiting for him.

Again, there are legitimate and fair criticisms to be made of this show. I am certainly not the final arbiter of taste. I am seeing a lot of my own neuroses and insecurities in OBI-WAN, so it speaks to me. It may not speak to others.

If you think OBI-WAN looks cheap, that's not an unreasonable remark in light of Episodes 4 - 6 which use a simpler approach to Stagecraft settings (LED background, foreground 'exterior' dressing, blurriness and fog and darkness to merge the dividing lines). It's low-spectacle and low-drama and to some, it comes off as vacant, empty and dull and that's absolutely fair, just as it was absolutely fair for Slider_Quinn21 to dislike the Rey character (and I apologize for being so obnoxious about that).

But if you have a problem with Ben's alias, that's really not OBI-WAN KENOBI's fault; that problem was there long before a single page of OBI-WAN was typed and will remain long after we're all gone.

Another thought on OBI-WAN. Or rather, an expansion on previous thoughts.

People have criticized OBI-WAN, not unreasonably, for having characters running on obvious courses to obvious destinations. Obviously, Darth Vader can't kill Obi-Wan Kenobi in OBI-WAN KENOBI when it's set 10 years before A NEW HOPE.

But that scene in Episode II really hits hard when Ben is horrified to discover that Anakin Skywalker is still alive. That he really screwed up back in REVENGE OF THE SITH. And Episode III really impacted me, specifically the sequence where Darth Vader storms the village and Ben cowers behind a window grate. Then Ben flees if only to draw Vader away, Vader catches up to him, ignites his red lightsaber... and General Obi-Wan Kenobi, the master-warrior-defender of Naboo invasion, the hero of the Clone Wars... he runs away in terror.

Vader catches up to him, red lightsaber ready -- and Ben triggers his own lightsaber but holds it with all the swordsmanship that a child might have when brandishing an overly heavy flashlight. Ben is so obviously not even holding the lightsaber with the intention of putting up an actual fight; he's pretty certain this his his last moment of existence and he's just trying to illuminate the darkness to see what in holy hell Anakin Skywalker has become.

The name Obi-Wan Kenobi is a name of myth and legend. It summons to mind the resolute, determined Padawan of THE PHANTOM MENACE, the forceful and measured warrior of ATTACK OF THE CLONES and REVENGE OF THE SITH, the wise sage of A NEW HOPE who faced Darth Vader and death with humour, dignity and resolve. But Obi-Wan Kenobi is nowhere to be found in Episode III of his own show; instead, we get Ben and when Ben faces Darth Vader, Ben looks like he's about to wet himself.

Ewan McGregor's acting is really very good here.

This scene really speaks to me. Nobody feels like an adult. Nobody really thinks they have their act totally together. Even Obi-Wan Kenobi has had really bad periods in his life. It was not a straight line from hypercompetent police officer to semi-retired old man who still knows how to handle a laser sword.

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Because just having seen A New Hope, there's no indication from Leia that she's ever met Obi-Wan.

ireactions wrote:
  • Observation that Leia must have met Obi-Wan before A NEW HOPE to recognize and react to the name "Ben Kenobi"

  • Observation that it's odd that Leia would refer to Ben as having "served" in the Clone Wars instead of referring to Ben having rescued her years after the Clone Wars

  • Rationalization for subterfuge based on intergalactic politics so convoluted it takes FIVE PARAGRAPHS to explain it

While I think my explanation and the rationale of the show makes 'sense,' I would argue that in terms of quality -- it's not great that there's an apparent discrepancy between OBI-WAN KENOBI and A NEW HOPE that needs two hundred and fifty nine words from me to explain it.

I mean, who really remembers all the trivial dialogue from A NEW HOPE about Alderaan being a disarmed planet, Leia's cover story for the ROGUE ONE mission being a diplomatic mission, "Princess Leia" being a public front for her true identity as a Rebel commander, and the Emperor dissolving the Senate just after the Death Star is deployed?

Surely OBI-WAN should have built that exposition into its own scripts. ("Leia, you must be careful. Your parents' work -- his work with me -- it must be secret, even in the years to come. No one can know that your mother serves the Empire in public to enable your father to defy them in secret.") Slider_Quinn21 shouldn't need me to convince him that it works; OBI-WAN should do its own damn job.

In terms of Leia in OBI-WAN, I don't believe there is a plothole or a continuity error, just a slight oddity in one scene of A NEW HOPE.

OBI-WAN KENOBI plays fair with the dialogue in A NEW HOPE. A NEW HOPE indicates that Ben only adopted his Tatooine alias after the Clone Wars. "'Obi-Wan... Kenobi. Now that's a name I've not heard in a long time."

Aboard the Death Star, Luke tells Leia, "I'm Luke Skywalker and I'm here to rescue you. I'm here with Ben Kenobi" and Leia reacts, "Ben Kenobi!" and immediately trusts Luke. This means that Leia must have met Ben during his civilian life to know him by that name.

This means OBI-WAN had space to show how Leia and Ben had met, although OBI-WAN now had to explain why Leia's holo message to Ben was, in light of OBI-WAN, a little odd:

Leia Organa's Holo Message in A NEW HOPE:
General Kenobi. Years ago, you served my father in the Clone Wars. Now he begs you to help him in his struggle against the Empire. I regret that I am unable to present my father's request to you in person, but my ship has fallen under attack and I'm afraid my mission to Alderaan has failed.

I've placed information vital to the survival of the Rebellion into the memory systems of this R2 unit. My father will know how to retrieve it. You must see this droid safely delivered to him on Alderaan. This is our most desperate hour.

Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi. You're my only hope.

OBI-WAN KENOBI indicates that Ben's mission to rescue a young Leia was off the books. In contrast, Leia's message to Ben in A NEW HOPE was a formal request to recall a former soldier to the former Republic now Rebel Alliance. Therefore, she addressed him by rank ("General"). She referred to his last run of official active duty (his Clone War posting for Bail Organa).

She didn't refer to his off-the-books mission to rescue her because, if discovered, it would be apparent that Alderaan had been collaborating against the Jedi overtly after the Clone Wars when Alderaan was, at the time, attempting to maintain a fragile accord with the Empire ("Alderaan is peaceful, we have no weapons").

But doesn't Bail Organa, adoptive father of Leia, represent Alderaan? That doesn't appear to be the case in the non-LEGENDS, canon literature: the royal lineage was through Leia's adoptive mother, Breha Organa, which would allow some plausible deniability to declare that Bail had gone rogue, acted against his duty as a Senator in the Imperial Senate, and violated Alderaan's non-aggression pact with the Empire while leaving Alderaan untouched by his betrayal.

(In the end, it didn't matter; in A NEW HOPE, Tarkin says that Darth Sidious / Emperor Palpatine has dissolved the Imperial Senate and now Imperial soldiers have full authority to blow up Alderaan on a whim.)

The formal nature of Leia's message also made it clear: this wasn't seeking out Ben of Tatooine to do some discrete favour to maintain some secret arrangement with Dad; this was summoning General Obi-Wan Kenobi to resume active duty.

As for Leia's muted reaction to Ben's death in A NEW HOPE... life seems cheap and death seems constant in the STAR WARS universe. Leia earlier had a pretty muted reaction to her entire planet being destroyed. Luke has a pretty muted reaction to finding his farm burned and his uncle and aunt murdered; he actually gets sadder about Ben.

There's the possibility that Leia had a less than flattering remembrance of Ben. Ben staggered, blundered and stumbled in a rescue mission to save Leia's life, only had small bursts of actual Force ability that she witnessed, sent Leia away to survive while Ben parted ways to go on a suicide mission that he somehow survived, likely through a combination of luck, luck, luck and luck and possibly some brief burst of Force power.

She was grateful to him, but she probably didn't think that highly of him. My sense: Ben is the absolute last person that Leia would ever recruit for any dangerous mission; that if she turnned to old General Kenobi, she was down to her last potential agent.

In the context of Ben's not-great performance in OBI-WAN, Leia exclaiming "Ben Kenobi" implied that she was amazed that Ben actually made it to the Death Star when 10 years ago, he could barely make it to the spaceport.

Leia, seeing how upset Luke is, would not have wanted to tell her rescuer that her recollection of Ben was Ben being traumatized, helpless, terrified, defeated, unable to reliably access his Force-abilities, self-sacrificingly suicidal. She may have been wondering if Obi-Wan had finally achieved that death wish he had when they first met.

She may have been wondering if the frantic, frightened middle-aged man she met during OBI-WAN KENOBI had somehow gotten it together to become a great mentor adored by his pupil. She may have felt it best not to say anything until she ascertained who this Luke-person was and who this Ben-person had become and chosen to let Luke remember Ben Kenobi at his most self-assured and capable.

**

I have to note that Lucas had a peculiar attitude to tone in his movie. He wanted STAR WARS to be a lighthearted adventure story. Naturally, he set STAR WARS in a fascist dystopia.

Lucas wanted Luke and Leia to be fun, relatable characters. Naturally, he killed Luke's de-facto parents by incineration and blew up Leia's home planet while she stood by helplessly.

I think that's part of why ROGUE ONE had a relatively good response. It showed what life would actually be like under the Empire and in a rebellion. STAR WARS is the Saturday morning cartoon adventure version of that life.

**

I'm not sufficiently familiar with CLONE WARS to comment on Qui-Gon's continuity in that show.

**

I have to say, the reviews for OBI-WAN range from average to poor. The fanbase seems happy to have more Ewan McGregor, but the Serious Reviewers note that OBI-WAN is boxed in narratively: nothing that significant can happen to Obi-Wan, Darth Vader, Leia, Luke, Owen or Beru. A lot of viewers felt OBI-WAN could not rise above these restrictions.

And I think that's fair. But for me, I found a lot in seeing Obi-Wan reduced to the defeated Ben, horrified to discover that the supposedly-dead Anakin was now Darth Vader. The first scene where Ben encounters Vader and frantically runs was really gripping, as was Ben's eventual reunion with the Force.

One major criticism: reviewers seized on how Ben defeats Vader but doesn't kill him and walks away. This has been cited as OBI-WAN being restricted in what it can do with the characters even when it makes no logical sense for Ben to spare Vader. Later, Vader abandons the search for Ben; this was also cited as a forced character choice.

To me... Vader was defeated and I don't see Ben executing or assassinating anyone, ever; Jedi only kill in the heat of combat. Strategically, Darth Sidious had no love for Vader and would happily replace Vader with the next apprentice, so Ben was better off letting Vader stay where he was until Ben (or Luke) would be in a position to defeat both Vader and Sidious. As for Vader giving up on Ben, I would say that it showed how ultimately, Vader is a slave of Darth Sidious.

But it is an absolutely fair criticism to cite both as narrative problems.

RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

So the orville just came out with a book / audio book (narrated by an actor) based on one of the scripts of a popular episode.

That is... less than accurate.

The novella SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL is written by Seth MacFarlane and the audiobook version will be read by noted actor Bruce Boxleitner (BABYLON 5). The story was originally a script for Season 3 that could not be filmed due to pandemic restrictions. (I don't think you can describe it as a "popular episode" if it was never actually filmed.)

"Just came out" is also... less than correct. It's coming out July 19.

https://orville.fandom.com/wiki/Sympathy_for_the_Devil

I was just making a joke saying Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru "probably" can't die. (Unless Obi-Wan were to replace them with clones while Luke sleeps. Or maybe Luke knows they are clones and that's why he wasn't that upset in STAR WARS when he returned to his family farm to find the estate burned to the ground and two charred skeletons that used to be his aunt and uncle.

I really liked Moses Ingram's performance as Reva. Disturbing and terrifying only for Vader to turn the tables on her. I also liked how OBI-WAN KENOBI emphasizes how Reva is the one character whose fate is actually open. Ben of Tatooine can't actually die in a prequel to the 1977 movie. Leia can't die. Luke can't die. Darth Vader can be maimed and mauled and marred and mutilated, but not in any way that prevents him from appearing in A NEW HOPE. Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru will probably survive this story to die in a future story. Reva is the only one with an open future.

OBI-WAN, Episodes 4 - 6: This works for me. I'm glad it worked for Slider_Quinn21. I am very, very sorry that it didn't work for Grizzlor; I never want anyone to not enjoy a product.

OBI-WAN is an odd little continuity insert of a series. The obvious authorial intent of A NEW HOPE is that Obi-Wan Kenobi and Darth Vader have not met since Vader was Obi-Wan's Jedi apprentice. "When I left you, I was but the learner; now I am the master." The obvious authorial intent of REVENGE OF THE SITH is that the battle in the lava (because that's a sensible place to have a swordfight) was Obi-Wan and Anakin's last confrontation before they met again on the Death Star. OBI-WAN is plainly a studio decision to hammer a new Obi-Wan/Vader story in between REVENGE and A NEW HOPE to sell some Disney+ subscriptions.

However, authorial intent doesn't count for much in this franchise. Obi-Wan in A NEW HOPE replies that his old student is "only a master of evil, Darth," and Alec Guinness is clearly addressing Vader as though "Darth" is a first name. Obi-Wan tells Luke that Vader "betrayed and murdered your father," and George Lucas' originally commissioned script for EMPIRE had the character of Anakin Skywalker appearing to Luke in visions alongside Obi-Wan. None of this matches RETURN OF THE JEDI confirming Vader's true identity or PHANTOM MENACE making "Darth" an honorific for Sith Lords.

The OBI-WAN series seizes on these continuity discrepancies as soft spots in the canon to carve out some space for itself, offering some rationale for why Obi-Wan's supposed lie to Luke wasn't Obi-Wan's lie at all, explaining why Obi-Wan would address Anakin as "Darth," and the series offers these explanations with deft writing, a strong emphasis on character conflict and progression over plot or visual spectacle, and a taut sense of understatement, never overselling a moment when the series can instead let the audience realize the implications as the scene unfolds -- and justifying an inserted story into the continuity of Obi-Wan and Darth Vader.

And now to spoilers...
















OBI-WAN does a great job of creating an arc for Obi-Wan and Darth Vader. Obi-Wan is shattered and broken after the Clone Wars and hiding behind the name Ben; then he finds out that Anakin not only survived the lava Obi-Wan left him in but has become a mass murdering force of doom, making Ben of Tatooine even more of a disaster as he lives in the shadow of Ben Kenobi's failures.

Ben cowers in the face of Vader, flees from him, can't escape him, and is so weak that Vader's lightsaber swings seem to bat Ben around like a rag doll while Ben staggers backwards from every blow and crawls away in fright. This is not the cool, measured, powerful Obi-Wan Kenobi that Ewan McGregor played in the prequels or the calm, assured Ben Kenobi of A NEW HOPE; Ben of Tatooine is weak. His supposed mission of 'protecting' young Luke Skywalker is shown to be a sham; Ben of Tatooine can't even protect himself.

Never has any Jedi Knight seemed so vulnerable, so fragile; even a defeated Luke in EMPIRE STRIKES BACK was defiant to the last. But Ben of Tatooine is a traumatized war veteran who has lost his capacity for conflict or violence. All he's good for is acting as a decoy so that refugees can escape. He faces down Darth Vader and Vader casually buries Ben of Tatooine alive; this time, Vader has the high ground. Vader is all that will remain of the legacy of Obi-Wan Kenobi.

But then, beneath a thousand tons of rock and soil, saved by the smallest of Force bubbles, Ben sees Leia Organa of Alderaan; Ben sees Luke Skywalker of Tatooine, sees their spirit and potential, sees their light and good repelling the darkness that Vader has cast him into -- and suddenly, Ben Kenobi bursts from beneath the ground, restored, renewed, having accepted that the despair and dark he feels is what makes the light side of Force what it is. Reconciled and renewed, he defeats Darth Vader, he apologizes for having failed to save Anakin, only for Vader to reply that Vader himself killed Anakin, absolving Ben of his guilt at last. "Goodbye, Darth," says Obi-Wan, once again sparing Vader -- possibly a mistake, but ultimately a decision on Ben's part to resume his role as a source of light in the galaxy.

This story is extremely small and intimate. When Ben of Tatooine realizes that his legacy will not merely be Darth Vader, it's a quiet, gentle moment and the transition from Ben of Tatooine to Ben Kenobi is subtle and low key. When Vader declares that Vader killed Anakin, not Obi-Wan, it's a low-volume, low-drama moment voiced by a wheezing, decrepit old man in a broken Vader suit, the voice of Hayden Christiansen's Anakin fading in and out of Vader's James Earl Jones voice.

The minimalism is also present in certain production aspects, in stark contrast to THE MANDALORIAN and BOBA FETT. When OBI-WAN has a flashback to the ATTACK OF THE CLONES era where Obi-Wan and Anakin were training, the show declines to use any deaging effects on Ewan McGregor and Hayden Christiansen. On one level, it's visually jarring because the recap sequences use shots of REVENGE OF THE SITH, but the flashback has a 40 year old Hayden Christiansen playing his 19 year old self, using only his hairstyle and costume to indicate this is the young Anakin. This is one area where slimming Anakin's face and removing the lines would have been worthwhile, but the creators elect to instead have the acting sell it for the audience.

Curiously, OBI-WAN does insist on de-aging the voice of James Earl Jones. Vader throughout OBI-WAN KENOBI sounds like the mean average of Vader in A NEW HOPE and EMPIRE STRIKES BACK. Jones does not sound like this in 2022; his vocal performance in the 2016 ROGUE ONE made Vader sound raspy, wheezy, tired, agitated, struggling to complete his lines before running out of breath.

Vader's voice in OBI WAN KENOBI has been assembled by the Respeecher company which mined Mark Hamill's audiobook recordings to create Luke's lines in BOBA FETT. However, there is no sense of Vader's voice being recompiled from previous clips; it's clearly a performance.

Likely, Respeecher had new 2022 recordings of James Earl Jones performing all the lines, then created a 70s and 80s library of Jones' voice from all his audiobook readings, radio performances and more -- and created a vocal template that Jones' 2022 recordings were remixed to match. It's strange that Disney would hire an effects company for Darth Vader's voice but not Anakin Skywalker's face.

OBI-WAN is good. It's low key. There's some talk of a second season. I'm not sure the story has any room left between the first season and A NEW HOPE, however.

THE ORVILLE: the third season's second and third episodes were really weak for me. "Shadow Realms" reminded me of that third season ENTERPRISE episode where crew members get transformed into monsters and it was a grim, miserable episode of nothing. "Mortality Paradox" was a collection of random scenes of danger in random settings (a high school, a plane, whatever) followed by an overlong denouement where a superior being explains that it was a test of something or other. There was no characterization, no insight into the crew members, no meaningful arc development.

Also, the humour of the show seems to have evapourated. I got the sense that MacFarlane never really wanted to do a comedic STAR TREK, that he put in jokes to sell the show to FOX, but now that Disney and Hulu are funding the series, MacFarlane is no longer required to add in comedy and he doesn't want to.

This is difficult for me. THE ORVILLE was, to me, a workplace comedy with that workplace being a STAR TREK starship staffed with more normal people. Now it's a space workplace drama with minimal comedy, but with LOWER DECKS having aired two seasons of a comedic STAR TREK while THE ORVILLE was off the air, I can understand ORVILLE getting more into flawed human starship drama instead.

Episode 4, "Gently Falling Rain," was a serious episode of THE ORVILLE that had all the character development that seemed absent in the previous two episodes. There is real insight into the nature of fascism and demagouges and bigotry, the madness of the mob, the hunger for power in fascists and the trap of thinking that you can appeal to the better nature of racists who despise any life that doesn't resemble what they see in the mirror. MacFarlane played this episode with gentleness and vulnerability without the moral superiority and unrelatability of, say, Captain Picard. The action was intense and the increased budget has led to some gripping space battles.

It's good.

OBI-WAN, Episode 3: Obi-Wan was so powerful in THE PHANTOM MENACE and ATTACK OF THE CLONES. Toppling tens of battle droids with a lightsaber. Agile and invincible.

But Ben Kenobi in OBI-WAN is so diminished, so weakened. He struggles to fight off five stormtroopers; when he succeeds but reinforcements arrive and shout for him to surrender, Ben actually gives up, not even trying to block blaster fire with the lightsaber that he doesn't even ignite. This reduced version of the character is, to me, much more interesting.

And when Darth Vader shows up, Ben mentally collapses into panic and fear. Ben decides to give himself up and draw Vader away to give ____ a chance to escape; he doesn't believe he can fight back. Ben struggled to telekinetically lift a child. Ben surrendered to average stormtroopers. Ben stands no chance against Darth Vader.

The prequel Obi-Wan was so powerful that I never really believed anything bad could happen to him whereas I have serious doubts that Ben can actually survive long enough to the 1977 movie.

OBI-WAN: Episode 2 -- the writing has some serious plotting issues. Obi-Wan, in his search to retrieve a kidnapped ____, tracks her to a planet. Planets are REALLY big places, but Obi-Wan manages to track her to a city. It's still a BIG city. And Obi-Wan still locates ____ by... randomly talking to some randoms outside the airport and kicking down a few random doors, and randomly, ____ is behind one of them. OBI-WAN doesn't even get to use the Force as a catch-all explanation because his Force powers are pretty curtailed as, like Luke in THE LAST JEDI, Obi-Wan has clearly severed his Force connection to hide himself.

However, while the plotting isn't great, the emotional arc is strong. Obi-Wan encounters a fake Jedi with no power and the story notes that this phony conman Jedi has actually saved more people in a day than Obi-Wan has in 10 years. Obi-Wan is so shattered by the trauma of REVENGE OF THE SITH (a movie I myself couldn't finish) that he can no longer hack it as a hero; at one point, ____ calls him out as a 'fake' Jedi and it's hard to argue.

But then Obi-Wan has to get it together to save a little girl and discovers that he may still have what it takes -- only for this moment of self-realization to give way to horror when he discovers something he hasn't realized for 10 years: his only real achievement in the Clone Wars, killing the Sith apprentice Anakin Skywalker, was actually no achievement at all; Anakin's alive and Obi-Wan's failure to take him out and inability to see the fight through may be why the Empire has flourished while Obi-Wan has been working in a butcher shop. The character arc soars even though the plot is clumsy.

Obi-Wan keeps getting called out as "old" by a little girl which is interesting because Ewan McGregor is 51 and looks like a young man in his late 30s/early 40s with a beard and makeup-deepened lines. But in the context of the story, a man who looks like an adult will seem 'old' to a child

This is a pretty funny YouTube parody fan edit of Vader's scenes in the 1977 movie. All of Vader's dialogue is re-recorded with a James Earl Jones impressionist voicing new dialogue making specific continuity references to ROGUE ONE, THE PHANTOM MENACE, ATTACK OF THE CLONES and REVENGE OF THE SITH in absurd efforts to reconcile all the discrepancies between the prequels and original trilogy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oQtGCtnF2Y

**

It's not a crime to dislike OBI-WAN. However, I watched the first episode on my HDTV (55 inches, probably average size these days) and to say fan films have better "production values" is simply untrue. I don't know what Grizzlor is referring to by that term, but OBI-WAN's filming, special effects, costuming, props, set designs and choreography even in the first episode alone are an extremely high quality.

OBI-WAN uses the StageCraft virtual location technology; the show looks like it was lensed in Tunisia, North Africa like the original 1977 film. OBI-WAN has extremely intricate and detailed costume designs with Tatooine's citizens all clad in distinct desert garb unlike the 1977 film having everyone wear the same robes. OBI-WAN has a chase scene staged in the uneven terrain of a forest with a child actor.

OBI-WAN's production values aren't attempting to mimic the densely computer generated look of the prequels, a look present in a lot of STAR WARS fan films from DUAL to that remake of the Obi-Wan/Vader fight. Instead, at least with the first episode, it has set its sights on the minimalism of the 1977 movie, using range, space, silence and stillness to convey the desert environment of Tatooine. Minimalism is not a crime, although it's also not a crime to dislike it.

The minimalism of the first episode is particularly effective in showing how everything that defined Obi-Wan Kenobi has faded away. He is no longer a man in law enforcement; he works as an assembly line butcher and has to steal food to survive. He is no longer a defender of the innocent; he cowers when asked for help and stands silent when people are threatened or starved by the powerful. He is so devoid of will and assertiveness that when a thief robs him, he buys back his own property. Obi-Wan has become a man of minimal effort in a minimalistic story.

No fan film has ever been able to do desert filming as well as the 1977 movie because sand is notoriously hard to shoot in and no fan film has been able to simulate a desert with the background and foreground elements matching. Desert is for professional productions.

Totally fine to dislike OBI-WAN.

I'm glad REBELS retains its stature for you.

The thing that really strikes me about that scene: despite all the horrible things Darth Maul has done, despite Maul having killed at least two of Obi-Wan's friends (that I know of), Obi-Wan strikes Maul down but then takes pity on him, giving him comfort, considering him as much a victim of the Sith as anyone Maul ever killed, closing his eyes and letting him pass with a peace and dignity that Maul couldn't find in life and certainly never offered anyone else.

It was all about the characterization and not about being Cool. Which brings me (back) to another subject:

Confession: I've never been able to finish watching REVENGE OF THE SITH. I kind of liked THE PHANTOM MENACE, but ATTACK OF THE CLONES was so dull and clumsy and like watching a student film, probably because Liam Neeson brought a certain prestige and importance to PHANTOM MENACE but wasn't there to do the same for ATTACK OF THE CLONES. I watched the first 10 minutes of REVENGE when it came out on DVD and... it was like watching a video game cutscene on YouTube without ever actually playing the game. I couldn't get into it. I ended up giving the DVD away to the little boy next door; I read the novelization by Matthew Stover instead (and that was a great book).

I went on YouTube to watch the final Anakin/Obi-Wan fight and... this is what I could describe as "comic booky" where the scene doesn't make any visual sense and has been designed entirely around cool visual moments. How are Anakin and Obi-Wan controlling the 'surfboards' that are floating above the lava when there are no pedals, no joysticks and no real human interface? How are they maneuvering these surfboards to and from each other to exchange lightsaber blows?

Why are they slashing and hacking at each other instead of, say, escaping the fiery lava all around them first, lava that is splashing madly but nonsensically not burning them or their conveyances? It's possible there's some protective field, but that protective field isn't blocking the lightsabers. Why does Obi-Wan try to kill Anakin but then nonsensically walk away with Anakin down but not dead, allowing Anakin to be transformed into Darth Vader?

These are questions similar to what you would find yourself asking when reading any 90s-era comic book where Batman drives a car with impractical fins that would scrape against any tunnel or wears a mask with horns so long that they would hit the top of any doorframe of any indoor environ and wears a cape that is so long it probably gets stuck on furniture and people around him probably step on it and cause him to trip and fall. REVENGE OF THE SITH in the 20 whole minutes I've seen is very comic booky, it's all about the imagery even if the story completely fails to justify the imagery.

The TV Tropes entry for this is Rule of Cool:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfCool

In contrast, Obi-Wan vs. Maul is ultimately not about any of that nonsense. It is about how Obi-Wan has in some ways fallen. The once resplendent Jedi Knight of the Republic has become a hermit in the desert, watching over a farm boy. From a knight of an ancient and noble order to a barely tolerated babysitter. But a true Jedi does what is needed and Obi-Wan has to protect Luke from Maul.

And in the confrontation with Maul, Obi-Wan doesn't do any Force grabs or flips or whatnot; he instead mimics Qui-Gon Jinn's stance in PHANTOM MENACE, luring Maul into the same double-bladed attack that killed Qui-Gon -- but Obi-Wan is ready for this move, having already seen how it works. Obi-Wan smartly slashes the double blade in half and Maul across the heart. Maul's silly flourishes are his undoing and Obi-Wan, having protected Luke, now grants Maul comfort in his final moments rather than ranting about Maul's failings the way Obi-Wan ranted at Anakin in REVENGE.

Question for Slider_Quinn21:

Do you feel the OBI WAN series suffers from Obi Wan having confronted Darth Maul in another TV show already, depriving the OBI WAN show of an important story?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeG215-yu-k

The thing I find fascinating/frustrating about STAR WARS is the same thing I find fascinating/frustrating about THE X-FILES: it seems to take place in a fictional universe that is both driven by science fiction technology AND magical fantasy. STAR WARS has spaceships, laser swords, laser blasters, artificial intelligence; it also has spells, mysticism, magic, prophecy, mental energy to matter transmutation, matter to ethereal energy transformation -- and I don't particularly understand how these are reconciled.

I also don't understand how the sci-fi aliens of THE X-FILES coexist with the poltergeists and werewolves and goat monsters and vampires. At times, STAR WARS seems to take place in two separate universes, just like THE X-FILES. The term "comic booky" has often been used derisively. I find that to say something is "comic booky" is to say that it takes place in an internally inconsistent universe where the rules of operation are less than coherent and at times downright contradictory, designed for a compelling image rather than a passably plausible reality.

STAR WARS can be extremely comic booky; the idea that someone would create droids with personalities that resist performing their duties is nonsensical. But the image of C3PO cowering in the face of danger was too funny for George Lucas to resist.

STAR WARS attempted to reconcile both halves of its universe by declaring that the Force exists in microscopic particles called midichlorians. This went over poorly.

In contrast, STAR TREK exists in a flatly scientific universe, and all acts of 'magic' are explained in scientific or technological terms. Psychic ability is a sensitivity to temporal particles; psionic ability is manipulation of gravity; matter transmutation is altering universal constants; telepathy is a sensitivity to neurological energy.

1,467

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

And now we go off topic. Remind me to file a report with the Sliders.tv administrator about this.

I read the BACK TO THE FUTURE novelization when I was in school and thought it was a bit bland, especially with Marty McFly, a character who was so endearing on the screen and so oddly charmless in the book. Looking at it now, though, I've come to realize: BACK TO THE FUTURE is a movie. The story is not well-suited to prose and Marty McFly is not an effective character in the medium of novels.

The reason: Marty McFly in the BTTF script is a bland, reactive character. Marty has no character arc: he doesn't overcome any failing or flaw. Instead, the character arcs are entirely with George McFly: George overcomes his insecurity about his writing, George learns to assert himself, defend himself and stand up for himself. George learns to express his feelings in writing, in love and if need be, with his fists.

Marty is a helpful bystander, but Marty's problems -- not playing music at a school dance and not having a car to drive his girlfriend out to a camping trip -- are all solved by George and Lorraine's actions, not Marty's. The novel is unable to mine Marty for any characterization because, as far as the script goes, he doesn't have any.

Why does Marty McFly work in a movie? It's all Michael J. Fox. Fox gives the character a winning impishness as he skateboards to school and hangs onto a truck for added speed, in his defiance towards the principal mocking his father, in his donating a quarter to the Clock Tower fund. Fox conveys Marty's horror at his mother being sexually aggressive towards him. Fox sells Marty's astonishment when meeting a teen version of his father and trying to see his dad's older face in this younger man's visage. Fox infuses Marty with desperation, amusement, wonder, mischief, daring and fun -- almost none of which is in the original screenplay.

This is why the original actor for Marty, the very talented Eric Stoltz, was fired from the role. Stoltz is a great actor, but Stoltz could not make Marty work because there was nothing on the page for Stoltz to play and he didn't have Fox's gift for putting his own personality into otherwise characterless characters. And this is also why the novel doesn't work; the script was not designed to work in any medium other than the motion picture in which an actor -- as opposed to a novelist -- would bring Marty McFly to life. Marty McFly needs Michael J. Fox's empathic connection with the audience to truly come alive.

I'm sorry the OBI WAN series isn't working for Grizzlor. I have not seen it yet, but from various reviews, it looks to be inoffensive to most.

**

I think my issue with the deepfake Mark Hamill body and the Respeecher Mark Hamill voice is based on Robert Floyd's interview with me about imitating Jerry O'Connell.

During a phone call with Mr. Floyd (Mallory in Season 5), I asked him about the intricacies of imitating Jerry O'Connell. He talked about how he watched a lot of SLIDERS episodes to get Jerry's voice in his head. Floyd was a gifted mimic and he could quickly perform a note-perfect recreation of Jerry's voice: the timbre and tone, the weight and pronunciations, and then he moved to studying Jerry's posture and body language. Floyd said in a different interview that he was really taken with the "inner strength" that Jerry brought to the character of Quinn Mallory, and in my interview, Floyd said that he wanted to tap into the fact that Jerry made Quinn so intelligent and scientific and how Quinn "built the show."

I noted that Floyd, when performing the original Quinn in Dr. Geiger's lab and in the later scenes with Rembrandt, did *not* imitate Jerry's voice, but he performed the Quinn Mallory demeanor: the intensity in his gaze, the sense of absorbing and intensely calculating the information around him. Floyd explained that he was perfectly capable of imitating Jerry further. "I'm pretty good at it. I could have done it for an episode. I could have done it for a season."

However, he didn't feel it was good enough to merely act with Jerry's voice and body language. Instead, what he wanted to do was strongly emphasize the identity crisis of Floyd!Quinn and Jerry!Quinn. "I would try to find little things that either Quinn or Mallory could grasp onto, even if it was through the other's voice or the other person's intelligence... Otherwise, you're just playing schtick."

Webster's Dictionary defines "schtick" as "a usually comic or repetitious performance or routine," and I believe Floyd is indicating that only copying Jerry would be empty repetition; it was important to *create* something new as well, making the Jerry-impression merely one facet of an original performance.

To me, the deepfake Mark Hamill body and the Respeecher Mark Hamill voice is just playing schtick.

It's interesting: Mark Hamill was on set in BOBA FETT. He performed all of Luke's scenes with the actors. Then body double Graham Hamilton performed the scenes. Hamill's performance wasn't used in the final product, but the creators wanted Hamill to be present so that all the other actors could react to Mark Hamill specifically. However, whatever acting choices Hamill made were not retained in the deepfake due to the obvious technical limitations. Mimicry itself is not a full-fledged performance because to truly perform, an actor has to create something new rather than imitate what previously existed.

**

I like the fan film reshoot of the Obi-Wan/Vader fight of 1977. It's great as a short film. Maybe a special short on Disney+.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_V24PLzqRLg

However, I don't think it should be edited into the 1977 movie. In terms of remastering, I think it's fine to remove the smeared jelly under the landspeeders, remove matte lines around spaceships and monsters, get the lightsabers looking consistent, add windows to Cloud City, etc.. However, adding new CG effects to a 1977, 1980 and 1983 movie series made with model kits and sparklers only produces a mismatched look. In the 1977 special edition, the CG X-Wings don't match the model shots. It's distracting whereas sticking with the 1977 effects allows the film to establish a baseline for its effects achieve consistency.

STAR WARS is a 1977 movie that looks like it's made in 1977. Even the story is dated; as a 1977 film, it has no concept of long distance, wireless data transmission. The secret WMD plans are delivered by a barrel instead of emailed. There's no getting around the fact that it's a historical artifact and will remain so no matter how much CGI is pasted on top.

**

Leia's face in RISE OF SKYWALKER is not CG, but her hair and body and clothes are computer generated to disguise that they are shots from a previous movie. The deepfake technology and the Respeecher application (used for BOBA FETT's Luke dialogue) were not ready for the big screen yet when RISE OF SKYWALKER was filmed, but if they had been, I think JJ Abrams and friends would definitely have used it -- but strategically and sparingly.

They could have used high-res photos of Carrie Fisher's publicity stills and all her additional dialogue recording sessions from FORCE AWAKENS and LAST JEDI to form a databank of her voice and vocabulary to have Fisher's face available at any angle for a CG model and with her recreated voice able to speak any line. But I don't think they would have made Leia a bigger character because, as with Luke in BOBA FETT, the more you feature it, the less real it feels.

Instead, I think they would have just filled in some of the gaps in RISE OF SKYWALKER's recreated coverage of Carrie Fisher. RISE has a lot of scenes where we go from a repurposed facial shot of Carrie Fisher to the back of her body double's head and her scene partner facing the camera. A deepfake Leia could have been used so that we could get brief side views of Carrie Fisher in conversation with others so that the limitations of Fisher's actual footage wouldn't be as glaring.

Abrams directs with understatement in his drama scenes, so he would have used it minimally: a shot of Leia covering her mouth in horror when hearing that Palpatine is back (so you don't need expression).

The Respeecher technology could have also filled in some of Fisher's dialogue, not to give her lengthy monologues or highly emotive moments -- the technology isn't good enough for that -- but for small additions of a few lines here. A few sentences of guidance to Rey in her training ("Don't give up!" "Focus!").

In the film, Leia says "Nothing's impossible" and "Never underestimate a droid" and both feel a bit detached from the scene; Respeecher might have made minor additions like "Nothing's impossible, Rey, not for you" and "If you've seen what I have, you'd never underestimate a droid."

Leia's death scene is done with Carrie Fisher's body double in silhouette and no dialogue (because they didn't have any). And while I wouldn't recommend trying to deepfake and Respeecher shots of Fisher performing Leia reaching out to her wayward son, deepfake could have offered a brief shot of Leia's calm face before she dips her head back into shadow. And given her three short lines. "I have to reach Ben. I know what it will take from me. But it's what I have to do."

Also, issues with Fisher's footage caused Rose Tico to be cut almost entirely from RISE. The original script kept Rose at the base with Leia and gave them scenes written around Fisher's unused dialogue from FORCE AWAKENS and LAST JEDI. But Abrams found that the footage of Fisher didn't match the tone of the script, couldn't find a way to amend the script, and the scenes were sadly cut before filming. I imagine that had deepfake and Respeecher been available, the Rose and Leia scenes would have stayed.

I would be okay with Abrams someday filling this stuff in someday.

So, what's wrong with the deepfake version of Luke Skywalker in BOBA FETT?

Lucasfilm hired a fan deepfaker to bring his skillset to recreating a late-80s Mark Hamill. The image of Luke Skywalker looks to me like it's drawn on 4K scans of RETURN OF THE JEDI, new film scans of publicity and costuming photographs for that film, and the face mapped into a digital profile of every facial expression and lip movement needed for each scene and line of dialogue. Actor Graham Hamilton played Luke on set; the deepfake of Luke's face was then grafted onto Hamilton's face.

In addition, all the dialogue is drawn from recordings of Hamill in the 80s doing voiceover and audiobook readings, fed into an AI network that can then rearrange them into any scripted sentence and smooth over the intonations and volume so that it sounds coherent.

And yet, it doesn't feel like a real person. This version of Luke is photorealistic in contrast to the somewhat immobile and blurry version in MANDALORIAN. Luke can interact with all characters and isn't limited to standing still. But something is off: Luke feels stilted and inhuman in all his scenes, muted and hollow even though the face and eyes look right.

Part of the problem is the voice. Yes, it sounds like Mark Hamill in the 80s, but the tone of the voice is completely devoid of human variability. In matching all the intonations and volumes from different sources and applying consistency, the computer generated lines are very flat. Luke sounds calm and completely neutral; neutral when expressing doubt, neutral when delivering kind or difficult lessons, neutral when told something unsettling. It's Mark Hamill's voicemail rearranged and while the technical achievement is astonishing, it still has the effect of a repurposed rearrangement of Hamill's old voicemails albeit well-disguised.

The face, despite being a technical marvel, is also a serious issue. Luke's face lacks any extremity of emotion: he's mildly sad, mildly satisfied, mildly calm, mild across the board, mild to the point where Luke's face seems less like a human being in motion and more like a still photograph that has been magnificently animated through computer generated modelling and motion but is ultimately a still photograph that's only offering a false illusion of movement. On some subconscious if not conscious level, you can feel that it's an animated photograph instead of a true moving image of a face.

As a result, Mark Hamill's likeness may be present in the deepfake, but Hamill's acting ability is absent. It's fine for a few lines and some action sequences. But when Ahsoka tells Luke that he reminds her of Anakin, there is no emotional reaction from Luke, just a facial movement to acknowledge that she spoke. Mark Hamill could have played this scene with many approaches: he could be proud that he is thought of in the same way as the war hero of the Clone Wars, Anakin Skywalker. He could be disturbed that he reminds Ahsoka of the man who became Darth Vader. He could react with pride but then transition into concern.

The deepfake Luke Skywalker has none of Hamill's emotive consideration; it has no capacity to pitch the moment in either direction. The facial animation model is designed to mimic and maintain the likeness of Luke Skywalker; it isn't capable of expressive emotions when the facial template is ultimately to replicate a still photo of Luke. For this scene, all the deepfake Luke can do is make eye contact to indicate that he heard Ahsoka say words; the deepfake can't produce an actual emotional reaction that contorts the face and maintains the photographic likeness.

The lack of an actor's presence is particularly glaring in the scene where Luke tells Grogu to choose either the life of a Jedi or his friendship with the Mandalorian, saying that Jedi eschew all attachments and Grogu's lifespan, training and path will span so long that the Mandalorian will be dead of old age by the time Grogu can return to his friend. Hamill would have seen many options for this scene.

Hamill could have been sharp and demanding, ordering Grogu to make a terrible choice to show how uncompromising Luke has become. Or Hamill could have described the path of the Jedi in derisive, bitter terms, indicating that Luke doesn't actually approve of the Jedi way and doesn't think it's right for Grogu and is not keen on training Jedi if this is what he has to ask them to do. Or Hamill could have spoken with quiet warning about the Jedi path while emphasizing the Mandalorian with gentleness and warmth, meaning Luke knows Grogu misses his friend and isn't happy with Luke; Luke would be kindly offering Grogu a way out. Hamill would have made choices in how to play this scene.

The deepfake Luke Skywalker makes no choices in how to perform this conflict. The deepfake delivers the choice to Grogu in a mild, neutral, bland tone that doesn't inform Luke Skywalker's characterization in any way. Aside from sounding like Mark Hamill in the 1980s, there is no sense of a human being conveying Luke's emotions and motives. There is just a computer generated animation of an actor's likeness and a computer recreated approximation of that actor's voice. There is no performance.

Acting is about human beings making choices; the deepfake Luke Skywalker is an algorithmic approximation that can only offer mimicry; it can't make decisions and it cannot perform as a character. A short cameo with a line or two is fine, but when put into lengthy scenes, it becomes clear that the deepfake character isn't an actor. It's a body double and a vocal impressionist best limited to a few shots.

1,471

(1,098 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Who is the Flash's greatest supervillain? Eobard Thawne? Professor Zoom? The Anti-Monitor? The Rogues? The Rival, Inertia, Walter West, or Godspeed?

I think it's become clear: the Flash's deadliest enemy is Ezra Miller.

Google Ezra Miller and you get a pretty comprehensive picture of how they are a complete and utter psycho. A lunatic who threatens children and their parents. A nutjob who steals work from musicians and doesn't pay them. A loon who mocks law enforcement on social media when the police are searching for them. A jackass who can't get through a month without being arrested for starting a barfight.

Warner Bros. is in serious trouble with THE FLASH, a movie where their lead actor is a violent criminal who targets children and keeps visiting the same family homes repeatedly to threaten the inhabitants with violence and guns.

Warner Bros. spent 10 years trying to get a FLASH movie together, invested $200 million on the 2023 incarnation of this film after likely spending anywhere from $15- $75 million over 10 years. They paid for scripts they didn't film, for the directors they hired and lost or fired, for holding contracts on the actors, for staffers to keep this movie inching forward.

And now their movie is filmed and is looking unreleasable because Ezra Miller is insane; nobody will look at Miller and see Barry Allen or the Flash. They'll see a maniac named Ezra Miller.

There is no profit to be made on a FLASH movie now. THE FLASH movie is a dead project, a product whose only audience will be the morbidly curious. Any movie has to earn about three times its budget to break even. Is a movie with this much bad press and a cancelled actor likely to earn $600 million? At this point, WB is in no position to refilm Miller's scenes with a new actor; Miller's in every scene.

Ezra Miller has made THE FLASH a write off. There is no DC franchise to be built on Ezra Miller. There is no FLASH movie series with Ezra Miller. No one will ever hire Ezra Miller again; you wouldn't hire Ezra Miller to handle a cash register; I wouldn't trust Ezra Miller to wash my windows. There is no sequel to be made with Ezra Miller; there is no DC Universe series to emerge from any Ezra Miller production.

Temporal Flux once expressed the fear that Warner Bros. would actively destroy CW's THE FLASH show to prop up the FLASH movie; THE FLASH movie has self-destructed all on its own with a determined psychosis that would make David Peckinpah retreat and Bill Dial weep.

Maybe Warner Bros. will use deepfake technology to replace Ezra Miller's face with Timothée Chalamet or Lucas Till. I've written elsewhere that deepfake is fine for a few shots but creates a stiff, inhumanly robotic presence any time you need an actual human performance... but even that would be better than releasing a movie with Ezra Miller in the lead role.

A thought about Season 1 of PICARD: a lot of fans were wondering why PICARD did such a limited, minimalistic deaging on Brent Spiner, why they didn't make Data look as young as he did in Season 1 of TNG with the magic of deepfake; why CBS wouldn't put in the same effort that fans have with their own deepfake fan videos of PICARD scenes.

Well, I've been watching Luke's scenes in BOBA FETT where Luke's face is based entirely on RETURN OF THE JEDI stills and photographs grafted over a body double and his voice is composed completely from Mark Hamill's audiobook performances from the 80s. A lot of viewers marvel at how mobile, plausible and sharp Luke's face looks, how his voice sounds exactly like Hamill in the correct era.

While technically proficient, I would say that Luke's face is highly inexpressive with only vague approximations of actual emotions; his face is so neutral that even in motion with animation, it has the feeling of a still and immobile photograph. Luke comes off as a highly advanced animation or animatronic rather than a human being.

Mark Hamill's acting wasn't like this hyperadvanced shop window dummy; Hamill was expressive, vulnerable and he used his body language, face and voice with thought and feeling. Deepfake Luke is like a very versatile statue, great for a few shots, but once the fake Luke has to do any actual acting, there's a sense that there is absolutely no performance here, just a computer program animating still photos and rearranging sound clips.

I think that a deepfake version of Data in PICARD would have taken Brent Spiner's performance out of the character's face, leaving his expressions largely neutral and devoid of the subtlety and thought that Spiner put into the character. The way Data expresses his facial reactions is something that should always be in Spiner's control when he plays the character onscreen; the CG deaging slimmed and smoothed him, but the face and the movements of that face were Spiner's own. It was a limited deaging, but any more would remove Spiner's facial performance and then you'd have something as empty as deepfake Luke.

1,473

(3,555 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I got my fourth dose of Moderna today. My province (think American state) was offering Novavax doses to anyone because people who fear the 'new' technology of mRNA vaccines may feel more comfortable with a protein-based vaccine that already created the spike protein with moth cell cultures rather than having mRNA direct your immune system to create a spike protein. The availability was to encourage the vaccine-hesitant.

I got my third dose at the end of December, so I signed up for Novavax as it's been approved as a fourth-dose booster. However, when I arrived at the clinic, the nurse told me that she'd be happy to give me a fourth dose (well, half-dose) of Moderna to match my previous three vaccinations.

1,474

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

On love...

Why is the SLIDERS novelization of the Pilot so terrible? It always struck me as strange that Brad Linaweaver's novel wasn't at least mediocre; I mean, he already had the story and just needed to convert it to prose.

Thinking about it recently: my take is that Tracy Torme's Pilot script is a love story, but Brad Linaweaver wrote the novelization as a hate story.

Linaweaver's writing career was defined by writing novels that expressed his contempt and loathing for Nazism and Communism. His magnum opus was MOON OF ICE, a novel about an alternate history in which Nazi Germany developed the atomic bomb first. Linaweaver developed his writing skills by penning angry essays about the triumph of capitalism over communism, Libertarianism over National Socialism. He wrote from a place of anger and contempt against that which he (not necessarily wrongly) judged to be evil.

Then he was handed a SLIDERS script to turn into a novelization. One would think he'd be a great choice. Unfortunately, Linaweaver's novelization is a cruel, grotesque affair. The emphasis is on Soviet America's violent bloodshed; the novel opens with the sliders observing a crowd being gunned down by soldiers massacring civilians and children with Linaweaver delighting and relishing the corpses and splatter, all of it giving voice to his hatred for Russian communism.

Linaweaver seems to disdain America and Americans too, however, but it's self-superiority as opposed to hate. Linaweaver is mocking towards academia and Arturo, mocking towards Wade's feelings towards Quinn, mocking towards Quinn's class and wealth in the family being able to afford a gardener. Linaweaver writes from a default level of looking down on others when writing Earth Prime. His writing turns to loathing and contempt once the story moves to Soviet America, laying out everything in the most repulsive fashion: the streets, the smells, the food. Everything under Linaweaver's pen is dirty and unpleasant, moreso in the parallel world of the story.

This may be why Linaweaver also did such a terrible job on the SLIDERS episode guide. SLIDERS: THE CLASSIC EPISODES was over a year late and with all the episode entries based on the shooting scripts with Linaweaver never bothering to watch the episodes and creating errors in his already slapdash plot summaries. Why did he do such a lazy, indifferent job on this next SLIDERS book?

I suspect it's because hate is cunning and cruel and knows loyalty to nothing and no one, not even its most devout practitioners. I suspect that Brad Linaweaver liked SLIDERS' scripts, he liked Torme, and he therefore couldn't tap into the fuel that made him write with passion. As a result, Linaweaver was paralyzed: he couldn't write SLIDERS: THE CLASSIC EPISODES as the only content he ever wrote well or would ever want to write: he couldn't write a hate story.

In contrast, Tracy Torme's Pilot script is a love story. The Pilot is about how Tracy Torme is in love with the United States of America. Now, we can argue whether or not anyone should love a piece of land or a government. We can note that Torme grew up the son of a wealthy musician, that Torme was able to enter screenwriting and earn a great living, and that Torme's love for America is because Torme had the great fortune to be born into privilege and comfort and associates that fortune with the country. We can certainly be aware that America has treated its citizens abominably.

But regardless, Torme's love for America is heartfelt, sincere, loving, patient and kind. While Torme's love for his country is at times boastful, arrogant, rude and overly insistent on its own way, it isn't resentful nor does it rejoice in wrongness. Instead, Torme presents the contrast between the United States of America and the parallel Soviet America through a series of gentle jokes.

In the United States of America, the legal system allows an injured worker to profit from his own misfortune and an opportunistic lawyer to ensure a payoff for a percentage; what's more, the legal system is daily entertainment. America's entertainment is filled with opportunity: an over the hill entertainer like Rembrandt Brown believes he has a second chance, radio news is provocative yet relatively harmless.

The homeless man ranting about communism is a silly curiosity. Capitalism and the free market allow smart young women like Wade Welles to turn down thousands of dollars in sales today for tens of thousands in a month. Trickle down economics allow Quinn to find all the scrap parts he needs to build sliding.  The power of the US dollar is so prevalent and strong that everyone can have some.

In Soviet America, the legal system is a quagmire with TV court being for fascist show trials and entertainment is for suppressing free thought; the TV lawyer is a deadly interrogator, the homeless communist is a political leader, and holding the US dollar makes one a target of the communist regime. In Soviet America, everything that Torme loves about America has been twisted into something bizarre and uncanny, but Torme emphasizes the peculiarity and baffling humour of the situation and plays it all for laughs. Rembrandt's capture, interrogation, trial and sentence are played as comedy.

Torme doesn't play it for too much danger or fear; Torme clearly doesn't like communism yet, unlike Linaweaver, Torme doesn't use the Pilot to hate what he disdains. Instead, Torme uses Soviet America to create a sense of unfamiliarity, homesickness and longing for what he loves.

The characters are striving to return home; the skewed inversions of the United States in the Soviet America are all to emphasize everything that Torme loves by noting their absence in this world. Furthermore, ends the visit to Soviet America by offering the hope that even in this terrible place, what Torme loves might still be saved.

The Pilot novelization is a story of hate. But the Pilot script and the Pilot episode offer a story of love. A story of Tracy Torme's love for America.

1,475

(934 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I liked MS. MARVEL and because I liked Kamala, I liked that everyone else liked her too. But it's a fair criticism.

I'm not sure why some posts don't get posted and I'm looking into it. I've had one issue where I was editing a really, really long post from years ago but I couldn't save the edits. I got an Internal Server Error. I wonder if the server or software has a data limit for individual post entries that I can raise.

Very long post on a variety of TREK topics.

Should TREK go to a floating timeline?

I wonder if the solution to STAR TREK's continuity for 1992 - 2053 now being at odds with 1992 - 2022: change TREK continuity from fixed dates to a floating timeline.

In Marvel Comics, all of the 1960s adventures up to today exist in a floating timeline of 15 years in the past with topical references updated. Peter Parker is always in his mid to late 20s and has been Spider-Man for 10 - 15 years; Steve Rogers has always come out of suspended hibernation 10 - 15 years previous.

STAR TREK might benefit from switching to a floating timeline of one to two centuries in the future. If it needs to be justified in-story, a SHORT TREKS 10 minute film could have the Department of Temporal Investigations recreate the Big Bang to restart the universe. Indicate that due to this being version 2.0 of the same universe, the timeline may have some minor shifts that will fold into the timeline gradually.

At this point, STAR TREK could become vague about years.

In this restarted timeline, stories set during ENTERPRISE say Earth: Final Conflict (hahahahahah) happened "a century and a half" ago and the first warp flight happened "a century" ago. TOS will say that it happened "over two centuries ago." TNG and onward stories say that it happened "over three centuries ago."

STAR TREK can go back to being as vague about the year as THE ORIGINAL SERIES. If asked in interviews, the writers can say that TOS is set 300 years from "today," TNG is 400 years from "today" and continually keep TREK in a floating future timeline.

Or STAR TREK could avoid time travel to time periods where real-life history contradicts STAR TREK history.

Earth: Final Conflict

Just speaking for myself as a STAR TREK fan: I actually find it a little unfortunate for VOYAGER and PICARD to take their cast to 1996 and 2024 and not show the Eugenics War and World War III. I find it totally misses the point of STAR TREK. Roddenberry is a problematic creator, but to ignore the 1992 - 2053 conflict is to dismiss Roddenberry's most redeeming quality.

The Doom of Star Trek
Roddenberry had a glowing vision of the distant future, optimistic to the point of being unrealistic and therefore sickeningly sentimental. But Roddenberry had a very bleak outlook on the immediate future. Roddenberry believed that everyone watching STAR TREK was doomed.

Roddenberry envisioned that planet Earth would suffer six decades of war that would start with genetically augmented soldiers and culminate in a nuclear holocaust that would leave our entire world in the ruin of the post-atomic horrors. You die. I die. We all die, some quickly in a flash of nuclear bombings or slowly from radiation poisoning.

Humanity's survivors are scant. Crumbled governments resorting to martial law and brutality just to protect scant resources.

First Flight
In the midst of this savagery and bleakness and hopelessness, a lonely and bitter scientist nearing the end of a painful and lonely life tries to achieve one final dream, one empty gesture of defiance against defeat and suffering. He tries to fly faster than light.

He flies his ship. He doesn't believe he will succeed; he thinks his ship will likely fail before even reaching light speed. But with his future only containing starvation and illness, he has nothing left but his dream even if it is doomed to death and failure.

First Contact
But he doesn't die and he doesn't fail; he enters warp speed. Zefram Cochrane is the first human being to travel faster than light. He lands safely. His achievement catches the eye of a Vulcan science vessel crew. Earth has achieved warp speed; humans now qualify for First Contact. The Vulcans land to meet Zefram Cochrane and reveal themselves to humanity. They introduce themselves to us.

The Vulcans tell us that we humans are no longer alone in the universe.

We tell the Vulcans that we are in a terrible situation. We have destroyed our civilization. We have destroyed ourselves. Those of us who survive face ecological collapse. Global devastation from radiation. The dissolution of government. Famine. Disease. The Vulcans have come after our darkest hour. They have arrived to see humanity's twilight.

The Vulcans tell us that we're wrong.

A Gift of Knowledge
The Vulcans tell us that they have experienced everything we have -- and worse -- on their own planet. They tell us that they had to teach themselves to control their worst instincts and darkest emotions. They formed a new belief system based on self-control and logic. The Vulcans say that their logic demands that they offer the human race information and knowledge to save Earth. Knowledge that will be offered at a rationed, gradual pace.

Failure
The Vulcans offer the knowledge to let humanity build the tools to clean the atmosphere and restore the water, flora and fauna of the planet. But five years after First Contact, Earth's fractured governments reject and ignore the Vulcans, instead forming fascist dictatorships battling over remaining resources, executing anyone accused of any crime, engaged in rampant, violent purges of nuclear war survivors.

The Vulcans retreat but do not withdraw, watching and waiting. Reaching out to key figures with the hope that when this aftermath passes, the Vulcans can try again. If nothing else, the sociological situation on Earth will provide useful data for the Vulcans' own civilization.

Eventually, the post atomic horror governments collapse and the Vulcans resume their full efforts. With Vulcan knowledge and human work, humans repair Earth's irradiated soil, regrow crops and replant forests. They teach humanity to treat and repair bodies ravaged by radiation sickness. They offer humanity a new system of economy that dispenses with money.

The Vulcans refuse to directly provide aid. They provide information. They make suggestions. But they say humans have to do the work to clean the air, grow the food, restore the water. The Vulcans will teach, but they won't act.

United Earth
Two decades after First Contact, humanity has found a second chapter with the Vulcans' suggestions and ideas. Earth has replaced its disparate and fallen nations with a united planetary government and together, humans have finally conquered war, famine, poverty and disease.

As humans move past scarcity and avarice and look to the stars, they begin actively resent the Vulcans' withdrawn, withholding attitude. They resent being judged for the damage they have repaired. For the past that they have overcome.

They fume at spending a century building a Warp 5 engine when Vulcans could hand one over.

The Vulcans never expect humanity to reach the stars. The Vulcans are dismayed when humans achieve sufficient warp capability to explore the universe.

Mentally Transmitted Diseases
Humans and Vulcans find themselves repeatedly at odds in their parallel interstellar explorations; the humans are bold and interested while the Vulcans are restrictive within their protocols and procedures and disdainful of human space travellers.

Captain Jonathan Archer of the Enterprise NX-01 discovers that the Vulcans' isolationist attitude is due to a secret they are trying to hide from other races: Vulcan civilization is experiencing an epidemic of Pa'nar Syndrome, a disease caused by mind melding, a telepathic form of intimate thought sharing through psi-power enhanced physical contact.

Mainstream Vulcan society considers mind melding abhorrent and obscene. A tawdry abomination of deviant behaviour.

Epidemic
Archer protests that intimacy shouldn't be taboo. But then it's shown: mind melds cause degenerative neural disease that is further transmissible upon future mind melds. There is no treatment or cure. Vulcans have withdrawn from the concept of intimacy and sharing except in terms of cold, objective information. This is why the Vulcans were so distant and passive-aggressive in their dealings with humans.

The NX-01's Vulcan science officer, T'Pol, is infected by this mentally transmitted disease after to succumbing to temptation for intimacy over cold, objective logic. She also becomes addicted to an emotion-stimulating drug, unable to cope with the Vulcan way suppressing emotions to the point of denial.

Vulcan: Final Conflict
Captain Archer investigates further. A year later, he discovers: mind melding is not inherently harmful. Pa'Nar Syndrome is caused by poorly trained mind melds performed without psi-safety precautions. The art of safe mind melding and the philosophy behind mind melds have all been lost in Vulcan history. Archer tries to find out why.

Archer comes into contact with a telepathic recording of Surak, the founder of Vulcan logical philosophy. This echo of Surak's consciousness reads Archer's memories of Vulcans and notes that Vulcan logic has taken a turn from Surak's original intent.

IDIC
Vulcan history has prioritized Surak's logic but misplaced the true heart of his teachings: the value of infinite diversity in infinite combinations. With IDIC, Vulcan logic is a guiding principle to Vulcan emotion rather than a force to remove emotion. The concept of mind melds were created to share emotions with control and safety, to express openness to all philosophies, to make Vulcan logic merely one starting point to enlightenment.

Archer returns this telepathic echo of Surak to the Vulcans, starting a reformation of Vulcan culture, restoring the gift of the mind meld and helping Vulcans rebuild their culture, and repaying humanity's debt to the Vulcans. Vulcans and humans reach a new stage of their partnership that leads to the United Federation of Planets.

Greatness
All these improvised, revisionist, separate accounts of Earth's pre-TOS history told across TOS's "Metamorphosis," TNG's "Encounter at Farpoint," the FIRST CONTACT movie and Enterprise's fourth season -- I feel that together, they form the greatest story ever told. A story of failure, downfall, disaster followed by redemption and restoration. I think this is the core of STAR TREK.

Roddenberry wrote the first half up to Zefram Cochrane's warp flight. The genius screenwriter Gene L. Coon wrote Cochrane's story in the TOS episode "Metamorphosis". Ronald D. Moore and Brannon Braga delved further into Cochrane with the FIRST CONTACT movie. And Season 4 ENTERPRISE writers Garfield and Judith Reeves-Stevens wrote the Vulcan reformation storyline. And these stories exist within the Roddenberry framework.

Meaning
Roddenberry's framework is incredibly meaningful because it's hard to look at 2022 and imagine our dire circumstances leading to a future that's anything like THE NEXT GENERATION. Except Roddenberry's vision of our present was actually a whole lot worse than our actual present.

There's something very hopeful in declaring that humanity effectively melted down between 1992 - 2053 but somehow found its way to a United Earth, to First Contact, to the Earth-Vulcan partnership, to Starfleet, to the Vulcan reformation, to the Federation, to the stars.

A lot of reviewers lambast STAR TREK for being overly optimistic and dismiss Roddenberry's vision of humanity as a foolish fairy tale in which humans make all the right choices because of humanity's inherent goodness. It's true that Roddenberry wrote many scripts that present this opinion.

But in Roddenberry's vision of human history from 1992 to 2063: humans make all the wrong choices. They choose war, famine, starvation, hoarding, greed and disease, they nearly destroy themselves -- but then a miracle gives them a second chance and this time, they learn from their mistakes.

On the aesthetic differences between THE ORIGINAL SERIES, DISCOVERY and STRANGE NEW WORLDS

DISCOVERY and STRANGE NEW WORLDS are what some fans call a "visual recast" in which the original characters, set designers, propmakers and effects artists are now roles performed by new people.

The way the creators are approaching it: the 1966 cardboard and wood of THE ORIGINAL SERIES was the 23rd century for low-res black and white TVs (with colour gradually entering the market). The 3D printed plastics and metals we've been seeing in DISCOVERY are the 23rd century for 4K TVs.

This was definitely not the intention when DISCOVERY first started. Originally, DISCOVERY was an anthology series that would only have one season in the 23rd century that would use modern materials for 60s style costumes and sets. Bryan Fuller's intention was for DISCOVERY to look like a variant on the 60s costumes. After Fuller was fired, CBS had the costume designer go with an updated version of the ENTERPRISE costumes instead.

When the NCC-1701 Enterprise showed up in the Season 1 finale of DISCOVERY, the ship designers said they created a version of the Enterprise that could conceivably become the 60s version after a few refits. However, the show didn't really commit to this and left it ambiguous as to whether DISCOVERY's 23rd century would shift into the 60s designs or replace them.

Season 2 decided to go with what Memory Alpha (the TREK Wikia) has called a "retcon design" and declare that the 23rd century looks like DISCOVERY with visual discrepancies being a matter of artistic interpretation. The Season 2 episode "If Memory Serves" used clips of the 60s-shot episode, "The Cage" and used the standard definition effects of the practical Enterprise prop instead of the remastered computer generated version from the blu-ray release. "If Memory Serves" flashes from Jeffrey Hunter as Pike to Anson Mount as Pike.

The episode also shows a clip of Spock examining singing flowers (cardboard on string) on the planet Talos IV. Michael Burnham later visits Talos IV and examines computer generated flowers with a deeper shade of purple-blue. The flowers make a similar (but more richly designed) sound effect; the statement is that the cardboard is the standard definition version and the CG flowers are the high definition 4K version.

As rationalizations go, I've seen worse.

(The worst rationalization I've ever heard for dated filmmaking was George Lucas 'explaining' why Obi-Wan and Anakin engage in all sorts of stunt-driven acrobatics in the prequels but just stand and point with their lightsabers in EPISODE IV. Lucas said they were using a different form of Jedi martial arts in E4. He was better off not talking about it.)

This is almost totally irrelevant to PICARD. The Eugenics Wars! PICARD's second season, set in the year 2024, should have been right in the thick of nuclear hellfire that dominated 1990 to 2053. Instead, 2024 was... basically 2022. What's up with that?

In case you're not familiar: the original STAR TREK established that the Enterprise is the product of a post-apocalyptic, dystopian civilization in which humanity devastated itself and was at the brink of self-annihilation before blundering towards a more peaceful world and their eventually positive collaboration with the Vulcans. The utopian values of STAR TREK came in the aftermath of bloody horror, global destruction, and mass deaths across the entire world. Humanity in STAR TREK completely fell apart before it put itself back together.

The 1967 first season episode, "Space Seed," reveals that 1992 - 1996 was dominated by the Eugenics Wars in which genetically engineered superhumans began collaborating and then competing to conquer planet Earth. These superhumans, the most prominent of whom was Khan Noonien Singh, conquered a third of the Earth before humanity repelled them and Khan and his surviving followers fled the planet in a spaceship that put them in suspended animation. Spock describes this 1992 - 1996 conflict as the "last" of the Earth's "World Wars."

In "Bread and Circuses" (1968), Spock says that 37 million people died in this "World War III." In "The Savage Curtain" (1969), Spock further elaborates that this World War III was actually composed of multiple conflicts which include several iterations of Eugenics Wars that went into the 21st century and that a pivotal faction was a group of eco-terrorists led by the notorious Colonel Green. This is a retcon indicating that World War III was not a 1992 - 1996 conflict but actually went to the 2050s.

THE NEXT GENERATION's pilot episode, "Encounter at Farpoint," establishes that World War III was a global nuclear conflict with cities across the globe nuked and destroyed, and that even after the war ended in 2053, it was an era of "post-atomic horror" with humanity ravaged by radiation, famine, starvation, disease, martial law, brutal systems of dictatorial law enforcement, executions for any breach of law, soldiers forcibly drugged to maintain their combat readiness and savagery. Subsequently, DEEP SPACE NINE and ENTEPRISE reinforce that Earth was in shambles after the war.

The feature film FIRST CONTACT shows the Earth in 2063, most major cities on Earth have been destroyed with nuclear weapons and few governments remain after the post-atomic horror. Due to Zefram Cochrane's first faster-than-light warp flight, the Vulcans make first contact with humanity and are recalcitrant and hesitant to offer humanity advanced technology given the disaster of 1992 - 2063. However, by 2151 (the premiere of ENTERPRISE), humans have formed a United Earth government and conquered war and famine.

For all of Gene Roddenberry's utopian ideals in TNG, Roddenberry was very firm that his personal vision of STAR TREK was a post-apocalyptic society. That his 'perfect' vision of humanity in the 24th century was the result of humanity having given in to its absolute worst impulses between 1992 - 2053.

However, in every time travel story that has brought STAR TREK characters to the 'present' day between 1992 - 2022, the Eugenics Wars are not shown; they don't appear to have happened.

VOYAGER's "Future's End" two parter aired in 1996. It features the Voyager crew travel to the year 1996. No global conflict is shown; the Eugenics War isn't referred to, 1996 is the real world 1996. The Earth is not overrun by world-conquering superhuman tyrants. PICARD has the characters travel to the year 2024 which, according to TREK lore, should be a time of nuclear war. But it's just 2022.

The PICARD producers said that in their minds, the Temporal Cold War of ENTEPRISE had shifted the WWIII dates to later in the 21st century and/or that due to the nuclear war wiping out records, the history of the Eugenics War and WWIII were poorly recorded. However, a scene in PICARD has an evil geneticist seize a personal project file that is labelled Project Khan and despite the producers saying that Khan's time is now later in the future, the file is dated 1992 - 1996, the original date of the Eugenics Wars.

Obviously, STAR TREK producers preferred to depict the real version of the 90s and the 2020s when their characters travelled to these eras in shows produced in the 90s and 2020s. However, the idea that STAR TREK's World War III has shifted is a rather facile explanation: FIRST CONTACT is set in 2063, and the 41 years that now exist between today and Zefram Cochrane's first warp flight will only become shorter and narrower.

I don't see anything wrong with perpetually shifting STAR TREK's WWIII ahead. STAR TREK's continuity has always been a continual work in progress. Kirk worked for the United Earth Space Probe Agency and the Enterprise was an Earth ship before Starfleet and the Federation solidified. The time period of the original series shifted from the 22nd to 27th century; only TNG finally placed TOS in the 23rd century with TNG in the 24th. The when of STAR TREK was a vague, improvised projection of the future based on the present that later writers have pinned down specifically with set dates and years that are now causing problems due to the longevity of the series.

The STAR TREK novel duology, "The Eugenics Wars," depict the 1992 - 1996 conflict as a series of covert events where the presence of superhumans was hidden from the world at large and their wars and conquest led to numerous real world crises that the public were deceived into viewing as natural disasters when it was covert warfare. The novel series cuts off in 1996 before getting to the nuclear war and post atomic horrors of the 21st century.

The INTO DARKNESS comic book tie in, KHAN, depicts the Eugenics Wars as a full blown conflict that is simply an alternate reality to the real world.

Ultimately, I think the simplest solution here is to (a) accept the Eugenics Wars as covert events (b) maintain the nuclear driven WWIII to keep Roddenberry's intent that STAR TREK's utopia was hard-earned and (c) just stop having the characters time travel to the 'present' day in which Khan didn't take over a chunk of the planet in the 90s and nuclear war hasn't started (yet).

Just leave it alone and focus on the future.

No spoilers. I finished PICARD's second season. It was good in a lot of places. It wasn't great.

The plot was good; the actual episode-to-episode scripting was strangely unable to exploit the ideas for full impact.

Q forces Picard to confront a childhood trauma! But the story doesn't use Picard's childhood trauma for anything but a plot purpose to help Picard escape some villains. The Borg evolve to a new stage! But it largely happens in a single scene and then centuries of development take place offscreen. Picard engages with his family history and how his ancestor was critical to Earth coming out of a very dark age! But it's dealt with in a single scene of pep talking.

I found myself spending entire episodes engaged but getting to the end and realizing the episodes were less than the sum of their parts. It was totally okay and I liked every scene, but good scenes need purposeful alignment and arrangement to cohere into a good story.

In Season 1, there were a lot of scenes that seemed disconnected and detached but hinted at some deeper purpose; the finale revealed that every scene was in some way about Data's legacy and Picard and Data having what Brent Spiner termed a "gentler" farewell to each other. In Season 2, all the scenes are theoretically about Picard's legacy: his family's legacy as pivotal space explorers and Picard's own legacy as Locutus of Borg.

But it never comes together. There is no sense that Picard's actions in the story had any real effect on history (it's mostly other characters who do that) or on the Borg (again, that's the work of another character).

It looks like Michael Chabon, the Season 1 showrunner, stepped back from Season 2. Chabon's writing style is gentle introspection, seemingly disconnected scenes, then gradually (and again, gently) revealing how they are all connected in the conclusion. It's a style that is unusual among TV writers were clear, unambiguous writing is the norm. Chabon was a master at doing the opposite and doing it well. Chabon seems to have laid out the Season 2 storylines. But Chabon wasn't running Season 2, rewriting every page and rearranging every scene to fit his themes. He wasn't really there because he'd signed a new production deal with CBS to create other shows for them and had no time for PICARD.

This seems to have thrown the writing staff off because Chabon is such an idiosyncratic, unique creator and it's probably hard for someone to come into the show to try to maintain Chabon's style.

I have made it to Episode 4 of PICARD and the appearance of The Punk from THE VOYAGE HOME (and played by the same actor!) was pretty funny. There was the sense that he had a deeply traumatic event the last time he was asked to turn off his music and didn't (because Spock nerve pinched him). That's fun.

I understand that not every story every told is going to be a fun, lightweight, optimistic adventure like THE ORVILLE and it's okay -- it's just that the real world has gotten so scary that Picard going to some dark alternate timeline is really not what I want to see and not even that much more disturbing than the actual 2022 we're living in now where TF keeps making dire predictions and is right three out of five times.

Admittedly, TF also repeatedly predicts the return of SLIDERS, so it's not all bad.

STAR TREK in the 60s resonated because it declared that we would become our best selves and set off to STRANGE NEW WORLDS. But you can't have light without dark; not every show should be STRANGE NEW WORLDS or THE ORVILLE and PICARD is that show that isn't. That's okay.

I've gotten kind of stalled on PICARD at episode 4. This is not a fun show. It's dour and grim. In contrast, I raced to watch ORVILLE because I knew it would be fun, a little sad, serious, enjoyable, emotional and a good experience.

I don't know if it is 'right' for me to get to STRANGE NEW WORLDS until I have grimly gotten through PICARD and two seasons of DISCOVERY. STRANGE NEW WORLDS looks fun, though, and it is hilarious that the pilot episode of STRANGE NEW WORLDS was "The Cage," an episode shot in 1965 that never aired in full and the series to follow was only picked up to air in 2022.

I got a message from one of the ORVILLE producers saying that as originally scripted, the battle scene in "Identity"'s second part was actually a lot smaller. But when doing the special effects, it went from a few Kaylon ships to a massive conflict with thousands dead and that had the inadvertent effect of making Isaac's complicity seem a lot larger than originally intended. By the time those effects were complete, the rest of the season had already been written and couldn't address Isaac's situation.

This seems to tie into MacFarlane being too busy acting to possibly do rewriting.

It looks like there were intended to be some scenes of Isaac being friendly with the crew after "Identity", but in editing, the creators removed them because they knew it made no sense for a post-"Identity" Isaac to be on good terms with anyone but Ty. This is why Isaac didn't really appear that much after "Identity" and why Isaac being a pariah only finally comes up in Season 3, three years later.

Strangely, no spoilers for Season 3 in this post!

"Electric Sheep" is a very good episode, but this episode had no business being the Season 3 premiere. It should have been aired in Season 2 immediately after the Kaylon two-parter. Putting it in Season 3 was insane and reflects some moderate -- not serious, but moderate -- problems in Seth MacFarlane's showrunning where he and his staff write all the outlines for the episodes in advance, then have to stick to the outlines when having the scripts without a lot of room for revisions and alterations. The reason MacFarlane runs his show this way: because he has to act in the show too, he doesn't have time to do rewrites when filming or throw out scripts and bring in new ones.

As a result, Season 2 had a magnificent two-part epic episode, "Identity" 1 and 2. Part 2 had an ending that was good but a follow up that didn't make sense. To recap, since it's been three years: the mid-Season 2 two parter revealed that Isaac is a double agent plotting for the AI Kaylons to exterminate all biological life forms in the galaxy, starting with the Union planets. Isaac's presence aboard the ship from the Season 1 premiere has been a plot to gather full data on the Union's technological abilities to kill them more easily.

Isaac complies with orders from Kaylon Primary at first in taking the Orville under Kaylon control and imprisoning the crew. Isaac is complicit in the death of an Orville crew member, standing by when a crewman is ejected into the vacuum of space by the Kaylon. But when the Primary orders the death of Dr. Finn's little boy, Ty, it compels Isaac to switch sides, free the Orville crew, shut down all Kaylon aboard (including himself) to allow the Orville crew to regain the ship and contact the Union to summon a defensive force against the invasion.

The Union fleet can barely hold their position and only win once the Krill, brought in by Grayson and LaMarr, come to the Union's aid. Thousands of Krill and Union officers are killed; the fleet has triumphed at terrible cost of life. Captain Mercer has Isaac reactivated and reinstated aboard the Orville, declaring that maintaining Isaac's life as a Union officer and accepting his presence will allow the Union to benefit from Isaac's knowledge of the Kaylon in advance of their next attack.

This was fine for the end of the two-parter. But there were five episodes after that and not a single one of these five episodes addressed how WEIRD it must be for the Orville crew to be working and serving and living alongside an officer who was complicit in a plan to surveil and eventually kill them all. An officer who was knowingly and willfully a part of an invasion plot that led to thousands of their colleagues and friends and family dying in the Kaylon attack. An officer who knew this attack was coming and passively permitted it and complied with it until his favourite babysitting charge was threatened.

Crew members worked alongside Isaac without comment. Isaac was not featured very prominently in Season 2 after the "Identity" two parter. Isaac had no subsequent arcs for the rest of Season 2. Isaac simply performed his role as the science and engineering bridge officer with little to no comment. The Season 2 finale indirectly revealed that in an alternate timeline, Isaac and Ty never formed any connection due to the absence of Commander Grayson; as a result, Isaac never turned on the Kaylon and the Kaylon succeeded in their invasion.

Aside from that Isaac was treated as one of the crew with no trauma, mistrust or anger expressed towards him. This simply didn't make any sense. The reason this error happened: the outline for Season 2 had specified that Isaac would betray the crew but then change his mind. The outline assumed that Isaac's redemption in "Identity"'s second part would be sufficient; the next five episodes of Season 2 were planned as standalones focusing on other characters.

But when "Identity" was actually scripted, there were scenes where, for the plot to unfold as outlined, Isaac had to be present and passively permitting the Kaylon to kill crew members. The script also makes Isaac far more complicit in the invasion than the plot likely intended. "Identity"'s first part indicates that Isaac was operating under the belief that the Kaylons were waiting on his reports before deciding whether or not to attack the Union, but Part 2's script indicates that the Kaylons never had any intention of sparing the Union no matter what Isaac reported. Part 2's script also shows that the Kaylon have a collective database of shared functions, knowledge and intentions. This plot point is needed to explain how Isaac can singlehandedly stop all the Kaylon aboard the Orville once he switches sides. But it also means Isaac was neither ignorant nor unaware.

The script therefore made Isaac a lot more treacherous and inactively murderous than the writers had clearly intended, and so much so that Isaac saving Ty was not sufficiently redemptive. As a result, all the post-"Identity" episodes would need to address how Isaac was a traitor and an accessory to one murder and a planned genocide.

But Seth MacFarlane could not do that; the post-"Identity" episodes had all been outlined and were already being written at the same time as "Identity" was written. Due to his workload as showrunner and actor, it was impossible for MacFarlane to throw out any one of the next five scripts to slot in an Isaac-centric story dealing with the aftermath of his betrayal and attempted redemption.

As a result, THE ORVILLE simply offered no comment on Isaac's social standing among the crew. It didn't say the crew were angry at him; it didn't say the crew were happy with him; it just didn't say anything at all but implied that the crew were nonsensically tolerant of him for reasons unstated.

Season 3 finally addresses it. The premiere, "Electric Sheep," reveals *exactly* how the crew feel about a (reformed) traitor still serving among them. They feel exactly how you'd expect them to feel, so much so that it's odd to think that everyone was okay with being in the same room with Isaac for the last five episodes of Season 2 when everyone would clearly not be okay with it.

"Electric Sheep" reiterates Mercer's Season 2 reasons for keeping Isaac on the team: Isaac turned on the Kaylon, Isaac is the only chance the Union has for mounting some defence against the next Kaylon attempt at genocide. But Mercer forcing his crew to work with someone who was part of an effort to kill them and all their families and friends is going over precisely the way you think it would.

"Electric Sheep" does not pretend to offer an easy answer or a quick resolution to Isaac's shocking revelations in Season 2, merely indicating that there is a path forward and that there is a tentative optimism towards this path. It's very good -- and it simply makes no sense for this episode to air three years after "Identity". "Electric Sheep" should have been "Identity"'s third part and aired the week after.

Can you believe that Season 3, Episode 1 of THE ORVILLE is the first episode of the show that's aired since 2019? 2019!!

I was also surprised to find Episode 1 in the Disney+ app. I wasn't expecting to see it there. Watching it now!

1,484

(698 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I'm not sure I have an up to date email address for you, but if you will supply it, I will PayPal you the $12. I need to know what you thought of this series that I have never, ever, ever watched. I just need to know. My soul won't rest without receiving your perspective of a series you brought up in passing once when discussing Netflix's THE PUNISHER.

I've got about two more weeks of upscaling 15/LOVE before I take another run at SLIDERS. I think I'd take the second Daelin segment from "As Time Goes By" and run Topaz on it, outputting it to 480p, 720p and 1080p with film grain added. My expectation, based on what I'm getting with 16mm 15/LOVE episodes edited on standard definition digital video: they'll all look about the same on an HDTV and so will most shows shot on film but edited in an SD format.

After that, I'll definitely redo Episodes 2 - 9 of SLIDERS at least. For the rest... I don't know. There isn't that much of Seasons 3 - 5 that I really want to upscale again.

**

BACK TO THE FUTURE has struck me as a painful example of how NBCUniversal is shockingly unprofessional with home video releases. The 2002 DVD release of the BACK TO THE FUTURE series inexplicably and nonsensically had cropping errors.

The film was shot non-anamorphically in a 4:3 format and then cropped to 16:9; Universal Home Video for some reason zoomed in further on the 16:9 crop. As a result, props are not visible, plot points like futuristic sneakers are cut off, characters' sightlines are impeded because what they're looking at is no longer onscreen.

Universal Home Media proceeded to lie about it, declaring that only a few minutes of footage were affected and then fans had to exchange their discs via mail. The 2010 blu-ray release had packaging that was so overly tight in securing the discs that fans kept breaking the discs and Univeral Home Video had to send out instructions on how to extract the discs from the cases.

The 2010 release with the saturated colours is the release that Bob Gale first presented in 2008 at a Florida screening. The saturated colours, I imagine, would have been Gale overseeing the remastering, retailoring the video quality. It would have been a process of adapting it from the dim, low-contrast look of film and SD video releases. It would now be reconfigured for viewing on backlit LED and plasma screens and digital cinema projectors with their deep blacks and bright whites.

If the 2020 blu-ray release is suddenly desaturated and washed out, it's likely the same negligent attitude that Universal has taken with SLIDERS as well albeit with more effort. The original 35mm film was already scanned and remastered in 2008 for 1080p blu-ray; it looks like for the 2020 release, Universal rescanned the 35mm film for native 4K and applied high dynamic range colour grading (HDR) to the new version -- but they just took the native film colours and ran the whole scan and HDR process with plug and play rather than manually resaturating the image like the 2010 release.

BACK TO THE FUTURE is Universal's biggest home video franchise for the collectors market, and this is how they've treated it. Universal clearly doesn't have what it takes to be a competent home video company; they can't even get boxes right. On some level, they have an active contempt for the business; nothing else would explain sublicensing their work to Mill Creek, an even more unprofessional and incapable company that released a SECRET WORLD OF ALEX MACK DVD set that was VHS quality.

1,486

(58 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

This doesn't affect anything, but in the years before I started having people fill out a Google Form to register, we were getting several spam registrations a day. I recently went through the database and deleted all of those hundreds of ridiculous spam accounts.

I've been doing some upscales of the early 2000s TV show 15/LOVE. This half-hour teen soap for a Canadian children's channel (YTV) was a low budget, high creativity dramedy funded by small Canadian studios with small Canadian tax credits and they were filming on what looks like 16mm film and edited on what also looks like standard definition digital videotape. You can watch it on Amazon Prime and I was able to access the digital video masters; they are pleasingly grainy in their film content. There is a bit of fuzziness due to the standard definition scaling and compression.

I upscaled the first episode of 15/LOVE to 1080p with the Topaz deblur and added Topaz film grain on top of the compression-removed image and... it looked like a cleaned up, uncompressed standard definition image that had been well-scaled to 1080p. There were a few blurry artifacts where Topaz tried to add additional pixels to some in-motion scenes where the digital videotape seemed to have smeared some of the image and it looked a little like shattered glass. I tried running the upscale to just 720p and this helped, but I noticed that when watching this on an HDTV, the video quality wasn't any different between 720p and 1080p.

I ran the upscale with Topaz deblur and film grain -- but I left it at 480p. And then I watched this cleaned up image and on an HDTV, this cleaned up 480p image didn't look any different from the 720p and 1080p upscales. All the work had been done at the 480p resolution.

I think that shows that were broadcast in SD and released on DVD will benefit from Topaz upscaling them to 1080p if they were edited in a high definition format (HD videotape or HD digital files). THE DEAD ZONE is one such show. And the Pilot episode of SLIDERS upscaling to the point where the upscale looks like film (as opposed to upscaled standard definition videotape) makes me think the Pilot was likely edited on 35mm film (a 4K capable format).

However, 15/LOVE and SLIDERS -- I'm not sure they actually benefit from having Topaz raise the resolution from 480 to 720 or 1080 pixels high. They might be better off just left at 480p with Topaz's sharpening and cleanup then scaled by the video player. I think if I do another upscale of SLIDERS, I'll just leave them at standard definition.

It would certainly be better for file sizes. My SLIDERS Season 1 upscales are 4 - 6GB each; each 720p episode of 15/LOVE is about 2GB each. Meanwhile, the 480p Topaz-enhanced 15/LOVE episodes are about 800MB each and they don't really look any different from the 2GB versions when played on a big screen.

1,488

(58 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Another update: I've adjusted the mobile theme at RussianCabbie's suggestion so that the "Last Post" and the link to the most recent addition to each thread is visible on narrow smartphone screens. And in threads, the mobile theme now has a narrower author-byline column and the fonts on mobile are 20 - 25 per cent smaller to fit better on phones.

The desktop/laptop version of the forum is the same except I have made the font 7 per cent larger. The default PunBB theme was built in a world where most computer screens were 1366x768 pixels; now the midpoint is 1920x1080 with higher end screens being 4K. Text is smaller on such high resolutions. A slight increase is helpful.

You may need to clear your cache if you want to see the updated theme right away.

1,489

(58 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Hi, everyone. Sorry for our recent outage. We went offline because Dreamhost installed a database update bringing us from MySQL5.7 to MySQL8 which was incompatible with our Bboard software.

After installing a MySQL8-compatible Bboard on Thursday night, we spent Friday revising our Bboard database to be readable for our new Bboard platform.

As of Saturday morning, we seem to have restored all accounts, posts, private messages, the polling function, the spam prevention measures, the purple theme (an effort to mimic the Sci-Fi Channel purple as directed by TemporalFlux), the mobile-adapted layout, the search function and the user icons.

We aren't sure if previous polls are still working because we're having trouble finding those posts.

If you notice any anomalies, please post here or email ireactions (at) gmail.com. We will be testing the Bboard further before making a full reopening announcement via forum email.

Shortly after I typed my last post in this thread, Netflix removed the HDR from DAWSON'S CREEK. I think they processed the DAWSON'S CREEK in HDR by mistake. 16mm film stock, when presented in HDR format, does not see a wider range of light levels. Instead, it just increases the 16mm film grain and makes it look like a layer of static. (Also, DAWSON'S CREEK isn't even available on United States Netflix anymore; I've heard it's on HBO Max.)

1,491

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

There is no rule against slash fiction and homosexual or bisexual characters -- original or not, TV characters or not.

While I did ensure that every new registrant signed over to me their eternal souls and I intend to use that to the fullest extent of appropriate moderation (no homophobia / fat shaming / doxxing / misinformation / deepfake pornography / racism ), there is absolutely no rule against slash fiction nor will there ever be any rule against slash fiction. If you consider Quinn Mallory gay or bisexual, you go ahead and write that story. I myself seem to be watching a lot of short YouTube films about lesbians these days, I am not averse to LGBTQA content and SLIDERS fans who are -- well, you can find that one guy on Parler, I'm sure.

On the subject of video quality... My TV and my Android TV Mibox has had some over-the-air software upgrades. Both are now outputting video at 4K and now presenting video with High Dynamic Range (HDR) where the contrast between bright and dark image elements with high fidelity to the different light levels; you can have a very bright flashlight against a very dark forest and there are now more shades of gray.

I would have been fine to just turn it off, but when streaming services present media with HDR, it doesn't convert well to standard dynamic range (SDR). DAWSON'S CREEK on Netflix is HD HDR now and the HDR presented in SDR on my TV makes the image look dull and muddy. I had to get the HDR on for the material to be watchable. Also, I usually set my TV at 1080p instead of the full 4K image because I honestly can't tell the difference, but 1080p seemed to prevent either my Android TV box or my TV from using HDR correctly; it was muddy HDR until I let the resolution autoset and it autoset to 4K.

I'm concerned about the bandwidth usage of 4K; while I have unlimited internet service, I do have other family members who use the wifi and I don't want to hog it.

There's also some issues with HDR picture settings on my TV. I generally set my backlight to about 35 per cent of full brightness and I turn off all the contrast enhancement and noise reduction filters. However, any content scanned from 16mm film, such as DAWSON'S CREEK in HD HDR, looks muddy and dull at 35 per cent because the backlight isn't enough to present the HDR image. Also, because it's 16mm film, the graininess looks like a layer of static over the picture. To make this older content watchable, I've had to turn on the noise reduction to 100 per cent.

However, these settings when applied to 35mm film content like INCEPTION make the image look way too smoothed out and lacking in sharpness. Movies and shows shot on film benefit from all the enhancements turned off and the backlight set to a comfortable 35 per cent or so. Meanwhile, CW superhero shows and STRANGER THINGS are HD HDR shows and the active contrast enhancement actually makes them pop off the screen a bit more and the high backlight is preferable; HDR means that the brightness isn't uniform, just for the bright scenes.

I've adjusted three presets: Vivid now has maximum backlight and contrast enhancement but no noise filtering for HDR and 35mm film content and it's good for most major motion pictures and modern TV shows. Standard now has about 75 per cent backlight and high noise filtration for 16mm film. And Energy Saver now has my customary 35 percent backlight for the lesser video quality formats.

1,493

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I don't really see Quinn as bisexual. Entirely too much of Quinn's character decisions are based on sympathy that is specifically for women and there's a glowing smile on his face in "Greatfellas" when the conwoman kisses him and there's at least five to seven years of longing for Daelin Richards and a crush on his grade school teacher -- I don't think Quinn is exactly Tim Drake when it comes to revealing a character to be bisexual. Wade, on the other hand...

I've spent a lot of time writing Quinn's life and thinking on his backstory and the reason I prefer to think that Quinn has had sex with a number of women: it's clear that he's a sexual being and I don't wish to condemn Quinn -- a friend -- to celibacy if that wouldn't make him happy. That said, Quinn in the Pilot is clearly a shut-in, averse to human contact, withdrawn and secretive, hiding his pursuits behind a wall of deflections and deliberately ignoring Wade's obvious crush. The number of sexual partners for Quinn is not high.

In my mind, the stories "Virtual Slide" and "Roads Taken" happened with Quinn and Wade. Quinn is shown to be intimate with simulations in "Virtual Slide" and lives out a marriage with children in "Roads Taken".

In my fanfic, SLIDERS REBORN, Quinn is restored with the original sliders in 2000, but after getting them all home in 2001 and undoing the Kromagg invasion, Quinn does not see them again until 2015 for various reasons. I imagined, in my head, that Quinn had at least one romance that didn't work out and I have, in my mind, imagined who this woman is before Quinn met Wade again in 2015 (again, this is fanfic). I concocted a whole character for her, but it never came up in the actual fanfics I wrote; I knew my audience wanted Quinn, Wade, Rembrandt and Arturo, not Quinn and some nobody who didn't factor into the original sliders' lives. I just didn't want SLIDERS REBORN to inflict celibacy on Quinn for 14 years.

Quinn's life is defined by one fine mess after another and I like to think that his sex life has been as much a disaster as, well, sliding.

Strictly my head canon. For example, I've never spoken to *any* fans who believe Quinn and Logan had sex. And there is no onscreen certainty that they did; I just think it makes for a better story if Quinn had sex with Logan and then has to deal with the fact that he had sex with himself and that his double was having a sexual affair with the Professor. That's a very interesting character complication too worthwhile to throw away, at least for me.

1,494

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

On the subject of the sliders 'origins,' I have never really given much thought to who Wade and the Professor were before the show started and Rembrandt is so full of past anecdotes that I don't need to think about it.

However, I have thought a lot about Quinn's boyhood and have been working on an essay called "The Sex Life of Quinn Mallory" which outlines every sexual encounter I think he has ever had in his life in my head-canon/fan theory space and as part of my own fanfic series, so it's not 'canon.'

I believe Quinn has had sex with Stephanie (but not Daelin), Nan (a classmate in his graduate class in the Pilot), Jane ("Love Gods"), Logan ("Double Cross"). I believe that every sexual experience in Quinn's life has been a horrific, traumatic, disturbing event culminating in Quinn horrified to discover that he had sex with a double of himself and that this double had been having sex with the Professor (shudder).

Then, stepping into my fanfic realm, I think Quinn has had sex with Wade (bubble universe in "Roads Taken"), Cadey (original character) and Wade (finally in real life).

(Yes, I am aware that Wade wasn't in "Roads Taken"; my fanfic posits that those stories really happened with Wade and what we saw onscreen was an altered reality. Sliders-fan Tucker actually wrote a version of "Roads Taken" with the original cast here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1icU … sp=sharing )

1,495

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

And from the world of comics, a late report: Tim Drake (the third Robin) came out as bisexual last year. Homophobic fans (like Kyle) hit the ceiling, shrieking that a straight character had been bent into homosexuality due to pandering. Tim Drake's creator, veteran superhero writer Chuck Dixon, is an low-key homophobe who has never said anything overtly homophobic but made coded declarations, saying that comic books should never teach children about "alternative" lifestyles. He expressed his contempt for Tim Drake being bisexual. I have noted it; now I'm going to ignore that and observe that the stories Chuck Dixon wrote for Tim Drake are actually a pretty consistent portrayal of Tim's closeted bisexuality (albeit unintentionally).

Dixon wrote the ROBIN title for 100 issues. Tim is written as a 15 year old whose genius-level technical and deductive skills have convinced Batman to make Tim his intern, to let him be Robin. Dixon did a great job on this book, balancing Robin's globe-trotting high adventure against mundane teen drama. Robin at night had to deal with death cults and genetic bombs and supervillains holding the city ransom; Tim Drake at school faced school shootings, teen pregnancies, and had to pretend he didn't know anything about hand to hand combat.

Dixon also dealt with sexuality in an extremely appropriate way for a comic book series about a teenager that I read as a teenager. Tim's first girlfriend, Ariana, invited Tim over to her house while her guardians were out; Ariana then stripped and kissed Tim. Tim stopped her and told her that he wasn't ready for this; that they weren't ready for this -- at which point the adults in Ariana's life suddenly came home early and were furious -- with Tim.

Tim was oblivious to female interest, sexually cautious and Tim Drake was an excellent role model for young boys experiencing sexual desire and in need of practicing sexual safety. Later, one of Tim's next girlfriends got pregnant from a previous boyfriend (not Tim), a very appropriate story for young boys who needed to know that careless sex could have consequences. This was what young, male readers needed to read.

However, re-reading Dixon's run now -- I don't find Tim's complete lack of sexual desire to be plausible when scripting a heterosexual 15 year old boy, even a bright and sweet young man like Tim Drake. I find that Tim's resistance to having sex with women is not believable; he doesn't struggle with it, he doesn't want to but refuse -- he simply says no as though he is internally opposed to sex with his wonderful girlfriend.

On this re-read, Tim comes off as sexually undecided; he isn't sure what he wants out of a romantic relationship and sex with beautiful, age appropriate women is something from which he reflexively, instinctively and immediately retreats. Like he has more to think about first.

It comes off as Tim being closeted, Tim not ready to confront that he is attracted to women AND men, Tim not willing to commit to the identity of being a heterosexual boy because he is on some level aware that he is isn't a heterosexual boy.

Was that Dixon's intention? Absolutely not. But authorial intent falls away in favour of the story on its own and lots of heterosexual parents are surprised when their kids are gay or bisexual. Dixon's writing was didactic; he wrote Tim reacting to the prospect of teen sex the way Dixon would want his own children to react. And the way DC would want Tim to react.

DC in the 90s was never going to let their teenaged Robin have sex before graduating from college, possibly not even before finishing grad school, and Tim was unlikely to ever finish high school for the duration of his floating timeline. Dixon never really had much choice in writing Tim's sex life; Tim in the 90s wasn't going to have one.

I imagine a more 'realistic' version of a heterosexual Tim telling Ariana that he doesn't want to just hook up while she's got an empty house; he'd like to plan a nicer date, maybe rent a room in a bed and breakfast; he'd like to get more romance into it than just the two being willing and having a home to themselves for a few hours. I imagine this 'realistically' heterosexual version of Tim telling Ariana that he wants to hold off just a little because he has a few books on female anatomy he'd like to finish reading so that he can perform as well as he can for what is likely to be an awkward first time.

It is absurd to think that Tim is heterosexual, 15 years old, and flat out unwilling to have sex with his very enthusiastic girlfriend because... his writer takes the view is sex is wrong and doesn't become right until some unspecified, undefined point. Dixon didn't do anything wrong in writing Tim this way; Tim is a superhero character, a fantasy vision of teenaged hypercomptence and morality. Tim is a well-written character and the fact that he's a little unbelievable isn't a problem in the unbelievable world of DC Comics.

But Dixon's version of Tim comes off as a closeted teenaged boy who avoids sex because he isn't ready to examine the fact that he desires sex with more than one gender. And this is quite an impressive unintentional achievement from an unrepentant homophobe.

1,496

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Aside from NARCOTICA, I strongly dislike all the comics. But I don't blame the creators or the artists. Licensed comics were often rushed hackwork written by writers marathoning VHS cassette tapes and rushing out a script to meet a licensing deadline. Artists worked off publicity photos that could be incredibly limiting in likenesses. Even NARCOTICA is only half-good, specifically the half drawn by Dennis Calero after Jackson Guice had to drop out due to personal issues. Comics severely underpay its freelancers and I don't find fault with comic book writers and artists who sometimes could not get it together for certain projects.

Why is the title of your story Sliders Reborn?

**

"The Seer" provides a very simple explanation for the Seer's vision: the Seer's premonition of death immediately after the sliders stepped through the vortex was not their deaths, but the Seer's own demise. This has always been, at least to me, a very obvious back door to avoid really killing Rembrandt off.

And because "The Seer" does not specify what world Rembrandt will slide to, does not have the Season 5 sliders join Rembrandt, does not show what's on the other side of Rembrandt's gateway, and also has Rembrandt take the broken Egyptian timer with him, there is absolutely no limit to what could be waiting for Rembrandt when he emerges after the end of "The Seer." Perhaps he makes it home; that's Temporal Flux's view as established in his SLIDERS DECLASSIFIED series. Perhaps the gateway is actually the end of a timeloop that rolls back in terms of plotting if not in-universe to Season 2 as suggested by "Slide Effects." Perhaps Rembrandt encounters the Quinn Mallory of the Azure Gate Bridge world as proposed by Slider_Quinn21.

Or perhaps Rembrandt came out of the other side of the vortex to find Quinn, Wade and Arturo waiting for him, miraculously and impossibly alive, somehow restored through the infinite possibilities of sliding, somehow able to locate their friend, somehow ready to lay Seasons 3 - 5 to rest and restore the status quo and sorry, why is your story called Sliders Reborn?

The thing about PUNKY BREWSTER and SAVED BY THE BELL is that it was not the end of the characters' world that they got cancelled. Punky, Zack and Slater have been off the air before and clearly survived it. PUNKY BREWSTER and SAVED BY THE BELL were cancelled, but their de-facto series finales were effective as jumping off points (unlike whatever the hell that was with THE X-FILES leaving poor Skinner run over, maybe dead, maybe alive).

PUNKY BREWSTER ended with Punky starting the adoption process for her little girl; while Season 2 could have shown all the difficulties after that, the Season 1 finale left you knowing that Punky had taken a good step forward. SAVED BY THE BELL ended with the students saving their school and Slater the gym teacher and Jessi the guidance counselor kissing; while a third season could have explored all the problems that would follow; as a final episode, it was a very happy romcom ending.

FAKING IT producer Carter Covington shot Season 3 of FAKING IT concerned that the show might not make it to a fourth year; Covington wasn't willing to end the show with Season 3, so he prepared cliffhangers. However, he described them as "happy cliffhangers" where something nice happened to each character; a fourth season could explore it further, but if there were no fourth season (and there wasn't), the audience would feel that the characters had been left in a good place.

MACGYVER also ended on a 'happy cliffhanger' in Season 5 due to an unexpected non-renewal, but in a rare change of events, I can't talk about it because I have not yet seen it (and now you may sigh with relief).

All this is in stark opposition to Quinn Mallory bleeding out in a field after being shot by the lottery police or the Kromaggs having implanted a slider with a tracking device that would mean any homecoming would be followed by invasion or Quinn and Maggie having "slid into the future" or Quinn nonsensically not bothering to slide to Kromagg Prime despite having the means to bypass the slidecage or Rembrandt jumping into an unstable vortex, fate unknown.

And one of the issues with SLIDERS: it is difficult to give SLIDERS a 'happy cliffhanger' because the sliders are lost in the multiverse. They're either home or they are not home.

I admit, I am sure that no cancellation-induced Peacock revival cliffhanger with Tracy Torme at the helm could possibly be as bad as "The Seer" (which I sometimes argue wasn't necessarily that bad as it enabled a lot of fanfic). I can't be sure of that because Torme did, as previously noted, leave Quinn bleeding out at the end of Season 1.

Maybe it's for the best that Peacock doesn't revive SLIDERS only to cancel it 1 - 2 seasons in like PUNKY BREWSTER or SAVED BY THE BELL due to internal financial issues that have nothing to do with the show.

1,500

(3,555 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

The Corsi-Rosenthal air purifier craze is interesting, but it sounds exhausting and painful to buy four fan coil air filters and a fan, assemble them into a cube, ensure it doesn't fall apart, and then change all four filters of this six-sided contraption every few months.

I just bought a couple air purifiers (Honeywell HPA064C with filters to be replaced annually) although they only cover 75 square feet compared to the average Corsi-Rosenthal covering 680 square feet. But I also replaced the dust filters in the two fan coils in my home with MERV-8 filters and put the two air purifiers near the intake vents, ensuring that my home air systems now have a direct line of clean air which goes into the fan coils and gets further circulated through the home.