121

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

interestingly enough, the twitter account deleted the tweet and didn't repost.  maybe sucked into the Bermuda Triangle.

122

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

https://twitter.com/thexfiles/status/17 … 2143474852
Coming July 30th from #1 New York Times bestselling author Claudia Gray…
The X-Files: Perihelion extends Scully and Mulder's story beyond season 11.

123

(627 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

THE LOST ROOM is on vudu, streaming free.  Might be free elsewhere.  I havent seen it but know ireactions is a fan.

124

(669 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

@ireactions -- was it the trek documentary "The Captains" where Stewart began crying over how he treated his ex-wife?

There was a lot of emotional issues there.

125

(627 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ireactions wrote:

This sounds fun! I don't think I have watched BACK TO THE FUTURE in ages. Did the theatrical screening use a cut with the TO BE CONTINUED wording at the end of the film? Or did it show as it did in theatres without the explicit promise of a sequel?

I didn't see the TO BE CONTINUED, and I looked for it..

was that a gag on the home video release?  Or was it originally in theaters for part i?

How are people feeling about Quantum Leap so far this season?

127

(627 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I saw Back to the Future last night via Fathom Events.  There is another date on Wed. Oct. 25.

It was my first time seeing it in theaters (part I that is).

It was spectacular.  I definitely felt like I was watching something that I hadn't *quite* seen before in a way.  It just altered the experience.

It was also really great to see a diverse audience age wise.  There were 8 year olds who were super into it and grey hair folks as well.   It really is a timeless piece of work and masterfully written, shot and acted.

If you can make it to an Oct. 25 screening and like the film, I suggest it.

Also the image looked great and whatever they did in the last blu-ray release on the picture, I dont think was used for this screening.

128

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Volume II of Paul Terry's book is available for pre-order.

https://www.abramsbooks.com/product/x-f … 419771392/

code XFILES30 to receive 30% off.

Now only if we had something like this for SLIDERS.

129

(627 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Best Buy wont be selling physical media

https://twitter.com/thedigitalbits/stat … 4381002903

https://www.mediaplaynews.com/wheres-the-love/

130

(3,375 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ireactions wrote:

I still long for the return of burner netbooks. It will never happen, the profit margin is too low.

the simple solution is refurbished laptops.  They tend to have issues, but usually not major ones, and are much cheaper.

131

(3,375 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ireactions wrote:

I myself was particularly obsessed with netbooks.

They were not a terrible idea, even Wade would've approved.

Today's laptop is a hybrid netbook any how when you compare percentage of data stored locally vs the cloud.

132

(3,375 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ireactions wrote:
TemporalFlux wrote:

Really, the only reason anything has value is because enough people believe it has value.  It’s all based on confidence.

Gold has value because it’s rare, it’s pretty and it’s physical - things that made it a symbol of power.  In the modern age, it also has usefulness in the physical ability to make technology work.

Paper money (like the US Dollar) had value initially because people had faith that the US government had enough gold (i.e. Fort Knox) to back up the dollar’s value.  In modern times, the dollar was unpegged from gold and took on a floating value.  But again, that value is backed by the full faith and credit of the US government (realistically based on perception of military might, industrial complex, alliances, etc).  Basically, the world believes the US is “good for it” (a belief that is eroding).

And now we have Bitcoin.  Can it have value?  Certainly - if enough people believe it does.  My concern is that I can’t see what’s backing it up.  All it seems to be is an exercise in how much electricity you can pump through a computer to do useless work.

I think people are more drawn to the idea of Bitcoin being a one world currency that governments can’t devalue through their action or inaction.  The worth of Bitcoin seems to be more as an aspirational philosophy; and that’s just not enough for me to believe in as a way to buy and sell goods and services.  I believe the value of Bitcoin is something as whimsical as the hippie movement (which largely faded from history and lost most of what faith it had).


Developments keep proving TF right on this. Cryptocurrency has proven to be useless, has no value backing it up, and it is also a massive scam.
https://slate.com/technology/2023/10/sb … cards.html

What's nuts is... as an investment instrument...(which it is not touted to be, it's supposed to be a currency used for everyday transactions)... if you held bitcoin before the pandemic and still hold it now, you'd still have a 10x return on the investment. 

The hype period is over but the market still values it as a potential future currency, otherwise the price would still not be so high (even if it's half of the peak).

The idea of giving people power especially in third world countries to not be reliant on the currency of potentially corrupt govts is a powerful one.  But too many people got involved in bitcoin simply as an investor and a lot of those who came in during the hype have exited now.   A lot of big companies exploited retail investors, people lost their shirt.   Even though crypto is supposed to be about removing influence by govt, the flipside of the lack of regulation was wealthy people getting more wealthy from it and consumers being manipulated by pyramid schemes.


For the life of me, trends like nfts, web 3, obscure cryptocoins.... they seem so full of hot air.  I don't know how people get so excited over such crap.  There seems to be more important things to help humanity but we have very bright people who get consumed and apply their talents toward this stuff.  Can't people smell bullshit?

It's odd but it is premium access to view on Peacock -- yet on NBC app, S2E1 is free. 

There was a fair amount of promotion for the premiere, but I suspect it was on channels you dont really watch.  Like, aimed at the network tv viewer.

Decent ratings?

https://tvline.com/ratings/quantum-leap … 235055066/

135

(6 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

tom2point0 wrote:
RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

This is great Tom!

Yeah we feel honored to be able to get in early. Hopefully the powers that be like our stuff enough to keep us on the screener list.

you are cory are great, always.

136

(6 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

This is great Tom!

137

(627 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Back to the Future is back in theaters Oct. 21, one night only:

https://www.fathomevents.com/events/Bac … Future-Day

138

(627 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

hate to see this
https://www.mediaplaynews.com/some-targ … footprint/

139

(747 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ireactions wrote:

Recently, I got a knock on my door and a nice person handed me my wallet. He said he'd found it at the grocery store and located my address from my driver's license.

I thanked him for his kindness and honesty, gave him the $40 in cash thawt was in my wallet, wished him a safe drive home, called the bank and cancelled every credit card number and debit card number in the wallet just in case he'd photographed the card details.

It's been a bit of a rough week. Replacement cards didn't arrive for a week. Some monthly bills could self-update to the new card number for payment, but some couldn't and I didn't have the replacement card in hand to provide the new numbers, so I had to send cheques or go to the bank.

My phone's tap to pay function immediately updated to the replacement number (which I could not see), so I had to ask friends to bring a credit card on outings to pay for parking because many parking machines don't accept tap to pay.

When paying off my credit card bill, I forgot to update the old card number and sent money for a non-existent bill while the actual bill went unpaid and forgotten until the card company brought it to my attention (and waived the overdue fine).

I still think it's important to carry one payment card even in an age of using a phone to pay because occasionally, I'll need to pay for something above the phone transaction limit. But I should have definitely not been carrying every bank and credit card in one wallet.

Sounds like a pain.

I try to avoid carrying/using debit cards at all costs, as they can get abused with fraud.

One issue about not keeping everything in the wallet is then the difficulty of having a safe space to keep other cards (without losing them as well).  Keeping everything in a wallet is definitely more conveinent.

140

(627 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

What do you guys think?

https://www.cancelledscifi.com/2023/09/ … i-fi-fans/

I've always thought there was some arrogance there not to embrace their brand and air a show that was part of their history in SLIDERS.  It hasnt been in re-runs on the network since like 2008 or something.  If SyFy wants to have a niche, I am sorry, you've got to understand what people will tune into a linear channel for.  Nobody is looking for prestige tv on cable.

141

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

More coverage of Philefest:


The X-Files Chat Room Podcast
https://thexfileschatroompodcast.buzzsp … al-episode
&
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/p … 0628358985



Scully Nation
https://scullynationpod.buzzsprout.com/ … after-dark

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/b … 0628420051

142

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I know what you mean. Let's call them diehard fans sourced from the general audience.  They aren't as concerned about the mythology of the alien invasion.   But they are highly interested and passionate.  The relationship between Mulder &Skully is important to them, Mulder's character is important to them, David Duchovny is important to them, Skully is important to  them, Gillian is important to them, Mitch Pileggi is important to them.   

It seems fan base. 2x more composed of women than sliders remaining fanbase (by percentage) I'd guess. 

Sliders fan base is less "geek" oriented than Trek's.  X files' might be more "geek" oriented than Sliders' but probably closer to Sliders' than Trek's on that scale.  Sliders' remaining fan base loved the characters (and their teamwork). X Files is closer to that than Trek's which may be more interested in thr mythology/world building.

143

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Another good podcast covering the PhileFest event in Minneapolis.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/1 … 0627997261

This is just a one-episode recap (no interviews or live coverage like the other one).

It's interesting hearing all this stuff, because X-Files and Sliders obviously came around at the same time, under the same network, and both have high brand awareness or familiarity today among the general public who were around back then.

Yet, you listen to these podcasts and the contrast between the SLIDERS fanbase and the X-Files fanbase is so stark.  Like, obviously X-Files was a much bigger property, but they have developed critical mass to have a ton of people travel to the middle of the country, enough tickets told to have a ton of the actors appear, 30 years after the fact.  Multi-day event.  Concert (the singer who did "Why Don;t You Love Me David Duchovony).  The creator present.  All 30 years later.

Now you think about SLIDERS.  A SLIDERS specific/only event would have trouble drawing many people just for the event.  Could you get 30?  40?  I don't know.   So there's just a huge difference.  X Files may have been 2x as popular as SLIDERS when it originally aired but the cohesion in the fanbase (still sticking together) feels 10x what SLIDERS has now.

I didn't realize there was that level of gap.

What worries me to some degree is, as wonderful as everything we'd have from SLIDERS has been, of course I want more.  And, it worries me that JRD and folks like Tracy may not be around forever.  At a certain point, any sort of event, even if it was an online reunion panel, may not be possible.  The years keep on slipping buy.   With X-FIles, the creatives behind it get to all come back together, and celebrate together.  Same with the fans.  Philefest gave everyone that wonderful feeling.  With SLIDERS, I dont know if Tracy has even seen Jerry in 25 years, or if Sabrina has seen any of the others in god knows how long, or if the core folks have been together.   Yet they had something so special originally.  And the actors' chemistry was special because how they got along.  And the fanbase drove so many resuscitations of the show.  The fanbase was special and hasnt had much to congregate around.   So it feels like people deserve this reunion but may never get one.  We may leave it at where it was in the 90s, and that's a shame.

SLIDERS, thankfully, is still not off the map.  It didnt come and go like most shows.  It still survives.  It still is on a premium streaming distributor.  Most shows disappear forever or go to second, or third tier platforms.  SLIDERS lasting  impact is not thing, it is something people still dip back into even if it's a niche.

144

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

A bunch of interviews by the X-Cast team from PhileFest.

https://www.spreaker.com/show/the-x-cas … es-podcast

I must say, looking back at your S2 up-res samples, season 2 really was quite an impressive leap (looking like blu-ray compared to what is on streaming).  And definitely on a higher level than s1.

It would be great if eventually with the advent of future technology, A.I. will be able to build out the rest of a 4:3 frame to go to 16:9.   It seems plausible this will eventually happen and I wonder if software companies like Topaz will see enough of a market/demand to introduce a feature like that. 

Right now though many of the seasons are resilient enough to withstand zooming/cropping to 16:9.  The image is clean enough, even if the cinematography gets affected a bit.

146

(59 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Vinyl records made a big comeback.

Maybe that will happen with home media.

What is nuts is that DVD is still a chunkable size of the market (actually the most popular format but the rest is split between either blu-ray or 4k/ultra hd

It's disappointing how packaging and extras on many of these movies have declined as home media sales have declined.

147

(669 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ireactions wrote:

The absurd "Doomcock" made a splash claiming he'd learned from test screenings that DIAL OF DESTINY would erase Harrison Ford and replace him with Phoebe Waller-Bridge who would take over the franchise. Since that was very much not the story of DIAL OF DESTINY, it's time to put a pin in "Doomcock" and treat his 'news' as precisely what it is: inflammatory lies made up to get short-term attention for web traffic and ads and crowdfunding. And we should not be linking to misinformation or referring to it as a "report".

Again: he calls himself "Doomcock". He presents himself to the world as "Doomcock".


I was not familiar with the account, but if there's something I post that you don't think should be on here, always feel free to delete the post.   It won't bother me if you do so if you don't think it adds value.

148

(669 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ireactions wrote:

I'm going to ask you not to share any more links to misinformation in this forum.

That YouTube channel is for a notoriously unreliable fraud with the asinine moniker of "Doomcock". This phony, in recent false news, gave a completely untrue summary of INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY where he claimed Harrison Ford's Indy would be erased from history and replaced by Phoebe Waller-Bridge's character. This person couldn't be trust to give a weather report, never mind STAR TREK news.

Furthermore, any news of franchise directions right now is obviously false because of that minor event you might know of called the writers' strike. Regardless, if you're trusting in a news source named "Doomcock", you need a different news source and to reconsider whether or not you have a firm grasp on reality.

I have no idea what you are thinking posting this link here. I don't know if it's related to that vague post of vagueness you put in the political thread. But this is not a place for fake news and fraudulent reports and misinformation.

A pop culture commentator I follow, who is a big trek fan, said it echoed how he felt.  It had to do with Star Trek, and so I shared it here for people who follow star trek in case they might be interested.  It really wasn't much more complicated than that.  As for the veracity of the report, I don't know if it's true or not.  Studios are still operating internally, and I am pretty sure they could engage with producers.   Regardless, it was posted here because it was what I thought people with an opinion on trek may or may not find interesting as far as the kurztman debate and how Paramount is handling the trek franchise.

As far as my post in the politics thread you referenced, it had nothing to do with that, and though it might have felt vague, it was not intended to be that.  It was an observation I felt like sharing, summed up.  Brief yes, but not meant to be vague or meaning more than what it said.

149

(669 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Just came across this.  Might be interesting for some trek fans here.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmCua8w0tBc

I just watched a season 5 episode and actually was surprised.  Though that season has always looked good on DVD whereas s2 not so much, on xoom, the episode I watched (the one on the aircraft carrier or battleship) was closer to s2 quality on the same service than I expected.  Not 1 to 1 but still gap wasn't as significant as dvds.

151

(59 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/ … st/675264/

paywall:
https://archive.ph/96ZyQ

ireactions wrote:
Season 2 Upgrades

Most of these issues seem to vanish with "Into the Mystic". Season 2 benefitted from switching to digital videotape and with that would have come a new film-to-videotape telecine process.

I'd be curious to know how SLIDERS in Seasons 2 - 5 look on a streaming service. With the DVDs, I don't recall any of the Season 1 interlacing issues on Seasons 2 - 5. They probably exist, but they don't seem as noticeable.

Two possibilities present themselves: digital videotape has some final process to make the cadences more consistent. Another possibility is that the telecine process for digital videotape ensured that sequences could be transferred from editing videotapes to the video master to DVD digital files with a lower level of generational loss or cadence distortion. This would isolate cadence issues to sequences where material from different videotapes are put in sequence with each other.

It could be some combination of both.

Season 2 has always been wonky to me.  While not having some of the issues we see in s1 episodes, it can have a very dark and blurry (on mid and wide shots) and grainless/washed out (on close shots) quality.


The lack of sharpness and the darkness and lack of color vibrancy bothers me most. 

Here are some screenshots on Xumo's platform.  It's still the best I have ever seen it streaming-quality wise.

https://i.ibb.co/dM3PBN4/image.png
https://i.ibb.co/Prr7JVB/image.png
https://i.ibb.co/f1pTzDz/image.png



If you have the web browser Opera, I believe they provide VPN where you can pick perhaps United States, and then be able to watch https://play.xumo.com/tv-shows/sliders/XM0AYB6TTOKW0L

Not that it's necessary.

To me, the major jump in quality comes during Season 3.   S2 has always had a dated like feel to me.


My instinct as to why Xumo looks better than Roku (and Peacock looks better than Roku, and worse than Xumo) is Universal is not doing anything differently on their end across this distribution.  These outlets have different systems for default handling of content.  It may be Xumo is more used to older SD content and more ambitious in "getting it right" since they don't have the other businesses that Peacock/Universal and Roku have.   And they may be more technology oriented.

I do have a pretty good recollection of the awful quality of the series on Netflix, and some recollection but not a lot of it  on Hulu.   It always looked terrible on Netflix though this for its run that I believe ended Dec 31 2016.  It was on Hulu a year later before the deal expired.

We know when it was *televised* on the Hub everyone felt it looked better than airing elsewhere.   

Comet, which came years later, was just OK.

153

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

So it looks like there is yet another X-Files event  Philefest or something and I think it's at Mall of America?

https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/philefest/
https://twitter.com/hashtag/Philefest
https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/Philefest/

154

(3,375 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

One of the interesting things about the last number of years was I learned how wrong some of my assumptions were about the charges or conclusions made by those that I disagreed with or wrote off initially.

I've learned to not write anything off, and to be more humble in drawing conclusions.

That does not mean a lot of the stuff I hear that I disagree with comes true, or that there's not a lot of bad-faith arguments made, politically/ideologically motivated etc.   But I also know not to just shut the door on anything that I don't like the  sound of initially.  File it away, or approach with a more open mind.   I'll learn from times when I was wrong or badly wrong.   I won't hunker down just because we have culture wars going on or different sides that have a very different philosophy on things.

155

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

https://www.avclub.com/the-x-files-at-3 … 1850803122

Jim_Hall wrote:
RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:
Jim_Hall wrote:

It definitely looks better than Roku. Probably better than Peacock too but I don't use it anymore. Xumo looks more saturated which I don't mind either way. I compared it with the original DVD Universal release, and the DVD looks like blu-ray in comparison. So far it appears Xumo is the best streaming between the three.

I'm glad you agree and it wasn't just me.

You compared xumo to the DVD?   The pilot or other content?


I'm hoping xumo is the start of a new trend but it's too bad the material was so basterdized by other outlets.

I could tell with the Pilot and other episodes it was like night and day.

Interesting that the best streaming still doesn't compare to the dvds.  I wonder why that is.  Maybe compression.

Jim_Hall wrote:

It definitely looks better than Roku. Probably better than Peacock too but I don't use it anymore. Xumo looks more saturated which I don't mind either way. I compared it with the original DVD Universal release, and the DVD looks like blu-ray in comparison. So far it appears Xumo is the best streaming between the three.

I'm glad you agree and it wasn't just me.

You compared xumo to the DVD?   The pilot or other content?


I'm hoping xumo is the start of a new trend but it's too bad the material was so basterdized by other outlets.

https://play.xumo.com/tv-shows/sliders/XM0AYB6TTOKW0L

Sliders is on a streaming app called Xumo now as Universal made the title part of its library for FAST outlets.  Previously the title was made for exclusive (it ended up on roku channel only bc of peacocks deal to be allowed on roku platform itself.

The good news is the image quality of the material on Xumo looks better at first glance to my eye.  Either xumo or Universal did a better job with ingestion or distribution, respectfully.   It just does not have all the blurriness or artifacts or crazy whatever that is on the roku channel version for example

I did notice that the show felt like it had a more video like quality however.  I've seen this before on some TV modes where they try to insert in extra frames or blur the motion between frames.  And you get something that feels like it's less so shot on film and more so on handheld video camera.

160

(8 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Hello PicardUK!

161

(59 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Jim_Hall wrote:

Now would be the perfect time for the studios to do restorations of previous films and tv shows.


agree, i think they should try to better make old new again.  or at least encourage people to look more at their library.   i think sometimes they push too many new things when people  havent had a chance to watch a lot of the  titles in the  library to begin with (newer producers stuff and classics they missed).

162

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ireactions wrote:

Before the writers and actors' strike, there was some indication that the excellent Ryan Coogler (BLACK PANTHER) was going to be reviving THE X-FILES either as a reboot or a continuation with a new cast.

I did hear that.

Yes, when the strikes end, I have a feeling less content will be ordered in the past.

Even if X-Files  is a bit of a mess re: mythology and handling Scully and her child, it's staying power feels significant.

163

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ireactions wrote:

X-FILES: THE OFFICIAL ARCHIVES: CRYPTIDS, BIOLOGICAL ANOMALIES, AND PARAPSYCHIC PHENOMENA is a wonderful book by Paul Terry. It is a collection of FBI casefiles, photographs, archival notes covering 50 of Mulder and Scully's monster-of-the-week cases. This is not a guidebook to the entire series, but rather a curated collection of in-universe documents.

I have this and love it.

I honestly wish you would do a SLIDERS book -- something more on the history of the show, perhaps with essays and critques as well. 

Although I admit it, you might only sell 100 copies (not because of the quality, of course). 

That said, it would be great to have a history before anyone associated with SLIDERS passes away --- though obviously Peckinpah is gone.

164

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

X Files had a 30th anniversary event in Saratoga Springs, New York, home of the X-Files Preservation Collection / Musuem.   They have another planned July 5-7 in 2024.

Looks like this year's was a success despite the location being somewhat out of the way:
https://twitter.com/William_B_Davis/sta … 1607228416

Coverage:
https://twitter.com/XFilesMuseum

https://www.saratogian.com/2023/07/08/t … f-x-files/


Podcast episode on the event

https://twitter.com/TheX_Cast/status/16 … 6184169473

165

(669 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

QuinnSlidr wrote:
RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:
QuinnSlidr wrote:

No. There was never a musical episode of Sliders.

The one episode that came close was The King Is Back, but I wouldn't call it a musical, since it wasn't a sing fest from start to finish.

I would watch it, though. I love Tracy's song writing and I think he would make it fabulous.

I love the response and agree with you

However if you click the YouTube video in my post you'll see I was referring to something else lol

LOL. My fault. I thought it was a supporting video comment...

Anyway...

Yes!! Sliders has an equivalent. Presenting the Professor Maximillian Arturo "Blistering Idiot" Compilation:

https://youtu.be/unIyuBOE3c8

ha!

what about "We're from Canada"?

166

(669 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

QuinnSlidr wrote:
RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

Does sliders have an equivalent?

https://youtu.be/Oz1c1xdoUFc

No. There was never a musical episode of Sliders.

The one episode that came close was The King Is Back, but I wouldn't call it a musical, since it wasn't a sing fest from start to finish.

I would watch it, though. I love Tracy's song writing and I think he would make it fabulous.

I love the response and agree with you

However if you click the YouTube video in my post you'll see I was referring to something else lol

167

(669 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Does sliders have an equivalent?

https://youtu.be/Oz1c1xdoUFc

pilight wrote:

I got a Mill Creek collection of "50 Classic Musicals" from a bargain bin for 99 cents.  It's got a mashup picture of Fred Astaire and Lena Horne on the cover.  It's as advertised, give or take the "classic" part.  There are 50 movies, they're all musicals, and there are some staring both Astaire and Horne (not together).  The 50 films are packed onto 12 discs, front and back with two or three per side.  Some of the films are not bad, one of the Astaire films is "Royal Wedding" where he does the dancing on the walls and ceiling, but they're all terrible transfers and heavily compressed.

I don't think it was Mill Creek, but a family member picked up something similar (of different types) for my grandmother and mom at one point.  Pretty cool.  One days, we might catch SLIDERS on one of those with quantum leap, seaquest, stargate (and maybe babylon 5 and farscape?).

pneumatic wrote:
RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

margins are slim and if they paid too much on the licensing fee in this one and overestimated demand, it would have probably put them in financial loss territory.

Yeah of course, that's why it would have to be the sale price that increases by $5-$10 to pay for the extra discs (assuming my estimate of disc costs was correct... for all I know it may be way off).


i guess what I was trying to say, but probably convoluted it with all the details, is that this release was for the more "price sensitive" customer who wouldn't necessarily buy it at price increases designed to support adding more discs. 

When the Mill Creek release was first announced, a website that covered DVD news (which unfortunately no longer exists) contextualized that Mill Creek was a "bargain bin" distributor (or was it "bargain distributor"?)  If you google "bargain bin" + Mill Creek there are a bunch of results that speak to that, but this one does a good job at capturing their angle:

"They're made specifically to be inexpensive product for bargain bins and impulse buys, not top-line presentations."

Of course, now that people are shopping online now, maybe bargain bins are becoming less of a thing. 

I would hope that one day there's enough technology where Universal starts get *serious* about their library and puts  forth an official blu-ray release that combines restoration + upscale, or just upscale -- although my guess is their upscale would not be as good as the effort you and ireactions have made, since they won't painfully experiment with the results.

pneumatic wrote:
RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

As far as bitrate -- could that just be a product of them trying to fit more episodes per disc?   Because even an added disc cuts into Mill Creek's slim profit margin.

I guess it depends how much it costs for them to manufacture an extra disc.  Suppose we wanted double bit rate, say 7mbps instead of 3.5, then a 20 disc series is going to become 40 discs.   If we allow +$5 for the total cost of the product, that would allow for 25c per disc.   I'm not sure how much a DVD disc costs to manufacture but I'd imagine most people would be willing to pay an extra $5 for better picture quality.  Maybe +$6.60 @ 33c/disc or +$8 @ 40c/disc?


These sold on Amazon originally for about 20 bucks and the online retail price was like 29.99 tops at most places.  Wallmart.com now has it for 15.  Brick and mortar may have sold it higher back in 2019.  The manufacturer suggested retail price was 45 but online nobody sold it for that. Maybe big box had it 30, 35, 40... I am sure they would have reduced it over time if they originally priced it at the upper end of those values.

88 episodes...  target market being people who would have skipped buying initial studio releases (about 3 runs over 15 yrs).

And even with those low prices, mill creek only gets 66 to 50 percent of that (eg 15 dollars).  So it's an extremely low profit margin of dollars per unit.  15 discs is taking out at least 5 bucks just on the DVD and sleaves. More discs/sleaves at 25-33 cents really matters to them and especially multiple if they are only making a few bucks a unit.

Besides he cost of printing, packing and shipping the current set as is, there is company overhead (employees..  mill creek is a rather small team )and the licensing fee they had to pay Universal for this release (my guess $50k to 250k). Let's assume 100k.

the-numbers.com has the DVD sales estimated at $295k in total revenue (before split between retailer and manufacturer).  The number may very well be lower than that since they use a number from brick and mortar retailers to estimate marketwide price.  In any case even at 295, if mill creek got lets say 60 percent of that in share with retailers, when you take out licensing fee, overhead, production costs, shipping costs...   margins are slim and if they paid too much on the licensing fee in this one and overestimated demand, it would have probably put them in financial loss territory.

Sorry for my being long-winded on this.

171

(627 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

this is incredible:

https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/28/world/wo … index.html

pneumatic wrote:

As far as I can tell Mill Creek isn't in the business of colour grading. If I had to bet money on it I'd say they are probably just doing the disc authoring & printing/pressing.  I could be wrong.

I wouldn't even mind the lower 4.5mbps bit rate of the Mill Creek release if they had at least used the same masters as the Universal version.  As an example I just bought this knowing full well that one of the reviewers has mentioned the reduced bit rate due to the lower disc count compared to the original 2008 CBS release.  Although if it has serious mastering errors it's going back on ebay.

You'd think over time the image quality would get better, but with DVD they are actively making it worse.  Which really hurts since DVD is already suffering at 720x480 standard definition, and there is often no better option due to the streaming services being even worse (except of course for shows that were remastered in HD at great expense to the studio).

Given the surprising popularity of DVD some 28 years after its conception, maybe they should consider coming out with a "DVD+" spec for better quality video while retaining backwards compatibility and cheaper production costs compared to bluray.   For example the DVD+ spec could specify a minimum bitrate and have predefined encoder profiles agreed upon by industry experts.  They could retire the interlaced format and require all video be stored on disc as progressive, and if generated from an interlaced master it would need to comply with a certain standard of deinterlacing & ivtc defined by industry experts.   The raster size should also be expanded to 852x480 for NTSC and 1024x576 for PAL to retain 4:3 pixel density at 16:9.


Yea, you are right, they don't do color grading as far as I know.  They did have Quantum Leap on Blu-Ray HD, and Airwolf, but I think maybe Universal did the restoration on that.  Mill Creek I think usually just uses the files universal gives them (and actually contractually these types of deals with distributors don't allow them to "change" the content).

As far as bitrate -- could that just be a product of them trying to fit more episodes per disc?   Because even an added disc cuts into Mill Creek's slim profit margin.

That, or it's just them being lazy or not having the know how.

You're right about DVD though -- I am constantly surprised how it's still ~40% units sold for the home market.  A lot of people stuck on dvd for some reason.

pneumatic wrote:

I feel like I got extremely lucky with an ebay seller in the US who was willing to do international shipping on their Universal NTSC discs.  Most sellers wouldn't bother shipping internationally for such a low dollar value item, so I am very grateful to that seller.   It took about a month to arrive.   I've currently lent it to a family member and told them to be extremely careful with the discs as they are irreplaceable.

There is an encode of the Universal discs on channel BT.  The quality is ok, but I still don't like being forced to watch someone else's encode for something so beloved.   It's like it has their fingerprints on it or something.  Although that one isn't too bad compared to some others - still highly watchable - and much MUCH better than the load of crap shoveled out by Mill Creek - they're the real bad guys here, am I right people?

The thing about Mill Creek was their business model is offering very casual fan of a series, essentially 3rd, 4th run, of a disc set (that they didn't buy at 1st, 2nd run) the series at a super affordable price, and usually in "bargain bin/shelf" type placements in brick & mortar stores.   So they are trying to keep their costs on the production side as low as possible (as few discs at possible).   They may have lazily encoded the stuff, you'd know better than I, but they really are not meant to be a premium distributor, and therefore are less equipped to "getting it right" in the look of the content, and won't spend much time fiddling before moving onto the next title.

174

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

@XFilesMuseum
We are making room for new inventory so we need to clear out the old.   This is your chance to enjoy a 10% discount on all orders over $15.00  in store and online.  Sale ends 8/1/23

https://twitter.com/XFilesMuseum/status … 8177184773

Some pretty cool items:
https://xfilespreservationcollection.co … hop?page=2

Bob Weiss joins:

https://rumble.com/v30uv2e-the-awake-na … .2023.html

Begins at the 1hr 32 minute mark

sliders conversation at 1h 57m

176

(669 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

is Jerry O'Connell noticably good and funny in lower decks?

His wife Rebecca is decent in the limited SNW I've seen although I guess doesn't offer anything extraordinary.  What do you guys think about her in that series?

RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

someone tell me how the streaming quality of this is acceptable?

this is what NBCU is distributing:

https://therokuchannel.roku.com/watch/e … 586f4c077f


SLIDERS s1-3 are free on vudu now with ads

i just checked out the pilot, and  it looked like dogshit.  all it does is make the series feel much older, like it was shot in the early 70s and poorly preserved.

178

(416 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

X Files had a 30th anniversary event in Saratoga Springs, New York, home of the X-Files Preservation Collection / Musuem.   They have another planned July 5-7 in 2024.

Looks like this year's was a success despite the location being somewhat out of the way:
https://twitter.com/William_B_Davis/sta … 1607228416

Coverage:
https://twitter.com/XFilesMuseum

https://www.saratogian.com/2023/07/08/t … f-x-files/

179

(59 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Jim_Hall wrote:

As I predicted, NBCUniversal has been BRUTALLY FINED $250 (first-time offense) for tree trimming.

https://variety.com/2023/biz/news/wga-s … 235673869/

This is like when the FCC fines Facebook for leaking hundreds of millions of people's personal data.  The fine is a small fraction of the benefit of doing so.

180

(747 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

good lord!