1

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Trump getting along with Mamdani is so bizarre to me.  Did Mamdani charm him out of his element?  Is Trump up to something?  Is it all theater?

It's mostly theater, but in the end, matters little.  The Mayor's Office only has yay much control of the city.  Basically the individual departments.  The City Council makes most of the rules, and they are complete lunatics.  Trump will continue to hammer him on New York's violent crime, which the Mayor really can't do a lot about given how the prosecutors and judges seem to be unable to find a violent crime serious enough to jail someone over. 

For his effort, the meeting was a good success for Mamdani, because first, Trump (regardless of rhetoric), 1000% legitimized him as something besides "whacky Socialist" simply by having him in the Oval Office.  Mamdani then smartly refused to endorse a DSA primary challenge to Hakeem Jeffries.  He also committed to retain the current police commissioner.

https://nypost.com/2025/11/24/us-news/j … ish-james/

As for Donald.  Well, his revenge prosecutions of Tish James and James Comey appear to have ended, with Judge tossing them, with Comey's (statue of limitations) having expired.  The reason was simple, Trump fired the US Attorney who wouldn't charge Comey, and appointed a bimbo who would.  Except that the Law requires Senate confirmation of those roles.  Prior to then, the district court has jurisdiction over who presides.  This was ironically exactly how Trump lawyers got his Florida documents case dismissed last year.  This opens the door to also get the morons he appointed around the country without confirmation to leave as well, including Alina Habba, his old lawyer, who was ridiculously appointed US Attorney in NJ, and has only been interested in Trumpian cases.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/tru … 51684.html

In even bigger news, Trump it seems has no choice now but to agree to extend ACA subsidies for TWO YEARS!  Faced with utter disaster otherwise, his and the GOP's repeal Obamacare narrative has failed AGAIN.  Democrats who chastised Chuck Schumer may want to have those apologies ready.  Why did this happen?  It was obvious, the GOP has NO EFFING PLAN that would keep 20 million people insured, and with a midterm bloodbath coming, I'm sure they spent the last few weeks begging Trump to reverse course.

2

(185 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

Mind Games
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmOFhZbgXIc

LOL, well that's more of a two-sport event than a combined game like "Mind Games" or my all-time favorite, Baseketball.  And ouch.

3

(140 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

It's a true crime podcast, so it's edited and such that way.  The podcast features an interview with Allison, but it's not hers, she's merely the primary subject. 

She also appeared on Michael Rosenbaum's show, which I felt was a fairly good interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajZ1V-VnLNI

I have watched all the documentaries on this NXIVM fiasco, from The Vow to Seduced, now these.  Each one delves deeper into the darkness.  However, one thing I took away from all of them, is that almost every single person went in WILLINGLY, and were all eventually victims to some degree.  They were often broken people, preyed on, often unsuspectingly.  The primary villain remains Keith Raniere.  Look, I think the whole self help thing is pointless, and this group was mostly fleecing customers like any other.  If you wish to be indoctrinated with this baloney, be my guest.  When it became a serious problem was when Keith began shifting to actual coercion, all to achieve his psychotic sexual predilections.  Resulting in (mainly women) pledging various levels of God-like devotion to him, leading to committing crimes themselves.  As I said, the subjects were all fully gung ho on this group, right up until they weren't.  Family members and outside persuasion did nothing.  One thing I got from Allison's comments, was similar to others, they truly did not understand or even question what was going on.  They understand it now, but at the time, they were in trance-like obedience to Keith, who had entirely designed it this way.  There's an entire story about the Mexican branch of NXIVM which has yet to be covered as well, which I've read may have had worse abuses than anywhere else.  But they involve wealthy and connected Mexican families, and down there, they control the press and law so you won't hear about it. 

On Allison specifically, she's remorseful, and seems to have taken her time in jail and experience at large to wish to now help those who have been incarcerated or abused, by obtaining higher degrees and certifications.  She's still on probation, but has already been doing a number of these things.  Her husband is a reformed white supremacist who has become a community activist.  Unsurprisingly, one could point to much of her problems back to an episode of sexual exploitation as a young girl, as well as an abusive boyfriend years later.  Keith used that to bend her fears and emotions at his will.  Again, it's easy to sit here and scoff at all of this.  But psychological manipulation of vulnerable people is a very real thing.  Many many lives were seriously damaged by this monster.  I don't believe in lives destroyed.  These people were good people, before then, and they all have the capacity of reform and to get a second chance.  I don't know if Ms. Mack would ever appear on screen again, and honestly don't care.  She seems well, and is contributing to society in a way I would never find myself doing. 

The whole thing is nuanced and not pretty.  And sadly, not unique or rare.

Well, Stargate has the good fortune of being owned by MGM, which Amazon bought several years ago.  Ironically, despite it's long term success and multiple spin-offs, I can say I've barely watched any of them.  Which is rare for me, a science fiction show I haven't seen.  I think that was mainly due to not having Showtime during the 90s, so I couldn't see it, and when they moved to Sci-Fi, I was still so annoyed at the Sliders treatment that I wouldn't watch anything on there!

5

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I'm not saying MAGA or GOP won't be conducting funny business, but Trump himself, why would he care?  These I feel are his primary objectives moving forward....

1. continue to make billions off the Presidency and international relationships for his company/family.

2. garner any kind of international/media praise he can, such as parading around as Mr. Nobel of Peace.

3. imprint "Trump" on whatever he can, be it airports, ballrooms, football stadiums.

4. exact REVENGE on those who attempted to put him away or take his business.  Tish James, Comey, Swalwell, Smith, etc., already finding that out.  Hmm, not a good thing to have "James" in your name is it?

5. deport anyone and everyone he possibly can, that isn't white.

6. continue with this baloney economic protectionism (tariffs), as he truly believes this is the root of all America's issues economically.

Democratic Congress really won't affect much of any of that, and he already has no reason to fear (LOL) impeachment.  The creep is on easy street from here on out.  The Democratic Party HAS to stay on message.  ONLY speak about affordability, housing, healthcare, schooling, groceries, heating, what families actually have to spend money on.  Stop cozying to these tech cretins and their A.I. garbage.  Stop spending all their time on the fringe issues that MSNBC wants to cover, and for God's sake, stop trying to "get Trump."  They MUST approach 2026/28 as they did 20 years prior, when they framed George W. Bush as the historic disaster his Presidency was.  Now it's Trump's turn, and they just have to frame what people largely already know, that he's a LOSER.

6

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

I agree that it would be illegal, but I struggle with understanding who would stop him.  Congress has decided to be impotent.  The federal courts have been an okay firewall (they recently forced Trump to fund SNAP), but the Supreme Court has gone out of its way to give Trump whatever power he wants.  And even when they disagree with him (potentially, on tariffs), Trump has already laid out the groundwork to de-legitimize them or bully them into obedience.

Trump runs the FBI, and their leaders are loyalists
Trump runs the military, and their leaders are loyalists
Trump has de-legitimized the media, and the media leaders are Trump loyalists
The people can still protest (for now), but the Republicans are trying to de-legitimize those.  And even internally, I've heard younger people are getting tired of the protests because they don't accomplish anything.  Whether its Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, or No Kings...there's great support and huge showings but what has changed?

But maybe you're right.  Maybe he wouldn't go so far as to simply cancel elections.  I don't know.  But I shouldn't have this little faith.

You have actually made the case for why Trump will not cancel midterms, or likely even get involved.  He has discovered that he can act like a king, and will never receive actual blow back or have anyone stand up to him.  His priority is to get a ballroom, a football stadium, a library, etc, built with his name on it. 

The gerrymander was a flop, and Trump's destruction of the economy through tariffs will hand 2026 to the other party.  Not to mention inflation, healthcare premium explosions, and his token revenge politics.  But that matters little to him.  He can have anyone do whatever he wishes, then PARDON them after the fact.  The Congress and the Supreme Court have become largely irrelevant.  The latter has one last attempt at relevancy should they correctly decide against Trump's bull crap "emergency" use of tariffs.  It's too late for international aid, healthcare access/costs, housing/energy costs, grocery prices, foreign investment, and hard working immigrants.  But if he can be stopped on the tariffs, at least the economy has a chance.

I doubt I'll have time to listen for awhile, but there are a growing number of podcasts covering Sliders, which is really amazing.  Given how long it's been off the air, and I have to presume most of these people never saw it when it aired.

8

(11 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Wasn't there a contest once from Acclaim to do something with the comic books?  Granted it likely went unfulfilled given it's early cancellation.

9

(11 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

One addendum was that Cleavant began pondering how they (on a reboot) could solicit "independent" story ideas.  JRD then lamented and explained how the WGA works and writers' rooms work, and largely crapped on that.  It was an intriguing discussion, but certainly reminiscent of the ones Informant used to have on the series of Sliders forums.  About how artistic ideas are shuttered by this (at one time Ivy League boys club).

Again, I think that fans just have no faith in ANYTHING coming out of WB/DC at this point.  Is the studio being sold again?  If so, will that change the direction AGAIN?  Which was what I was getting at.  How and why do you the viewer wish to get so invested in the content, if it's going to be shelved or flushed every few years?  It's sort of the dilemma that Marvel has, which has been reticent to reboot major characters.  Odd considering Sony did it with Spider-Man and the X-Men multiple times with success.

11

(11 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Thanks for the links.  Great to see that SLC did indeed professionally edit and release that panel video! 

St. Louis was pretty similar to the first one, but I think there's a lot more open honesty from Cleavant and John about the BTS on the show, and the process of bringing a series to TV.  Great panel and watch.

ireactions wrote:

Even with my confusion sorted, I don't really understand why the team was so celebratory at the end of Season 2. They had strong moral objections to Rick Flag, but nothing they did seemed to actually oppose him.

At the same time, I'm not in a position to stop my government from doing anything they want, so that part does sort of ring true. I would say the end of Season 2 suffers from needing the Salvation prison to be left open as a plot point for SUPERGIRL, MAN OF TOMORROW, LANTERNS, etc.

Well, the members of ARGUS who showed clear dissatisfaction with Flag Sr. left to join Checkmate.  You got the sense that they would become a foil for ARGUS, and eventually attempt to defeat Flag.  Hence the celebrating.  The finale's ending was not well received, because, it was a cliffhanger and now Gunn says he's not doing another season.

PS: Was very cool to see a band I'd actually seen (over a decade or so back) Foxy Shazam get the theme song on this season.  They were one of the openers for Panic! at the Disco in 2011 in NJ.  LOL.

13

(431 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

Looks like the X-Files/Ryan Coogler stuff is getting the ball rolling

https://www.cancelledscifi.com/2025/10/ … -and-more/

I just don't know what demo you can sell that show to now?  Who still even faintly believes in the supernatural or UFOS?  Maybe whacked out online addicted MAGA or the like, who are hooked on phony AI videos, and drown in conspiracies?  I cannot imagine Coogler would be the one for THEM!  Leave it buried.

I'll be honest, I really ignore the outer plot on that show.  For me it's about the characters and the loopy stuff they do, similar to The Boys.  What you all wrote about, frankly, is "news to me!"  Over my head.  I don't know if that's a good or bad thing...

I did binge through Peacemaker's season 2, which of course featured the parallel "Nazi" world with doppelgangers and such.  Fantastic work by all involved.  Of course, Gunn was noncommittal on the show's future, though I suspect characters will play a run in the Lanterns show.

16

(11 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I loved it. I'm someone who has heard EVERYTHING these guys have said about the show. But there was a lot there from their own backgrounds and such that made it very enjoyable. I was very enthused to hear them admit they were at the con to begin to drum up interest in a return of the series! I've been telling Jerry he should be doing these cons for awhile now.

17

(11 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Yep, that's the YouTube guy I spoke to yesterday.  I'm at work but will watch when I get home. 

PS: FanX themselves often post professionally edited panels but it can take weeks.

18

(185 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I found a guy on YouTube who uploads panel videos he takes at FanX.  He confirmed he DID record Sliders.  I think he records every panel there, so hopefully it won't be too long a wait.  From what I gather, seemed like the three of them sat there taking questions from the audience.

19

(185 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

They all look pretty great!

Any word on anything they discussed?

No word yet.  Hoping the con posts the panel after editing in the next weeks.

ireactions wrote:

Who would be your non-terrible choice?

What I would want is simply impossible, because DCU exists (like Marvel or Star Wars etc) simply to produce content.  I have to say, having these properties gobbled up by giant corporations and assigned studios to themselves has probably run its course.  It used to be that a Warner Bros would produce all kinds of movies.  A Batman or Superman film would simply be ONE or TWO of all those dozens and dozens of movies the studio made.  They now exist as their own units, and the needs to show revenue is simply too much.

21

(185 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Cool photos I've found so far...

https://i.postimg.cc/RJv8HQmg/555028276-10161103704205670-8352975607050972914-n.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/BPJyKc3M/555101590-18057200666396163-8825461246717834561-n.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/6TKFgwZX/555475939-1229323445667542-7906095597125136978-n.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/G9R6VrDm/555559405-1229323429000877-3396937759261368340-n.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/8sGx9Dvv/555670653-1229323539000866-7777658788505720138-n.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/nMxNgZmF/555750041-1229323542334199-6998335242974865945-n.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/m1TqHN45/555750041-1229323542334199-6998335242974865945-n-1.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/w3znZHN6/555872365-1229323482334205-8189972778535365470-n.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/SYm5M74C/556236952-10113755805822045-2153442113631856588-n.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/wR9PmczX/G14-HQr-Pb0-AEXzoa.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/mtyKNs7D/558269693-10232150032387425-3112804311869991491-n.jpg

I didn't "not" like it, there just wasn't anything to grab onto, for me.  But I'm really kind of "over" movies, especially the way they're produced these days, and more especially super hero films.  They're fine as a flash/bang, but the substance has gone.  Moreover, you look at what can be done in a longer form on streaming, with Peacemaker or The Boys, or example, and it's just so much more watchable.  They can actually get through a story, rather than cram into one showing.  Beyond that, I personally think Gunn was a terrible choice for this new DCU.  He hasn't made a good film in since GOTG2.  I think Supergirl will be a massive flop, the actress chosen was another questionable one.  He's good at irreverent and amateurish, and I guess that's what Warner Bros is fine with him doing now.  Just don't think it works both ways.  You can have a comedy with some drama/action, or an action/drama with some comedy.  Is that what DCU is now?  Just a bunch of dumb comedies?  The only way to get a serious movie is to have unrepentant violence like The Batman?  When arguably their biggest hit lately has been The Pengiun, a mob show, which is far more drama and intrigue than action or bloody.

23

(185 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Jerry is a "pro" at hosting these kind of things, so it will probably be quite a gas.  JRD usually gets very bombastic during them as well.  As I said, I do not think these guys have EVER publicly spoken about the series, at once.  I would temper expectations though, because these ARE actors, and they all kind of have a shtick that they fall back on.  At this point, I'll take ANY notoriety for the old girl.

Given the location and the brevity in time, I haven't heard of any of the "online" fans I know of making the trip, which is unfortunate.

24

(62 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Ironically, my friends and I were chatting about that video the other day.  Had Rick Beato not been involved, I probably would have questioned it's validity.  The singing voice is incredibly realistic.  We share a lot of Beatles stuff, videos in particular, and have checked out all the AI done around them.  It's usually terrible.  The singing sounds like a person doing it, but it's missing a lot.  This "Sadie Winters" definitely sounds the part, but the lyrics are pretty bland and redundant.  I guess it makes sense, it's kind of the level of songwriting which an amateur musician might come up with.  Something that largely copies from what's out there already, which is how most musicians begin.

25

(185 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Please note the Jerry will only be signing items related to Sliders at his table during the event

That's interesting/odd, that he's only touching Sliders.  Rebecca joked to me that he doesn't even have an "agent for these things."  I've yet to figure him out on this stuff.  He is also touring later this year with Corey and Will from Stand By Me https://www.standbymelive.com/, doing one of those movie with Q&A and VIP Meet and Greet add-on's. 

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Ooooh that will be cool.

Have they really not reunited at any sort of convention?

Not formally, no.  Jerry and JRD was just a backstage thing.  This is Cleavant's first convention (as a paid guest), and may well be the first one he's every done, period.  To be honest, this may be the first time the three of them have been in the same room since John was written off after The Exodus (and his infamous Christmas Party) early in 1997.  Sabrina moved to Rome as we know, a few years ago.  Had she still been up in Vancouver, maybe they could have convinced her to join, not sure.

26

(185 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

https://x.com/fanxsaltlake/status/1970186403016515698

https://x.com/MrJerryOC/status/1969943306772922668

Well it's official, the first EVER Sliders cast reunion, albeit way out at the Salt Lake City FanX show!  Jerry, Cleavant, and John Rhys Davies are all attending!  I'm so bummed this came together literally in the last week or so, just too little time for me to organize a trip.  I hope they do more.  Also hope that the panel is broadcast after wards to YouTube.


Saturday Sep 27, 2025 5:20 pm

TeamUp - SLIDERS TRIO Photo Op :: Photo Ops Booth-B
Cleavant Derricks, Jerry O'Connell, John Rhys-Davies

Saturday September 27, 2025 :: 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm
Sliders Reunion :: Grand Ballroom
Cleavant Derricks, Jerry O'Connell, John Rhys-Davies

https://fanxsaltlake.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2025/09/2025_Group_Photo_Op-Sliders-400x400.jpg

I watched this new Superman on HBO Max last night.  It was about as convoluted and indecipherable as The Flash was.  Or perhaps The Suicide Squad (2nd one).  The plot, very easy to follow.  Everything else?  The characters were simplistic buffoons, that made those in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory look like Rhodes Scholars.  Every interaction was cheap, hollow, cliched and dumb.  Clark/Lois couldn't be more fake, and why in the heck are the Kents two utter bumpkins from The Ozarks??  It felt written and directed by someone in the midst of a speedball high.  Was there ONE shot void of CGI, I truly wonder? 

Corenswet played a decent Superman, almost everyone else was quite forgettable.  Luthor crying at the end was eye rolling.  I don't read comics, but I've seen almost every Superman franchise (beginning with the old Kirk Alyn/George Reeves), to Chris Reeve, Dean Cain, Tom Welling, etc.).  I skipped Routh.  Also saw the SyFy Krypton show, DC's Titans, and of course, Superman TAS (played by Tim Daly).  So I'm not sure if there's elements of fan service or whatnot that I'm missing in this thing?  Though tough to tell, given how much "backstory" was essentially crapped out onto the screen at once.  I normally find Gunn movies enjoyable, but I have no desire to watch it again.

Gunn has been VERY good at a certain style in the genre, the tongue in cheek, shoot em up, comic book blockbusters.  GOTG, Suicide Squad/Peacemaker, and let's not forget my favorite, Super with Rainn Wilson.  Superman is normally more of an "epic" style of comic book blockbuster.  I've yet to see this one, but everything said and leaked sounded like the Snyder/Goyer film.

I certainly would fall into the category of wanting to see Gunn continue as head of DC, and only do his universe, rather than having that AND The Batman (Reeves) goes away because frankly I just think this is the wrong atmosphere/time to be releasing these dark and hopeless films.

Coyote vs. Acme, the infamously canceled Warner Bros project, has been revamped under Gunn for release, which is great.  I only wish he may do the same at some point for Batgirl, because I think it would have been good, and Keaton played a major role and I want to see it!!!!

ireactions wrote:

I don't know that Roddenberry was puritanical. His obsession with the planet Risa is certainly telling.

He was puritanical when it came to his view of what Star Trek should be.  His way or the high way, and it often stood entirely in the way of common story telling.  If they'd left it up to Gene, the show would have been canceled after one season, and never brought back.  Same for TNG.  Gene's vision of the future was utopian but also too stringent and unrealistic. 

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Enterprise Season 4 is (I think) the only live action Trek I haven't seen.  Help me understand what the explanation was.

That's funny, because it was probably the first case of Trek fan service, which has come around several times since.  I personally enjoyed it, but I think the Enterprise cast were miserable with it.  SNW is very very high on fan service.

DieselMickyDolenz wrote:
Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Did Spock have any romantic entanglements in TOS?  Because he seems to be quite the player in SNW hah.

Another shift in tone this week, but I think DMD is right about TOS.  Even the other series did a bit of that from time to time.  And like I said, no matter what the genre, I think the show does a good job.

I just got back from Trek to Vegas. One of the panels included David Gerrold, the writer for, "The Trouble With Tribbles," among other TOS and TAS episodes (and Sliders' "New Gods for Old"). He discussed how he got submitted the outline for Tribbles, hired by Gene L. Coon to write the episode, and generally his career with Trek. One interesting note was that Gene Roddenberry was away during the development and filming of Tribbles. When Roddenberry returned and saw the finished product, he was livid. He did not want a comedic episode of Trek. Ever. He felt comedy would turn Trek in to a kids show. Coon, obviously, disagreed. It directly led to Coon leaving the series.

So it sounds like Roddenberry wouldn't have been too keen on the shifts in tone, either, even though some shifts were present in TOS.

BTW, Gerrold literally wrote the book on how to write for Star Trek. The Trouble With Tribbles: The Story Behind Star Trek's Most Popular Episode gives the whole story of the episode's development and was cited by several of the writers at the convention as being instrumental in their getting started as writers.

Gerrold is a legend as was Gene Coon.  Roddenberry was a complete lunatic.  His rigid and puritanical views about Trek's future portrayal would have resulted in extinction.  Thankfully there were plenty of people around who knew how to write television.  Spock, like Kirk, McCoy, and even Scotty, were given several "romantic" stories during the series, because that's how you wrote television.  Nimoy was a huge hit with women during the 60s and 70s. 

As for SNW, it's an okay show, it's not great.  It's almost like a collection of short stories that you assemble into a book and sell it.  Ironically, Simon and Shuster did exactly that 30 years ago, and called it Strange New Worlds!  I had that book, ha ha.  I have yet to get around to the current season, but I've seen some blurbs and whatnot. 

The problem Trek has is that they just don't generate many new fans anymore, really haven't in a long, long time.  The movies did, but those were obviously separate from the TV stuff.  Next Gen, DS9, somewhat Voyager, they not only had Trek diehards watching, they had very large crossover/casual viewers.  You can't get that anymore, not with streaming, to the same extent.  Trek has buried itself into a corner, where they no longer write stories for the sake of doing science fiction, but have become this bizarre form where they have to follow this Biblical formula whereby characters/canon are the focus.  It used to be that canon was kind of used as in-jokes on the newer shows.  Often, the studio wouldn't even allow them to broach it.  So those writers wrote their own shows and didn't worry about it.  Enterprise was the first victim of being shoehorned, and it's only gotten worse.

Alien: Earth has been well received by many friends of mine who are Alien fans.  I won't have time to watch it for awhile.  It's a franchise for which you simply cannot take ANY canon seriously.  It's as valid as Friday the 13th's!  At the end of the day, it's a horror franchise just the same.  The films which tried to move it into some other realm failed.  And I loved Prometheus, but it just didn't work.  So I am not surprised that a return to suspense/horror is well received.

32

(185 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Malcolm Jamal-Warner tragically drowned at a beach in Costa Rica on vacation.  He was known as Theo Huxtable on The Cosby Show, but later guested on Season 4's My Brother's Keeper.  That episode is generally not held in very high regard.  The premise was very interesting, later to be covered by Michael Bay's awful The Island, which itself was sued by two different sources having claimed to write "that story."

33

(431 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I met Mark Snow at The X-Fest 2 outside Chicago a few years back, got his CD signed, very nice guy.  He had a fairly long and successful career on TV and film, beyond simply the X-Files theme, which frankly was a stroke of genius as those compositions largely made the show.  It gave the episodes, combined with Vancouver's climatic gloominess, all that was needed to be supernatural. 

I was a big fan of the show, but I'm not sure I wish to revisit it.  Hasn't aged well in some respects, and tbh younger me probably believed in things like aliens and ghosts and whatnot, whereas I do not at all now.  A big pull towards it was living through Mulder's quest to find his sister and uncover the truth about his family.  That wound up being revealed in a completely haphazard and ill-conceived way, and obviously once you've lived through it, the curiosity is gone.

CBS as an entity is likely on life support, ditto NBC and ABC, and FOX/CW are basically kaput.  I do not see much light in the future of Star Trek to be honest, which is unfortunate.  SNW has been very good, and hopefully continues to be on its way out.  But like HBO Max, Paramount + has no money.  And it's debatable whether soon to be new owners Skydance (UK) have any interest in doing anything about it.  There's likely to be a split up following the merger, where the TV carcass (like WB Discovery) goes to dust.

35

(6 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I saw that posted, as usual, I'm out on the town during one. 

Wow, 30 years.  It's interesting because technically my real, hardcore Sliders fandom goes back to around the fall of 1997, even 1998, when Sci-Fi acquired the rights to the reruns and aired them in order for what seemed like 2 years, many times over.  I'd watched the Fox run here and there but not intently.  The presence of JRD, being a massive Indiana Joneser, was what drew me to the show.  When he was canned, I remember hoping (and getting my wish) that the show was punitively canceled.  Only later as I said, did a multi-time rewatch really endear the show to me.  It became my favorite science fiction program. In many ways, it's lack of mainstream success kept it as kind of a guilty pleasure. This was also while joining the old MCA and Sci-fi boards and having a multiverse of craziness on those for the better part of a decade. 

Sadly this anniversary comes with Sliders having far less hope for a future return, and just one year after the death of its creator.  I do hope someone wises up and realizes the incredible story telling that could be done.

36

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

a) I do not know you or anyone else's personal characteristics here.  If someone said it, I'd forget or confuse with someone else.  It's something that does not enter my mind, as I don't hold anything for or against anyone for any belief or persuasion.  My intention is never to insult or chastise anyone here directly. 

b) Post I made was to continue to complain about why and how the Democratic Party has lost its way with the majority of the voting public.  Identity politics have left the Democratic Party in a bad way.  Trump is the backlash to that, this adherence to the rules of identity.  Don't dare break them.  You'll be ostracized. Canceled.  Paralyzed from doing simple things like incarcerating violent criminals.  Oh well, enjoy four years of MAGA. 

c) My thoughts were to protect young girls and women, who remain the most frequently victimized part of society, mostly by men.  I'm not backing down on barring biological men (post-puberty ages) from women's sports.  Particularly at the high school or collegiate level.  There are competive fairness concerns as well as physical injury concerns.  Anyone born male has inherent biomechanical advantages and those can be dangerous, just as an NFL linebacker would pose a risk to someone like me, who is not a pro.  Is it right or fair for trans women to be forced to compete in men's sports?  I'm really not sure what the ideal answer is, but I DO know that competitive sports particularly contact sports for women and girls, should remain solely for biological women and girls.  Joe Biden's administration thought differently.  They lost. 

d) I bashed "Drag Queen Story Hour," again, to some an innocuous idea, to others it was another instance where "normies" felt Liberals may have lost their minds.  I myself, have no problem with it.  If parents are informed, and given the choice to opt out, fine.  The kids really don't think about or care who's reading the dumb book.  They'd probably rather it be a Russian CGI YouTube character they all love.  HOWEVER, if you all don't think parents are unnerved by this stuff, you're not listening out there.  There is a larger argument in society about how to deal with potentially transgender children, which I am not touching with a 20 foot pole.  That one is as hot button as that volcano supposedly ready to pop off the coast or Oregon. 

e) Final one about the number of transgender women in women's prisons.  I had the thought in there, which I saw a bunch of times on-line and elsewhere, that was probably attributed to a UK study.  A study that showed very high percentages of trans women in female prisons, were convicted sexual offenders.  Not in the United States, because they don't largely allow mixing of genders in a prison, there are very small numbers of trans women in women's jails.  The studies also show that people who were born male, retain the same statistical pattern regarding criminality as those who remain "male."  Don't blame me, it's the Y-chromosome.  https://committees.parliament.uk/writte … 18973/pdf/

f) I did fail to mention that trans women are at risk in men's prisons as it is, which I did know was the case prior.  https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/ … t-2016.pdf  That being said, if you put a male convict in a female prison, you'd be run out of town.  Advocates for women simply don't view violent trans women as all that much less harmful than a violent male inmate.  How is this an attack on transgender people?  How is that an attack on ireactions personally?  This is the hill to die on?  That trans women have somehow given up the (I guess you could say) negative tendencies attributed to all men?  Are gay men in general less criminally active than straight men?  Probably not. 

g) Now, SQ21 asked where I get my news, well here's New York's NBC affiliate, surely not a right wing source, reporting on a phony trans person and convicted sexual predator, who took advantage of New York liberal's foolishness, to do what he does best, rape women.  https://www.nbcnewyork.com/investigatio … s/5067904/  It's anecdotal, but goes back to my point that these wild stories are what gathers people's attention.  You see this type of story enough times, and you form an opinion I guess. 

*As moderator, ireactions could have simply responded that my stance was wrong. You have the facts twisted.  Etc., etc.  Another multi-post meltdown about how I have apparently attacked the very right to exist.  The hyperbole.  I'm not sure it's the place of a moderator to be the nanny for the rest of us?  Interpreting intent?  I have honestly never seen anyone, anywhere else, perform like ireactions does.  Maybe this is what they do in Europe (I hope not Canada) where social media posts have put people in jail for thought crimes.  He's supposed to be in the medical field of some sort, yet wants to argue against human biology.  I don't care WHO you are, how you dress, what skin color you have, statistically, if you're born male, you're far more likely to be violent than those born female.  That is a blanket statement on the whole of Earthly mammals.  Males have a biological drive to have sex, far more than female.  Often this results in violence.  End of freaking story.  I'm not talking about ireactions or anyone like him, I was talking about convicted criminals.  Who are already decided by society, to be unsafe to be in it, for at least a period of time.  If you truly believe orientation or gender choice makes someone less violent or predatory, than anyone else of the same biological gender, I really don't know what more to say.  You chose to run right over those conceptual arguments, and claim victimhood.  Was I too harsh about the left's rush to defend trans rights?  Probably yes that was too flippant.  Again, I SUPPORT those rights.  But no one has absolute rights if they may infringe on another individuals, either.  When you opt for absolutism, you lose.

In conclusion, I see no point of this politics thread.  It's basically a dumping venting ground for Trump disgust.  It's not a place for open dialogue.

MOD: Post Relocated

Too bad Info isn't around for this, but BUFFY'S BACK (maybe, probably) at Hulu

https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/buffy- … 236291559/

Also seems another reboot at Hulu for Prison Break.  Good Lord.

https://variety.com/2024/tv/news/prison … 236247237/

38

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

QuinnSlidr wrote:

This is what most of the right wing channels are all preaching. And not all of it is fact.

What the right wing channels fail to address is the fact that the fires were so powerful and widespread that they were impossible to contain. No right wing community could have done better. Any winds over 55 mph, and planes are unable to effectively fly and put out the fires. This has nothing to do with state or city governance. It wouldn't have mattered if the reservoir was full or how many full fire hydrants we have, if they are not close to where the fires burned and raged or it's physically impossible to do. Conditions have coalesced into the driest winter on record, with little rain. If you combine that with the overall speed of the winds, and the embers that were flying all over the place, it's the recipe for a perfect disaster.

It doesn't matter whether you're democrat or republican: nature will treat you the same way. No republican would have been able to do it either.

Trump's victory is the absolute narrowest ever in history. It also was never a mandate as he erroneously likes to present it as. Like Hakeem Jeffries, the U.S. House of Representatives Minority Leader has stated previously - "I don't think that this requires major reform of the party."

George W. Bush had the absolute narrowest victory in history.  California's management of the flora is absolutely a reason for the disaster there.  The citizens out there have vocally stated that, and they're not Republicans saying it.  They had decades to improve their water management.  Nothing.  You can't do anything there due to the overload of regulations.  California is loaded with homelessness because you can't BUILD homes!!!  Good luck rebuilding in LA. 

ireactions wrote:

Slider_Quinn21's attitude is a huge part of why Democrats keep losing elections.

By that, I mean: Slider_Quinn21 is not being paid to stay awake when it's not an election year, and he has earned his rest. But politicians and party strategists have treated the job of winning elections as something to only work on 6 -8 months before the polls open, and it's a serious problem. Slider_Quinn21 is right to take a break; the DNC should not be resting and Democratic politicians should not be capitulating to Trump... but so many are.

The Democratic Party has a tendency to go into hibernation unless there's an upcoming and nearing election. They've allowed conservatism and fascism to dominate social media and news while Democrats only really get started in an election year, aiming to eke out narrow wins. This sleepiness has led to a party that lacks strategic flexibility, is easily toppled by a more ostentatious and media-dominant party, and is boxed out of the mediasphere.

There's also the fact that Democrats have a tendency to embrace the working class when they're not in power but focus largely on the upper middle class and wealthy when they win elections. Kamala Harris' campaign had a lot to say to people in a position to make down payments on their first homes and start new businesses and pretty much nothing for the casual shift worker scrambling to make back rent and skipping meals to cover the water bill. That's what you get from a supposedly left of center political campaign run by Uber executives speaking to other Uber executives instead of to people who work for a living.

I actually wholly disagree.  The Democratic coalition has shifted to pick up huge swaths of college educated voters.  Those voters are far more likely to vote during off-year elections.  The Democratic Party needs a new image, I don't know what it is, as I've said before.  They spent the week freaking out about some Nazi salute that Elon Musk clearly was NOT doing.  Idiots.  They've chosen to blindly defend utter bizarro policies simply out of fear of stepping on someone's "feelings."  Trump couldn't care less. Vance couldn't care less.  Wokeness has ruined the Democratic Party.  They've become paralyzed by it.  I never understood the "die on a hill" for illegal immigrants stance of that Party.  Never understood the abject refusal to allow voter ID laws. 

Trump has had, for his agenda, a massively successful first couple weeks.  His nominees, while divisive, are going to get through.  The significance of their populism cannot be underestimated.  He's also had a huge week of immigration deportation round ups.  Having the Presidents of Mexico and Colombia cave to his tariff threats to take rightly deported individuals back.  These were lay ups.  ICE raids where TV crews recorded a Haitian gangster screaming, or the bust of a nightclub and 50 Venezuelan gang members.  How couldn't the Biden admin NEVER do this?  They fought it tooth and nail.  No vetting, just a porous open border.  Meanwhile, sexual predators, drug dealers, gang members with rap sheets all deported this week.  Publicity stunt?  Partially.  But does it NOT demonstrate (even artificially) government DOING its job?

I would say the biggest problem on the Left right now, is the refusal to admit when one is wrong.  On anything.  Then there has been this absolutely over the top (largely out of nowhere) crusade to infuse "trans" sensitive everything, everywhere.  They could not understand why parents were uncomfortable with "drag queen story time"????  I'm as socially liberal as you will find.  If my niece/nephew were subjected to that, I would raise hell!!!  WTF are we doing????  Trans-women make up a large portion of women's prisons, putting actually WOMEN at risk.  So the left is fine with this, as well as having biological men in women's sports.  Very safe.  When middle of the roaders try to argue how this is insane, they are labeled viciously.  NO, you're just void of common sense.  Not female inmates fault that previously male or trans inmates committed crimes!  Again, WHAT ARE WE DOING?  Look, Ron DeSantis breezed in Florida when he went up against this crap, easily defeating supposedly all powerful Disney, because the VOTERS approved of it.

Yes, these are at times trivial issues.  However, they represent at large what people identify with politics.  It has literally fueled an entire podcast space devoted to people who simply want their heads from spinning from wokeness.  And many of these NEW listeners are men and women of color!  You turn on MSNBC, and it's completely off the rails.  Trump NAZI Trump NAZI Trump NAZI.  It didn't work!!!  Enough already.  How about start reporting and highlighting successful DEMS!!!  Have them talk about initiatives, not how to stop a Trump cabinet pick, an utter waste of time.

Stephen A. Smith rant should be watched by every Democratic party official.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/stephen-smit … 38680.html

I believe Jerry was recalling what they did during Season 4.  That was over 25 years ago, so I'm amazed he remembers anything.

I felt Skeleton Crew was fantastic, very enjoyable and kids should love it.  I wish they'd made a show like that 30-35 years ago, for me. 

SQ21, have to be honest, I really never think too far into canon when it comes to Star Wars.  It's not like Star Trek, where "history" has played such a crucial role.  I just want to watch something that is well acted, edited, directed, with cool effects, action, and a script full of humor and intrigue.  Skeleton Crew had that and more.  Get's an A+ from me.  Andor returns for it's second and sadly last season.  That's been a show for adults, incredibly well written and acted.  Terrific writing on those series.

41

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/19/politics … index.html

33% approval lowest since 1992

It's been a totally disastrous start of 2025 for Democrats.  The fires in Los Angeles have shown the Governor and Mayor of LA to both be utterly incompetent, and ready to pass the buck.  California is a one-party state, and despite it's strangling regulations, it completely failed job one, to safeguard its civilians.  Multiple examples of incompetence were on display with the widespread destruction.  A major reservoir was off line.  Hydrants were often missing (due to being stolen).  The Mayor decided to stay in Africa despite the threats of massive wind, then showed up and was unable to give a press conference.  It's fire department leadership chose to prioritize "diversity" instead of function.  Bass slashed it's budget.  And then you have cases where multiple local initiatives to safeguard power lines or remove vegetation were stopped by the eco-insanity rampant in California Democratic politics.  The city of Los Angeles nearly elected centrist Rick Caruso, who SHOULD have been the choice.  Instead, career Dem Bass won out, and you have incompetence.

Within California, we also have the former and ultra-woke Mayor of Oakland, another idiot who prioritized "reforms of Oakland police."  She blew the Oakland A's negotiations, and presided over record crime that led to most retailers to leave the city in droves.  Thao was finally, mercifully, recalled by voters after less than 2 years in office.  She has since been indicted on multiple corruption charges by federal prosecutors.  I won't even touch San Francisco, a completely broken place that was once a jewel of American cities, along with Portland and Seattle, on the west coast.  All ruined.

Move east to Chicago, where sadly they continue to be led by an utter fool in Brandon Johnson, who can no longer raise money.  He's that unpopular.  Like several Western cities, Chicago's Johnson will attempt to fight Trump's ICE on sanctuary city status.  The voters there don't want that.  Really almost everywhere now, they're sick of it.  The November electoral gains by Trump in urban areas proves that. 

And then good grief we get to New York, where a Democratic super-majority set greater NYC on the road to lawlessness and violence with Cuomo's insipid bail reform legislation 6 years ago.  Current Gov Kathy Hochul is easily the most disliked politician around, even worse than Trump.  Her revised congestion pricing tax is absolutely despised by anyone but the rich, lefty transplants who have taken over Manhattan and sought to banish the working class from their sight.  The Mayor of the city, who is currently groveling to Trump, in order to avoid near-certain federal indictment (for bribery), has worsened the crime in the city.

These are in total, absolutely cringeworthy examples of Democratic incompetence and corruption.  These are the most TAXED areas in the country, and what are the citizens getting?  Money wasted at every turn, and basic civic functions are simply broken and unreliable.  Each time, there HAVE been centrist Democrats who have tried to win back these cities.  The lunatic left who vote in droves, have barely stopped it.  I have to assume the tide is turning.  One cannot imagine the Mayor of LA will survive an almost-predictable recall.  Newsom might be the most inept looking Governor in America now. 

Diversity, equity, inclusion.  This is what the Democratic brand has supposedly morphed to become.  No, it should have been MERIT, COMMON SENSE, and COMPETENCE.  Unbelievably frustrating. 

Trump will take a victory lap for the Gaza Hostage deal, followed by "solving" the Tik Tok ban and bringing that back.  Followed by the start of a perhaps chaotic but largely popular migrant round up.

I can only hope that so many of our favorite actors, actresses, directors, writers, producers, and crew members, who have brought us so many wonderful movies and television shows, will be safe through this horrendous Los Angeles area fires.  Many prominent celebrities have already lost their homes in a matter of moments.

During the other night's #SlidersRewatch, Jerry actually made a joke about that....

https://x.com/MrJerryOC/status/1875727449256030443

Jerry O'Connell @MrJerryOC · Jan 4
We shot Sliders on 16 Millimeter.  A lot of TV was (at the time).  It is not formatted to our TVs now.  I remember being on set and asking about it and being told: 'We'll be dead when the wider format is the norm.' 
#SlidersRewatch

The pilot was shot on film though, was it not?  Versus video.  Plus the blu-ray is going the way of the dinosaur.

Or perhaps, a Trelane!  Although few could replace the wonderful William Campbell.

46

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

In other news, my first President, Jimmy Carter, has died at age 100.  He was known as a "boy scout," someone who did things honestly and for the right reasons.

47

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

QuinnSlidr wrote:

I think that by not covering Trump and not pointing out Trump's mental incompetence exactly as they did Biden's 24/7,  actually hurt the democratic campaign more than it helped. In that way, the media is entirely complicit and played a large part in the loss.

About the only station who was only covering everything anti-Trump was MSNBC (sadly).

I'm going to have to retort the Afghanistan negative talking points here with the following facts:

Only 13 American soldiers died.
President Biden saved over 122,000 people from certain death, who were airlifted out of Afghanistan successfully.

I'd call that a successful withdrawal. I'm sorry Americans died. But you can't deny that it was a highly successful withdrawal when it saved over 122,000 lives.

What others fail to say when bringing this up is how badly Trump botched everything when he negotiated with the Taliban.

It is entirely unrealistic and naive to act as if a military operation is going to be all hunky dory and without casualties.

They couldn't "point out" Trump's "decline" because it was not overtly evident.  Biden looked like awful, and was rarely seen.  Trump was out there multiple times a week, given speeches, albeit boring, dumb ones.  He gave interviews, tons of them.  Did podcasts.  Harris and Walz went into hiding post-Labor Day.  Trump being mentally demented while Biden was 100x worse was not going to stick.  Trump may have seemed nasty during the Harris debate, but mentally impaired not so much.

I view the withdrawal successful but American troops still died and thousands of Afghans were stranded.  Worse, the images on TV were so damning, and made Biden seem totally inept, as any foreign military mess will.  Multiple DEMOCRATS tried to warn him, he was stubborn and an old know-it-all, and refused to hear them.  The 13 troops who were "only killed" because a public relations mess, because their families were pissed off and continued that right through that infamous cemetery moment this fall.  Again, people SEE this stuff. 

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

With all due respect, I have no idea what news you were watching.  I think they absolutely normalized him.  Whenever I saw non-cable news, anything he ever said was heavily edited to make his speeches sound normal and traditional.  Whenever he said something wild or crazy, non-cable news didn't cover it.  He gave hundreds of speeches, and the only sound clips I ever heard were him saying stuff like "we are going to lower prices" or stuff like that.

I also think there was an amazingly small amount of coverage of Trump's economic plan which will absolutely wipe out huge number of struggling Americans.  No attention was spent on the logistics of Trump's idea to deport millions of people.  If I'd only watched those news, I would've thought that Trump was basically John Kasich - a completely normal Republican.

The media allowed Trump to take advantage of the idea that electing Trump will mean a return to pre-Covid life.  Even when he did press conferences, they never got him to clarify anything.  He got away with stuff like having "concepts of a plan" and never forced him to elaborate on anything.

People assume that all Trump voters are locked into Fox News, but Fox News is far and away the most popular cable news network and they don't even average enough viewers in primetime to cover all the people in Texas that voted for Trump.  Cable news coverage is a drop in the bucket.  Non-cable news isn't as big as it used to be, but it's still bigger than cable news.  And network news was so terrified of looking biased against Trump that they ended up being biased for Trump.  Which probably was great to the owners of the major media outlets, which were all behind Trump.

Again, Trump has all of the big media money and all the stupid people.  It's a great group of people to have.

I'll tell you what New York media has covered in the weeks leading to Christmas.  A twice illegal immigrant from Guatemala, who happened to be a jobless K2 addict and alcoholic, doused a woman on the subway and lit her on fire, to her death!!!!  This was on video.  He was deported and yet snuck in and was receiving gov't benefits!  Add that to the coverage of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua all over the country, and the other completely wild illegal-based violent crime.  All of which Biden inept policy is the biggest cause of.  Trump doesn't even need to open his mouth, he wins, or won, as it was. 

Then we have the media, including ABC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, etc. all of which thoroughly covered Trump's numerous legal cases.  As I warned multiple times, they weren't going to stick.  Sure maybe in NYC, where Trump was hated and the jury pool ready to hang him on anything.  Merrick Garland was lambasted for sitting on these cases, well there was a reason.  He wasn't stupid.  He knew that prosecuting a rival political figure was very risky, very dicey.  Especially one who could hire may lawyers, and who was going to get preference from conservative judges around the nation.  The ONLY case that had a sliver of a chance was the Jan 6 conspiracy, and that would have needed DC jurors, and he likely would have appealed that successfully anyway.  All of that was an utter waste of time.  The liberal media ate it up.

As for questioning Trump's future plans, again, it was done.  The voters DID NOT CARE!  They viewed the economy and the country incredibly negatively.  Biden was at 30-something approval thanks to Afghan mess, inflation, etc. going back to 2021.  You will NEVER win with those numbers.  Nor will your successor, who btw is now open to investigation for campaign fund misuse after spending tens of millions to apparently "buy" the support of celebrities.  All while her internal polling showed no shot of winning from the time they got in. 

People who don't like Trump, think he's probably a criminal, STILL voted for him!!!  What was the media supposed to do with that? 

It's time to put the blame where it is deserved.  Joe Biden was inept, his team and the media hid that.  His policies were a failure.  He finally had to give up on the unconstitutional and unpopular college loan forgiveness recently.  Yes, his infrastructure bill will be a good one in the years to come, but that takes years and years.  Now we have Democratic public health officials screaming for bird flu vaccines, and more lockdowns.  Enough with these people!  Biden and Harris approved of a nanny state, inflamed inflation with too much spending (most of which was basically fraud in the end), did nothing on immigration or crime, and wished to shut down debate on anything their side didn't approve of.  These are the most glaring complaints, and good portion warranted, from voters who departed their side.  Not counting the millions who voted in 2020, and didn't bother this time.  Which was rampant in the Northeast I can tell you.

I didn't understand Warner Bros inability to progress with immensely popular Henry Cavill?  James Gunn, well, he makes a certain type of content.  That style will not work with this property, so we'll see how he's adapted.  Superman is kind of a dying property, it really doesn't resonate like it did years ago.

49

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

The media are not to blame.  They barely covered Trump speeches, after being blamed for giving them too much air time in the past.  Meanwhile, they spent months, years now, covering Trump civil and criminal trials.  They are obsessed with Trump.  Yes, his mental aptitude was mentioned often.  The voters did not care.  They don't care about his morality.  Nor his financial malfeasance.  Etc, etc.  They hardly spent a minute on his two assassination attempts once they'd passed a few days.  No, the media did not "normalize" him.  Joe Biden and the woke brigade just sucked so badly (for enough Americans) that it really didn't matter about Trump. 

And on cue, recent reports have claimed that Joe Biden was arguably not up to the job when he was elected.  The fact that the Democratic chairs of the House Armed Services Committee (Adam Smith) and the House Intelligence Committee (Jim Himes) expressed that they could barely get in touch with the President, as early as 2021, is ridiculous.  One of them complained that the White House stone walled them from relaying major concerns over the Afghanistan exit, terrific.  There were additional concerns by staff over Biden frequently growing tired, being forgetful.  These were relayed later by US Attorney Robert Hur, who was of course vilified (for telling the truth).  Biden has "quiet quit" since dropping out of the race in July, and from nearly day one, DEMOCRATS were given excuses as to why they couldn't contact THEIR President, as well, he has good days and bad days.  BAD days???  Excuse me?  Again, it's no wonder the voters lost total faith in this guy close to three years ago now.  Now we have reporter after reporter saying, yeah well, I should have covered Biden's decline more openly.  Too late I suppose.  Harris forget it, clearly the voters saw her as the VP to a doddering fool, and that was that.  You had to have had an open primary where the Biden handlers could be completely kicked out of the process.

Trump is an idiot and a dickhead, but even at his age, he can play the role just fine.  For Christ's Sake he was shot at, and bounced right up.  Joe Biden tripped and fell on the stairs to Airforce One 50 times.  Remember, I was said to be overreacting when Hur testified, and Trump was shot.  Both times I made the point that these were incredibly consequential things for public perception.  With or without media bias.

The utter collapse of MSNBC should be applauded.  Their hosts shrieked 24/7 about Trump being a Nazi, when they decided to ignore the actual anti-semitism rampant in the left-leaning universities.  They need to get rid of everyone on there, except for a few people with common sense like Michael Steele, maybe.  Go back to how it was with Chris Matthews or way back with Charles Grodin.  When actual liberals espoused American values and principles, not DEI.

One thing I've come to realize in television, is that you can't really point to certain things and say, oh, that one is responsible for this or that.  It's a collaborative process, and unless you're in the writers' rooms, we'll never know.  Occasionally those secrets come out in commentary tracks, which rarely get done anymore, especially on a streaming show.  The war amongst Star Wars fans about WHO makes decisions over there is proof of that. 

But Kurtzman has had top EP billing the entire run.  He's the Rick Berman of this era, and Rick was significantly involved in every major decision to be made by Paramount Television on Trek during his reign.  They gave the production design, effects and makeup people a "clean slate" when the series began.  I'm not faulting them for doing so, given that was the first Trek TV series in well over a decade, and they wished to differentiate from those (initially) and the Abrams films.

The "Kurtzman" era has not been afraid to retcon whatever it likes.  The abomination they called Klingons was worst of all.

I guess I'm just surprised they opted for a bombastic action film replete with a high degree of CGI, given it's only a streaming release.  The writer and director are sci-fi pro's who have worked on Discovery for years, so it's in good hands.

I too would love a continuation of the 90's Trek characters.  Not sure if that will ever happen, again due to the flailing Paramount + environment.

I finally got around to watching the Section 31 trailer.  It's effectively some kind of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, on steroids.  Many ppl are not happy.  Not sure what they were expecting?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63k1Otp9qtM

ireactions wrote:

I see we continue our habit of judging and dismissing a series sight unseen.

I have never wanted to see any attempt at "Starfleet Academy."  It's a subject which Paramount have looked into many times since the late 80's.  Never appealed to me.  You're not on a starship, which has been the premise of Star Trek.  You're not leading some grand mission.  Yes, DS9 was not "on a ship" most of the time, but that was a serialized series where they did often go on missions and fought battles, etc.  Academy screams teen misadventures.  MEHHHHHHHHHHH.  And they have a great cast with Holly Hunter and Paul Giamatti playing some kind of roles, who are both legends.  It will go (on my docket) where Prodigy has gone, unwatched.

55

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I expect to be captured by one of the many drones hovering above the skies of New Jersey lately.  Taken to the mothership, and transported to a planet far, far away. 

This has indeed become the biggest story in this country of buffoons.  And so, I bid thee farewell!  I shall right from far beyond the stars.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On the subject of Democrats, Trump went to the Army-Navy football game for the fifth time, and he's not a sports fan.  Joe Biden IS a sports fan, but never went while President.  It's trivial yes, but come on, how hard is it to get off your old ass and go to the most treasured college football we play???  They just get everything normal and easy, wrong.

Democrats need to stop chasing MSNBC talking points, and making their own for a change.  Stop walking lock step with university bubbled idiots, who came up with every bad far left idea that the populace have puked over lately.  Stop screaming about the bogeymen, and start advocating actual progress.  Stop hating on America, and start talking it up, and bring back some pride in this country and it's principles.  Kamala Harris was essentially terrible on all of these points.

Oh right, Academy mehhhhh.  It's also well beyond even Discovery's time period.

Lower Decks was tremendous.  Sadly this is what you get with streaming services, they cancel everything early.  The model is completely awful.  Would love to see it revived somewhere else.  Paramount is also in a financial crunch, and that has affected everything.  SNW is the lone continuing series now, with a move towards a full on Trek sitcom, including being written by Tawny Newsome from LD.

Hey Jerry, Mr. Rhys-Davies does not live in New Zealand!  Not in many years, he's home to the Isle of Man in the Irish Sea.  We could go all the way back to the Funny or Die video period, or further to when Bob Weiss was talking a Sliders movie.  Jerry has said this kind of thing aloud, but it's gone nowhere.  He infamously was asking fans (including me) how to get in touch with Tracy. 

https://deadline.com/2024/11/comcast-sp … 236181907/

On the subject, not sure if all are aware, but NBC like most networks has been taking a bath on its cable TV platform.  In fact, the CEO of Comcast has seriously floated splitting the company with cable channels going off, leaving NBC proper, Peacock, and Bravo with NBCU.  Wouldn't have a huge effect, but maybe the move will cause the new company to actually invest in programming again.  I mean, do USA or SyFy even broadcast new, scripted series anymore? 

What is needed, as I've said before, is a production studio or writer/producer to come forward with a pitchable concept.  This is what the team around Torme were looking to do.  Unfortunately, both Tracy and his producers were a tad "long in the tooth," and were not going to get much traction.  You need (yikes) a J.J. Abrams Bad Robot to get a script and pitch it.  Then when it's moved into pre-production, that's when the actors would be brought in.

59

(185 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

So I admittedly don't follow Marc Scott Zicree's channel "Mr. Sci-Fi," but I did stumble on his wonderful remembrance for his long time friend Michael Reaves, who passed away last year.  I wasn't aware of their strong friendship, and just how many animated shows and whatnot they wrote for.   Plus the level of passion and success that both of them have had for science fiction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItbdnktumoA

He also ran into Jerry O'Connell at a convention recently and did a short video of the two in a hallway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPZr0B5ntG8

60

(3,535 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

The election was in many cases inevitable.  Incumbents lost around the world, far worse in places like Britain, due to runaway inflation.  This was somewhat "delayed" by the Dobbs decision in 2022, which converted a likely red wave into a trickle, and clearly put Dem cheerleaders into a state of false hopes.  For one, midterms, and Dems should be poised for a comeback in '26, feature high-propensity voters in a larger way.  They are more educated, and afluent.  In the general, you get the "rank and file," people who don't bother to vote otherwise.  In the case of Trump, who has solely been responsible for an unprecedented turn out with his base for three general's now.  Yes, Harris improved slightly on some Biden demos, but lost on others.  Most of those losses wound up being in blue states (more on that later), and did not affect the outcome very much.  This was the case with the "red" Latino shift.  No, what got Trump elected was what worked in 2016.  He pushed a simpler message, albeit intertwined with idiocy and intolerance, but populism DOES work, to some extent.  That resulted in large-scale growth of his base, but he also mastered independent, late-deciding, and most of all, "new voters."  I myself will take the hit for dismissing the scattershot Musk-led approach of pushing low-information, low-engagement people, particularly younger men, into voting Trump.  This was highly evident in the large number of ticket splitting and Trump-only votes cast in BG states.  Harris and Democrats deserve credit for bucking a lot of this, to ensure that numerous Democrats won razor-thin races in Congress, which she lost. 

So what did it?  Well, I have digested copious amounts of Monday morning quarterbacking the last few weeks, and the consensus doesn't move far from the mean on what I feel are these main points....

1. Joe Biden lost this election.  Trump did a lot, as I point out above, to get the numbers to win it in a more decisive fashion, and a hand-cuffed Harris did all she could, in a comically short amount of time.  In reality, she had no chance.  Joe Biden passed some significant legislation during his first two years, no question, but most of it has and will continue to take time to get going.  Still, he made several poor decisions during that time which came back to haunt him.  All of which resulted in a horrible "wrong track" and Pres approval rating which NO incumbent party or Pres has ever won on. 

  a. Inflation.  Biden insisted on the massive "American Rescue Plan," a $1.9 TRILLION dollar stimulus, which on top of what Trump had doled out, likely superheated the economy, and exacerbated inflation.  Economists of all stripes warned against this.  Biden calculated that job growth was more important than anything, and while he still might be correct, the public was hit with inflation that half or more of the population had never experienced before.  I was a wee toddler when Carter's inflation broke his administration, and allowed Reagan to breeze in. 
  *I would point out that the Federal Reserve increased inflation by purchasing debt securities as protection against pandemic economic downturn.

  b. Dysfunction.  The Afghanistan withdrawal was a complete fiasco.  Yes, Trump set that on its way with his Taliban deal, and yes, the Afghan Army had given up.  However, bipartisan Congressional panels found that the US military's recommendations were countermanded by Biden's own impatience on the subject.  In the long run, the USA is better off being out, but the perception of dysfunction was very damaging.  Biden's foreign affairs continued to take a hit, when his initial Ukraine successes have morphed into a near three-year stalemate, as he's kept Ukraine from neither advancing nor ceding the battlefield, out of concern over a wider conflict.  Biden's strategy has been a failure, because Trump is likely months away from shifting course entirely anyway.  On Gaza, Biden's hard line against the IDF's systematic destruction of the Palestinian enclave, followed by attacks in Lebanon and Iran, have all followed Biden's hollow admonishments.  He and by virtue, Harris, have shown to be largely ineffective on the world stage.  Not that strong man Trump was any better prior, but world events have not gone their way.

  There was of course, nothing more dysfunctional than Joe Biden's immigration policy.  After the health order was struck down in 2021, his administration made an absolute, buffoonish move to take America's limited, and extremely specific asylum language, and throw it out the door.  This was down without Congressional approval, and resulted in a non-stop border incursion that officials did nothing to stem.  The policy completely blew up in their faces when DeSantis and Abbott decided to bus migrants to Northern "sanctuary cities,"  which were overwhelmed, and pissed millions of people off, primarily working class voters of color.  The lack of a plan or any kind of structure made Biden again look totally inept.

  c. "Lawfare." The four-sided indictments handed Donald Trump, a weakened candidate who was unsure of his future, and trailing Ron DeSantis badly, the GOP nomination.  Now, I don't know if you can "blame" Joe Biden for this or not, directly, but he certainly could have made a call, and not allowed it to happen.  I said at the time, this was risky.  The GA and NY cases were a complete joke, and one will never see the light of day, and the other is likely to be thrown out on appeal.  Those Democratic prosecutors bowed to party pressure to move forward, buoyed by the cover given from Jack Smith's dual-prosecutions.  Even there, only one of them had a real shot, the Jan 6th case, which the Supreme Court gutted regardless.  Again, Trump was flailing away to nothing when these prosecutors, plus the idiots in Colorado who tried to toss him from the ballot, only supercharged his campaign and made him a martyr. 

  d. Not dropping out.  Joe Biden got a lot done with Democrat majorities through 2022, he should have taken the hints, and moved aside.  I've said before, I'm not sure if ANY Democrat would eventually have beaten Trump with the wrong track numbers where they were.  But they had a chance, and those chances faded when Biden pressed on.  The result were near-constant gaffes, and the White House seemingly "hiding" the President from the public during the past two years.  Say what you will about Trump's lunacy during the pandemic, but he was visible and audible throughout.  To his detriment, but when voters had the choice, they decided that Trump's pandemic response, at the time one-sided towards the economy, was something they wanted more of now.  Harris was a good campaigner, but she was hand-cuffed.  She was given Biden's campaign team, the same team that managed to see him achieve abysmal approval ratings, and who's management came to an embarrassing conclusion with the June debate, and clearly advised her NOT to attack her boss.  The result was that swing voters saw her as "more of the same," and a non-starter.  A full primary process was needed, and not in August of 2024 but in 2023!!!  Biden's refusal to move aside doomed his party's ticket.  It made their "democracy" claim worthless, given that their candidate was nominated without a single vote.

Alright, enough shitting on Joe.  Is the Democrat Party dead?  LOL, of course not.  Even bad parties in a 50/50 country are still going to compete, you never know what the next big over-reach of the ruling party will be.  They always over-reach.  For me, there are two types of voter-movement which affected Democrats this time.

2. The swing voter, he or she of low-turnout, low-information, and low-engagement politically.  He or She who apparently cannot be accurately polled.  What DO these indecisive people care about?  Well this time around, it was the cost of living primarily.  Costs which Democrats have just not done much about, at least in a meaningful way.  Has anyone wondered why there is a massive, long-term move from blue states to red ones?  Yeah, yeah, there's cultural reasons, but that's not the cause.  The cause is money.  Places like California and New York, which shed citizens at record levels, did so because they are high tax, high cost environments.  They keep raising taxes and tolls, and people are not only tired of it, they cannot afford it.  This has been happening even before COVID, and the exodus is a major problem.  States like Texas, Florida, Carolinas, Tennessee, Georgia Arizona, etc, all will gain electoral votes, and they are increasingly tough for Democrats in.  There was a time when the Democrat Party was focuses on cost of living issues primarily, in additional to environment, public health, and education.  Well, they continue to fail on the first one.  Housing construction favors the wealthy, with lower income folks increasingly priced out and forced to move, weakening their voter base.  This is a national issue.

3. The higher propensity voter shift has continued to be an issue.  This began in 2016, and aside from a massive stay-at-home vote turnout from 2020, has gotten worse.  These are voters who vote semi-regularly, watch the news, discuss politics, and leaned center to left for most of their lives.  This voter has moved, and for this election, they flat out RAN away from the Democratic party.  They are not MAGA.  They are not Republican.  They are 1000% ANTI-WOKE.  That's right, the Democratic Party's allegiance to coastal, university wokism has ruined this party.  It has promoted an agency not of equality but equity, a reverse racism which even minorities themselves have polled as being against.  Terms like DEI were publicly admonished by growing legions of moderate and center-left individuals.  The backlash to corporate DEI was devastating. 

  Then there's the criminal justice aspect, which has been been maybe the most damaging to the left.  Beginning with canonizing George Floyd, Democrats in cities began to tie the hands of law enforcement.  The result was widespread crime, both petty and violent.  Added to the violence from some freely roaming migrants, almost all individuals having been stopped by police, only to be let back on the street due to progressive Judges.  Nowhere has this been more devastating than the metropolises of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and New York, where voters had massive pro-Trump shifts, and voted out a number of progressive mayors, district attorney's and others.  The cities have been turned into cesspools.  Suburban voters have been treated to non-stop coverage of the insanity for four years. 

  These voters and more are sick and tired with Wokism.  They are fed up with statues of Jefferson or Hamilton being removed and hidden from view.  They're fed up with drag queen story hour.  They're fed up with PRONOUNS.  They're fed up with being told what vaccines you must have, or masks you must wear.  Fed up with Columbus Day being converted to Indigenous Day.  Fed up with BOYS competing in GIRLS sports.  Fed up when the media does things like "hide the Hunter Biden laptop story" or cancel people for questioning public health decisions made, as it turned out, without scientific backing.  Most of all, they're fed up with the social media left calling them racists or transphobic or garbage, simply because the LEFT has invented new ways to Nanny-State people.  I was flippant to this myself, thinking well it's just MAGA whiners or libertarian martyrs.  NO, it's a significant portion of the population.  It's growing, and worse of all for Democrats, it's gaining MASSIVE ground with voters 30 and under, especially men.  When Joe Rogan laughs at some of the ridiculous nonsense the woke come out with, most of young America laughs WITH him.  Democrats will never come back significantly unless they divorce themselves from this idiotic wokism once and for all, as the future demographics are not in their favor on this.  You cannot have lousy economic conditions for young people (particularly men) AND put cultural dog collars and leashes on them.  George Orwell hath spoken.

So yeah, that was a LOT to read.  I expect Trump's Presidency to come up short on most of what he promised, as he's an awful manager of everything, and is surrounded by vultures.  He'll tire of Elon Musk quickly.  I'm most intrigued to see how long RFK Jr. lasts, as though I support a good part of his health platform, I cannot see where it goes.  Case in point, on the other night's Real Time series, while the panel, including noted health expert Dr. Casey Means, applauded Bobby Jr's initiatives, Bill Maher, the skeptic laughed.  When they all complained about America's ill health being driven by fast food, Bill stated the obvious, people eat McDonald's because it's "FUCKING DELICIOUS."  They all were incredulous, but once again, the comedian had it right.  Just like Joe Rogan or John Olliver or Dave Chappelle, always keep your ears open for the comics, because they are the first ones willing to say what the public cannot.  The woke have attacked them to no end, I wonder why?  They saw through the B.S.