Oh wow you're rolling through it!

And yeah I agree.  I guess if their goal is to make it even more grounded than "grounded" versions of Batman, then Riddler just wearing green is pretty wacky.  But that's my problem with the villains.  If they're so watered down that they don't resemble the characters in any meaningful way, just have this be a show where Batman fights organized crime and no costumed villains appear at all.  I think the quality would be exactly the same.

To be fair, I haven't seen the last episode of season 2.  Maybe Joker is more Jokery there.

I also found it very odd that the whole first season led up to Batman saying (spoiler), but then season two just ignores that growth.

Have any of us watched Caped Crusader on Amazon Prime?  It's by Bruce Timm, but I feel like they've gone in a totally different direction from Batman: the Animated Series.  I think my biggest concern with the show is the villains.  I'm not bothered by the gender-swapping or the race-swapping, but I do feel like they might have altered the villains to the point where they're "in name only" equivalents.  I struggled with Joker and Riddler, especially.

Anyone else?

3

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Well, I do think this is all cyclical.  Bush led to Obama.  Obama led to Trump.  What will Trump lead to?  The pendulum has to swing back.  Is that AOC?  Is that DSA? 

Sometimes I get frustrated at how this can all be fixed.  But America healed after a true Civil War.  Germany healed after putting the original Nazis in power and then again when it was split in two after World War II.  Countries seemingly come back from this type of stuff a lot.

I still maintain that Trump and his ego are the problem.  I'm not saying there aren't fascists behind Trump ready to take the next step, but I think Trump offers a specific problem because he's so charismatic, he gets so many people who don't normally vote to vote, and he is litigious with the money to back up his lawsuits.  I don't think anyone else is going to have that combination anytime soon.  JD Vance has almost none of that.

So just calmly waiting for _________

I guess, but what was the meaning that was wiped out other than the lessons that Spock learned through the dream (which aren't undercut)?  All the characters were cartoonish and silly versions of themselves, and I'm not sure any of the non-Spock characters learned anything other than "you got to think outside the box."  Maybe T'Pring learned that she should lighten up a little?  But Vulcans usually don't show much character development anyway, and I don't know if T'Pring even needs to learn that lesson.  The crew missed out on getting to float around in space, but that's not something they'd ever get to do in real life anyway.

I guess my point is that I thought the whole episode was dumb (if not dumb fun), and I'm glad that it was essentially written off at the end.  I'd rather have a dumb/fun episode that is pointless than a dumb/fun episode that stretches the line beyond the point of insanity.

But that's just my opinion.

5

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Well I think the good news about Republican media is that I think they have everyone already they're going to get.  When a Trump official or republican congressman goes on Fox News and lies about the state of the world, they're preaching to the choir.  I cannot imagine a ton of people are being converted back into MAGA people by Republican media.  2024 was a time when people had forgotten the first Trump presidency, and they were sick enough of Democrats and Biden to take any offramp.

Now, people remember.  Trump has seemingly lost almost all his Hispanic support in two years, and young people are getting more and more disillusioned.  Democrats are winning in a lot of places they lost in 2024, and they're making places that were deep red competitive.  And none of the Republicans can dare to try and split the middle and speak out against what Trump is doing.  So those brainwashed Fox News people are the only ones who will vote for them.

I think if this were any other midterm in my lifetime, it would be a bloodbath.  The Democrats would take the House and the Senate.  They'd win state legislatures and governorships and local races up all over the country.  I think there's a real shift away from Trump and his BS.  But Trump controls law enforcement and the mail and every branch of the government.  I'm still not convinced he won't manufacture something to delay or postpone or cancel the election.  If he can't stop the election, he'll stop certain people from voting.  If he can't do that, he'll try and overturn elections he lost.

Maybe all that will fail.  Trump is slower and I'm not 100% sure he cares about congress.  Maybe he won't bother.  But I just cannot find enough hope to believe that things will look better in three or five months.

Tell your fellow Canadians that we're sorry.  And hopefully sanity can return in 2028 and we can be friends again.

*******

If sanity returns, I'm most excited here on August 24, 2026 to vote for Ossoff in two years.  He has Gavin Newsom's fire without all the other Gavin Newsom traits.

Yeah, I think the ending did save it, but that's why I compared it to sliders seasons 3-5.  Sliders wanted to do a vampire episode so they manufactured a reason for there to be vampires.  SNW wants to do noir or a musical or puppets and manufactures a reason for that to happen.  I think it's always entertaining and well done, but I just wish they'd do a standard TNG-like "mission of the week" episode more often.

Is Strange New Worlds too silly?

Its very clear that these guys love their work and love each other and have a ton of fun, but it's somehow more cartoonish than Lower Decks.  Well, maybe at least as cartoonish.

I think it's still well done and fun, but it feels like Legends of Tomorrow.  Or even seasons 3-5 of Sliders in the ways it stretches the premise to do wacky things just so they can do wacky things.

8

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Things continue to look better for the midterms, but I just cannot bring myself to believe it will do any good.  Polls keep coming out showing Talarico close or even ahead, but it's still way closer than it has any right being.  Paxton is having to make up AI stuff to even have any attacks on Talarico, and there will be millions of my fellow Texans who will vote for Paxton anyway despite all the reasons not to.

But even if Talarico gets more votes, I think Texas will try to do something crazy.  And who will stop them?

I'm excited.  I'm nervous.  I don't know what to expect.  But when you see how underwater Trump is with so many groups of people that he dominated with in 2024, I don't see how this isn't a bloodbath under almost any circumstance.  And what if, this time, the polls are undersampling the anger and the disapproval?

9

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Very sad to hear that Hayden Panettiere passed away.  Also very sad to hear about some of the struggles she's had in recent years.  I think we occasionally think of these pretty blonde girls as having the whole world, and it's important to remember that everyone has demons.

I hope she finds the peace in death that she could not find in life.

10

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

I think including Frank is an interesting choice because he's woefully unable to help Peter with any of the villains he faces.  I do think they did the best they could to bring Frank into a PG-13 movie - I thought he cursed a lot for a family-friendly movie.  Maybe not the exact language that he would use in One Last Kill or Daredevil, but I'd say he was 95% of the cursing in the movie?  He was toned down but I wouldn't say they sanitized him all that much.

I wonder if this movie would've been better if it had been Daredevil instead of Punisher.  Daredevil, you gotta think, would have a better ability to fight Jean, and he'd have a better chance of surviving against the Hulk.  I wonder if Destin Daniel Cretton requested Punisher or if Feige pushed for Punisher.

I think if you're cool with Jean's characterization, then that was my major concern with the film.  I know Nando v Movies loved Brand New Day, and he's a huge X-Men fan.  If he wasn't upset about Jean, I probably shouldn't be either.

11

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I really enjoyed Spider-Man: Brand New Day

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

I thought it was a really thoughtful movie that used a lot of MCU characters to make the world feel lived in and real.  I thought the performances were really good, the direction was great, and the story was a lot of fun.  It was really nice to see that Peter would go to Yelena for help with intel, to Bruce for help with science, to Frank with help on strategy.  It probably does the best job of using the shared universe in a really long time.

I don't have a ton of negative things to say, but a few things sorta bothered me.  Maybe just enough to bump it down to a 9.5/10.  I really liked it.

- Jean Grey.  Going in, that's who I assumed she would be.  But as the movie went on, I wondered if maybe I'd been tricked.  So when it was revealed, I was a little torn.  I don't read almost any X-Men comics, but do we think comic Jean Grey would do all the things that Jean does in this movie?  There were a couple of things that she did (putting civilians in danger and taking over MJ) that felt crueler than the Jean Grey that I know from movies and the cartoons.  I understand a) she was angry and b) she can change and be redeemed, but she could've easily killed dozens (hundreds?  thousands?) of people with her actions in this movie.  And I don't know if she came off as smart or impressive, either.  I think she probably could've been honest with Peter about 1/3 of the way through the movie and saved herself a lot of trouble.  I also worry about the whole body-snatcher aspect.  My understanding is that she can't traditionally do that.

- I'm still a little blown away by the lack of Sam Wilson in Phases 4-6.  He was in Falcon and the Winter Soldier, and he was in Brave New World.  I think it would've made the Multiverse saga better if he was in 10 of these movies.  He should've been the Nick Fury of these movies, and I'm just not entirely sure why he's been almost completely absent for most of this.  If Sam is really doing some kind of secondary Avengers, why wouldn't Peter go to him?  I don't know which Avengers that Peter has spent any time with, but unless Yelena is way easier to get in contact with, he's at least fought next to Sam and Scott.  It would just be nice to have any information on what Sam is doing.

- No references to Daredevil: Born Again.  The same city that voted in Wilson Fisk is cheering on Peter all movie?

- I liked the Spider-Man post-credits, but I would've loved to have something with Jean teasing the X-Men, but it sounds like they don't have their ducks in a row to do that yet.

But great movie.  Really loved it.  Probably the best movie of this whole saga if I'm being honest.  Would love another several Tom Holland Spider-Man movies.  Maybe two more before they introduce Miles and then a couple Peter and Miles movies before Tom steps away.

12

(2 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I was on Tubi and Sliders popped up.  I watched the Pilot for the first time in years.  Such a fun time smile

I really like Tom King.  I enjoyed his run on Batman, which I read recently, and I've enjoyed a lot of his one-off stories (Vision, Human Target, etc, although the one I haven't read is Mister Miracle).

I guess when I say adapt it, I'm referring to the artwork.  The art in Woman of Tomorrow is so striking, and it seems like all that color got washed out for the movie.  A YouTuber I like quite a bit, Nando v Movies, said the worst thing that could've happened to Supergirl was Project Hail Mary.  That movie has a sequence that is so bright and colorful and would've fit in perfectly in a Woman of Tomorrow adaptation.  Then the movie comes out and it's all brown and gray.  I haven't seen it so maybe that's a function of the story, but the story in Woman of Tomorrow is heavy and sad and depressing a lot, but there's still plenty of color and wonder.

And I agree that the dialogue in the book wouldn't translate, but it's also mostly voiceover.  A lot would have to be translated to dialogue, but I think a lot of the feel and look of the story could've been preserved.  Maybe it was.  I hope to see it next week.

It was getting attacked because of something Milly Adcock said about male fans.  I haven't seen it yet.  The most disappointing thing is that I really like the comic it's loosely based on, and I hear it isn't a super faithful adaptation.  Which is sad because it probably could've had the Zach Snyder Watchmen treatment and been pretty great.

But I'm hoping to see it in the next couple of weeks.

15

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

I like that explanation.  I like the idea of a prequel, but a prequel wouldn't offer any explanation as to where Frank was during Born Again season 2.  And yours covers that.

Another weird continuity thing.  As far as I can remember, Frank has been clean shaven in the four seasons of MCU television.  He's certainly clean shaven at the end of Born Again season 1.  He has a beard in One Last Kill which makes sense because, prequel or sequel to his last appearance, he's really struggling.

But why does he have the beard at the end when he's re-embraced being the Punisher?  Especially since he's clean shaven in Brand New Day.  I know he could've easily shaved in between these products and maybe he just temporarily likes the beard even if he's focused himself again.  But it would've been something to tie the projects together.

All in all, I still think it was great.  I still think it should've been a movie.

16

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Follow up to my note yesterday:

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

I've seen it said that there's a chance the Punisher special either a) takes place before Daredevil Born Again Season 1 or b) takes place entirely in Frank's head.

I think both are plausible and might explain some of the incongruity with the rest of the MCU (even just the Daredevil corner of the MCU).  It would've been nice if that would've been referenced.  If it is a prequel, I'm going to have the head canon that it takes place during the Blip which is why everyone is crazy and on edge smile

17

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Punisher: One Last Kill

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

The Good - It's really well done.  Gets you in the mind of Frank Castle.  They also don't hold back - they didn't "Disney-fy" the character, and there's some dark material you wouldn't expect from the MCU.

The Bad - It's short.  It's 51 minutes with extended credits (no post or mid credits).  By the time you feel like it's getting going, it's over.  This could've certainly been a theatrical movie with one more act if they wanted.  I also feel like it's super small on plot.  It feels like 75% of a movie with a huge action set piece missing.

The Cinematic Universe - It's crazy.  This story does literally nothing to explain why Frank was missing in Daredevil, does nothing to follow up on what happened in Daredevil, and does nothing to set up Frank in Spider-Man.  There's no reference to Matt or the AVTF or Fisk or anything.  There's one reference to the bigger world (that I caught, maybe there's more) but this is 100% an isolated story.  Which is fine.  I don't think everything needs to be connected to the bigger universe, and I'm glad they told a story (albeit one that feels truncated) that they wanted to tell.

And honestly, I'm more upset about Daredevil avoiding MCU connections than I am the Punisher.  Frank kinda does his own thing and is on a side quest.  But for Frank to be absent from Daredevil entirely and then to show up here with no ties to anything before or after just feels odd.  I really thought they might end this with Frank thinking he went too far and promising his family that he'll tone it down.  So when he shows up in Spider-Man, he's a little more toned down.  But nope.  Not how it ends.

Which is fine.  Maybe Spider-Man explains it.  Or maybe it doesn't.  Or maybe Frank somehow isn't toned down.  It's just a little bizarre to me that you have a character who was literally just absent for the whole season (but still referenced...like "don't forget about this guy, he'll be back soon") and is about to be a part of your big summer movie, and you make no effort to connect those two things.

I get that Berthal wrote this and it's a character piece for Frank.  But you have a short runtime.  You can add ten minutes to this with fan service and it's still only one hour.  Say what Frank was doing during Born Again season 2.  Mention what happened to Fisk and/or the disbanding of the AVTF.  Wherever Frank starts Spider-Man Brand New Day, bridge that gap.

You have this cinematic universe and you have this playground, and then you don't use it.  It just feels super weird to me.  You don't need Sam Wilson to show up and beat up a gangbanger, but I just don't understand why this happens.

Also, on another note.  Jon Berthal and Ebon Moss-Bachrach literally just filmed a special presentation for FX with a road trip sidequel of the Bear.  Ebon Moss-Bachrach plays the Thing and is tied in with Marvel.  Ebon Moss-Bachrach played Microchip in season one of the Netflix Punisher.  How did Ebon Moss-Bachrach not cameo in this???

18

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Although I'll be fascinated to see if anything from Daredevil (other than Frank himself) is referenced in that movie.

Spoilers for Daredevil

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

Well, season 2 wrapped up in a way where almost nothing from Daredevil would need to be addressed, unless its something in passing about what Peter did during the Safer Streets Initiative.  I gotta think, in terms of the show, that Peter was not considered a vigilante (meaning that Kingpin has a better relationship with Spider-Man than in the comics).  And I would think that Peter either didn't have any way of getting to Matt, or he was hesitant to get involved (maybe he sees Matt and Frank as dangerous).

I would be super interested in knowing what Peter did during that time, but I doubt it ever gets addressed in anything.

19

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I have been seeing a lot of discourse in the media about Dr. Doom in Doomsday.  They're comparing him to Thanos, and people are saying "the MCU built up Thanos for ten years" but there's been almost no reference to Dr. Doom. 

First off, I agree that it's a bit of a waste.  I don't want to rush Dr. Doom, and I think there was a lot of wasted opportunity with phases four to six.

But I guess my main response is "Thanos was barely in the movies until Infinity War." - he was in a couple of post-credits, and he was in one scene in Guardians.  This wasn't exactly Darth Vader until he finally made his move.  I think one of the strengths of the MCU was creating these heroes and their relationships to each other, and how they end up working together.

And I don't think a villain needs to be set up.  99% of all villains are introduced in the movie they're in.  It doesn't take a ton of work to set up a great villain.  The Joker in the Dark Knight is completely set up in the opening five minutes.  He's in one movie with no other set up, and he's one of the best comic book villains ever.

So did the MCU drop the ball with Kang and maybe rush Dr. Doom?  Absolutely.  But is that necessarily a problem?  I don't think so.

20

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

That's nuts.

Although fun fact: Jodie Sweetin was one of my first ever celebrity crushes smile

21

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I think one of the issues with the MCU in this regard is the lack of costumed supervillains.  A lot of the villains in the MCU are forgettable, one-off guys who fight the heroes away from the public.  So even if they wear a costume like the heroes, the public may never see that.  In the comics, I believe (and correct me if I'm wrong) that Jameson usually villainizes Spider-Man by saying he's in league with the villains he fights.  Another costumed villain.  So that could distinguish him from the Avengers that operate in the same city.  There really isn't a way for Fisk to claim that because who's he going to say Daredevil is in league with?  All the MCU villains are dead or reformed smile

I also think there would be some kind of push for Daredevil to register under the Sokovia Accords, but I don't even know if that's still a thing. 

I'm not too upset about any of it, really.  One, because I think season 2 has been good enough that I'm not thinking about it.  And two, because I think this problem in the MCU extends way beyond Daredevil.  I think, since Endgame, the universe has felt fractured.  Some of it wasn't the MCU's fault (Covid and Jonathan Majors are the most to blame) but it's just weird that the universe has felt less connected as they spread things out.  The more characters they have, you'd think there'd be more crossovers, not less.

22

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Andy Weir's stories make me feel optimistic about the future.  There's a scene in the Martian book (I don't know if it's in the movie or not, I can't remember) where the international community gets together and works to get supplies to save Watney.  I can't remember exactly, but I'm pretty sure the Chinese Space Agency donates a bunch of stuff, including a rocket mission they were doing for themselves.  It's basically said "all of us are smart and even though we might have political differences, this is more important than any of that."

There's also the scene from the trailer, which may be from the book, where Watney says "Every human being has a basic instinct: to help each other out. If a hiker gets lost in the mountains, people will coordinate a search. If a train crashes, people will line up to give blood. If an earthquake levels a city, people all over the world will send emergency supplies. This is so fundamentally human that it's found in every culture without exception. Yes, there are assholes who just don't care, but they're massively outnumbered by the people who do."

I think we need more of that to "flood the zone."

23

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Yeah, I think I understand the government's perspective, but I guess I'm talking about citizens.  In 99% of the show, Daredevil doesn't interact with normal citizens.  Neither do any of the other main characters.  But in 1% of the show, BB is dealing directly with citizens.

And this is a world where people have been familiar with superheroes for 20+ years.  And outside of the events leading to Civil War, the superheroes of the world have been mostly positive.  The timeline is muddled, but superheroes saved the city of New York very recently.  Now maybe every person in this world can clearly delineate Captain America from Daredevil.  Just like people in our world can clearly delineate "Abolish ICE" from "Defund the Police." 

I think those segments would be a great way for the show to directly show that delineation, but I can also see why the show might not want to muddy the waters or cause issues for, say, Spider-Man Brand New Day.  Although I'll be fascinated to see if anything from Daredevil (other than Frank himself) is referenced in that movie.

24

(954 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I am really enjoying Daredevil season 2.  I think the show flows really well, and it doesn't have any of the tug-of-war that happened last year because of the different showrunners making the show.

But I really wish this felt like the MCU.  I don't know what the timeline is, but this is a universe where Spider-Man is out there.  This is a universe where the Sentry/Void attacked not too long ago.  This is a universe that is still only a decade or two away from the Chitauri attack and less than ten years from the Snap.  I think the show needs to try and reference how people are reconciling their hatred of vigilantes in a world where Captain America fought aliens in the streets.

I wonder if having someone like Sam Wilson guest star on the show would help.  Maybe Sam even joins Fisk on the "vigilantes are bad" train because Sam wants people to fight in the light.  If not Sam, maybe Walker?  I don't know.  It would make the universe feel a lot more cohesive.  Instead, it just feels like this takes place in a different universe.  I'm sure the comics have the same problem, and I assume they also sorta ignore it.  But I would love to see the show address it.  Even if it's in a BB segment with someone saying "I love Captain America, but these vigilantes are just criminals giving superheroes a bad name"

And since they've addressed so many flaws from season one, I guess they just want to live in their own space.  I guess I'll be interested to see if anything from Daredevil makes it into Spider-Man Brand New Day.

25

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Well, I can see how it cost so much.  The Rocky puppet probably wasn't super expensive (I can see why you might not have liked it but I found it charming), but there's some breathtaking CGI stuff.  The Adrian planet was so beautiful that I've heard people insulting the Supergirl movie for looking so boring.  I didn't think it looked like a generic blockbuster like Fast and the Furious or whatever.

One thing I like about Andy Weir is the emphasis on trusting smart people and figuring out solutions to problems that seem impossible.  I think we need that right now so I'm also glad a lot of people are seeing this movie and thinking about those things.

26

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I'm pretty naive about stuff a lot of the time.  To me, I still think that people are drawn to law enforcement to do good.  So when I see stuff like Kingpin crushing the commissioner's head in front of a bunch of officers, my first thought is usually "surely someone will speak out against this."  Even in our world where we've seen ICE step well out of their bounds, I think the officers are working on a system of morals, however twisted that might be.  They hate immigrants and some are looking for an excuse to do violence, but I have to believe that there's a limit to that.  Obviously they're okay with using force (lethal and nonlethal) against immigrants (legal, illegal, and even suspected), but I would think they'd draw the line at arresting a bunch of white kids for seemingly no reason.

I assume people in the AVTF hate vigilantes and that's why they joined, but how can so many of them twist that philosophy into "okay let's kill a boat full of innocent workers we know aren't vigilantes."  Even in the face of *waves wildly all around*, I have to believe that most people are good and most people, no matter how much they might hate certain people, think that killing is wrong.  Even if they're okay with other people killing, they'd be hesitant to do it themselves.

All that is to say I'm hoping to see more defects from the AVTF.  I'm also not 100% sure I agree with recruitment staying high when the AVTF are actively being targeted by someone superpowered.  Do people like legally roughing up poor people enough to risk getting a fork thrown through their eyes?  I would assume once it got out that Bullseye was targeting officers, a bunch of people (especially the type of people ICE seems to be recruiting) would bail.  I would think they'd only be doing it because they feel like there would be no consequences, but Bullseye is dishing out a lot of consequences.  Throw in whatever Frank is doing and whatever Fisk says Daredevil is doing, and I can't imagine they'd be able to replace officers as quickly as Bullseye is dealing with them.  But again naive.

I do think the show is making super obvious parallels to Trump with Fisk, but I still think I'd prefer Fisk to Trump.  Fisk is a bad guy, but he's a bad guy who seems to care about people on some level.  I think Fisk is willing to work toward making things better with the intention of getting rich and powerful as a result.  I think Trump only cares about himself,  and he doesn't care on any level if things get better for people.  I think Trump might even make things intentionally worse sometimes just because he thinks its funny.  I legitimately think Trump is a worse supervillain that Fisk.

*******

So Trump's approval rating continues to plummet, and special elections keep going the Democrats' way.  I'm starting to get a little more optimistic that it could be a good midterms as long as Trump doesn't do anything totally crazy.

I've been a little relieved to see that Democrats aren't completely abandoning races in dark red areas like they have in the past. I'm hoping they're learning that they need to go after every race no matter how conservative or how small the race is, and I'm hoping they have some kind of plan to keep any of these gains they've gotten.  To recover from Trump, the Democratic party needs to be reaching out to disillusioned Trump voters and then they need to deliver for them.  I've said it before, but the Democratic Party needs to be able to transform itself into the party of the working class again, even if it means abandoning some really important stuff.  If there's a madman with a gun running around, you can't be too concerned with the fire code, even if the building is actively on fire.  Handle one issue at a time.  And right now, I think Democrats could do well with going all in on economic populism and saving social issues for a later day.

I don't know how likely it will be that the Democrats won't fumble this, but I'm using up what hope I have left that they can do it.

27

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I think that's totally fair.  Not everyone loves everything, and you don't have to like something because other people like it.  I loved it, but I can totally see where there might be leaps of logic to people who haven't read the book.  The story is also a bit samey to The Martian.  I started reading Artemis, Andy Weir's second and less successful book, and it's very different.  So I do feel like he went back to the well with a very capable and sarcastic protagonist.

But I'm a sucker for that kind of stuff.

28

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Spoilers for the movie in case you don't want to know anything.

DieselMickyDolenz wrote:

I had questions while watching that maybe the book addressed, but they didn't want to spend time on answering in the film, but nothing that bothered me to the point that it took me out of the experience.

The issue I could see if you're someone who didn't read the book is that Grace seems to get so much done so easily, it seems.  He generates a communication device for Rocky in what seems like a couple of hours.  He hands Rocky a clock and then suddenly they can have a normal conversation.

But in the book, that process takes forever and is a million steps.  The clock is an introduction to mathematics.  Grace learns that Rocky's numbers aren't base ten.  Through a lot of trial and error, they are able to create a mechanism to talk to each other.

The book is a ton of trial and error.  The movie just shows him getting it right.  Which makes sense - the movie is already pretty long with him jumping straight to the right answer.  At the end, Grace figures out that the Taumeba has leaked out into his fuel supply, but that takes pages and pages in the book.  He has to figure out what is going on, why its happening, and then he makes a decision.  The movie jumps straight to what is happening because it's already been 2:15 of movie and they gotta wrap it up.

Nothing is really removed but they do gloss over a lot in the interest of time.  But if you don't know that Grace actually does the work off screen, I could see how people might be turned off by how easily Grace seems to do a lot of fantastical stuff.

People love Project Hail Mary and I don't understand it.  I have no doubt, I am the one who is wrong though.

Genuinely curious what you didn't like about it and especially if it was what I just talked about.

29

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I saw Project Hail Mary last week, and it's really stuck with me.  Great adaptation of a really great book.  I don't think they could've done a better job adapting it.

Spoilers as well

Yeah I agree with all those points.  I wonder why Darem's species had to have a second look anyway.  He only does it once the whole season - couldn't he still look human but have extra powers?  Superman doesn't have a second look.

I had the same thought about the Doctor.  I watched the TrekCulture easter egg videos, and the host remarked that the Doctor didn't even deal with that trauma in Voyager.  So it's weird that it bothered him so long after.  It's also weird that he didn't choose a name, despite that being a thing he did in the Endgame timeline.

One thing about new Trek that bothered me (also brought up by TrekCulture) is that everything has to be a galaxy-threatening event.  Even with the Klingon stuff, the idea that the Klingons (who seemingly owned a huge chunk of the galaxy) were nearly wiped out by the Burn is a little crazy.  Wouldn't it have been just as good if they'd simply been weakened because they weren't technologically impaired?

I get that it's fun and exciting to have some new rules and new players, but I just wish it felt more familiar.

What did we think of Starfleet Academy season one?  I think the story was good and the characters were compelling.  I struggled with something that we've struggled a lot with in this era of Trek - going on missions.  I would've probably preferred, that if we were doing a campus that is also a ship, that they were going around doing missions.  And the students were either observers or active participants.

And I don't know what it is about the new century, but I'm struggling to feel comfortable with how things work in this time period.  I know we spent a lot of time in the TNG era, but it felt like we understood where everyone is and who the major players are and all that.  We know that the Federation was fractured.  We know that the Klingons are almost gone.  The Romulans and Vulcans have reunified.  But are things in such disarray in the Federation that everyone's kinda focused on themselves?  So the Cardassians or the Ferengi are out there but also cleaning up their own space?  It just feels like the villains in a lot of these seasons (even like in Picard) are pirates and random small sects that are causing issues.

32

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Yeah a comics podcast I listen to was talking about Netflix being the "least bad" option.  They're all bad (including the current ownership of Warner Bros.) but they aren't as overtly political.

33

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Oh cool, so Trump and Ellison got to snatch up Warner Bros.  This will be great for everyone.

34

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I'm sure companies will get a refund, but you never will (and prices will stay high either way). Trump needs to fund the system with $10 billion so the tariffs will always be around even if they keep getting struck down.

35

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

If I had faith in free and fair elections, this would look terrible for Republicans.  They're basically forced to hope that people don't watch the videos or are willing to be fully lied to.  They're also walking a fine line with their second amendment base by speaking out against people carrying legally in Minnesota.  It'll be interesting if Democrats can find some common ground (that Republicans are forced to take) and can get some gun control stuff passed.  But while the Republicans are being pretty evil, the Democrats have been completely unable to seize the moment.

In fact, polling suggests that Kamala Harris would be the frontrunner to win the 2028 nomination.  As happy as I was to vote for her in 2024, I think it would be a disaster if she were the nominee in 2028.  To me, the only candidate is Newsom because he's been the only one to stand up to Trump and beat him at his own game.  I think they'd have a real chance to pick up some of the apolitical people who voted for Trump.  Those people only care about Trump's "alpha male personality" and that's where Newsom has been hitting Trump.  Since those people don't care about issues, they should have no issue jumping from Trump to Newsom.  But they'd never vote for Harris.

Trump has historically low approval ratings.  The optics for all the stuff he's doing is failing except for his ultraloyal base.  JD Vance keeps embarrassing himself and fighting with MAGA people. The signs are there for this whole house of cards to collapse.  But with full control of the government, I think Trump has a thousand avenues to put his thumb on the scale, and I think he will use at least one of them.

36

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I have not, but I have 3 months free of Apple TV so maybe I'll add it to the list.

37

(196 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Grizzlor wrote:

Made me watch this interview now.   blehhhhhhh.  Well I didn't think it was that bad, just dumb.  Conan as he always did took a number of her flat comments and improved some zingers.  Far from the "worst interview of all-time," that's for sure.  I mean, there's Vince McMahon vs. Bob Costas in the ethos, after all.  Kari was always pretty ditzy in public, that's for sure.  Anyway, I found the segment awkward but Conan produced several good laughs.  idk what she was trying for there, but bombed, oh well

This was sorta how I felt watching it myself.  She was super awkward but Conan was able to salvage it.  They usually do planning for these interviews so I don't know if Kari went off script or if she was just bad at it.

But she certainly came off as bad and unlikeable.  I think she's lucky to have had any sort of career at all.

38

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I was never the biggest fan, and I would always sorta drag my feet restarting it.  But I was always pleasantly surprised at how much fun it was and how much I liked the characters.  I don't think it was ever my favorite show, but I think I genuinely liked just about every episode.

Oooh, how are you liking For All Mankind?  It took me a few episodes to get into it, but I've really enjoyed it.

39

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Grizzlor wrote:

I enjoyed the final season, it was a bit dumb story wise, but honestly, how many times can you have the same villain to defeat.

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

I thought it was a bit unrealistic that this group of kids was able to cross a wormhole into an alien world and defeat a huge monster and a wizard without anyone even getting hurt.  I think most of the people that went on that final mission were probably unnecessarily in danger, but I think they all earned their hero moment for story's sake.

Dumb, yes.  But I thought it worked.

40

(723 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I finished Stranger Things.  I think I heard that people didn't like the finale, but I thought it was good.  And while I don't think this was ever my favorite show, I was always impressed and surprised at how much I liked it.

I look forward to whatever the Duffer Brothers do next.

Anyone else watch it?

41

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I know I sound like a broken record here, but I just can't get myself too worked up about this.  Trump won.  The people who voted for Trump are going to have higher costs for goods and healthcare and lower wages and less jobs and the same level of taxes, and they don't care.  The "America First" and "No New Wars" people don't seem to care.  The only person who seems to care is Marjorie Taylor Greene.  I know Trump's approval rating is low, but he has a rock-solid floor that will support him no matter what.  And as long as that floor consistently votes how Trump wants in primaries, no one is going to turn against him.

It's just very depressing.  We're not even a full year into this, and he's got so many more fights he wants to start.  He owns Congress, he owns the courts, he owns the police, he owns the military.  It's Trump's world, and we have to live in it.

42

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Oh I know that Putin doesn't care about how many Russians die, but there aren't an unlimited number of Russians to fight for him.  Maybe they only lost the worst of their fighters, but I have to think that losing 250,000 soldiers would risk whatever fight Putin has in mind next.  Whatever military hardware was lost would have to be replaced.  Training hundreds of thousands of new soldiers takes time.

So even if Putin gets total victory in Ukraine, isn't he weakened for whatever is next?

***********

Interesting article came out that was trying to spin Trump's physical deterioration as nothing.  But it ended up increasing speculation that the guy isn't doing well.  What I can't understand is that a stubborn man in his late 70s who refuses to take care of himself and is popping all kinds of pills, eats like a pig, and never works out is still walking around.  Even with being a) rich and b) president, Trump said himself that he doesn't listen to his doctors' medical advice.  So when his lead doctor is telling him he's the healthiest person he's ever met and he's eating like he's 17, does having the best medical team in the world help?

So is Trump's body surviving just to make me angry?

43

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

So I think Putin won the war in Ukraine as soon as Trump won.  It's painfully obvious that Trump is doing whatever Putin wants, and Trump is so in love with Putin that it's crazy that the media won't call him out on it.  When Trump said that he'd win the war on day one, that's the promise that I figured he'd keep because Trump would do anything, including sending US ground troops to fight alongside Russia, to get Putin the win.

The fact that we're almost a year into Trump's presidency and Zelenskyy is alive is incredible to me.  He's the guy I felt the worst for when Trump won.

So I think it's just a matter of time until a) Trump forces Zelenskyy to take a deal and b) Putin breaks the deal and insists on more land.  Two of the three people in this are negotiating in bad faith, and Zelenskyy is trying to straddle the line between saving his people and saving his country.

One thing I sorta disagreed with in the article is that there haven't really been any consequences.  I think this war has highlighted the idea that Russia is a huge military superpower.  I know invading any country is difficult, but if Russia was as powerful militarily as people thought, this war should've been over years ago.  The only thing propping Putin up is nuclear weapons.  If nuclear weapons suddenly disappeared, I wonder where Russia would even rank in the world in terms of military strength.

I also wonder how much this has set Russia back.  I know that Russia has a collective spirit to fight for Russia, but their supply of soldiers isn't infinite.  250,000 soldiers can't be easily replaced, I wouldn't think.  All the military hardware they've lost will have to be replaced.  Maybe it's no big deal, but I just can't imagine it's not.

44

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

So Trump is doing something really dumb at the moment, which is to say that "affordability is a con job."  Now he's already pivoting away from it, but telling people the economy is great when people know that it isn't is such a dumb strategy that would never work, no matter how charismatic you are.  The solution here seems to be simple and something Trump does with everything else - which is to blame Biden.  I think he could get 2-3 years of runway out of his base if he blames Biden.  He does this as well when he says "we inherited the worst economy of all time" or whatever nonsense he spews, but telling people that are struggling that they're not struggling is very dumb, even for Trump.

Especially when the people who elected him are going to struggle a ton.  The "I know how to get elected but have no idea how to govern" crowd continues to shoot themselves in the foot.

Another interesting thing I've been thinking about.

2024 - Republican
2020 - Democrat
2016 - Republican
2012 - 2012 - Democrat (Incumbent)
2008 - Democrat
2004 - Republican (Incumbent)
2000 - Republican
1996 - Democrat (Incumbent)
1992 - Democrat
1988 - Republican
1984 - Republican (Incumbent)
1980 - Republican

In other words, we flip flop in every election since 1988, which was the last time that the presidency stayed in the same party with a different candidate.  Not only that, we're getting more impatient.  We used to give the president the full 8 years, but we aren't doing that anymore.

If we have fair elections in 2028, not great for JD Vance.  And it might mean that incumbents don't have the same protections they used to have either.

45

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Grizzlor wrote:

On perhaps the most insane front, we are now bombing Venezuelan cocaine cartels and threatening to illegally depose the dictator there.  While Trump pardons a Honduran former president and convicted cocaine trafficker.  I feel as though this may be the biggest story to come.  What is this lunatic doing?  An invasion of Venezuela is not even popular with MAGA.

I do feel like Trump is losing it.  He called Walz the R word.  He said "affordability is a con job" when people are struggling to afford stuff.  I think he's shedding voters, and I think his mental decline is getting to him.  I also wonder if Trump's alternate reality is starting to get to him.  If he truly believes that the economy is incredible and prices are way down and that his approval rating is 90%+, then it probably would be maddening to get questions about things.

But at the end of the day, it doesn't matter.  The fact that we were right about Trump being old and crazy doesn't matter.  He's president and will be for three more years.  I don't have any faith that anyone would try to usher him out of office, and he could have an approval rating of 0% and it wouldn't matter.  I think it's a foregone conclusion that the Democrats would win the House if we have elections next year (and maybe the Senate based on how terrible elections are going for Republicans - look at the Tennessee election yesterday).  But who cares?  As Grizzlor said, Trump doesn't need Congress to do anything he's trying to do, and the Republican Congress isn't doing anything anyway.

The only thing that would change things is if Trump's monkey heart gives out, but even if it does, Vance being less crazy will maybe lead to slightly more sanity but it won't improve anything.  I'm just not willing to buy into any sort of good news until I believe there will be fair elections, not only in 2026 but in 2028.  I'll still vote, but I'll believe it when I see it.

46

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Yeah, Trump legitimized Mamdani, and I'm not sure what he got out of it.  Trump even basically allowed him to call him a fascist and a despot, and Mamdani didn't walk any of it back.  I'm curious how Fox News and the other Trump media handled that because they'd spent weeks demonizing him.  So I'm wondering if Trump went off script or if he'll walk back his praise of Mamdani, or if everyone will just forget about it all.

What's crazy is that Mamdani's meeting was about the most normal thing that's happened in 5+ years of Trump presidency.

47

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Trump getting along with Mamdani is so bizarre to me.  Did Mamdani charm him out of his element?  Is Trump up to something?  Is it all theater?

48

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I think the Epstein files are a hoax...not in the way that Trump says they're a hoax (i.e. not real) but in the sense that it affects nothing.  I don't think anything in the Epstein files, even if it's concrete evidence against Trump, will affect anything.  His voters do not care.  I keep hearing whispers that this would be the thing that takes Trump down, or it will lead to a bunch of Republicans abandoning him, or that it will lead to his impeachment.

There is nothing that will do any of that.  I think most people either already think that Trump is a rapist or don't care either way.  He's either a pedophile or he's a necessary evil.  That's the two camps.  I mean you already saw Megan Kelly come out and basically say that being a pedophile isn't even that big of a deal, and she has teenage daughters!  I wouldn't be surprised if you didn't see laws passed in Florida that lower the age of consent to below whatever Trump is accused of doing.  I think Republicans would be more likely to lower the national age of consent to 10 or 11 than do anything to Trump.

He's been in the public eye for decades and he's been under immense political scrutiny for a full decade.  If anything was going to take him down, it would've already happened.  Like I said, the only escape we have from Trump is how long modern medicine keeps him alive.

49

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I mean maybe you're right and he wouldn't care if Congress was 100% Democrats so why bother with messing with the midterms.  He got his tax breaks, and he gets to do whatever he wants so who cares about getting anything done?  He shut down Congress and it didn't affect him one bit.

I guess the elections he'd want to cancel are in 2028.  But I still think 2026 could be a dry run.  I just don't feel like there's any reason to be optimistic.  People are putting all their hopes in the Epstein stuff, but it could be released that Trump did the whole operation and that Epstein was a patsy and I don't think it would matter.  Trump said he could shoot someone in broad daylight and not lose any support and he was right.

So we just gotta wait until his monkey heart finally gets clogged with Big Macs for this nightmare to be over.

50

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I agree that it would be illegal, but I struggle with understanding who would stop him.  Congress has decided to be impotent.  The federal courts have been an okay firewall (they recently forced Trump to fund SNAP), but the Supreme Court has gone out of its way to give Trump whatever power he wants.  And even when they disagree with him (potentially, on tariffs), Trump has already laid out the groundwork to de-legitimize them or bully them into obedience.

Trump runs the FBI, and their leaders are loyalists
Trump runs the military, and their leaders are loyalists
Trump has de-legitimized the media, and the media leaders are Trump loyalists
The people can still protest (for now), but the Republicans are trying to de-legitimize those.  And even internally, I've heard younger people are getting tired of the protests because they don't accomplish anything.  Whether its Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, or No Kings...there's great support and huge showings but what has changed?

But maybe you're right.  Maybe he wouldn't go so far as to simply cancel elections.  I don't know.  But I shouldn't have this little faith.

51

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

My optimism is gone still.  I think it will be too easy for Trump to manufacture a situation where there are no midterms.  With the government shutdown and military in major cities, I think he's pushing buttons to try and create a situation where people push back enough for him to declare martial law.  I think the die has already been cast, and I think they're just waiting for the rationale to do it.  And I think if people don't take the bait, he'll just do it anyway.

Other than throwing lavish parties and ruining the White House, Trump has been doing two things:

1. Putting loyalist military into blue cities
2. Complaining about voter fraud

I think he'll use some combination of those two to "delay" the midterms, but like the shutdown, it will just be indefinite.  Or he'll hold bogus elections where Republicans win with 80-90% of the vote.

I hope I'm wrong, but there's a tariff on hope and I can't afford it.

52

(3,571 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Oh sorry I guess I never gave an update.  I was able to get my dose of Moderna at a local pharmacy as well.  You have to meet one of the qualifications to get it, but a) my BMI is one of the qualifiers (because BMI is a sorta worthless metric) and b) they don't check so you can just say you do (not even which one) and get it.

So I got mine about a month ago.  My wife got hers a couple weeks later.  We didn't get ones for the kids because it's a bit more of a challenge, but they got their flu shots.  Hopefully it's good enough!

53

(475 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I think Coogler could make anything work.

I think conspiracies are a whole lot less fun post-MAGA because they're completely mainstream instead of being funny and fringey.  But I think you could do a show and instead of aliens maybe you do something with Artificial Intelligence.  Maybe Mulder believes that some kind of AI has started taking over the world, and he has to get to the bottom of things.

Or do aliens.  Aliens are still in the culture and are relevant.

I think the DCU is going to be given a shot, even if Warner Bros is chopped up and sold for parts.  I think Superman was enough of a success to give Gunn another shot for the slate that he has coming up.  Nothing more than that is guaranteed, but that's true of any cinematic universe.  The MCU was able to keep going because they didn't really have any misses.  They had smaller movies, but the two biggest critical negatives from phases 1-3 were Incredible Hulk (which people don't even consider to be fully canon) and Thor: The Dark World (which was post-Avengers but still fairly early on).

So I think whether WB survives or not, Gunn will be given a chance because he's been successful so far.  Not billion dollars but still profitable and successful with fans and critics.  Now if Supergirl is a disaster or if Man of Tomorrow is a disaster, all bets are off.  But no matter who owns WB, I think Gunn will get an opportunity.

ireactions wrote:

At the same time, I'm not in a position to stop my government from doing anything they want, so that part does sort of ring true. I would say the end of Season 2 suffers from needing the Salvation prison to be left open as a plot point for SUPERGIRL, MAN OF TOMORROW, LANTERNS, etc.

I think if the answer is "Checkmate is in no position to take down Flag" then that should have been acknowledged.  In an episode that was already significantly longer than the normal episode, I think they could have spent two minutes with a scene between Peacemaker, Harcourt, and Adebayo that went over the unlikelihood of a direct assault on ARGUS.  Maybe something as simple as.

PEACEMAKER
Okay, what are we doing about this prison?

HARCOURT
Nothing, for now?

PEACEMAKER
Nothing?

ADEBAYO
They could have hundreds of people moved to that prison by now.  How can we do nothing?

HARCOURT
A week ago, we probably could've caught them by surprise.  But Fleury says they've increased security a hundred-fold.  No one gets in or out unless Flag is present personally.  It's a fortress.

ADEBAYO
We could still...

HARCOURT
We could, but we'd lose people.  I think we have a plan, but we're going to need to be patient.

PEACEMAKER
In the meantime, let's do as much good as we can.

I don't know, something that at least acknowledges that they want to do something but just can't at this point.  Or, like I said before, don't let them find out about the prison.  Maybe Checkmate's first mission is to figure out what Flag is up to.

Either way, I think they're allowed to be excited that they're back together and happy and have a path, but the ending certainly implies that they don't care about the prison.  And they immediately pay for that if that's the case.

Yeah, I think that's fine.  I think LOST had a great character resolution but obviously not as concrete of a plot resolution, and I still think that's my favorite show of all time.  So I get that.

And I think the character resolution was really good.  I just wish the plot was either better wrapped up or the team was a little less aware of the villain plot.  As it stands, they basically ignored Flag's plan.

Grizzlor wrote:

I did binge through Peacemaker's season 2, which of course featured the parallel "Nazi" world with doppelgangers and such.  Fantastic work by all involved.  Of course, Gunn was noncommittal on the show's future, though I suspect characters will play a run in the Lanterns show.

I think the season was very good from a character perspective, but I thought the plotting was very odd.  The way that the finale is set up, it felt like the kind of episode where they go and steal back the multiversal device or prevent the prison from being a thing in some other way.  Instead, they...do nothing?  This isn't a situation where the bad guys have a plan, and the good guys don't know about it yet.

They know that Rick Flag is creating a metahuman prison, but they spend a bunch of time and energy creating a new spy organization.  Now maybe their plan is to create Checkmate and then go after Flag, but how many metahumans could they have imprisoned by then?  It seemed like they had a window to go after Flag, and they didn't really take advantage of it.

And I get it's a shared universe and that Gunn is writing basically everything at this point, but it leaves an unsatisfying feeling in the audience when the good guys don't even try to stop the bad guy.  I can understand why the plot wasn't "save Earth X" because I don't think our guys are nearly equipped to do that.  But our team, with Bordeaux and Harcourt and Judomaster and Fleury all as inside guys, against a handful of ARGUS agents?  That's something our team would be pretty good at.  And I would assume they could fairly easily win that if they had made any effort.

And, yeah, they'd basically be back at square one on the run with Flag chasing after them, but at least they would've made an effort.  And if they were going to immediately take down Flag, I don't think they really showed that (unless I missed it) they were even planning on going after the prison.  It played like "oh well, Flag is a bad guy.  Let's start an agency to do some good."

I do think a lot of the character beats were hit, and I thought the whole thing was well done.  And I get that Gunn will work through these plot threads.  But to leave the plot here is super weird.

I would have preferred if the season ended with the good guys knowing nothing of Flag's plan.  Maybe Judomaster/Fleury/Harcourt all abandon ARGUS before Salvation is even found, they create Checkmate, and then Flag reveals his plan to the audience (but none of Peacemaker's team).  Then Peacemaker is sent there.  Then, at least, the good guys don't look like they're simply ignoring the problem.

It also leaves the DCU in a weird place.  I don't really know if any of this will get followed up in Lanterns, but if it gets followed up in Man of Tomorrow...where does it leave that?  Is Man of Tomorrow going to take place in Salvation?  Is Superman going to go up against ARGUS and Lex?  Is Superman going to go rescue Peacemaker?  I love all the Peacemaker characters, but they play in completely different sandboxes.  I'd prefer if they were kept separate.

But I trust Gunn, and I'm still excited to see what he does with all this.

58

(196 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Yeah, I wonder how many new stories there could be, but if they really haven't gotten together after all this time, maybe some fun stuff came up.  Looking forward to it!

59

(196 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

They all look pretty great!

Any word on anything they discussed?

60

(196 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I think it will be a lot of fun to hear stories, maybe some stories we haven't heard before.  I assume they'll make some sort of vague reference to some kind of reboot / sequel shows.  Personally, I'm not going to put any stock into anything they say about that because I think Sliders was a hard sell 20 years ago, and I think it's going to be a harder sell today.  I maintain that there's no way they're going to do a show with JRD being 81 and Cleavant being 72.

The best bet has and will continue to be a show with Jerry as the mentor character to a younger cast.  You might be able to get the others for guest roles or cameos, but the Sliders cast is *way* older than the Golden Girls cast was.  So this would feel like that but much worse.

And honestly, the JOC thing isn't even the best bet.  The best bet is a bigger named actor pushing for the series to be made with a complete new cast, a la Quantum Leap.  I know there were some bigger named actors that liked the show back in the day (Kelsey Grammer?) that could maybe make it happen with a new, younger cast.  But I assume if that was going to happen, it would've happened already.