Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Biden pardoned Hunter.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/president-joe … =116358693

He broke his morals, he broke his code, he broke his ethics, he had no choice. Trump is coming after the Bidens, he had to try to save his son.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

ireactions wrote:

Biden pardoned Hunter.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/president-joe … =116358693

He broke his morals, he broke his code, he broke his ethics, he had no choice. Trump is coming after the Bidens, he had to try to save his son.

LOL. Indeed. Let them try. With dirtbag republicans electing a 34-time convicted felon, rapist, racist with over 90 criminal charges in addition to the 34 convicted felonies, and many failed businesses, I don't want to hear one. Single. Word. From them about Hunter Biden or President Biden at this point.

Besides, Hunter is not the President. So who cares?

The only reason republicans brought bogus partisan charges against Hunter is because they had absolutely nothing on President Biden. LOL.

With all the fake outrage they are pouring into Hunter Biden, they sure are the sorest winners on the face of this planet.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

You are treating this like a joke. You are fixated on mockery and ridicule.

Trump is trying to have deranged loyalists run the Department of Justice and the FBI and they would most certainly pursue Biden's son for revenge. Biden's family and everyone who's ever opposed Trump -- the Clintons, the Bidens, Jack Smith, Gretchen Whitmer -- they're all going to be targets.

Show some respect and take it seriously.

3,364 (edited by QuinnSlidr 2024-12-01 20:16:12)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

ireactions wrote:

You are treating this like a joke. You are fixated on mockery and ridicule.

Trump is trying to have deranged loyalists run the Department of Justice and the FBI and they would most certainly pursue Biden's son for revenge. Biden's family and everyone who's ever opposed Trump -- the Clintons, the Bidens, Jack Smith, Gretchen Whitmer -- they're all going to be targets.

Show some respect and take it seriously.

All republicans deserve mockery and ridicule for what they push on FOX (Faux) News and Newsmax as real news.

Sorry, but that's reality and the truth.

I will never respect a republican. Ever. Again.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

I was not asking you to respect Republicans; I was asking you to show some respect for how Trump is going to use law enforcement agencies to target Democrats and their families and take the threat seriously instead of treating it like a joke.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

ireactions wrote:

I was not asking you to respect Republicans; I was asking you to show some respect for how Trump is going to use law enforcement agencies to target Democrats and their families and take the threat seriously instead of treating it like a joke.

Oh I know they fully intend to. Never questioned or joked about that part for a second.

I'm simply drawing attention to the fact and joking about the fact that their fuhrer is a 34-time convicted felonious racist rapist and yet they are screaming and crying foul on President Biden for pardoning Hunter Biden when their fuhrer committed far more fouls than President Biden ever has.

3,367 (edited by ireactions 2024-12-01 21:11:23)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

I am raising a serious subject of threat and danger, morality and ethics, and you are making light of it.

You are deliberately mischaracterizing a call for serious discussion as a demand to respect Republicans, and your mischaracterization is obvious and ridiculous.

Your LOLs are completely inappropriate for the subject matter at hand. If you can't discuss serious subjects seriously, go somewhere else.

3,368 (edited by QuinnSlidr 2024-12-01 22:03:02)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

ireactions wrote:

I am raising a serious subject of threat and danger, morality and ethics, and you are making light of it.

You are deliberately mischaracterizing a call for serious discussion as a demand to respect Republicans, and your mischaracterization is obvious and ridiculous.

Your LOLs are completely inappropriate for the subject matter at hand. If you can't discuss serious subjects seriously, go somewhere else.

I think you may be misinterpreting. I am not mischaracterizing anything. My LOL, once again, is talking about the hypocrisy of it all and republicans in general and how the army is screaming about President Biden pardoning Hunter when Trump himself is appointing a criminal he pardoned as the ambassador to France, and that republicans themselves have nothing but hypocrisy in electing an official doing that.

Never once did I levy any comments to suggest that I was downplaying any threats.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

dYou have repeatedly accused anyone who doesn't share your political talking points of being a Trump supporter or a Republican, and now you have done the same with me. I tried to have a sensible, serious discussion about Biden's use of his pardon power, you turned it into another campaign of accusing another poster, in this case, me:

QuinnSlidr wrote:

I will never respect a republican. Ever. Again.

I didn't tell you to respect Republicans. I am absolutely sick of your harassment. You have repeatedly mischaracterized other people's posts, deliberately and willfully.

On multiple occasions, you have falsely accused posters of being racists or Republicans and Trump supporters when they didn't share your talking points of choice or weren't as fervently supportive of the Democratic National Party as you demanded.

You have harassed people for reporting that Kamala Harris lost the election and for not buying into your unproven conspiracy theories.

You are now harassing me by claiming that I demand you respect Republicans when I try to discuss how much threat Biden must see in Trump for Biden to pardon his son Hunter.

This is a clear pattern of harassment in your behaviour.

You have been warned about all your forms of harassment repeatedly, you have been warned that any further harassment in any form will lead to a ban and I am sick of warning you.

This is your final warning, I will not speak to you about it again.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

ireactions wrote:

dYou have repeatedly accused anyone who doesn't share your political talking points of being a Trump supporter or a Republican, and now you have done the same with me. I tried to have a sensible, serious discussion about Biden's use of his pardon power, you turned it into another campaign of accusing another poster, in this case, me:

QuinnSlidr wrote:

I will never respect a republican. Ever. Again.

I didn't tell you to respect Republicans. I am absolutely sick of your harassment. You have repeatedly mischaracterized other people's posts, deliberately and willfully.

On multiple occasions, you have falsely accused posters of being racists or Republicans and Trump supporters when they didn't share your talking points of choice or weren't as fervently supportive of the Democratic National Party as you demanded.

You have harassed people for reporting that Kamala Harris lost the election and for not buying into your unproven conspiracy theories.

You are now harassing me by claiming that I demand you respect Republicans when I try to discuss how much threat Biden must see in Trump for Biden to pardon his son Hunter.

This is a clear pattern of harassment in your behaviour.

You have been warned about all your forms of harassment repeatedly, you have been warned that any further harassment in any form will lead to a ban and I am sick of warning you.

This is your final warning, I will not speak to you about it again.


Let's recap - I tried to contribute to this discussion by talking about Trump's unreasonable pardoning power by appointing an ambassador to France whom he pardoned. I even agreed with ireactions on this - saying "LOL. Indeed..." because of the republican backlash that is ridiculous and the fact that their hypocrisy is palpable. My LOL is also referring to how predictable this a-holes (Trump's) actions are in his second term. I was not turning anything ireactions said into a joke. I have to live through a second Trump term here. I can't and don't have the luxury to escape. And I'm not allowed to LOL? Even once?

My respect comment as well was not harassment, nor was it intentionally claiming that you were demanding that I respect republicans. I was saying that I would simply never respect republicans again - in general - in response, and I haven't respected them for a long time because of their actions. Why can I not state that without it being an attack?

But, I don't even know how to convince you at this point.

I was trying to talk to you tonight and have a discussion. But yet I'm immediately accused of attacks and harassment, and turning a discussion into a joke, when I didn't do such a thing, and given a final warning. Apparently, I'm not even allowed to speak of republicans in general, otherwise I'm accused of mischaracterizing and calling ireactions a republican. When this is not what happened at all. Isn't it possible for two things to be true in a discussion at one time without accusing someone else of an attack?

Need I mention that I have also stated in my posts previously that nobody *has* to agree with me - with any of the information I posted? Did anybody forget that part?

I really can't win here. No matter what I do.

Good luck everyone. I tried.

3,371 (edited by ireactions 2024-12-02 08:27:29)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

This is yet another example of you trying to weasel out of your behaviour: you focus on your most recent harassment and minimize or deny it while avoiding how you have a lengthy history of harassment.

Your history includes accusing someone with doubts about Biden of being a Trump supporter; accusing someone who disliked a speech from a black person of being racist; accusing someone who reported Kamala Harris' 2024 loss of being ignorant for reporting basic facts of public record; accusing anyone who didn't buy into unproven election denialism of being a Trump supporter; accusing someone trying to have a serious discussion about pardon powers of demanding respect for Republicans.

You have also repeatedly posted election misinformation to intimidate anyone with criticisms of Democrat politicians and campaigns. You falsely insist that Democrats won. You do this deliberately to make people uncomfortable criticizing Democratic strategy and hesitant to say that Kamala Harris lost the election; you want them to fear your misinformation and accusations.

You are a serial harasser. Your defense is to claim that whatever harassment you engaged in most recently didn't happen while ignoring the massive track record of harassment behind you. It is perfectly clear at this point that despite multiple warnings, you have no intention of curtailing this behaviour.

This track record of repeated harassment and intimidation both overt and subtle is why you are no longer welcome to post here.

3,372 (edited by Slider_Quinn21 2024-12-02 08:51:08)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Just my two cents here, but I would like to find a solution that doesn't involve dwindling our already-small community by another person.  I truly respect ireactions' desire to keep this moderated and respectful and not allow toxic behavior.  I also understand QuinnSlidr's fear and anger.

I would prefer if both of you took a step back and tried to read each other's posts from a different angle so we don't lose anyone (voluntarily or involuntarily).

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Out of love, gratitude and respect for Slider_Quinn21, QuinnSlidr's ban will be lifted on Wednesday morning (Eastern Time).

But my mental health really cannot handle any more discussions getting derailed into unproven conspiracy theories and weird accusations of insufficient loyalty to Democrats or fealty to Republicans for the crime of criticizing Democrats and how they lost the election. There probably isn't a single poster here whom QuinnSlidr hasn't accused of treachery or fascism because they didn't buy into his talking points. I only have so much energy in a day and shouldn't be devoting so much of it to monitoring and moderating and addressing this behaviour. I have a day job and my mother needs a lot of attention and care. The only reason I am posting right now is because I am ill at home for the day after my COVID vaccination.

Out of deference to Slider_Quinn21, the ban will be lifted on Wednesday. Because, well, I respect Slider_Quinn21 and I am honour-bound to try things his way even if I foresee only exhaustion and grief waiting for me.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Back to the subject at hand:

Joe Biden betrayed his promise. He vowed a separation of private concerns and public good, promising that he would not pardon his son Hunter. He broke his word.

I don't blame him at all. I totally agree with all the moral and ethical criticisms of what he has done. But given the impending Trump presidency, I cannot blame Biden for taking every step possible to protect his family from the Trump-steered Department of Justice and FBI. It's morally and ethically wrong, as laid out in the parameters set by Biden himself -- but it shows how much Biden must fear the Trump presidency and how short on options, hope, and belief in America he is at this point.

Biden has decided that the shattering of his moral principles and his political legacy at this point is happening regardless of what he does or doesn't do, and has elected to save his son. I hope all fathers would do the same for their children, but it shows how truly dark the world has become.

My father once told me, "Son, if you robbed a bank, I wouldn't hire a lawyer for you, but I would visit you in jail." However, I'd like to think that if my dad thought I'd be targeted for more than just the crimes I committed, he'd come to my aid.

At the same time, I have a lot of room for the views of those who point out that Biden has turned his back on his own declared standards of right and wrong and betrayed the public trust with his actions.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

ireactions wrote:

Out of love, gratitude and respect for Slider_Quinn21, QuinnSlidr's ban will be lifted on Wednesday morning (Eastern Time).

Thank you.  And I hope QuinnSlidr comes back and respects your wishes.

**********

On Biden.  I really have cut myself off from the news.  No social media.  No news apps.  No cable news.  I just can't stand to think about it.  At Thanksgiving, my family is not very political and no one wanted to talk about it.

But I agree with you that he did what he had to do.  I think Trump is absolutely going to us the Department of Justice to go after his enemies, and I wouldn't be surprised if several of them left the country.  I don't know where they'd go.  I assume they'd go to an extradition country, and I can't imagine any of them protecting a former president over the current one.  And Trump would absolutely try to punish anyone who harbored one of his enemies.

It's a mess.  My only hope is that Trump is content with the power and the title and being out of trouble and just leaves everyone alone.  If his advisors can sway him from doing anything too extreme, maybe we can get through it.  But if he decides to follow through on any of his extreme campaign ideas (or is encouraged to do so), we're in trouble.

********

My family and I went to Disney last week.  In EPCOT, there's such a focus on the future and hope and learning from our mistakes.  The front of the park has this futuristic/inspirational instrumental music, and Spaceship Earth (in the iconic EPCOT sphere) is all about how we can build on the past to make a brighter tomorrow.  Other parts of the park are about our natural world, our shared planet and differing cultures, and our imaginations.

On one hand, I was inspired to make the world a better place.  On the other, when my mind would wander, I was just depressed at how things are going and how bad things could get.    And how my kids might have to pay for what's happening now.  And that just sucks.

3,376 (edited by ireactions 2024-12-03 19:30:05)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

QuinnSlidr will get an automatic email on Wednesday morning with his login details.

God help me.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Thank you, ireactions. May I please calmly state my piece? I want to apologize. There is no anger in this post about you or your actions, ireactions. I understand why you took the actions you did. But, I have a few points I would like to make. And I will move forward with the topic at hand afterward.

I really was not harassing you, ireactions, on Sunday night when I was legitimately trying to start a conversation. I wasn't just saying that to "weasel out of any behavior."

I also apologize for how you took that republican comment. I could have worded it differently when I initially said it, because I meant what I said about not respecting republicans in general. I did not know you would take it that way. I certainly did not mean, however, for you to take it as an attack on you. And that's the absolute truth. I know you are not a republican, and I would never call you that because of that fact alone.

For past actions: For people/usernames I don't know very well, I do not put it past any Trumper to pose as an independent or otherwise obscure their voting party in order to get people to let their guards down, spread vaccine disinformation, and other disinformation and right wing talking points, in order to put up a facade and make people trust them more online. This is because outright being a Trumper doesn't work very well anymore. It's a common tactic in use by these individuals. I can't tell you how many I have been right about this elsewhere online, and they reveal themselves when backed into the corner of an argument. I have lost count. Here, however, I have apologized and owned up to my mistakes towards other posters in the past, and smoothed things over with the posters involved. My right wing radar has always - generally - been accurate in the past down to a few characters because of their speech patterns, but I can be wrong as well, and I am not afraid to admit when I am wrong.

And I meant it.

I'll also admit because of my past actions, yes, I was angry. But not anymore. And this election's aftermath has been difficult to work through. We are on the verge of losing the very fabric of our democracy that our grandfathers fought for because of a worthless fascist demagogue who worships Putin, Kim Jong-Un, and Hitler. And he has his little buddy Leon Muskolini working for him. I'm not very happy about that at all. All threats need to be taken seriously. I know we all feel the same way here.

We have a great fight ahead of us still. We still have to come back together as democrats and put an end to the infighting and focus on the future. We should not leave ourselves to split the party in two or three or more factions in a ton of different ways. That's where the republican party should be going. Not us.

John Pavlovitz explained it perfectly (I included a portion of his write-up at the end of this post). The conclusion of the 107 days of this election was so much more than just "losing an election." It was a loss of hope...of what can be. And what we will not have.

By the way...I really need to take a page out of Slider_Quinn21's book and simply turn off the news entirely for a bit. It just continues to get worse, darker, and even more depressing. I need to focus on more positive things. The sequel is, more often than not, much worse than the original.

====================================================================

We're Not Going Back. Or Are We? - by John Pavlovitz

https://johnpavlovitz.substack.com/p/we … kor-are-we

This isn’t just a political loss, as devastating as that has been to come to grips with.

It is about so much more than a transfer of power and a Congressional renovation and the legislative ripples that will result.

This is about about one hundred and seven hopeful days, and the fact that there could have been so many more. It is about grieving the what-might-have-beens and the what-never-will-be’s.

I was talking with a dear friend last week and she said to me, “The last one hundred and seven days gave me something that I’d given up on: they gave me hope. Instead of spending the past three months mentally and practically preparing myself for the horrible things that I’d previously resigned myself to, I ended up getting fooled into believing again. That’s what hurts the most.”

She felt she’d gotten distracted by months of hope, only to have it all snatched away in a matter of hours. There’s an emotional whiplash to it all that many of us are living with right now.

And that’s probably the heart of this grieving.

Over one hundred and seven days, many of us went from a place of certain dread and resignation, to the prospect of possibility; and almost reluctantly to an expectation of victory, to anticipatory joy, to preemptive elation—and now we feel like that’s all been squandered time. It feels like a waste.

But I don’t believe the last one hundred and seven days have been wasted at all. I believe they were reminding us just what the hell we live for, and because that is the place we begin. That is the spot from where we start today: they why of our lives.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Back to the topic at hand in this thread:

Regarding President Biden pardoning Hunter: I think President Biden sees the threat that the new incoming administration will be to his son and his family, and I think he made a calculated decision to pardon Hunter as a result. Was it going against what he said previously? Sure. But, and I think democrats should get a handle on this: President Biden does not deserve to be ridiculed for doing so. Former President Trump pardoned many, many people including Paul Manafort and others who don't deserve it.

In addition, Hunter Biden's case comes down to being a political prosecution. He made restitution for taxes that he owed. And the gun charge is usually only brought with much bigger cases. Hunter only had that gun for 10 days, and he never used it. He was going to kill himself with it. Not hurt others.

In addition, Hunter was not using drugs at the time so he wasn't lying and he stopped using shortly before he was just out of rehab, and he was still not using at the time.

If it's one thing republicans do, is accuse others of everything they are actually doing themselves. They have a habit of doing this.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

QuinnSlidr wrote:

By the way...I really need to take a page out of Slider_Quinn21's book and simply turn off the news entirely for a bit. It just continues to get worse, darker, and even more depressing. I need to focus on more positive things. The sequel is, more often than not, much worse than the original.

I can't recommend it for everyone because I think its important to stay apprised on local news and stuff like that.  But it has felt really good to not have to worry about Trump or hear his name.  I don't know if I can keep it up for 4 years, but it has been good for my mental health.

It's also let me take a step back and realize that the truth of the situation will probably be somewhere between Trump being the worst president ever and the best parts of his first term.  I think some of my anxiety came from doom-and-gloom people on the left who, like Republicans, are selling fear.  I've allowed myself to rationalize with myself that maybe it won't be worst case scenario with Trump.  There are certainly horrible things that are going to come out of it (the Supreme Court, global warming, and Trump getting away with all the crimes he's already done), but we have to rely on a couple things:

1. I truly believe Trump is a unique animal, and I don't think enough Republicans want to be a part of burning down the United States.  Naive or not, I'm choosing to believe that if Trump pushes things too far, enough Republicans will stand in his way.  In the past, people have.  Let's hope they continue to.

2. Republicans are really bad at being in control.  I think they're the opposite of Democrats - great at politics but terrible at leading.  I think there will be infighting, I think there will be a disagreements on how far to take things, and I think they don't have even "concepts of a plan" to get anything done.  I think this was all about keeping Donald Trump out of prison, and they accomplished that.  They're a dog chasing a car.  Now what.  Maybe I'm wrong.  The president gets 100 days to get stuff done, and Trump is fairly terrible at getting things done.  He's good at being popular and convincing idiots to support him, but that won't help him now.

Let's see if some his dumber ideas (10% across the board tariffs) get done.  Let's see if he actually rounds up a bunch of immigrants or just does some dog and pony shows at the border.  I think we'll know pretty soon if we're getting Trump the Dictator or Trump the impotent showman.  And for my mental health, I'm choosing to believe that we'll see more of the latter.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

A rumination on how Democrats have not evolved to face structural changes in states and electorate, which led to defeat in 2024 and will lead to even more if they don't make urgent changes.
https://www.thebulwark.com/p/democratic … nationally

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

I think there's a lot of good information there.  And my hope is that, unlike the Republicans, Democrats will actually learn from their loss and make changes/improvements.  If they can fix what's wrong (and there are still free and fair elections), Democrats have an opportunity to take advantage of running against a party that is 100% Donald Trump when Donald Trump might not even be willing to help them.  There could be a huge vacuum of power in the Republican party with no one there to take over.

And if Democrats can be smarter and evolve, they could get massive wins.

But the party kinda sucks at all this so I'm not overly optimistic at this time.

3,382 (edited by QuinnSlidr 2024-12-05 11:28:51)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:
QuinnSlidr wrote:

By the way...I really need to take a page out of Slider_Quinn21's book and simply turn off the news entirely for a bit. It just continues to get worse, darker, and even more depressing. I need to focus on more positive things. The sequel is, more often than not, much worse than the original.

I can't recommend it for everyone because I think its important to stay apprised on local news and stuff like that.  But it has felt really good to not have to worry about Trump or hear his name.  I don't know if I can keep it up for 4 years, but it has been good for my mental health.

It's also let me take a step back and realize that the truth of the situation will probably be somewhere between Trump being the worst president ever and the best parts of his first term.  I think some of my anxiety came from doom-and-gloom people on the left who, like Republicans, are selling fear.  I've allowed myself to rationalize with myself that maybe it won't be worst case scenario with Trump.  There are certainly horrible things that are going to come out of it (the Supreme Court, global warming, and Trump getting away with all the crimes he's already done), but we have to rely on a couple things:

1. I truly believe Trump is a unique animal, and I don't think enough Republicans want to be a part of burning down the United States.  Naive or not, I'm choosing to believe that if Trump pushes things too far, enough Republicans will stand in his way.  In the past, people have.  Let's hope they continue to.

2. Republicans are really bad at being in control.  I think they're the opposite of Democrats - great at politics but terrible at leading.  I think there will be infighting, I think there will be a disagreements on how far to take things, and I think they don't have even "concepts of a plan" to get anything done.  I think this was all about keeping Donald Trump out of prison, and they accomplished that.  They're a dog chasing a car.  Now what.  Maybe I'm wrong.  The president gets 100 days to get stuff done, and Trump is fairly terrible at getting things done.  He's good at being popular and convincing idiots to support him, but that won't help him now.

Let's see if some his dumber ideas (10% across the board tariffs) get done.  Let's see if he actually rounds up a bunch of immigrants or just does some dog and pony shows at the border.  I think we'll know pretty soon if we're getting Trump the Dictator or Trump the impotent showman.  And for my mental health, I'm choosing to believe that we'll see more of the latter.

I can wait and see if some of the dumber ideas get done. But, there have been plenty of signs over the news, hence why I am not very optimistic and why I need to continue to focus on more positive things.

Anyway, for example...

Republicans may not have a choice. Elon Musk has threatened every senator with being primaried if they vote against Trump's cabinet picks.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-team-w … 29118.html

In addition, most of Trump's cabinet picks are either authors of Project 2025 or connected to Project 2025 in some way:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/202 … picks.html

This is not going to bode well for Ukraine, either. As Trump advisors (as Trump is) are vehemently against NATO and will push for Ukraine to concede territory:

https://www.reuters.com/world/trumps-pl … 024-12-04/

While President Zelensky continues to try and get NATO to provide Ukraine with an INVITE and include all occupied territory, including Crimea. It's not explicitly stated but overtly implied through his "Ukraine must join NATO as an entire country." comments. Will pulling Crimea over the umbrella of a NATO alliance trigger war?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn8g8ylvyldo

And you're right. It's not for everybody to not focus on the news. I prefer having at least a basic understanding of everything going on, but at this point, things are happening quite fast and they are evolving rapidly. A brief break for a couple of days would be a good idea for me. But not permanently.

I only hope President Biden and Mark Rutte are able to help get Ukraine into NATO before the current administration ends. And that President Biden's upcoming pardons are sufficient to help protect some from being unfairly targeted by Trump.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

QuinnSlidr wrote:

Republicans may not have a choice. Elon Musk has threatened every senator with being primaried if they vote against Trump's cabinet picks.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-team-w … 29118.html

Threat of primary is a real thing, but remember that some of these senators are more powerful than Trump in their own states.  For example, I think John Cornyn (who is somehow the best senator from Texas) has fought with Trump on a handful of things and he'd still win a primary easily.  And some Republican senators don't have to worry about primaries because they might not be up for re-election until 2030.  I don't know how effective "this guy didn't vote for this random cabinet pick six years ago"

It might be a useful tactic for some people who are moderately anti-Trump and up for re-election in two years and don't have a strong incumbency, but who is that?  I'm not super worried about Elon Musk trying to bully very specific people.

In addition, most of Trump's cabinet picks are either authors of Project 2025 or connected to Project 2025 in some way:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/202 … picks.html

I think Project 2025 is dangerous, but project 2025 isn't permanent.  Anything that can be done in project 2025 can be undone.  Even if Trump guts the federal government and institutes loyalists only, the next administration (Republican or Democrat) could undo it.  You also have to remember that part of the reason that the government isn't loaded with party loyalists is that the government can't function that way.  Some of the stuff in project 2025 would actually hurt Trump's ability to do certain things.  Not to mention that Trump loyalists aren't going to be as good at their job as career experts.  Which would suck for everyone, but it would also suck for Trump.  An inefficient government is bad for him.

I do worry about Ukraine.  I'm not sure there's anything that Biden can do to salvage the situation, but I'm hoping that Zelenskyy can defy Trump like he's defied Putin.  I'm hoping the Ukrainian people don't let our election destroy them.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

I think Project 2025 is dangerous, but project 2025 isn't permanent.  Anything that can be done in project 2025 can be undone.  Even if Trump guts the federal government and institutes loyalists only, the next administration (Republican or Democrat) could undo it.  You also have to remember that part of the reason that the government isn't loaded with party loyalists is that the government can't function that way.  Some of the stuff in project 2025 would actually hurt Trump's ability to do certain things.  Not to mention that Trump loyalists aren't going to be as good at their job as career experts.  Which would suck for everyone, but it would also suck for Trump.  An inefficient government is bad for him.

I do worry about Ukraine.  I'm not sure there's anything that Biden can do to salvage the situation, but I'm hoping that Zelenskyy can defy Trump like he's defied Putin.  I'm hoping the Ukrainian people don't let our election destroy them.

You're right. I hope it isn't permanent. There are some who claim that as soon as Trump is back in, he's not leaving the White House. Ever. Unless he dies. He has longevity on his father's side but as you have pointed out previously he eats like crap and takes far too much in the way of drugs. So perhaps things are not as dire as they seem.

The problem with Ukraine is that it's rich in natural material resources that the Russians want, and badly. And that's why they are after it because these resources will make them billions of rubles richer. After the Trump administration takes control of the White House again, there's nothing stopping Trump from destroying half the government he doesn't like and pulling us out of NATO for good.

I really want this to be one of the situations where I'm wrong. I really do. We'll have to wait and see on this one,  Slider_Quinn21.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

QuinnSlidr wrote:

The problem with Ukraine is that it's rich in natural material resources that the Russians want, and badly. And that's why they are after it because these resources will make them billions of rubles richer. After the Trump administration takes control of the White House again, there's nothing stopping Trump from destroying half the government he doesn't like and pulling us out of NATO for good.

I worry about NATO but, again, assuming Trump doesn't name himself king for life (and even then), there would be nothing to stop us from rejoining NATO.  And the only one that wants to leave NATO is Trump, and he only wants to do that because he's in love with Putin.  This is a Trump thing, not a Republican thing.  Now it's a Republican thing because it's a Trump thing, but a lot of this stuff dies with him.

Trump won.  And not just the election.  He won whatever he wanted to win.  We lost.  And there's no doubt it sucks.  But Trump won't live forever, and a lot of the stuff he wants dies with him.  The next president, Republican or Democrat, will be harder on Russia, will be more helpful to Ukraine, and will be better for America and Americans than Donald Trump.  I still say he's a singular enemy, and now we need to wait him out.  Either until he dies or voluntarily leaves office.

Either way, the clock is ticking.

3,386 (edited by QuinnSlidr 2024-12-06 16:39:22)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:
QuinnSlidr wrote:

The problem with Ukraine is that it's rich in natural material resources that the Russians want, and badly. And that's why they are after it because these resources will make them billions of rubles richer. After the Trump administration takes control of the White House again, there's nothing stopping Trump from destroying half the government he doesn't like and pulling us out of NATO for good.

I worry about NATO but, again, assuming Trump doesn't name himself king for life (and even then), there would be nothing to stop us from rejoining NATO.  And the only one that wants to leave NATO is Trump, and he only wants to do that because he's in love with Putin.  This is a Trump thing, not a Republican thing.  Now it's a Republican thing because it's a Trump thing, but a lot of this stuff dies with him.

Trump won.  And not just the election.  He won whatever he wanted to win.  We lost.  And there's no doubt it sucks.  But Trump won't live forever, and a lot of the stuff he wants dies with him.  The next president, Republican or Democrat, will be harder on Russia, will be more helpful to Ukraine, and will be better for America and Americans than Donald Trump.  I still say he's a singular enemy, and now we need to wait him out.  Either until he dies or voluntarily leaves office.

Either way, the clock is ticking.

Indeed. Let's hope that clock continues to tick!! In the meantime...

I'm not liking this new trend of dems capitulating to Trump...first Bernie Sanders praised Elon Musk and now John Fetterman has said that Trump should be pardoned...

What's going on? Bernie used to hate Elon Musk.....and John Fetterman should darn well know that the Hush Money Trial was based on fact, not political motivations.

I had some respect for Bernie Sanders before as a democrat. Although I do think he is getting up there in recent years and fit the one thing that we probably shouldn't be going after in politics - old men - the same thing we have had for every Presidency in the many many years since America was first created. What happened to having a fresh perspective and something new??? I am really saddened that he has felt the need to do this...

Bernie Sanders claims DOGE boss Elon Musk ‘is right’ over defense spending

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bernie-sande … 57906.html

I also really liked John Fetterman...but not after this though. I am saddened that this is happening here too. But not surprised.

John Fetterman says Hunter Biden, Trump both deserve pardons after 'politically motivated' trials

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald … rcna183094

And all of this comes after the disastrous MSNBC debacle in which Joe and Mika capitulated to Trump and went to Mar-a-Lago and kissed the ring:

At the crossroads of news and opinion, ‘Morning Joe’ hosts grapple with aftermath of Trump meeting
https://apnews.com/article/scarborough- … 5ab94b7bf8

Most of these folks probably believe that there is no way out. That the only way forward is to kiss the ring and produce positive reporting on a 34-time convicted felon. While I understand where they are coming from, I am not happy that the honesty and integrity of the media has been completely overturned by the election of this son of a...

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Continuing ruminations on why Democrats lost the election in 2024.
https://www.salon.com/2024/12/13/democr … nt-truths/

"The working-class voters Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign needed were not moved by talk of joy. They were too angry about feeling broke."

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

I can understand a lot of what those voters were feeling.  I do think white blue collar workers had pretty much been abandoned.  I think blue collar jobs are drying up, and I think those people were hit especially hard by the pandemic and inflation.  And while the stock market is doing well, I would guess that very few of those people are even in the stock market.  It's hard to buy stocks when you can't afford food.  I can understand being upset and wanting a change.

The problem is that Donald Trump isn't change.  They're also against the sorts of things that Trump has openly said that he wants to do.  He's against unions, which will further hurt blue collar workers.  His tariff plan will make costs go up further.  Extending his tax cuts won't help anyone because taxes won't actually go down - they'll stay the same (or go up).  Trump is looking to end social security and medicare which these people depend on.  If people voted for a new candidate, I think I could get all the way to understanding where they're coming from, but they chose to make their lives worse.

I do think Democrats need to spend the next two years talking to those people.  I think they need to spend money on focus groups and town halls and community groups and figure out what they want and how to get it to them.  Democrats need to get back in with union leaders and union members.  They need to say what they're going to do, and then they're going to do it.  And I think Democrats need to spend more money in small towns and rural states.  I know they can't spend money everywhere, but they can't just abandon half (the land) of the country and just let that be Trump country.  They need to start playing long games like Republicans do - plant seeds and then wait for them to grow.  We went from "there may never be a Republican president again" to three straight elections that Republicans either won or almost won.

I also think that Democrats need to be careful with black voters not to just assume that they'll vote Democrat forever.  Black people need to be listened to and helped.  I still maintain that Democrats got too excited about their shiny new toy (suburban white voters) and lost their way.  I think they need to go back to meat and potatoes issues that low-income voters care about, and they need to leave educated voters to make the pragmatic decision.  The Democratic nominee should do literally nothing to help me because a) I don't need any help and b) I'll make the pragmatic decision.

And seriously they need to start now.  They have a ton of work to do and if we're right about Trump, there are people that are going to be even angrier.  They need to be ready to welcome those people back with hard work, not empty promises or jargon or memes.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Here's an interesting article offering a view on why Kamala Harris and her campaign from wealthy Uber executives and such did not resound with working class people:
https://jacobin.com/2024/12/democrats-o … linton-dlc

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Based on press conferences from Governor Gavin Newsom and Hakeem Jeffries, I think it is likely that another conclusion could be reached as to how Democrats lost the election beyond just the working class people. There could be a deeper reason why these voters chose to vote the way they did that isn't uncovered. For example, we have a lot of folks who are contradicting each other on why Democrats lost the election. California Governor Gavin Newsom said as much on 12/5/2024:

https://www.youtube.com/live/6Ty2Uv_cTs … amp;t=2642

As California Governor Gavin Newsom said in that press conference on 12/5, he had a stack of papers in his car on that day talking about the election and why Democrats failed. And they all contradicted each other. He said to be patient and that all will be revealed. This refers to why Democrats lost.

https://www.youtube.com/live/A2qGNcWv4h … amp;t=1346

In addition, Hakeem Jeffries, the minority leader of the  House of Representatives, brings up election problems - where dems won the down vote but not the top of the ticket (President) in all of the swing states (the down vote is where voters would vote for a government candidate democratic - and all democratic ballot measures - and only voted for Trump for President at the top of the ticket). Jeffries calls into question whether Dems need a makeover at all when all of these Democratic governors were re-elected. He thinks there are questions about how and why Trump made it there "somewhat convincingly." His words. Not mine. I recommend watching the entire press conference.

Also, he accuses republican gerrymandering as being among the top issues that need to be resolved for the next election.

"There were 6 battleground states that had statewide elections outside of the presidential election. Democrats swept 5, and only lost in Pennsylvania? That doesn't sound to me like we need a complete makeover."

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

There could be a reason why working class voters didn't vote Democrat for president that isn't about why working class voters didn't vote Democrat for president? What kind of tangled convolution is that?

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

ireactions wrote:

There could be a reason why working class voters didn't vote Democrat for president that isn't about why working class voters didn't vote Democrat for president? What kind of tangled convolution is that?

Here are several examples of contradictions and differing opinions on the topic.

Why Democrats Lost in 2024 - Lessons from Phoenix and the Working Class

https://azmirror.com/2024/12/04/why-dem … ing-class/

This one states that the decline in non-college-educated voters were a major reason why Dems lost. Not working class voters. If we're going strictly by education, non-college-educated voters exist in every class. They can't make up a class all by themselves. It almost uses non-college-educated voters and working class interchangeably, leading to the contradiction.

This article makes the point that talking about the working class leaves out a lot of different types of voters, and that we don't talk enough about who makes up the working class when these discussions arise:

What we don’t talk about when we talk about the “working class”

https://www.vox.com/politics/390108/wor … oters-2024

Did Democrats Lose on the Economy or Culture Wars?

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-51 … s-weigh-in

In this one, one person says it's the working class. Another person says that party building actually needs to take place. Parts of the working class Dems lost, and others that held strong.

And still in this same article, another person thinks that the overall message of "what have Democrats done for me in the last 4 years" is something that can't be answered by the working-class and middle-class voters, who can't answer this question tangibly - is something that needs to be discussed.

3,393 (edited by Grizzlor 2024-12-15 01:33:36)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

I expect to be captured by one of the many drones hovering above the skies of New Jersey lately.  Taken to the mothership, and transported to a planet far, far away. 

This has indeed become the biggest story in this country of buffoons.  And so, I bid thee farewell!  I shall right from far beyond the stars.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On the subject of Democrats, Trump went to the Army-Navy football game for the fifth time, and he's not a sports fan.  Joe Biden IS a sports fan, but never went while President.  It's trivial yes, but come on, how hard is it to get off your old ass and go to the most treasured college football we play???  They just get everything normal and easy, wrong.

Democrats need to stop chasing MSNBC talking points, and making their own for a change.  Stop walking lock step with university bubbled idiots, who came up with every bad far left idea that the populace have puked over lately.  Stop screaming about the bogeymen, and start advocating actual progress.  Stop hating on America, and start talking it up, and bring back some pride in this country and it's principles.  Kamala Harris was essentially terrible on all of these points.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Mitt Romney (haha) in his autobiography (of sorts) bemoans how his failed presidential campaign foolishly focused on campaigning to the 'bosses' of America. After losing and after a pleasant lunch with the re-elected Barack Obama, Romney realized that most people in America hate their bosses and he should have campaigned to the people who work for bosses instead as there are a heckuva lot more workers than bosses. "Stupid!" he says of himself.

I'd never support this guy, but I could learn a lot from him.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

The Trump attacks on the media have begun. And they are far worse the second time around. Beginning with ABC, Trump has sued them for $15 million, and they capitulated and settled. Despite the fact that they told the truth. PBS reporting reflects:

"President-elect Trump settled a defamation lawsuit with ABC News for $15 million. That suit followed a segment in which George Stephanopolous inaccurately said Trump had been found liable for raping writer E. Jean Carrol when in fact, he had been found liable in a civil case for sexual abuse. Amna Nawaz discussed more with New York Times reporter David Enrich."

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/abc-n … s-2nd-term

The PBS.org statement is a bit inaccurate because the judge in the case later stated that yes, Donald Trump was still found liable for rape:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics … udge-rape/

Now, Trump is suing the Des Moines Register over Anne Seltzer's final polling survey which showed Kamala Harris 3% ahead of Trump in the state that did not materialize in the vote:

Trump sues Des Moines Register and top pollster over final Iowa survey

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/12/17/medi … elzer-poll

New York CNN — President-elect Donald Trump is escalating his legal campaign against media outlets by suing renowned pollster J. Ann Selzer, her polling firm, The Des Moines Register newspaper and its parent company Gannett.

Unlike many of Trump’s legal actions against the press, which often allege defamation, this case alleges violations of the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act, which prohibits deception when advertising or selling merchandise.

While the nontraditional claims are unlikely to succeed in court, Trump is using the lawsuit to wage a broadside against what he perceives as left-wing media, mainstream press coverage of elections and the role of pollsters during campaigns. Though he won the 2024 election, Trump alleges the news coverage of Selzer’s poll — published days before the election showing Kamala Harris with a surprising lead in Iowa that didn’t materialize in the vote — was intended to artificially help Democrats during the campaign.

Media experts warned the lawsuit could have a further chilling effect not just on news reporting, but also on political polling. Selzer didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from CNN.

The Des Moines Register said in a statement that the newspaper and Selzer had “acknowledged” that the “pre-election poll did not reflect the ultimate margin” of victory and have released the poll’s full data and details, as well as “a technical explanation” from Selzer.

“We stand by our reporting on the matter and believe this lawsuit is without merit,” said Lark-Marie Anton, a spokesperson for the newspaper’s parent company, Gannett

===================

How much worse are these attacks going to get under an emboldened Trump?

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

The media is very much to blame for Trump's re-election, and they're going to pay for it.  Like I am with Trump supporters, any suffering is on them and they have no one to blame but themselves.

If we survive the Trump era, we need a complete revamp of the media.  Right now, far too much media is controlled by right wing money.  Bezos ordering the Washington Post to cancel its endorsement of Harris was abhorrent.  So if Trump destroys the media, maybe we can rebuild it into what it used to be.  Probably not but a man can dream.

3,397 (edited by QuinnSlidr 2024-12-18 19:25:12)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

The media is very much to blame for Trump's re-election, and they're going to pay for it.  Like I am with Trump supporters, any suffering is on them and they have no one to blame but themselves.

If we survive the Trump era, we need a complete revamp of the media.  Right now, far too much media is controlled by right wing money.  Bezos ordering the Washington Post to cancel its endorsement of Harris was abhorrent.  So if Trump destroys the media, maybe we can rebuild it into what it used to be.  Probably not but a man can dream.

Yep. I recognized this as soon as the media didn't say a single word about Trump being the same age as Biden. He's made far worse senile remarks than Biden ever has, and the media doesn't say a single word? Come on. I fully agree with you there that they are absolutely complicit. And yes, Bezos' actions were completely off the wall.

Today, though...the latest in a string of perverted efforts to destroy our government because to them, they don't want any rules, Elon Musk made a concerted effort to stop the shutdown bill. And it was successful. He successfully shut down a bipartisan bill that Mike Johnson worked with Dems and Republicans on for months to make possible.

Although I am trying to remain optimistic that a last-minute aversion will happen as usual, at this time, I don't know. Government destruction may be coming sooner than anticipated because of President Musk. Many folks on Twitter are referring to Musk as President Musk now, including Bernie Sanders. So, I half-horroredly-jokingly use the term myself.

Trump is not going to like that.

But, it was a joint effort between Musk and Trump to kill the bill to avert the shutdown with multiple comments from Trump and Musk on the social networks. If the government shuts down, many people who are dependent on certain services from the government will not be able to receive them. I realized after I posted previously that people will still be getting their checks, assuming a shutdown doesn't last for long...

From: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what … other-one/

"Benefits such as Social Security and Medicare continue to flow because they are authorized by Congress in laws that do not need annual approval (although the services offered by Social Security benefit offices may be limited during a shutdown). In addition, the Treasury can continue to pay interest on U.S. Treasury debt on time."

This is, however, going to get bad really fast unless something happens to stop it.

3,398

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

The media are not to blame.  They barely covered Trump speeches, after being blamed for giving them too much air time in the past.  Meanwhile, they spent months, years now, covering Trump civil and criminal trials.  They are obsessed with Trump.  Yes, his mental aptitude was mentioned often.  The voters did not care.  They don't care about his morality.  Nor his financial malfeasance.  Etc, etc.  They hardly spent a minute on his two assassination attempts once they'd passed a few days.  No, the media did not "normalize" him.  Joe Biden and the woke brigade just sucked so badly (for enough Americans) that it really didn't matter about Trump. 

And on cue, recent reports have claimed that Joe Biden was arguably not up to the job when he was elected.  The fact that the Democratic chairs of the House Armed Services Committee (Adam Smith) and the House Intelligence Committee (Jim Himes) expressed that they could barely get in touch with the President, as early as 2021, is ridiculous.  One of them complained that the White House stone walled them from relaying major concerns over the Afghanistan exit, terrific.  There were additional concerns by staff over Biden frequently growing tired, being forgetful.  These were relayed later by US Attorney Robert Hur, who was of course vilified (for telling the truth).  Biden has "quiet quit" since dropping out of the race in July, and from nearly day one, DEMOCRATS were given excuses as to why they couldn't contact THEIR President, as well, he has good days and bad days.  BAD days???  Excuse me?  Again, it's no wonder the voters lost total faith in this guy close to three years ago now.  Now we have reporter after reporter saying, yeah well, I should have covered Biden's decline more openly.  Too late I suppose.  Harris forget it, clearly the voters saw her as the VP to a doddering fool, and that was that.  You had to have had an open primary where the Biden handlers could be completely kicked out of the process.

Trump is an idiot and a dickhead, but even at his age, he can play the role just fine.  For Christ's Sake he was shot at, and bounced right up.  Joe Biden tripped and fell on the stairs to Airforce One 50 times.  Remember, I was said to be overreacting when Hur testified, and Trump was shot.  Both times I made the point that these were incredibly consequential things for public perception.  With or without media bias.

The utter collapse of MSNBC should be applauded.  Their hosts shrieked 24/7 about Trump being a Nazi, when they decided to ignore the actual anti-semitism rampant in the left-leaning universities.  They need to get rid of everyone on there, except for a few people with common sense like Michael Steele, maybe.  Go back to how it was with Chris Matthews or way back with Charles Grodin.  When actual liberals espoused American values and principles, not DEI.

3,399 (edited by QuinnSlidr 2024-12-23 07:59:21)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

I think that by not covering Trump and not pointing out Trump's mental incompetence exactly as they did Biden's 24/7,  actually hurt the democratic campaign more than it helped. In that way, the media is entirely complicit and played a large part in the loss.

About the only station who was only covering everything anti-Trump was MSNBC (sadly).

I'm going to have to retort the Afghanistan negative talking points here with the following facts:

Only 13 American soldiers died.
President Biden saved over 122,000 people from certain death, who were airlifted out of Afghanistan successfully.

I'd call that a successful withdrawal. I'm sorry Americans died. But you can't deny that it was a highly successful withdrawal when it saved over 122,000 lives.

What others fail to say when bringing this up is how badly Trump botched everything when he negotiated with the Taliban.

It is entirely unrealistic and naive to act as if a military operation is going to be all hunky dory and without casualties.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Grizzlor wrote:

The media are not to blame.  They barely covered Trump speeches, after being blamed for giving them too much air time in the past.  Meanwhile, they spent months, years now, covering Trump civil and criminal trials.  They are obsessed with Trump.  Yes, his mental aptitude was mentioned often.  The voters did not care.  They don't care about his morality.  Nor his financial malfeasance.  Etc, etc.  They hardly spent a minute on his two assassination attempts once they'd passed a few days.  No, the media did not "normalize" him.  Joe Biden and the woke brigade just sucked so badly (for enough Americans) that it really didn't matter about Trump.

With all due respect, I have no idea what news you were watching.  I think they absolutely normalized him.  Whenever I saw non-cable news, anything he ever said was heavily edited to make his speeches sound normal and traditional.  Whenever he said something wild or crazy, non-cable news didn't cover it.  He gave hundreds of speeches, and the only sound clips I ever heard were him saying stuff like "we are going to lower prices" or stuff like that.

I also think there was an amazingly small amount of coverage of Trump's economic plan which will absolutely wipe out huge number of struggling Americans.  No attention was spent on the logistics of Trump's idea to deport millions of people.  If I'd only watched those news, I would've thought that Trump was basically John Kasich - a completely normal Republican.

The media allowed Trump to take advantage of the idea that electing Trump will mean a return to pre-Covid life.  Even when he did press conferences, they never got him to clarify anything.  He got away with stuff like having "concepts of a plan" and never forced him to elaborate on anything.

People assume that all Trump voters are locked into Fox News, but Fox News is far and away the most popular cable news network and they don't even average enough viewers in primetime to cover all the people in Texas that voted for Trump.  Cable news coverage is a drop in the bucket.  Non-cable news isn't as big as it used to be, but it's still bigger than cable news.  And network news was so terrified of looking biased against Trump that they ended up being biased for Trump.  Which probably was great to the owners of the major media outlets, which were all behind Trump.

Again, Trump has all of the big media money and all the stupid people.  It's a great group of people to have.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Media normalization of Trump was one of the biggest issues of 2024. Grizzlor has had his finger to the pulse of lots of things and his predictions have been so right that I have had to cry myself to sleep a few times, but claiming media didn't normalize Trump is not factual.

3,402

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

QuinnSlidr wrote:

I think that by not covering Trump and not pointing out Trump's mental incompetence exactly as they did Biden's 24/7,  actually hurt the democratic campaign more than it helped. In that way, the media is entirely complicit and played a large part in the loss.

About the only station who was only covering everything anti-Trump was MSNBC (sadly).

I'm going to have to retort the Afghanistan negative talking points here with the following facts:

Only 13 American soldiers died.
President Biden saved over 122,000 people from certain death, who were airlifted out of Afghanistan successfully.

I'd call that a successful withdrawal. I'm sorry Americans died. But you can't deny that it was a highly successful withdrawal when it saved over 122,000 lives.

What others fail to say when bringing this up is how badly Trump botched everything when he negotiated with the Taliban.

It is entirely unrealistic and naive to act as if a military operation is going to be all hunky dory and without casualties.

They couldn't "point out" Trump's "decline" because it was not overtly evident.  Biden looked like awful, and was rarely seen.  Trump was out there multiple times a week, given speeches, albeit boring, dumb ones.  He gave interviews, tons of them.  Did podcasts.  Harris and Walz went into hiding post-Labor Day.  Trump being mentally demented while Biden was 100x worse was not going to stick.  Trump may have seemed nasty during the Harris debate, but mentally impaired not so much.

I view the withdrawal successful but American troops still died and thousands of Afghans were stranded.  Worse, the images on TV were so damning, and made Biden seem totally inept, as any foreign military mess will.  Multiple DEMOCRATS tried to warn him, he was stubborn and an old know-it-all, and refused to hear them.  The 13 troops who were "only killed" because a public relations mess, because their families were pissed off and continued that right through that infamous cemetery moment this fall.  Again, people SEE this stuff. 

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

With all due respect, I have no idea what news you were watching.  I think they absolutely normalized him.  Whenever I saw non-cable news, anything he ever said was heavily edited to make his speeches sound normal and traditional.  Whenever he said something wild or crazy, non-cable news didn't cover it.  He gave hundreds of speeches, and the only sound clips I ever heard were him saying stuff like "we are going to lower prices" or stuff like that.

I also think there was an amazingly small amount of coverage of Trump's economic plan which will absolutely wipe out huge number of struggling Americans.  No attention was spent on the logistics of Trump's idea to deport millions of people.  If I'd only watched those news, I would've thought that Trump was basically John Kasich - a completely normal Republican.

The media allowed Trump to take advantage of the idea that electing Trump will mean a return to pre-Covid life.  Even when he did press conferences, they never got him to clarify anything.  He got away with stuff like having "concepts of a plan" and never forced him to elaborate on anything.

People assume that all Trump voters are locked into Fox News, but Fox News is far and away the most popular cable news network and they don't even average enough viewers in primetime to cover all the people in Texas that voted for Trump.  Cable news coverage is a drop in the bucket.  Non-cable news isn't as big as it used to be, but it's still bigger than cable news.  And network news was so terrified of looking biased against Trump that they ended up being biased for Trump.  Which probably was great to the owners of the major media outlets, which were all behind Trump.

Again, Trump has all of the big media money and all the stupid people.  It's a great group of people to have.

I'll tell you what New York media has covered in the weeks leading to Christmas.  A twice illegal immigrant from Guatemala, who happened to be a jobless K2 addict and alcoholic, doused a woman on the subway and lit her on fire, to her death!!!!  This was on video.  He was deported and yet snuck in and was receiving gov't benefits!  Add that to the coverage of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua all over the country, and the other completely wild illegal-based violent crime.  All of which Biden inept policy is the biggest cause of.  Trump doesn't even need to open his mouth, he wins, or won, as it was. 

Then we have the media, including ABC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, etc. all of which thoroughly covered Trump's numerous legal cases.  As I warned multiple times, they weren't going to stick.  Sure maybe in NYC, where Trump was hated and the jury pool ready to hang him on anything.  Merrick Garland was lambasted for sitting on these cases, well there was a reason.  He wasn't stupid.  He knew that prosecuting a rival political figure was very risky, very dicey.  Especially one who could hire may lawyers, and who was going to get preference from conservative judges around the nation.  The ONLY case that had a sliver of a chance was the Jan 6 conspiracy, and that would have needed DC jurors, and he likely would have appealed that successfully anyway.  All of that was an utter waste of time.  The liberal media ate it up.

As for questioning Trump's future plans, again, it was done.  The voters DID NOT CARE!  They viewed the economy and the country incredibly negatively.  Biden was at 30-something approval thanks to Afghan mess, inflation, etc. going back to 2021.  You will NEVER win with those numbers.  Nor will your successor, who btw is now open to investigation for campaign fund misuse after spending tens of millions to apparently "buy" the support of celebrities.  All while her internal polling showed no shot of winning from the time they got in. 

People who don't like Trump, think he's probably a criminal, STILL voted for him!!!  What was the media supposed to do with that? 

It's time to put the blame where it is deserved.  Joe Biden was inept, his team and the media hid that.  His policies were a failure.  He finally had to give up on the unconstitutional and unpopular college loan forgiveness recently.  Yes, his infrastructure bill will be a good one in the years to come, but that takes years and years.  Now we have Democratic public health officials screaming for bird flu vaccines, and more lockdowns.  Enough with these people!  Biden and Harris approved of a nanny state, inflamed inflation with too much spending (most of which was basically fraud in the end), did nothing on immigration or crime, and wished to shut down debate on anything their side didn't approve of.  These are the most glaring complaints, and good portion warranted, from voters who departed their side.  Not counting the millions who voted in 2020, and didn't bother this time.  Which was rampant in the Northeast I can tell you.

3,403

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

In other news, my first President, Jimmy Carter, has died at age 100.  He was known as a "boy scout," someone who did things honestly and for the right reasons.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

We should absolutely be working on bird flu vaccines; it could be the next pandemic.

The rest is interesting opinion.

3,405 (edited by Slider_Quinn21 2025-01-02 09:07:01)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Grizzlor wrote:

The ONLY case that had a sliver of a chance was the Jan 6 conspiracy, and that would have needed DC jurors, and he likely would have appealed that successfully anyway.  All of that was an utter waste of time.  The liberal media ate it up.

I mean it was a former president on trial.  The media eats up any trial of anyone of significance.  Remember OJ?

And the strongest case was the documents case.  Trump took documents and did God knows what with them.  It was thrown out because Cannon is a huge Trump sycophant, and he might put her on the Supreme Court for it.

People who don't like Trump, think he's probably a criminal, STILL voted for him!!!  What was the media supposed to do with that?

Show Trump for who he is.  Cover the things that Trump has said.  Cover the things that he wants to do.  Cover the entirely of what he said, not finding 2-3 second sound bytes that made Trump sound normal.  I'm telling you that I watched local news and the Today Show (it's what my wife watches in the morning) and they didn't mention any of those things.  If there was no other news, I would've thought that Trump is John Kasich.

The media has an obligation to tell the truth and show the world for how it is.  The media for the 2024 election did their best job to make Trump into a boring candidate with no policies at all.  Which is what Trump wanted.  He ran on "everything was perfect when I was president" and people believed it.

It's time to put the blame where it is deserved.  Joe Biden was inept, his team and the media hid that.  His policies were a failure.  He finally had to give up on the unconstitutional and unpopular college loan forgiveness recently.  Yes, his infrastructure bill will be a good one in the years to come, but that takes years and years.  Now we have Democratic public health officials screaming for bird flu vaccines, and more lockdowns.  Enough with these people!  Biden and Harris approved of a nanny state, inflamed inflation with too much spending (most of which was basically fraud in the end), did nothing on immigration or crime, and wished to shut down debate on anything their side didn't approve of.  These are the most glaring complaints, and good portion warranted, from voters who departed their side.  Not counting the millions who voted in 2020, and didn't bother this time.  Which was rampant in the Northeast I can tell you.

Again, people are idiots.  The good news is that the idiots that voted Trump in are going to get exactly what Trump told them they would get, and they're going to suffer for it.

Airplane wrote:

Shana, they bought their tickets. They knew what they were getting into. I say, let 'em crash!

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Again, people are idiots.  The good news is that the idiots that voted Trump in are going to get exactly what Trump told them they would get, and they're going to suffer for it.

Airplane wrote:

Shana, they bought their tickets. They knew what they were getting into. I say, let 'em crash!

Indeed. Isn't it interesting that now Trump is coming out openly saying that it would be difficult to bring grocery prices down? He is basically saying openly that he campaigned on a lie.

Also, "President" Musk is championing H1-B Visas and MAGA does not like it one bit. Even "Vice President" Trump came out in support of Musk's H1-B Visas. I use the quotes as sarcasm because of all the social media furor of folks calling Elon President Musk and Trump Vice President Trump.

"President" Musk is also censoring accounts like Laura Loomer who is openly coming out against him. He removed her verified check mark as a punishment of sorts.

By the way...where is JD Vance? He is very very...silent?

Didn't we warn the Trumpers? We sure did. en masse.

3,407 (edited by Slider_Quinn21 2025-01-03 09:39:38)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

QuinnSlidr wrote:

Isn't it interesting that now Trump is coming out openly saying that it would be difficult to bring grocery prices down? He is basically saying openly that he campaigned on a lie.

Trump's proposed policies would cause prices to go up.  Maybe significantly up.  So the only people who voted for Trump to help with grocery prices don't know anything about how that works.  Tariffs will increase prices.  Period.  Hard stop.  Deporting millions of illegal immigrants would increase prices.  Decreasing taxes but increasing government spending will increase inflation.  People that voted for Trump either don't understanding how anything works, or they voted for higher prices.

Again, Trump overwhelmingly won the stupid vote.  And that's why he's gonna be president.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:
QuinnSlidr wrote:

Isn't it interesting that now Trump is coming out openly saying that it would be difficult to bring grocery prices down? He is basically saying openly that he campaigned on a lie.

Trump's proposed policies would cause prices to go up.  Maybe significantly up.  So the only people who voted for Trump to help with grocery prices don't know anything about how that works.  Tariffs will increase prices.  Period.  Hard stop.  Deporting millions of illegal immigrants would increase prices.  Decreasing taxes but increasing government spending will increase inflation.  People that voted for Trump either don't understanding how anything works, or they voted for higher prices.

Again, Trump overwhelmingly won the stupid vote.  And that's why he's gonna be president.

Oh yes. I wholeheartedly agree with you, Slider_Quinn.

This is also evident with Google Trends searches for tariffs going up quite a lot after the election.

They all just wanted to "own the libs" regardless of anything else.

And they're gonna pay for it. Good.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Jacobin contemplates where the Biden presidency lost its way, primarily with the Build Back Better bill being split.
https://jacobin.com/2025/01/biden-domes … res-legacy

3,410 (edited by Grizzlor 2025-01-19 15:40:01)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/19/politics … index.html

33% approval lowest since 1992

It's been a totally disastrous start of 2025 for Democrats.  The fires in Los Angeles have shown the Governor and Mayor of LA to both be utterly incompetent, and ready to pass the buck.  California is a one-party state, and despite it's strangling regulations, it completely failed job one, to safeguard its civilians.  Multiple examples of incompetence were on display with the widespread destruction.  A major reservoir was off line.  Hydrants were often missing (due to being stolen).  The Mayor decided to stay in Africa despite the threats of massive wind, then showed up and was unable to give a press conference.  It's fire department leadership chose to prioritize "diversity" instead of function.  Bass slashed it's budget.  And then you have cases where multiple local initiatives to safeguard power lines or remove vegetation were stopped by the eco-insanity rampant in California Democratic politics.  The city of Los Angeles nearly elected centrist Rick Caruso, who SHOULD have been the choice.  Instead, career Dem Bass won out, and you have incompetence.

Within California, we also have the former and ultra-woke Mayor of Oakland, another idiot who prioritized "reforms of Oakland police."  She blew the Oakland A's negotiations, and presided over record crime that led to most retailers to leave the city in droves.  Thao was finally, mercifully, recalled by voters after less than 2 years in office.  She has since been indicted on multiple corruption charges by federal prosecutors.  I won't even touch San Francisco, a completely broken place that was once a jewel of American cities, along with Portland and Seattle, on the west coast.  All ruined.

Move east to Chicago, where sadly they continue to be led by an utter fool in Brandon Johnson, who can no longer raise money.  He's that unpopular.  Like several Western cities, Chicago's Johnson will attempt to fight Trump's ICE on sanctuary city status.  The voters there don't want that.  Really almost everywhere now, they're sick of it.  The November electoral gains by Trump in urban areas proves that. 

And then good grief we get to New York, where a Democratic super-majority set greater NYC on the road to lawlessness and violence with Cuomo's insipid bail reform legislation 6 years ago.  Current Gov Kathy Hochul is easily the most disliked politician around, even worse than Trump.  Her revised congestion pricing tax is absolutely despised by anyone but the rich, lefty transplants who have taken over Manhattan and sought to banish the working class from their sight.  The Mayor of the city, who is currently groveling to Trump, in order to avoid near-certain federal indictment (for bribery), has worsened the crime in the city.

These are in total, absolutely cringeworthy examples of Democratic incompetence and corruption.  These are the most TAXED areas in the country, and what are the citizens getting?  Money wasted at every turn, and basic civic functions are simply broken and unreliable.  Each time, there HAVE been centrist Democrats who have tried to win back these cities.  The lunatic left who vote in droves, have barely stopped it.  I have to assume the tide is turning.  One cannot imagine the Mayor of LA will survive an almost-predictable recall.  Newsom might be the most inept looking Governor in America now. 

Diversity, equity, inclusion.  This is what the Democratic brand has supposedly morphed to become.  No, it should have been MERIT, COMMON SENSE, and COMPETENCE.  Unbelievably frustrating. 

Trump will take a victory lap for the Gaza Hostage deal, followed by "solving" the Tik Tok ban and bringing that back.  Followed by the start of a perhaps chaotic but largely popular migrant round up.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

I would hope that diversity, equity and inclusion are balanced equally with merit, common sense and competence rather than having one at the expense of the other.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Grizzlor wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/19/politics … index.html

33% approval lowest since 1992

It's been a totally disastrous start of 2025 for Democrats.  The fires in Los Angeles have shown the Governor and Mayor of LA to both be utterly incompetent, and ready to pass the buck.  California is a one-party state, and despite it's strangling regulations, it completely failed job one, to safeguard its civilians.  Multiple examples of incompetence were on display with the widespread destruction.  A major reservoir was off line.  Hydrants were often missing (due to being stolen).  The Mayor decided to stay in Africa despite the threats of massive wind, then showed up and was unable to give a press conference.  It's fire department leadership chose to prioritize "diversity" instead of function.  Bass slashed it's budget.  And then you have cases where multiple local initiatives to safeguard power lines or remove vegetation were stopped by the eco-insanity rampant in California Democratic politics.  The city of Los Angeles nearly elected centrist Rick Caruso, who SHOULD have been the choice.  Instead, career Dem Bass won out, and you have incompetence.

Within California, we also have the former and ultra-woke Mayor of Oakland, another idiot who prioritized "reforms of Oakland police."  She blew the Oakland A's negotiations, and presided over record crime that led to most retailers to leave the city in droves.  Thao was finally, mercifully, recalled by voters after less than 2 years in office.  She has since been indicted on multiple corruption charges by federal prosecutors.  I won't even touch San Francisco, a completely broken place that was once a jewel of American cities, along with Portland and Seattle, on the west coast.  All ruined.

Move east to Chicago, where sadly they continue to be led by an utter fool in Brandon Johnson, who can no longer raise money.  He's that unpopular.  Like several Western cities, Chicago's Johnson will attempt to fight Trump's ICE on sanctuary city status.  The voters there don't want that.  Really almost everywhere now, they're sick of it.  The November electoral gains by Trump in urban areas proves that. 

And then good grief we get to New York, where a Democratic super-majority set greater NYC on the road to lawlessness and violence with Cuomo's insipid bail reform legislation 6 years ago.  Current Gov Kathy Hochul is easily the most disliked politician around, even worse than Trump.  Her revised congestion pricing tax is absolutely despised by anyone but the rich, lefty transplants who have taken over Manhattan and sought to banish the working class from their sight.  The Mayor of the city, who is currently groveling to Trump, in order to avoid near-certain federal indictment (for bribery), has worsened the crime in the city.

These are in total, absolutely cringeworthy examples of Democratic incompetence and corruption.  These are the most TAXED areas in the country, and what are the citizens getting?  Money wasted at every turn, and basic civic functions are simply broken and unreliable.  Each time, there HAVE been centrist Democrats who have tried to win back these cities.  The lunatic left who vote in droves, have barely stopped it.  I have to assume the tide is turning.  One cannot imagine the Mayor of LA will survive an almost-predictable recall.  Newsom might be the most inept looking Governor in America now. 

Diversity, equity, inclusion.  This is what the Democratic brand has supposedly morphed to become.  No, it should have been MERIT, COMMON SENSE, and COMPETENCE.  Unbelievably frustrating. 

Trump will take a victory lap for the Gaza Hostage deal, followed by "solving" the Tik Tok ban and bringing that back.  Followed by the start of a perhaps chaotic but largely popular migrant round up.


This is what most of the right wing channels are all preaching. And not all of it is fact.

What the right wing channels fail to address is the fact that the fires were so powerful and widespread that they were impossible to contain. No right wing community could have done better. Any winds over 55 mph, and planes are unable to effectively fly and put out the fires. This has nothing to do with state or city governance. It wouldn't have mattered if the reservoir was full or how many full fire hydrants we have, if they are not close to where the fires burned and raged or it's physically impossible to do. Conditions have coalesced into the driest winter on record, with little rain. If you combine that with the overall speed of the winds, and the embers that were flying all over the place, it's the recipe for a perfect disaster.

It doesn't matter whether you're democrat or republican: nature will treat you the same way. No republican would have been able to do it either.

Trump's victory is the absolute narrowest ever in history. It also was never a mandate as he erroneously likes to present it as. Like Hakeem Jeffries, the U.S. House of Representatives Minority Leader has stated previously - "I don't think that this requires major reform of the party."

Diversity, equity, and inclusion are not anyone's enemy here.

But the right sure wants people to think so.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

I think both things can be true:

1. I think Democrats need to reform.  They needed to reform even if they'd won.  The current makeup of the party isn't sustainable and the people want different things.  They can't be the party of the working class and suburban educated people.  It doesn't work.  They need to shift back to what the party was trying to be under Obama, and that means winning back the MAGA people that voted for Obama.  That was a winning formula.  Clinton/Biden/Harris's route is too dangerous and relies exclusively on people hating Trump.

2. Things aren't that bad.  And Trump is going to immediately throw any goodwill he gets out.  His ideas are disastrous, and if he implements anything he wants, it will make the economy way worse than it was under Biden.

And pointing at the approval rating is pointless.  We are at a really polarized situation where the opposite party will say they disapprove no matter what the president is doing.  The maximum approval rating is 50%.  So unless you get everyone in your own party to approve, that's the best you can do.  Trump will have similar approval ratings no matter what he does, and I expect his to get much worse.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Simon Rosenberg, ever since the election, has issued mea culpa upon mea culpa and admitted that he has far more questions than answers. I'm hesitant to post what he has to say, but I appreciated his admission that he was wrong and he has lost a lot of certainty, and he is hesitant to give a definitive summary of how things turned out so very, very, very badly. At the same time, he has noted that there is a lot to be done and that needs to be done in the second age of Trump.

3,415 (edited by RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan 2025-01-20 19:16:35)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Two summers before the election I knew this was coming.  The only doubt I had was after the msg rally and the subsequent erroneous  Iowa poll in the final couple of weeks.   The democratic party invited this future.  In 2020, Biden won because people simply wanted to vote against trump.  In 2024, it could have been trump or a number of other republican candidates but Biden couldn't win and Harris was not someone with a vision that would help people move off of the Biden white house's performance, particularly the last couple of years.

Shame on Biden for not transitioning after people voted him in with his promise as a one term transition president.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

I think both things can be true:

1. I think Democrats need to reform.  They needed to reform even if they'd won.  The current makeup of the party isn't sustainable and the people want different things.  They can't be the party of the working class and suburban educated people.  It doesn't work.  They need to shift back to what the party was trying to be under Obama, and that means winning back the MAGA people that voted for Obama.  That was a winning formula.  Clinton/Biden/Harris's route is too dangerous and relies exclusively on people hating Trump.

2. Things aren't that bad.  And Trump is going to immediately throw any goodwill he gets out.  His ideas are disastrous, and if he implements anything he wants, it will make the economy way worse than it was under Biden.

And pointing at the approval rating is pointless.  We are at a really polarized situation where the opposite party will say they disapprove no matter what the president is doing.  The maximum approval rating is 50%.  So unless you get everyone in your own party to approve, that's the best you can do.  Trump will have similar approval ratings no matter what he does, and I expect his to get much worse.


Slider_Quinn21: How much good will do you think that Trump threw away today with all of his executive orders?

My guess: 250%. And then some.

We're not part of the Paris Climate Accords anymore as of today.

Thankfully, at least, the clown is unable to will away birthright citizenship because it is a constitutional right.

God help us all.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

Two summers before the election I knew this was coming.  The only doubt I had was after the msg rally and the subsequent erroneous  Iowa poll in the final couple of weeks.   The democratic party invited this future.  In 2020, Biden won because people simply wanted to vote against trump.  In 2024, it could have been trump or a number of other republican candidates but Biden couldn't win and Harris was not someone with a vision that would help people move off of the Biden white house's performance, particularly the last couple of years.

Shame on Biden for not transitioning after people voted him in with his promise as a one term transition president.

Yeah, I had a very, very, very, very bad feeling about Biden even before the first debate, but Biden seemed absolutely confident and... I wanted to believe, and I hoped he could eke out a win or pull off a miracle. With Kamala... it was a close race and I had hopes, but I've come to see it's foolish to think that a close race means a good chance because if chances were good, it wouldn't be close.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

QuinnSlidr wrote:

Slider_Quinn21: How much good will do you think that Trump threw away today with all of his executive orders?

My guess: 250%. And then some.

We're not part of the Paris Climate Accords anymore as of today.

Thankfully, at least, the clown is unable to will away birthright citizenship because it is a constitutional right.

God help us all.

I would love to chime in, but I have no idea what Trump did yesterday.  I paid no attention to his inauguration - I only found out it had been moved inside in passing.  I took my kids to a basketball game and watched no news.  As my wife watched the news this morning, I listened to a comic book podcast while I helped get the kids ready for school.

I don't know what Trump did, and I'm going to do my best to not find out on my own.  Anything I learn might come from here.  I'm not adverse to knowing, but I'm not going to allow that man any more headspace for me.  If he wants to burn the world down, I'll enjoy whatever time I have left.

3,419 (edited by QuinnSlidr 2025-01-21 21:51:10)

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:
QuinnSlidr wrote:

Slider_Quinn21: How much good will do you think that Trump threw away today with all of his executive orders?

My guess: 250%. And then some.

We're not part of the Paris Climate Accords anymore as of today.

Thankfully, at least, the clown is unable to will away birthright citizenship because it is a constitutional right.

God help us all.

I would love to chime in, but I have no idea what Trump did yesterday.  I paid no attention to his inauguration - I only found out it had been moved inside in passing.  I took my kids to a basketball game and watched no news.  As my wife watched the news this morning, I listened to a comic book podcast while I helped get the kids ready for school.

I don't know what Trump did, and I'm going to do my best to not find out on my own.  Anything I learn might come from here.  I'm not adverse to knowing, but I'm not going to allow that man any more headspace for me.  If he wants to burn the world down, I'll enjoy whatever time I have left.

I 100% agree with you on that one, Slider_Quinn21. But, my notifications for all the major news apps (ABC7, CNN, MSNBC) are setup as such that everything that happens comes through on my iPhone, so I get short headlines from all the major news networks. So it's hard to tune everything out. I can only handle this in small doses anyway.

Here are a few updates:

Ol' Elon performed a clear apartheid Nazi salute at Trump's inauguration on Monday at least twice.

Now all Federal DEI employees have been placed on paid leave starting Wednesday.

John Bolton's security agents service that he had been receiving from the Biden administration has been cancelled immediately because he came out against Trump.

And Trump has reversed all low Medicare/Medicaid prices that President Biden had negotiated.

Trump does not care about anyone but himself and the mega billionaires backing him.

Re: American Politics: Discuss and Debate

QuinnSlidr wrote:

I 100% agree with you on that one, Slider_Quinn21. But, my notifications for all the major news apps (ABC7, CNN, MSNBC) are setup as such that everything that happens comes through on my iPhone, so I get short headlines from all the major news networks. So it's hard to tune everything out. I can only handle this in small doses anyway.

The day after the election, I cleaned out my phone.  I deleted the Apple News app, I got rid of the news widget on the far end of my home screen, and I made my browsers (at home and work) default to a blank screen instead of a "random news" screen.  I'm not withdrawing fully from the world - I don't go out of my way to avoid news - I find out plenty from my friends' group chat and just existing in the world.  And I'm not going to go out of my way to slam my head so far in the ground that I don't know about stuff like the LA wildfires or stuff like that.  Even trying to avoid inauguration stuff, I organically found out that it'd been moved inside.

But I'm off social media (I've been off twitter for a while and I haven't been on facebook since election night), and I've eliminated any way my phone can update me on stuff.  I am actively avoiding listening to the news when my wife has it on, and I will absolutely avoid when my in-laws have Fox News on (I'll go to a different room).  But I'll find out about stuff second hand and that's fine with me.

As far as what Trump's done, none of that is too unexpected.  And honestly, I know things are going to get bad but any executive order that Trump does can be undone by the next guy.  Now if Bolton gets killed that's obviously permanent, but the rest of it can be fixed in four years.  The Paris Accords will have lasting damage, but that was to be expected.  I expect things to be bad with Trump, and I'm prepared for a lot of bad stuff.  What scares me is stuff that can't be undone or we can't come back from.  And we won't really know that until we see if we have free and fair elections in 2026 and 2028.

I did talk with one of my friends the other day, and he said he's somewhat optimistic that the MAGA movement might schism in 2026.  After the midterms, Republicans don't have any use for Trump anymore.  He can't run again (assuming we have elections), and they're going to have to pivot to giving Vance credit for whatever is happening (like Democrats did with Harris).  That could fracture the base because there are people that aren't Republicans - they're only loyal to Trump.  So what do those people do when Trump is out of the picture?  Trump's endorsements obviously help, but they aren't foolproof.  And when I was monitoring this stuff online, they're just as quick to turn against Republicans that aren't fully loyal to Trump as they are Democrats.

I don't know.  Maybe something to keep an eye on.