Sliders.tv → Sliders Bboard → Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media
*closes eyes*
Back in the 1980s, Donatello found a magic pen in April's apartment building that would bring whatever drawn with it to life. It turns out that April's father drew her with the pen and dear God why did April, a normal person in a crazy world, need to be a magical creature why why why?
That's...........dumb.
Mirage TMNT has a bunch of gems, but there is also a lot of crap in there as well. Kinda like Sliders. When it's good, it's damn good. But a lot of Mirage TMNT I just get into a daze as I read them.
As far as volume 4 speicifically, it started out pretty ambitious and was exciting with Laird returning. I usually enjoyed Tales more, much of them were one shot stories and more fun than the drawn out arcs of volume 4.
It's true that many of the Mirage TMNT comics are excellent. The initial 21 issues and the four one-shots are, despite missteps, very strong in terms of their superb artistry as Kevin Eastman and Peter Laird blend beautiful artwork and superb storytelling into hyperdynamic action and deeply stirring contemplation. There are problems like their bizarre design choices meaning it's hard to tell the Turtles apart and the long delays between individual issues was absurd. They are good comics.
The guest-era, from #22 - 44 when Eastman and Laird were too busy managing licensing and franchising to write and draw comics, is filled with excellent work. Eastman and Laird returned to writing the series with Jim Lawson drawing the epic "City at War" arc which is also a very serious, thoughtful, action packed story. There isn't any of the humour from the original animated show or the Nickelodeon series, but the lunacy of the Turtles comes through -- although, as I said, the fact that you can't tell any of them apart speaks poorly of Eastman and Laird's design skiils.
Volume 2 is an awkward, unfinished, abruptly concluded mess. Volume 3's pretty good if you make sure to read the fan-published issues. Volume 4 is filled with beautiful artistry and many of the TALES OF THE TMNT stories are excellent, but the unfinished, inconclusive nature of the series means nobody should read it. The TMNT Entity blog remarked that most readers could stop at "City of War" and feel like they had a complete, finished, satisfying product without stepping into the incomplete material of Volumes 2 - 4.
I'm still in the middle of TMNT: ODYSSEY.
What do you think about the volume 1 guest issues drawn by Rich Hedden and Tom McWeeny (34, 38-40)? They also did a one shot The Maltese Turtle. They were over the top comedy gold in my opinion, and heavily influenced me personally as an artist (even though I never pursued it professionally). They also had a series from Dark Horse called Roachmill and did a few guest stints on Gen 13. I wish they had continued to create funnybooks in that kind of over the top humor, but I guess there's little market for it, as McWeeny ended up doing a lot of inking for Image (no humor style), a lot with DV8.
#34 is a delightfully psychological tale with some great jokes. #38 - 40 would be funnier if the story were compressed into a single issue; they didn't have enough jokes for three installments. My favourite of the guest-era are the three Michael Zulli issues.
I finished reading the Mirage finale, ODYSSEY. This is essentially the SLIDERS REBORN of NINJA TURTLES; a parallel-reality spanning epic made by the fans for the fans and at their own expense. It's pretty amazing, but the fact that it exists speaks to the sheer failure of the actual creators.
Synopsis! Synopsis!
TMNT ODYSSEY is a series finale for the Mirage comics that, like SLIDERS REBORN, seeks to address a sea of unresolved plots and posting tribute to a labyrinth of continuity while telling its own story in addition to serving as a definite conclusion.
The story: a mysterious time traveling and reality warping villain is destroying realities containing versions of the Ninja Turtles, wiping out the first and second animated shows, the live action films, the Archie published comics and it’s up to the aged Mirage Turtles to confront this enemy known only as the Shogun.
The Shogun turns out to be a future version of Michelangelo driven mad by several cosmic artifacts and grief over the Turtle family haven drifted apart and by how all his parallel universe counterparts are not thinkers and writers but absent minded goofballs. He seeks to destroy reality and rebuild it into his ideal multiverse in which his family will never separate or die.
The Turtles fight their brother to the end of time. Raphael kills Michelangelo and Leonardo grabs the cosmic object just before all of reality is destroyed. The multiverse reforms and the new worlds include the IDW comics, the Michael Bay films, the Nickelodeon series and potentially more.
It's nicely written by Andrew Modeen and it's drawn by TMNT comic veteran Jim Lawson, so despite being fan fiction, it fits right in with the official Mirage comics and easy to see as canonical.
It’s a good finale. The Turtles are all old now, still excellent fighters but worn down by injuries and sadness. The unfinished Volume 4 is integrated into ODYSSEY through a sequence of the Turtles annual camping trip at multiple points in their lifetimes, one of which is set during Volume 4 without specifying how that volume ended.
The Turtles, traveling across time and space to find the Shogun, are joined by survivors of characters from the other continuities, showing respect to every version of the Turtles. There’s extensive tribute to Mirage comics to observe what’s being concluded.
The ending directs readers to embrace the new Ninja Turtles shows, films and comics while heralding the Mirage comics as the core source material and assuring us that the previous incarnations lived full lives even if they did so out of sight from the readers. NINJA TURTLES ODYSSEY takes the Turtles to the end of their lives and then shows them reborn.
I can't find the old Sleepy Hollow post, but I wanted to say a couple things about it.
First off, I think it's been really fun this year. A lot like season one. I think the new people have meshed really well, and the stories they're telling are interesting. I think Dreyfuss and taking over America with supernatural help is a great move for the series, and they've kept Sleepy Hollow close (enough) that it doesn't feel like a spin-off.
Second, they called it the "season finale" but I wonder if it will be back. Even with half the original cast, it can't be cheap, and the ratings are about 2/3 what they were last year (when it was brought back for less episodes on a Friday). That being said, it's just a half-season show, and it seemed to do okay on a Friday. Maybe it will be back.
Third, it's really weird that we've had a couple different flash forwards, and they still haven't really explained what happened to cause Dreyfus' America. So he kills the president and becomes president? Becomes emperor? Other than change the flag and execute political prisoners, what's different about his country? I'm sure they have budget restraints of showing too much (thus the story told in children's drawings), but they can tell us about it in dialogue and it doesn't cost anything 
Fourth, it reminds me a lot of Fringe's final two seasons. And not just because John Noble is back.
I haven't seen Sleepy Hollow this year. After season 1, the show took a huge dive. I may check it out if it's on Netflix though.
I watched seasons 2 and 3 but it dragged. This season, he's gone to Washington DC and is working with a secret group (very small) that is the direct result of Washington trying to build in a supernatural defense into the government. It feels like a very organic move for the show. Depending on what happens, I think this season is worth checking out (I don't think there's any need to see the other two seasons - this one is very much a follow up to the 1st season).
Interesting. I will keep it in mind for summer.
On the Walking Dead. Spoilers.
I know some of you watch, and this is a show I sorta hate-watch. A lot of people are talking about the idea that, last night, Rick took a step in his fight against Negan and the Saviors by acting very-much like Negan and the Saviors. And that's a fine talking point, but the show does that all the time.
Something I'd like to talk about is something a little different and something that I think could've made this season of the Walking Dead different. The Saviors are shown to be just like a lot of the other evil communities in the show. The big difference is that they're more like gangsters....going around and shaking people down in exchange for peace.
But what if the Saviors....were saviors? What if they were shaking people down for...protection?
Imagine a different version of this season where, for the first time, Walkers weren't a problem? Alexandria and Hilltop are free to go on supply runs because....the Saviors are a protection racket. They take your guns and they take their cut of your "revenue", but they're also out there mowing down the walking dead. And they're good at it. They can clear whole towns and help put up walls and start communities. And, in exchange, they get their piece of the pie.
It'd be an interesting conundrum where people are torn between living in this authoritarian government and living in complete zombie-infested chaos.
I think it'd be a much more interesting dynamic - Negan would be evil, sure. But he'd have a much better reason to think of himself as the good guy. "Look, we're out there winning this war for you. We keep your communities safe. All we're asking for is for you to gather up some supplies and share them with us while we're doing it. While we're out there risking our lives, we don't have time to plant a garden and get food. You guys are going to have to do that for us if you want to live in peace."
I think that would be much better.
Does anyone watch USA's Colony?
It's a pretty interesting show. They just finished season 2.
I haven't tried Colony yet. I will probably get around to it eventually though.
I've been watching Thirteen Reasons Why, on Netflix. It is a compelling series, but it is emotionally draining... and I'm only on episode 4. A lot of people don't like stories that are dark or depressing, but I'm fine with it as long as they're done well. An emotional reaction is good. And saying that every story should be happy and fun in some way is just silly. The show is well acted and well made. Good on them! That said, I feel like curling up in bed with the covers pulled over my head after every episode.
Just finished episode 8 of Thirteen Reasons Why. I pity the people who binge watch this show. I really do.
Re: Voyager and "Endgame"
I haven't seen this since it aired, but there's a lot of good things here. The problem, as is the case with a lot of Voyager, is a lazy amount of planning. The stuff in the episode is all good, and I think if the ideas in the episode were a season-long arc, it could've been a really good one. The problem is that everything feels detached....like it belongs to a completely different season of the show.
Imagine if Endgame part one were the first episode of the season. Tuvok's mental degradation could be a season-long arc. He's diagnosed at the start, makes a mistake here and there, then it gets worse and worse until he realizes he's a danger to the crew. Same with Seven and Chakotay. Instead of randomly popping up, it could be something that develops. They could also discover that the Borg transportation hub exists and spend the season trying to find it. Maybe they have to go in the wrong direction....making the decision to abandon it much more weighty.
I know Voyager never really worked that way, and it's a little easier to see with TV the way it is now. But it's crazy that they had the ideas and then just crammed them all nonsensically into one episode.
Voyager always had better ideas for episodes than they had episodes. They're the poster child for good concept/bad execution.
I recently finished a DS9 rewatch and had the same problems with it I did the first time. Too much time spent on mundane topics. O'Brien infiltrating the mob, Bajoran religion, Vic Fontaine, trying to fix the Ferengi, AAAAH. Can I have some science fiction in my science fiction, please?
I can't find the old Sleepy Hollow post, but I wanted to say a couple things about it.
First off, I think it's been really fun this year. A lot like season one. I think the new people have meshed really well, and the stories they're telling are interesting. I think Dreyfuss and taking over America with supernatural help is a great move for the series, and they've kept Sleepy Hollow close (enough) that it doesn't feel like a spin-off.
Second, they called it the "season finale" but I wonder if it will be back. Even with half the original cast, it can't be cheap, and the ratings are about 2/3 what they were last year (when it was brought back for less episodes on a Friday). That being said, it's just a half-season show, and it seemed to do okay on a Friday. Maybe it will be back.
Third, it's really weird that we've had a couple different flash forwards, and they still haven't really explained what happened to cause Dreyfus' America. So he kills the president and becomes president? Becomes emperor? Other than change the flag and execute political prisoners, what's different about his country? I'm sure they have budget restraints of showing too much (thus the story told in children's drawings), but they can tell us about it in dialogue and it doesn't cost anything
Fourth, it reminds me a lot of Fringe's final two seasons. And not just because John Noble is back.
And....it's cancelled.
Anyone else watch 12 Monkeys on Sci-Fi (I won't call it by its new name)? I've really liked it so far, and I was a little worried when they announced they were going to release the entire season over one weekend (4 episodes Friday, 3 each on Saturday and Sunday). Especially after they'd announced that it was renewed for season 4 and cancelled after that. They released a trailer for season 3 months earlier, and I was worried that the season was terrible (and that the network was simply renewing to make up for extra costs and dumping the subpar season 3 so not to waste valuable airtime).
I'm almost done with the season 3 binge, and I've been impressed. It's not groundbreaking television by any means, but the show is fun and the characters are interesting. The network said they thought the show worked as a "binge-worthy" show, and since I've watched the whole season in a couple of weeks, they might be right.
I have no idea if the binge strategy benefits the network or not. I'm assuming the vast majority of people DVRed the season, and those results expire, right? But if it worked for them, do you think this is something that other networks would try?
Does anyone else watch?
I watched season 1, but haven't been able to see anything past that yet. Hopefully at some point.
Has anyone here ever shopped through iOffer? I was just looking at the site because I was running random searches on old TV shows that were canceled after one season, and they have sellers with a lot of those complete seasons. It'd be cool to buy a few (VR.5, Strange Luck, Freakylinks, etc.) but I've never even heard of the site before today, so I probably wouldn't actually shop there (for my bootlegged copies of long forgotten tv shows)
Anyone else watch 12 Monkeys on Sci-Fi (I won't call it by its new name)? I've really liked it so far, and I was a little worried when they announced they were going to release the entire season over one weekend (4 episodes Friday, 3 each on Saturday and Sunday). Especially after they'd announced that it was renewed for season 4 and cancelled after that. They released a trailer for season 3 months earlier, and I was worried that the season was terrible (and that the network was simply renewing to make up for extra costs and dumping the subpar season 3 so not to waste valuable airtime).
I'm almost done with the season 3 binge, and I've been impressed. It's not groundbreaking television by any means, but the show is fun and the characters are interesting. The network said they thought the show worked as a "binge-worthy" show, and since I've watched the whole season in a couple of weeks, they might be right.
I have no idea if the binge strategy benefits the network or not. I'm assuming the vast majority of people DVRed the season, and those results expire, right? But if it worked for them, do you think this is something that other networks would try?
Does anyone else watch?
I had it on that weekend. They have an excellent show. It probably does better suit binge watching. The broadcast was done that way because the previous ratings sucked. They burned off s3 and are giving it a proper closure by ordering a s4 because the executives know its quality scifi and they dont want to pissoff the hardcore scifi base who invested time into it not to mention create bad press from critics.
I think there just might be so much quality serial drama out there shows like that where you really have to have a handle on whats going on may be taking a ratings hit. Who can keep all this stuff anymore? Eventually the number will decrease but production is at a high with streaming services investing and taking a loss on the content and a lot of cable channels fighting for their future and being aggressive as well.
But its already starting to change... esquire network is gonna be dead, a&e and mtv are just going to do reality moving forwardm. The shift away from the golden age is already starting. A good show like 12 Monkeys getting low ratings and having a season burned off over a weekend was basically a sign that the marketplace needed to correct itself because consumers cant handle all of these "10 hour movies".
It sucks that it couldn't find an audience. It's a fun show, I always enjoy it more than I think I will
Is it as scary to you all as it is to me that we now count on SyFy to know quality science fiction and to make sure their shows have proper endings?
I do wonder if Sliders would've gotten a similar treatment if it had been done today. Especially with Torme at the helm.
I think Sliders ended up just being made too early. It was a few years too early from a serialization perspective, and I wonder all the possibilities it could've had to find an audience. Would it have been premium cable? Netflix? Amazon? Or would it have been something like Timeless on NBC and had all the same problems?
The Leftovers might be the best show I've ever seen.
Sliders could have gone down a more Lost path, perhaps. The concept of the show was crazy, but it was taken seriously, so the strange, twisted, crazy elements seemed somehow believable. If Sliders were done with a bit of restraint and style, that "slightly askew" approach to alternate histories could be really interesting. If they could achieve the feeling that we're on the wrong world through camera angles, set dressing, lighting, etc, it could make the audience really feel that disconnect that the Sliders were feeling.
The Leftovers... I got halfway through season 2 and then forgot to finish it. It just didn't pull me in.
Well it sounds like so much of Torme's problems with the network were because he wanted the show put in a specific order. Back then, it was silly because TV wasn't serialized. Now, it's crazy that a show *wouldn't* be set in the order the creator wants. I know it happens sometimes, but now TV is so serialized that it has to be shown in order. People go back to binge previous seasons to watch a new season.
If Torme hadn't started off on the wrong foot, I think Sliders could've been a bigger success.
Man...I figured you'd have loved The Leftovers. It's so much about character...all the best parts of LOST. I don't know if a show has affected me as much emotionally. I think The Wire is the best show, beginning to end, of any show ever. LOST is my favorite show. The Leftovers might be the best of both worlds.
Yeah, I thought I'd love The Leftovers too, but I just have a really hard time connecting to the characters and everything that happens to them.
I'm the same way with Breaking Bad. Everyone says that it's the best show ever, but I can't watch it. I want everyone on that show to die.
I never loved Breaking Bad for the same reason. I never liked Walt...not even at the beginning. He was always an a-hole, and I was just waiting for him to get his.
It's even worse with House of Cards. No one on that show is likeable or relateable.
I do find House of Cards interesting, despite the fact that I dislike almost everyone. Also, I couldn't stop laughing at their version of Highland Park when they showed Claire's childhood home. It was as bad as Supernatural's version of Richardson. They must have just looked at the carefully framed Google search images.
With Breaking Bad, it's like we were supposed to feel for Walt and then witness his downward spiral, but like you said, he started out pretty unlikable.
Hahah, I didn't know Claire was from Highland Park. I grew up around there. Hopefully you can't tell.
But yeah, I can't stand the characters and have no one to root for. I quit in season 2 and won't go back.
Wow. You're fancy folk! The only person I've ever known in that area was an au pair from South Africa.
Haha well if you couldn't tell by now, I guess I'm not
I do think Sliders was a bit ahead of its time. The problem was perhaps it wasn't quite the mass, mass consumer product FOX needed to support its ratings requirements. Sliders at its best was clever and the team-work aspect of it appealed to bright people -- but not all of America is super bright... and that's why they pushed it into the adventure, dinosaur, movie-of-the-week template. To appeal to a "broader" audience.
Nowadays, on another network, Sliders wouldn't have to draw stupendous ratings but could find its audience - folks of above-average intellect who like the teamwork aspect of the show and not always resorting to guns/brute force to solve problems. When Sliders moved to cable, SyFy's household reach wasn't quite as significant as it is now.. "cable" wasn't quite "cable" yet... so of course that impacted the budget, and its not like they could produce a lot of quality.
I just think the problem back then was you either needed to be huge or it was unstainable, or small and cheapish. The spectrum for different models wasn't quite there. So yea, I think it was ahead of its time. It's why we all love it still but it just couldn't make FOX money. And if you look at some of the episodes that did well in the ratings, FOX wasn't necessarily wrong about what drove tune in. A lot of the crap in season 3 got some of the higher ratings.
This is why X-Files was really such a gem. It was smart but also got great ratings. Hard to do.
Call me a traditionalist, but reinventing SLIDERS' platform and storytelling to be more 'modern' and in step with LOST or whatever strikes me as reinventing the wheel. To me, what makes SLIDERS limitless and potent is that every episode is set on a new Earth. Every episode is a new story in a new setting with a new beginning, middle and end. It's weird to me that Tracy Torme was so obsessed with writing a show that would alienate a casual viewing audience with arcs and ongoing continuity when he and Robert K. Weiss created a series concept that could welcome new viewers at any point with any episode.
It's also weird to me that FOX, while rightly concerned with making SLIDERS accessible to a general audience who might not see every episode in a pre-view-on-demand era, ultimately turned the show into something that was totally incomprehensible to the casual viewer by Season 4.
And, looking at SLIDERS' sister series, THE X-FILES -- THE X-FILES didn't really do ongoing story-arcs either. Each season mostly had standalone episodes that could be aired in any order -- and throughout the season were a few myth-arc episodes that would serve as sequels to the previous myth-arc episode but create little to no interference with standalones. This approach was sustained even in the 2015 revival.
As a result, THE X-FILES was almost always accessible. Despite criticisms of being overly dense, the majority of X-FILES stories are about a and a believer investigating a paranormal event -- no additional information required. And that was probably how SLIDERS should have been -- standalone episodes with a Kromagg/Wrong Arturo/Logan St. Clair thrown in occasionally, and trying to do anything else in the 90s was just insane.
I just think that today's viewers expect the story to go somewhere. Supernatural's best episodes are their stand alone episodes, I think, but we still want to see them going somewhere. I think the show's weakness has been that the characters haven't been allowed to grow and mature as much. They tried it with Dean in season 6, but the fangirls on the internet went nuts and demanded that they go back to the way things were before. Ultimately, it weakens a show.
I don't think that Sliders should be too arc-centric. However, like Lost, I think that they should make an effort to ground the series and make us feel like each universe is realistic, even if it isn't. The writers have to believe in it, in order to make us believe in it. And even if the characters move from world to world, we are watching the same people. Those experiences have to leave a mark and the characters have to progress. I don't think that jumping in at episode 37 should be as simple as jumping in at episode 1.
I'd probably take the approach in a modern version of SLIDERS where the characters evolve on an ongoing basis, but the A-story and B-story are resolved within each episode. So, Quinn would start out as geeky and intimidated, but by the end of Season 1, he throws his first punch and by Season 2, he'd be more aggressive but also more tactical. Wade would start out as mousey and shy, but by the middle of Season 2, she'd become daring and wild. Rembrandt would start out as cowardly, but by the end of Season 1, he'd be handling shotguns and knocking people unconscious. And the Professor would become more and more relaxed.
I would also tweak the setup every season or two. Season 1 is about surviving all the craziness of the multiverse. In Season 2, the sliders become more determined to get involved in people's lives and learn more about parallel cultures. In Season 3, they defeat Logan St. Clair, take over Prototronics, rename it Sliders Incorporated and now they have a home base and much more advanced technology. In Season 4, the sliders realize the Kromaggs have become a threat impossible to ignore and the myth-arc episodes involve either learning more about the Kromagg campaign of conquest or gathering technology that could be useful in a future conflict and end the season with war erupting.
In Season 5, we have a three episode arc in which the sliders defeat the Kromaggs but lose Sliders Inc. and their home base and their advanced sliding and are reduced to being nomadic wanderers once again. In Season 6, the sliders finally make it home, but discover that after five years of travel, home is as alien to them as any parallel Earth and begin the process of not only rebuilding Sliders Inc. but training new recruits in a new project the Professor calls Sliders Academy.
In Season 7, we flash forward 100 years into the future to see a world that has been changed by sliding technology -- and then our sliders appear, having been trapped in quantum limbo and only just emerging from the vortex, unaged from when they were put in suspension, and now involved in a new battle for the legacy of sliding itself. And so on and so on.
Well, I'm not even talking about reinventing Sliders or even changing the roadmap.
I just know that one of the first clashes between Torme and Fox was about the show airing out of order. And that the clashes is what ended up, for all intents and purposes, killing the show.
If Sliders had been written in 1995, put in a box for 10 years, and then filmed in 2005, there would've been no issues with a show airing in a specific order. That might've made the relationship between Torme and the network easier.
Of course, the ripple effect could've made things worse. In 2005, there might've been added pressure to make the show even more arc-based. Instead of standalone episodes like Eggheads, we might've had entire episodes scrapped to see how Bennish is doing to find them. We might've had a Rickman-like character in season 1 instead of season 3, and once the Kromaggs were introduced, that might've meant all of season 3 (instead of season 4) would've been Kromagg-infested.
It's a delicate balance...these hypotheticals.
I always did kinda want them to revisit Bennish on Earth Prime and keep his story going. But at the same time, tethering us to Earth Prime in such a way could make us feel less loss when it comes to the Sliders feeling lost.
With the Mummy falling short at the box office, what are the odds that Universal's "Dark Universe" never gets off the ground?
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-f … ls-1001345
I learned about this a while ago, but got distracted by life stuff.
Can't wait to see what they do with this! I'm going to need a pineapple (pizza? Or maybe upside down cake), cinnamon pie, and Quatro Queso Dos Fritos!
I forgot to reply about the Dark Universe.
DC/Warner has also been working on a Dark Universe project for a long time and I think there is a lawsuit over the name. If Universal's project isn't making them a lot of money, it may not make sense to fight for it.
I forgot to reply about the Dark Universe.
DC/Warner has also been working on a Dark Universe project for a long time and I think there is a lawsuit over the name. If Universal's project isn't making them a lot of money, it may not make sense to fight for it.
The Weekly Planet was talking about this recently, and they were wondering if the "Dark Universe" name was just DC's insurance in case Justice League isn't successful. Because the proper name is "Justice League: Dark" - and the success of Justice League will probably affect the marketing for the "dark" movie. If Justice League is successful, DC will want to connect to it. If it's not successful (or at least not critically successful), then they might want to make it feel separate with a different-sounding name.
I'm still assuming Justice League will be great, and it'll be called "Justice League: Dark"
Hard to say. I personally thought the trailer for The Mummy was top notch, and I still enjoyed the movie. However, I understand the public sentiment. It's not a "Mummy" movie, it's a Tom Cruise movie. Now I'm a fan of his action work, but I can see how many have probably grown tired of him. You're not watching The Mummy, you're watching Cruise with The Mummy as background. IDK, maybe they just should have remade the Monster Squad!
Also, I think it's important to note that Alex Kurtzman probably wasn't the best choice here, despite having a VERY involved Cruise on set. Goes back to my long-standing criticism of just about everything he and Roberto Orci touch. Usually vapid trash that makes tons of money, or vapid, boring trash that doesn't.
Hmmm, considering what a mess the Dark Universe seems to be, I wonder if they'll just scrap it. Cruise's star power could probably keep it afloat, but it seems horribly planned. They only have one filmed planned, a couple stars attached, and a ton of TBAs. Shouldn't be too hard to hit the eject button if they want to.
Are there any Blade Runner fans here?
The new video looks pretty cool. I don't love the cast (Jake Gyllenhaal should have starred) but the new footage has me more excited for the film than I was after the trailer first came out.
The movie does look pretty cool. I'm curious to see where the plot goes.
As for casting... I'm not a huge fan of either Gyllenhaal. I think they're both approaching Matt Damon/Leo DiCaprio levels of over-rated. So I prefer Ryan Gosling by far.
The movie does look pretty cool. I'm curious to see where the plot goes.
As for casting... I'm not a huge fan of either Gyllenhaal. I think they're both approaching Matt Damon/Leo DiCaprio levels of over-rated. So I prefer Ryan Gosling by far.
I'm surprised you prefer Gosling. To me, he seems like a choice of the studio to maximize the revenue potential on this flick, but he seems all wrong for the franchise. Blade Runner takes place in a very gloomy environment. You need someone with some gruff and who can do downtrodden far better. I just don't think Gosling is right for that at all. Gynllenhaal would be excellent, imo, take a look at him in Prisoners. Which is directed by the guy doing 2049.
It's too bad though Ridley couldn't come back - he had to do the next Alien which of course bombed.
BR 2049 looks very good, and this comes from someone who isn't a fan of the original.
I guess we don't really have to be for either Gyllenhaal or Gosling. There are tons of actors out there who could have carried the role in another universe. I just mean to say that I like Gosling better. He has a better screen presence and just don't irritate me as much as Gyllenhaal has come to (I did like Donnie Darko and October Sky).
In the end, I just wish that Harrison Ford wasn't so closed off to the idea of returning to one of the roles that made him famous.
(/sarcasm)
I have a feeling that Ford won't be in the movie all that much. Might just be a minor part towards the end. All the scenes he's in look like the same set piece, right?
I have a feeling that Ford won't be in the movie all that much. Might just be a minor part towards the end. All the scenes he's in look like the same set piece, right?
that's a good point, i didn't think about that. i can't believe they have him wearing a grey t-shirt too.
Well, I think Harrison Ford is happy to reappear in these "soft reboots" / continuations, but I think he doesn't want to do much of the heavy lifting. It was harder with Star Wars, but I think in this he could be a minor person who provides information from the past and connects to what happened before.
That's just my guess. The dude is in his mid-70s so it's hard to expect too much from him these days.
Isn't he signed to play Indy again?
That's just my guess. The dude is in his mid-70s so it's hard to expect too much from him these days.
other than crashing planes, yea.
#TooSoon
Isn't he signed to play Indy again?
Yes, I believe. So can we assume they kill his character off? Steven Spielberg has a lot prove after they pasted in Shia LaBeouf swinging through trees.
Nice piece on the original Blade Runner, with a roundtable interview from some of the experts
I've been reading all of the rumors about the Samsung Galaxy Note 8, and also the IPhone 8. They've been running a race for fingerprint scanning built into the display, and I was curious to see who would win. Short answer, probably neither. The Note will have it built into the back of the phone.
But the more interesting updates have been for the iPhone.
They don't seem to have any fingerprint scanner at this point, since they failed to put it into the screen. They could put it on back, but they haven't ordered the parts yet and time is running out.
No fingerprint scanner means that they will be relying on facial recognition. This poses some problems, including the fact that it isn't yet reliable enough to be used for highly secure features, such as Apple Pay. So, no Apple Pay at launch?
Still no headphone jack.
Wireless charging is a big new addition, but new rumors suggest that it may not actually work at launch.
The rumor is that the screen will cover the entire front of the phone, but there will be a notch on the top of the screen, for the camera, sensors, etc. So while it will technically have a lot of screen space, I don't think that space will all be usable for games, videos, pictures, etc. It will mostly be status bar stuff.
Rumors are also saying that parts may be in short supply, so the number of available phones may be lower than normal, resulting in a delay in availability.
Rumors also suggest that Apple may be asking as much as $1200 for the basic iPhone 8, and possibly up to $1500 for the better one, because they're going for a "pro" crowd.
I'm not an Apple person, so I'm curious how this sounds to their customers. I'm sure that it will have better screen resolution and processing, and all of that. But can Apple charge that much money for a phone that seems to be cutting some features that people either rely on or were expecting to be added?
All of this is based on rumors and anonymous sources, so while it would pass CNN standards, it is really just hypothetical right now, for the sake of discussion. I'm just curious to know how these rumors look to anyone who might actually consider an iPhone.
Sliders.tv → Sliders Bboard → Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.