Marvel Cinematic Universe by Slider_Quinn21 (Page 7 of 15)

I was there for a midnight premiere of Captain America; not an empty seat in the house.  It’s one of the few movies I’ve been to where at the end the audience stood up and cheered clapping; and I felt the same way.  The movie had alot of heart; and it really left me pumped up.

I attribute that more to director Joe Johnson than anything else.  That man really gets the idealized version of World War II filled with that innocent patriotism and a propaganda feel.  That’s really what Captain America is; it was a perfect fit.

I mean, I've read your idea on how the trilogy should've gone....building to him being frozen.  And I think that could've been a stronger story as far as Steve/Peggy, but I think for Steve on his own, I think it's fine to throw him right into the future.  He doesn't really get the Hollywood ending that he wants, and as soon as he feels comfortable with this life he's always dreamed of, it's torn away from him.

The other movies are really about Steve regaining what he lost.

I see where you're coming from regarding how the Avengers might've cut short a story that would've gone longer if they didn't need Steve in the future.  But if you consider his 1940s story done, then I don't think worldbuilding affected this movie as much as, say, Iron Man 2.

I don't know if I agree with that.  Steve is a boring character, but he's boring in a lot of the same way (comic) Superman is boring.  He does the right thing.  He thinks with his conscience.  And he's willing to fight if someone disagrees with him.

That's sorta what I'm talking about in my review.  I was surprised at how much character stuff there was.  I think they missed the mark on some stuff, but you get a pretty good idea about the depth of his friendship with Bucky.  You get a pretty decent idea of what makes this guy tick and what makes him angry.  When you look at the Captain America trilogy, there's actually a decent foundation for those movies.  First Avenger is the worst of the three (in my opinion), but it's almost a Batman Begins situation.  Dark Knight is a better movie, but there's no Dark Knight if Batman Begins didn't do heavy lifting.

I was impressed.  Not blown away.  But impressed.

Jessica Jones, season 2...

SPOILERS
.
.
.
.
.
.

The second season was better than the first. While it probably could have been tightened up, it didn't have some of the bigger problems of the first season... or, it probably did, but it was presented in a way that made a bit more sense.

In general, I'm not a fan of the "Person who was thought dead turns out to not be dead" trope, especially when that death is such a large part of the main character's story. And while bringing Jessica's mother back to life for this season did provide some emotional weight to the story, I'm still not sure that it managed to bypass my dislike of that trope.

Once it was done, I guess it worked out okay. There was definite struggle with Jessica and her mother, and it didn't feel illegitimate, given the circumstance. It made the arc between those characters really interesting in a lot of ways.

Jessica killing the prison guard... At first, I thought it worked and that it served a purpose, by making Jessica do the thing that she hates the most about her mother. However, when all is said and done, I don't know that that beat was played strongly enough to make the killing worthwhile. Yeah, she killed a bad guy and she felt bad about that, but nothing really became of it. Especially since the guy splatted on the sidewalk with the smashed side up, and no apparent cause for that injury.

Some parts of the season felt weird, in that they failed to reference The Defenders and Jessica's role in saving the city there, or the fact that she really could have used the help Luke or Danny at certain points, but never mentioned them. They do get points for having Foggy pop in and out really quick.

The whole combined MCU continues to be more of a distraction than anything else. They mention the Raft several times, which we saw in Civil War. But they also talk about being the most powerful women in the world, which probably isn't true (though, come to think of it, Marvel has really failed to build up female characters). Then you consider that we're also supposed to lump in Agents of SHIELD... it's just a mess. And needlessly so. It's not like they're going to combine the Netflix shows with AoS or the movies. At least, I hope that the Netflix characters won't appear in Infinity War, because it just doesn't fit. None of these properties feel like the same reality. And that's fine. It's good even. I just wish that the studio would stop messing around and commit to the fact that they're not the same world.

At the end of the season, I felt like the story with Jessica's mother was *ended* more than *resolved*. Trish just appears and shoots Jessica's mother, and then runs away, and the whole thing feels like an afterthought. The building conflict between Jessica and this problem that was her mother ultimately led nowhere.

Like I said, the season was better than season 1. I actually didn't dislike season 2. It just had some problems that prevent me from saying that it was actually good. It just didn't seem to come together in the end. It just kinda wound down.

I bought tickets to see Infinity War on opening night.  Whether or not the movie lives up to the hype, I want to see it the same time as everyone else.

Well I agree and disagree.  Regarding the size of the cast and character work...it's not necessarily crucial for a lot of this in that film.  It's probably not necessary for, say, Dr. Strange to learn a valuable lesson in this movie.  All these characters aren't going to need to change and/or grow for them to serve their purpose.  He might just need to be there to say some spells, open some portals, and show how powerful the villain is.  And, I think, that's okay.

There are obviously three levels of MCU heroes - there's the original Avengers who have had solo films (so just Hulk, Iron Man, Thor, and Captain America), the next gen of solo-film heroes (your Spider-Man, Dr. Strange, Ant-Man, the Guardians, Black Panther), and everyone else (which would include secondary heroes like Falcon and even original Avengers like Black Widow).

This movie is doing to focus, character-wise, on the originals....since these next two movies are supposed to be a passing of the torch of sorts.  Robert Downey Jr. is going to be too expensive at some point, even if he's game.  Chris Evans has said he's done.   Hemsworth said that Ragnarok energized him, but he won't do this forever.  There's only so much for the Hulk to do since he can't have solo films.

So if this movie is about Tony finally coming to terms with all he's done....with Captain America finally making the ultimate sacrifice, with Banner getting the peace he's always wanted, and Thor growing as a hero....then I think it's fine if every other character just sorta shows up and says their catchphrase.  Because, soon, it'll be their time to step up and carry the emotional weight.

I'll certainly be grading it on a curve.  To take all these huge characters and somehow make a movie that makes any level of sense will be impressive on its own.  I'm expecting it to either be a clusterf*ck on at least one level, and that's how I'm going to rate it.

The Russo Brothers have come out and said that the two main characters in the movie are Thanos and Thor.  So if they're gonna spend any time developing Thanos as a character and if they're able to determine that there *is* a main character, then a lot of these guys are going to be background characters.  And if you're a big fan of Scarlett Witch and she doesn't get an important role, you're just going to have to get over it, unfortunately.

Incidentally, the lead up to Infinity Gauntlet in the Silver Surfer monthly, the Thanos Quest and the Infinity Gauntlet mini-series is one my all time favorite storylines in comics.  The art of Ron Lim in Surfer coupled with Jim Starlin’s writing (the creator of Thanos) was really the pinnacle of the material they produced in their careers.

Bonus trivia if you didn’t know - Thanos is based on DC Comics Darkseid.  Starlin went to DC first wanting to write his stories for Darkseid and the New Gods, but DC said no.  So Statlin went to Marvel, created Thanos and told his Darkseid stories anyway.

Yeah, but that's one of the weird things about movies in general....the people who make the advertisements (trailers and TV spots) aren't usually the people making the movie.  Every once in a while, you see moviemakers complain that something was spoiled in a trailer or a TV spot - it happens on TV too...I can remember the LOST creators getting really mad at the ABC people for "Next week on..." stuff.

At the end of the day, they both have very different goals.  The people making the trailers want to get as many people into the theaters as possible, and the moviemakers want to make the best movie they can.

But if the movie is mostly about Thor and he's not been in most of the trailers....I sorta like that.  It's better than having a great deal of the movie spoiled for me.

True, but for team up movies, you sorta have to be willing to get your one moment, cheer, and then try and enjoy the rest of the movie.  You can't really expect your favorite person to be the star because there's so many people to choose from.  That's why the ads can make it seem like Spider-Man or the Guardians are the star, when, in reality, the writers used the best character they thought the story demanded.

If TF is right, then Thor probably makes the most sense as a Adam Warlock equivalent.  Hulk as Silver Surfer....and then, after that, it's a lot of ground-level people.  Iron Man, Captain America, Black Panther, Spider-Man....they're not going to be able to put up as much of a fight in a brawl with Thanos.

That's what's sorta fun about Avengers movies.  While I enjoy the DC characters more, all of them are just so ridiculously powerful that team-ups seem almost pointless.  Flash is sometimes an afterthought in the Justice League, but Flash would destroy most of the Avengers by himself.  And don't even get me started on Superman...he'd put the Avengers out of business.

But in this movie, anyone can die.  Not just from a realism perspective....but since this is essentially the end of the road for a lot of these characters....anyone can die.  And that's why I'm seeing it the first showing in town

Knew this was coming, but now some solid word that development of Marvel movies at Fox has been halted pending the Disney merger (something currently set to be finalized sometime before next summer).  This means that Deadpool 2 and X-men Dark Phoenix will be the last of the Fox-verse.  The New Mutants movie is still hanging out there (set for release in February), but it didn’t appear to be very connected to the other X-men movies.

https://www.bleedingcool.com/2018/04/19 … men-movie/

Personally, I think Fox got X-men right more often than not; but Fantastic Four needed to go to better hands.  Done correctly, FF will be a seamless blend into the Marvel Studios movies.  X-men is going to be different; and I’m envisioning it as becoming something more like the old animated series in the 1990’s.

One of the biggest boons of getting the Fantastic Four license back is access to Kang the Conqueror.  Kang is their ticket to actually one-up themselves on Infinity War if they attempted to adapt Avengers Forever.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avengers_Forever

It would need some re-tooling given how heavy the story was steeped in old Marvel continuity, but it could be done.

I will get back to you at some point after it hits Redbox.

I should probably see Ragnarok at some point too.

If the movie is good, I'll say so. I never watch a movie and hope that it sucks, just so I can point out how much it sucks. I'm always happy when one of those movies surprises me. That just hasn't happened in a while.

I am not giving them points for what they've done so far, in terms of their cinematic universe. It's been a mess, with a few bright spots here and there. Making a ton of money doesn't make their movies good. They set an ambitious goal, and it would have been awesome if it had worked. I just don't think that it did. And they don't appear to be learning from their mistakes (because they're more about profits than craft, and that's fine). If they could do that, maybe the next round of joint-universe movies would be great.

SPOILERS continued

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

I was wondering that too.  While everyone else seemed to be acting naturally regarding Star Lord's plan, especially when it failed, Dr. Strange seemed to think things were going according to plan ("We're in the endgame now").  The only question I had was...would everyone go along with the plan if it meant they'd die?  I think Strange would be willing to sacrifice himself, especially if it were only briefly, if that's the only solution the Eye showed him.

Tony might be willing to sacrifice everyone if he truly believed that they'd win in the end (and would trust himself to be able to do what's necessary).  But Spider-Man certainly didn't seem like he knew he was going to die (although it'd be almost as heartbreaking if he did know....and his begging was just a natural reaction of a teenage kid realizing he wanted to be noble but also didn't want to die).  And while Star-Lord is a good guy in general, I'm not sure he'd go for a plan that involved him dying.

Granted, Strange might've kept certain details from everyone.  He certainly might've lied at parts.  He could've made the whole thing up and only told Tony what was going to happen (because he'd be the only one who really needed to know).  But the way people acted, even after Thanos was gone, didn't make it seem like (outside of Strange and maybe Tony) that people thought things had gone according to plan.

Now I'd read something about the ending that people wanted - that the deaths should've been reversed.  That Cap/Thor/Tony/Hulk should've died, leaving Panther/Spider-Man/Strange/etc as the remaining heroes who have to step up and save the day.  And when everyone is resurrected, suddenly, all our favorite heroes get one last big action sequence before they say their goodbyes.

To me, I don't think that really works.  The torch is going to be passed, but it needs to happen the proper way.  The way the movie actually ended gives our heroes the time to really sit on things.  The original Avengers lineup still exists.  Assuming Tony can get off Titan, they can regroup and fight one more time as a family....and then they can pass the torch.  This is the fight that was started in Avengers, and they need to be the ones to face it.  Plus, Cap needs to face losing Bucky.  Tony needs to face *all* his failures (including the loss of his surrogate son).  Banner needs to face the Hulk.  Thor needs to face the fight he lost. 

It started with them.  And it needs to end with them.  Peter and T'Challa and Strange and Danvers and Lang will get their time.

One thing that was odd was the complete lack of Hawkeye.  I know he was referenced and I know he's coming back, but Hawkeye is an original Avenger.  And I wonder if there should've been a mid-credits sequence where we cut to the Barton farm, and Hawkeye's whole family disappears.  And we either see him go for his quiver or just zoom in on his face and he knows he has to fight again (as Ronin).  It would've been more downer endings on top of a downer ending, but why not add one more thing to the pile.  The fact that they worked in an (again, another downer) ending for Maria Hill but not Hawkeye was strange to me.

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

I think that makes sense.  The movie does seem to strongly imply that Strange is pretty cool with what was happening.  Thanos even remarks that they didn't use the time stone when they could've.  Strange didn't because he was okay losing.

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

Yeah but is that a spoiler?  I wonder if it would have Thanos' name in it (so we'd know that Thanos survives the story).  There've been a handful of stories with his name in it: The Thanos Imperative, Thanos Rising, etc.  Even something like Infinity Crusade could hypothetically be a spoiler since you'd know that the story was continuing.  Although, since this was Infinity War Pts 1 and 2, that might be less of a big deal.

There was some thought that it might be Secret Wars, but that's not necessarily a spoiler either.

One thing to consider is....what is it a spoiler for?  Is there a chance that it wouldn't be an Infinity War spoiler but a Captain Marvel spoiler?  Could Avengers 4 revolve around Skrulls, in addition to Thanos?  You'd think that they'd have enough on their plate after undoing Infinity War and then getting *everyone* together to beat Thanos....but every MCU villain needs a faceless army....could that be the Skrulls?

(I'm legit asking, I'm not familiar enough with the source material )

New topic: Infinity War in relation to the TV shows:

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

Season 1 of Marvel's Agents of SHIELD tried to be a close tie-in to the movies.  There were cameos (Nick Fury), full guest appearances (Sif), and direct connections (a cleanup from Thor: The Dark World and a huge tie-in with Captain America: the Winter Soldier).

After that....not so much.  There were loose tie-ins to Avengers: Age of Ultron, a few asides to people like Hulk and Captain America, and references to the Sokovia Accords.  But that's about it.  As ireactions has talked about at length, there's a weak connection between Marvel TV and Marvel Films, and it only goes one way.  The TV shows reference the movies, but the movies don't reference the TV shows.

It's even weaker on the Netflix shows.  There are references to the Battle of New York, but they're very vague about it.  I'm not sure about other shows like Cloak & Dagger and the Runaways.

At the end of the day, it's no big deal.  These shows are doing their own thing, and that's fine.  Not everything needs to be connected, and even when they're dealing with huge disasters, there's usually not any real reason why the Avengers would show up in the Netflix shows or vice versa.  Even when they're in New York in the movies (like Dr. Strange or in Infinity War), they'd have to be in Hell's Kitchen for any of the Defenders to show up.  So while a cameo like that would be cool, it would be more coincidence than fate.

But Infinity War ends with half the humans on the planet being turned to dust.  That's not something these shows can just turn a blind eye to.  Even if all the Defenders/Agents of SHIELD/Runaways/Cloak & Dagger all happen to escape Thanos' wrath....this is an insanely big development in what's supposed to be a shared universe.  And it won't be resolved for a year.

I don't watch Runaways or Cloak and Dagger.  Maybe they all take place before Infinity War and won't ever reach that point in MCU.  Same could be said of the Netflix shows....which could hypothetically take place at any time between Avengers and Infinity War without many mile markers to tell us when things happened (no one has mentioned Spider-Man, for example, so we can assume that he hasn't made an appearance yet).

But Agents of SHIELD has always been the one to tie in the most (aside from the sidequel series Agent Carter).  And while the show has shied away from too many connections in recent seasons, they did mention that something was happening in New York on the most recent episode (airing concurrently with Infinity War).

Half the human population can't disappear and that not affect Agents of SHIELD.  It just can't.

The one way out would be if, 1) the show gets cancelled and 2) the show wraps up its current storyline quickly.  People have analyzed it a bit - the fight between Iron Man/Strange/Spider-Man and Thanos' generals takes place during daylight.  A later scene takes place at night in Great Britain, and another scene takes place during the day in New York.  Then, the final scene takes place in Africa (during the day) and America (during the day).

It seems like Infinity War takes place over the course of a single day.  Maaaaaaaayyyyyybbee two.  Either way, New York is referenced on SHIELD at night (in America), meaning that Stark/Spider-Man/Strange are, at the very least, on their way to Titan.  Vision and Scarlett Witch are, at the very least, with Cap and his team.

So the remainder of SHIELD has to take place in the remainder of the movie or it has to be referenced.  And, to be fair to the universe, some of the primary agents are going to have to disappear.

Will they?  Or will this finally be the moment when Marvel TV and Marvel Films decide to go their own way?

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

Yeah, but unless they somehow retcon it, they've already referenced what was happening in New York.  Granted, it was definitely vague enough that Candyman could've been referencing anything.

It's a weird spot.  Marvel, wisely, isn't setting any movies during a time that would eventually get retconned.  And while it could be cool to have Agents of SHIELD explore the time after such a horrible thing happened....when (not if) it gets undone, it'd be a (at that point, a definite) final season that won't exist in canon anymore.

I like the show.  It's been much better in recent seasons since it was allowed to stretch its wings.  But the show's ratings have dropped, they're seemingly going toward a resolution.  I'd go ahead and end the show.  Maybe start a new Marvel show after Avengers 4 if they want to stay in the network TV game.

Agents of shield started their tie in to the avengers movie last night. From what i understand last night was happening at same time as 1st part of movie, next week titled the end takes place with 2nd part of film. havent watched aos since mid yr2 so no idea how good it was

It's also gotten kind of cheap. This whole season looks like it was filmed in someone's basement and they clearly don't have the money for the extras and location filming that they once had. Excellent character-oriented writing and the stories are as strong as ever, but every episode feels like a bottle episode with only a few exceptions this year. I love the scripts, but the visual quality of the show has gotten frustratingly claustrophobic with the team constantly advancing down dimly lit hallways to get to more dimly lit hallways.

Agents of SHIELD doesn't spoil movies anymore.  The last couple of episodes have vaguely (and more recently, directly) referenced what's going on with the Avengers, but it wouldn't be anything you wouldn't know from knowing the movie exists.  They can't do it for long because Infinity War *will* impact their universe, but it doesn't have to yet (and the show only has, potentially, two episodes left).

I 100% expect that Infinity War will have zero effect on the Netflix shows.

Back to Infinity War spoilers....

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

So I watched a few minutes of Spider-Man Homecoming last night because it popped up on YouTube.  It was then that I remembered that Aunt May found out that Peter was Spider-Man.

To me, the Spider-Man death is the one that hurts the most.  And it isn't because I expect him to be dead because I don't.  While everyone else faced their death with relative grace and poise, Spider-Man might've been the only one in the entire universe that knew what was happening to him and faced it with true fear.  He begs for his life.

And it hurts because Peter, while being brave and strong and heroic, is a kid.  He's going to come back, and he'll be a hero again in his next solo film.  And that'll probably be fun and funny like Homecoming was.

But it's haunted me since I saw it because he's a kid in a very adult situation.  I've gone back and forth with the question of whether or not Peter knew that the plan involved him dying.  And I still don't know whether or not it's sadder for him to have known (and then freaked out realizing that dying, even for a noble cause, sucks) or whether or not he didn't know (and it's just a 15-year-old kid realizing he's going to die).  I know the moment is going to haunt Tony, but it still haunts me nonetheless.

And that's when I thought about Aunt May.  I know this is a younger, sexier Aunt May.  But it's still Aunt May.  And I realized that, while she doesn't know that Peter disappeared....she knows enough.  Infinity War takes place over a couple of days, and the inciting incident is a fight between Iron Man, Dr. Strange, Spider-Man, and two alien invaders.  The news would obviously cover a huge spinning spaceship arriving in New York, the ensuing battle, and the ship disappearing.

There'd be witness accounts of who fought, and what happened to them.  Someone may have seen (and heck, there could be video) of Spider-Man and Iron Man on the spaceship (since no one would really know who Strange is).

And Aunt May knows that Peter is Spider-Man.  Even before she can get worried that Peter hasn't come home yet, she'd know that Peter boarded an alien spaceship that traveled light years away.  Even before people started disappearing, she'd know.  And even if she disappeared herself, she'd have a couple of days to understand that Peter was gone.  Not missing.  Gone.

And that made me sad again.

INFINITY WAR was okay. I didn't hate it, I thought it was a good superhero epic -- it's just, I'm not really that into epics. I don't like seeing giant battlefields with hundreds of thousands of people charging forward; I prefer the three-person battles of CIVIL WAR or, despite reservations, Daisy and Coulson walking through a dimly lit hallway. It bothered me that INFINITY WAR trampled over RAGNAROK's ending by immediately slaughtering "half" of the survivors of Asgard and gave Thor his eye back.

I don't really have any strong opinions about INFINITY WAR except to say it's not really for me; I'd rather see superheroes more on the scale of Oliver and Felicity eating breakfast for dinner or Barry making his wedding plans or Kara and Lena eating Chinese food, if that makes any sense.

I found the scale of INFINITY WAR really difficult to relate to and, to be honest, the only reason I went to see it in theatres was so that I could watch this week's AGENTS OF SHIELD (which I will go watch now at the gym).

Regarding Infinity War:

I see where you're coming from, but I don't know if the small-scale moments were even possible with a movie like that.  They did their best here and there (Quill and Gamora, Thor and Rocket, Tony and Pepper, Thanos and Gamora, etc), but these types of movies lend themselves to big giant action sequences.  Although, to be honest, I found the Wakanda battle scene to be the worst of the movie.  I preferred the other, smaller action sequences.

(In fact, I would've gotten rid of the faceless army in general.  I know we needed some fun action sequences and big wins for our team, but I think fighting Thanos' generals and then Thanos himself would've been just as much fun.)

People have been saying that Infinity War overwrites the point of Ragnarok, but I don't see that.  Yes, Thanos destroyed half of the Asgardians, but half of them still survived.  Thor might've failed in saving all of them, but all of them were going to die on Asgard.  He still saved a ton of Asgardians because of that movie.  The eye stuff is weird because I think they could've kept it - I didn't see any particular reason to give him the eye back (they could've had him lose to Thanos because of depth perception or something).

That's actually the one thing I would've liked to have seen.  If Thor is really the warrior that can take Thanos down, I wish we could've seen how he lost so easily the first time.

I also wondered that....did Thanos "spare" the societies where he already destroyed half the life?  Or did places like Gamora's planet and Asgard lose another half?  I'm guessing, since it's Thanos' mind controlling the gauntlet, that he spared them.  But I wasn't sure how that worked.

***********

Regarding AoS and Infinity War....it's very strange to me that the aliens in the Confederacy are aware that Thanos is attacking Earth but don't seem that concerned about it.  Do they not know about Thanos' plan?  Because, you'd think, if they did....that the final fight on Earth wouldn't just be the Avengers....there'd be alien spaceships and superheroes and remnants of the Nova Corps and everyone that's still alive.

Because the Confederacy seems to be treating the conflict like "we wanted to plunder the Earth before Thanos got there...." not seeming to realize that Thanos is going to destroy half of *all life* - there's a 50% chance that he could kill any individual in the universe.  It should, in theory, be an all hands on deck vs. Thanos thing.

I'd be very interested in seeing Infinity War aftermath on Agents of SHIELD.  But I don't know if they'd go there (I guess we'll find out Friday), especially when it's likely that the aftermath would get undone.

There's some cool stuff they could do.  But if the budget has been definitively slashed, maybe it could help things.

Or maybe they'll divert more money to it with less episodes.  We'll see....even with the slashed budget, I think the season has been entertaining.  And I'm watching it on my DVR way earlier than I used to, since I'm eagerly looking for clues onto what Thanos is up to

Did they blow the budget in the first half of the season on CGI monsters and space travel?  I don't remember if that looked really cheap and crappy or not.

They're calling the season finale "The End" so I'm guessing the writers and producers were ready for the show to be over.  Between that and Infinity War making a season 6 a bit of a chore to make work, I'm wondering if some involved were glad it would end when it did.

But maybe part of the deal to make season 6 13 episode involved raising the budget so that it can work.  I know Marvel TV and Marvel Films are separate, but Marvel definitely has the money.  And maybe with the cancellation of Inhumans, they could divert some of the money that would've gone to Inhumans to SHIELD.

Some Infinity War spoilers below....

Man, I can't imagine things are that bad between Marvel TV and Marvel Film, but Ike Perlmutter still runs TV and is hated by the studio....so maybe you're right. 

It does make some sense.  First off, Marvel is notorious about avoiding too many spoilers, and I'm sure it was on a need-to-know basis (and I can't imagine TV writers were need-to-know).  Second, the references to Infinity War on SHIELD are very vague and could hypothetically be derived from trailers alone.  In fact, some of the references are, arguably, wrong when seen in context of the movie. The Confederacy says that "Thanos and his forces have begun an assault on your world, even as we speak"  But Thanos doesn't even arrive on the planet until the end.  His generals do attack, but the attacks are brief.

And even last episode when Mac sees a news event about an attack in New York, it looks like different damage than I would've expected from the Iron Man/Spider-Man/Strange fight.  I don't remember any damage to buildings like I saw in that shot (although its been a couple weeks now and I can't remember exactly).

So, with that in mind, I don't think they'll address it at all.  They probably weren't given any warning so I'm guessing the finale will end before Thanos snaps his fingers.  Maybe they'd have time to film some sort of epilogue but even then, I doubt it.

It sucks - more than anything, SHIELD could be used to draw people to the movies and vice versa.  The show has, unquestionably, gotten better since SHIELD *depended* on the movies to work, but there could be cool "event" episodes that tie into what's happening in the movies.

(Although Infinity War hasn't really caused a spike in the ratings)

Slipping them into a parallel dimension could work.  Time travel could possibly work (either send them back in time to the 50s - maybe mix in some Agent Carter?) or sending them forward in time to avoid any consequences.

"By Odin's beard, you shall not cut my hair, lest you feel the wrath of the mighty Thor!" [pause] "Please, kind sir, do not cut my hair. NO! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"

"That looks painful. Dear brother, you're becoming predictable. I trust you, you betray me, round and round in circles we go. See Loki, life is about... It's about growth, it's about change, but you seem to just want to stay the same. I guess what I'm trying to say is that you'll always be the god of mischief, but you could be more. I'll just put this over here for you."

"The damage is not too bad. As long as the foundations are still strong, we can rebuild this place. It will become a haven for all peoples and aliens of the universe." [Asgard explodes] "Oof. Now those foundations are gone. Sorry."

Translation: "These movies and shows aren't made to serve MY personal interests and specific desires for film and TV, therefore they are objectively bad and people who like things I don't are wrong." Didn't you learn anything from your nervous breakdown in the DCEU thread?