Re: DC Superheroes on TV & Streaming (1966 - 2024)
Re: The Flash
Their explanation makes sense. He's a time remnant who was forgotten and ignored (and they only did that because they were already fractured at that point, I assume) and so in order to create himself, he has to kill Iris. It's dumb time travel logic, but it holds (some) water.
My issue is with the rest of the episode. I get that you don't want an amnesiac as a titular hero.....but the plan worked. Savitar was pacified, and he could've been taken down. Barry was prepared to kill himself to kill Savitar....why wouldn't everyone be okay with him (temporarily) losing his memories?
I get that the building was on fire, people were in danger, and Flash didn't have control of his powers. But Barry seemingly had better control of his powers the first time, and while Wally said he could explain how to Flash to him, he didn't try. I think they should've stuck with the plan.
And even though Wally didn't have his powers (so there wasn't a speedster on Earth One who could fight Barry), Cisco's powers still worked. Go grab Jesse. Or Supergirl. Or, and I hate to harp on this (no I don't), Team Arrow could handle an amnesiac Barry, right? If Flash-Barry can't control his powers, why would Savitar?
Re: Savitar. Barry and Time-Remnant Barry shouldn't be any different, right? They're essentially the same person with no memories. So why does Barry wake up all happy and cheerful and Savitar wakes up and immediately attacks Killer Frost? That's implying that Savitar-Barry is naturally evil, and I don't think that's what they're going for.
I also don't understand how this round of time travel causality works. If Savitar losing his memories takes away Wally's speed (because Savitar couldn't create Kid Flash), why does Savitar exist at all? Following the causality loop....would the Savitar Time Remnant need to be created...so Savitar shouldn't exist.
It could've been a really fun episode (like Smallville's "Blank" was), but it ended up being a bit of a mess IMO.