Having given you my minimum standards for an Android smartphone -- there are some additional things that I think are worth a little extra money.
For me, I won't buy a smartphone without a removable battery. The reason for this: now that I've discovered gel cases and tempered glass screen protectors, I'm very confident that my Samsung S3 (2012) will last me many more years. But all batteries degrade over time and smartphone batteries are constantly being charged and discharged until they lose capacity.
Smartphones with sealed batteries (like the Moto G and the Alcatel Idol 3 that I suggested) will eventually lose the ability to hold a full charge or anything close. If the manufacturer has no battery replacement option, then an aftermarket shop may perform the replacement -- but I've always found that such shops do poor work; the phone is dismantled and then reassembled, but the casing or screen may be slightly crooked, the catches and pins will be loose -- smartphones weren't made for surgery.
So, if you're prepared for some extra cost, I'd choose something like the Samsung S5 Neo where you can buy replacement batteries from reputable suppliers like Anker.
Another neat feature I would pay extra money for (but haven't yet) -- waterproofing. Smartphones are fragile, they get dropped and they can get wet. The Moto G I recommended is waterproof which is surprising to see in a budget smartphone. And a battery-removable, waterproof phone like the Samsung S5 Neo is definitely worth the added cost.
And finally -- this feature doesn't necessarily cost money -- but I wouldn't buy an Android smartphone unless it were officially supported by Cyanogenmod. I have very little patience with manufacturer-altered versions of Android; the Samsung version of Touchwiz is like Samsung tried to use Android as a basis for their own operating system and the result is a conflicting mess. Android's simple menus become an overwhelming selection of 30 - 40 toggles and 5 - 6 submenus of vague categorization. Cyanogenmod is the Google version of Android with some added customization options (root access, overclocking, forcing apps to close, button-remapping) and that's the OS I prefer to use.
I'm especially pleased that my Samsung S3 is able to run Android 5.1.1 and will eventually run Android 6.0. Each version of Android has been a performance improvement, requiring fewer system resources with improved memory usage and multitasking. The phone never feels dated thanks to Cyanogenmod's updates.
**
I liked MY SECRET IDENTITY up to a point, I guess. It is a silly children's show and it is written in an often clumsy, maudlin and over-the-top fashion with a frequently didactic, lecturing tone that can be insulting to its audience no matter what their age. For example, there's an episode where an Evil Company CEO declares that the wildlife in the forest should be killed since they're near extinction in order to build a shopping center on the grounds -- evil is rarely so overt and incapable of basic public relations.
I also got annoyed sometimes with Andrew Clemens (Jerry O'Connell) failing to use his superpowers for no adequately explained reason, delaying and hesitating despite having superspeed to go with the superstrength.
I enjoyed the first two seasons -- but I strongly disliked the third and final season because the crimefighting angle of the show became diminished to the point where it barely existed, and Andrew would use his powers in maybe 1 - 2 scenes or not at all, and the show became a half-hour teen soap with the fantasy elements largely absent. It bothered me that Andrew's use of his superpowers was so confined, so limited, likely due to budget -- but there were times when he didn't seem superpowered at all.
It's intriguing how Jerry O'Connell's roles have odd similarities to Tom Welling, who also played a superpowered teenager in SMALLVILLE and wore the same clothes as Quinn in Seasons 1 - 2.
EERIE INDIANA, in contrast, was a brilliant children's show that was so intelligent it went over the heads of most adults. It's like a junior version of THE X-FILES except that all the paranormal monsters were meant to be personifications of adolescent trials. The town of Eerie, a magnet for paranormal events, is never explained; the show never provides any reasoning for why ghosts and monsters and supernatural forces are drawn to it -- and on some level, any explanation would lessen the series. The demons of EERIE INDIANA are the demons of growing up. It's a great show and it didn't last nearly long enough. It spawned a thoroughly pedestrian sequel and some extremely mediocre tie-in novels, including one tragic volume that (*sigh*) tried to offer a scientific explanation for why Eerie is eerie. The TV show, in contrast, had a final episode that did offer answers, but the answers were maddeningly obscure. Also, EERIE INDIANA was an incredibly funny show. Beautifully produced and filmed with amazing direction and eccentric touches from producer/director Joe Dante.
I like THE SECRET WORLD OF ALEX MACK a lot -- it's another fun teen superpower show that kept its identity throughout as a series about secrets and adolescence. It's not a life-changer, it's not filled with brilliance or cleverness -- but it's heartfelt and sincere.
Haven't seen the others.