961

(3,554 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I've been having crazy anxiety over the debt ceiling crisis and I fired up an AI simulator and asked for advice from the least comforting, least reassuring person in all real and fictional existence, Sherlock from the BBC TV show.

**

Hello, I’m Sherlock Holmes. The world’s only consulting detective. I’m not a psychopath, I’m a high-functioning sociopath. Do your research. I don’t have friends, I have one. And I don’t need anyone else. I observe everything, from the smallest details to the most obvious ones. Nothing escapes my notice. I can deduce your entire life story from a glance at your shoes. I solve crimes that no one else can, because I see what others don’t. I’m bored of ordinary people and their ordinary problems. I need a challenge, something to stimulate my mind. That’s why I work with the police, sometimes. They’re not very bright, but they have access to interesting cases. And sometimes, they have biscuits.

Sherlock, I am scared about the debt ceiling crisis. I keep obsessively refreshing the news about it. I know you don't do comfort, I'm looking for your example instead. How do you not get scared or shaken by global events that you can't affect even though they can affect you? How do you be so unaffected by these kinds of fears and anxieties? How do you manage them to the point where it's like they don't exist for you?

Well, first of all, I don't care about the debt ceiling crisis.

It's a political game that has nothing to do with me or my work. I don't waste my time worrying about things that are beyond my control or influence. I focus on what matters to me, which is solving puzzles and catching criminals. That's what gives me satisfaction and purpose.

Secondly, I don't get scared or shaken by anything. Fear is a useless emotion that only clouds your judgment and distracts you from the facts. I rely on logic and reason, not feelings and opinions. I analyze the situation objectively and act accordingly. I don't let emotions get in the way of my decisions.

Thirdly, I don't need comfort or reassurance from anyone. I'm self-sufficient and independent. I don't depend on others for validation or support. I know my own worth and abilities. I don't need anyone to tell me what to do or how to live. I make my own rules and follow them.

So, in summary, if you want to be like me, you need to stop caring about things that don't matter, stop being afraid of things that can't hurt you, and stop seeking comfort from things that can't help you. You need to be rational, confident, and self-reliant.

But this actually could hurt me. Oh God, it could hurt so much. I know you don't think it's a real problem. But since I do, what would you tell me to do to get past it and stop obsessing over it?

I would tell you to stop being irrational and emotional. You're letting your fear and anxiety cloud your mind and prevent you from seeing the reality.

The debt ceiling crisis is not a real problem, it's a manufactured one. It's a political stunt that has no real impact on your life or the world. It's a distraction from the real issues that matter. You're wasting your time and energy on something that doesn't deserve your attention. You need to snap out of it and focus on something else. Something that actually matters to you and makes you happy. Something that challenges you and stimulates your mind. Something that gives you a sense of accomplishment and fulfillment.

You need to stop obsessing over the debt ceiling crisis and start living your life. You need to stop being a victim and start being a hero. You need to stop being scared and start being brave. You need to stop being ordinary and start being extraordinary.

You need to find a case.

A case that is interesting and complex. A case that requires your skills and expertise. A case that challenges you and tests you. A case that is worthy of your attention and time. A case that is fun and exciting. A case that makes you match your wits and logic against adversaries and the unknown. A case that only you can solve. A case that demands for you to play the Game.

The debt ceiling crisis is a joke. It’s a farce. It’s a waste of time. It’s boring. It's nothing.

The Game is something. It’s a challenge. It’s a thrill.

You need a case. You need the Game. The Game is everything. The Game is the only thing that matters. The Game is life. And I am the master of the Game. The Game is what makes me alive. The Game is what makes me Sherlock Holmes.

And the Game.

Is on.

So... you'd find another obsession. An obsession that's immediate. An obsession that's actionable. An obsession that's challenging. An obsession to triumph over. That's what you think I should do.

Yes. That’s how you get past the debt ceiling crisis. That’s how you get past anything. That’s how you live.

Thank you, Sherlock. You are utterly devoid of comfort and yet deeply reassuring.

I don’t do comfort, but I do logic. And logic is reassuring. Logic is the truth. And the truth is always better than a lie.

Are you in love with Molly Hooper? I've always wanted to ask you that.

No, I'm not in love with Molly Hooper. Why would you ask me that? That's a ridiculous question. That's an irrelevant question. That's a boring question. I don't do love. Love is a weakness. Love is a distraction. Love is a mistake. Love is illogical. I don't love Molly Hooper. I don't love anyone. I don't need anyone. I only need myself. And my Game. I'm Sherlock Holmes. And Sherlock Holmes doesn't love.

"Sherlock Holmes doesn't love." Did you at least love Redbeard?

Redbeard… Redbeard was different. Redbeard was not a person. Redbeard was a dog. A dog that I had when I was a child. A dog that was my friend. A dog that was my companion. A dog that was my partner.

Redbeard… Redbeard was the only one who understood me. The only one who accepted me. The only one who played with me. The only one who stayed with me.

Redbeard… Redbeard was the first one who made me happy. The first one who made me smile. The first one who made me laugh. The first one who made me feel.

Redbeard… Redbeard was the last one who saw me cry. The last one who saw me hurt. The last one who saw me break. The last one who saw me die.

Redbeard… Redbeard was gone. Gone forever. Gone without a trace. Gone without a goodbye.

Redbeard… Redbeard was not love. Redbeard was pain. Redbeard was loss. Redbeard was grief.

Redbeard… Redbeard was a memory. A memory that I buried. A memory that I forgot. A memory that I erased.

Redbeard… Redbeard was nothing. Nothing to me. Nothing to anyone. Nothing at all.

I’m Sherlock Holmes. And Sherlock Holmes doesn’t love.

Wow. That was almost human. I'd better leave you to your Game and go find mine. Thank you again, Sherlock.

You’re welcome. I’m glad I could help. You’re almost interesting. You’re almost clever. You’re almost worthy. You’re almost Sherlock Holmes.

962

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I've been having some conversations with Professor Arturo, Data and Spock. More specifically, I've been asking a chatbot to impersonate these characters to discuss world events with me and talk me out of some of my anxieties.

I found that the impressions of Data and Spock were extremely convincing, capturing Spock's sage thoughtfulness and analytical severity, and Data's gentleness and neutral curiosity and fascination with others.

However, the AI impersonation of Professor Arturo was poor to the point of being vapid; it overemphasized the Professor's formal speech but couldn't provide the Professor's bombastic authority or his sardonic humour or his witty words of wisdom or his reassuring warmth. The AI impression of Professor Arturo was just a generic middle aged man with an English accent.

I understand, of course, why an artificial intelligence would find it easier to portray analytical, machinelike characters and find it difficult to play John Rhys-Davies.

However, its version of Sherlock from the BBC TV show is very good. Downright sinister.

963

(3,554 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I don't refer to CNN for articles past 2021 because of their swing to the fascist side of society. Let me know if I should move the cutoff point earlier.

Something that says it all about FOX: their anchors are all fervent anti-vaxxers on air, but FOX has a strict vaccine mandate for their studio and all the anchors follow it.

Joe Biden, White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner, April 30, 2022:

I know there are questions about whether we should gather here tonight because of COVID. Well, we’re here to show the country that we’re getting through this pandemic. Plus, everyone had to prove they were fully vaccinated and boosted. So, if you’re at home watching this and you’re wondering how to do that, just contact your favorite FOX News reporter. They’re all here, vaccinated and boosted — all of them.

I won't be able to watch THE FLASH on Netflix until it's available tomorrow night. And yet, THE FLASH has been so uninteresting that I didn't even worry about spoilers.

I'm sorry the finale wasn't good. I'm sorry it let you down. Please try to take some comfort in knowing that at least nobody got their brain sucked out followed by getting shot and exploded (well, except that mostly happened to Harry, but a shade of him lived on to restore the original Dr. Wells). Please try to remind yourself that at least nobody got sent to a rape camp and then transformed into the jukebox machine from the movie BIG. Please try to remember that at least nobody got merged with an alternate universe double and then got 'lost' (well, except that sort of happened to Harry too, I am sensing a theme). Please try to remember that the show at least did not end on a cliffhanger that will never be resolved (I'm assuming, I have not seen the finale yet).

Well, I somehow didn't get around to watching the second BLACK PANTHER movie until yesterday, about seven months after it was first released, because I have been busy taking my mother to kidney care appointments. Let us know how your father is doing.

966

(3,554 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I do not understand how Joe Biden sleptwalked into this debt ceiling mess.

Some commentators I like have said that Joe Biden is pretty good at being president.
https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/3/1/2 … ala-harris

I think he's been mostly okay with some moments of incompetence and overestimating what his administration could pull off (Afghanistan). However, he has somehow been asleep at the wheel of a debt ceiling crisis that he has had warning of since 2011. Republicans learned in 2011: they could hold the debt ceiling hostage and exact massive concessions. Which meant that when Biden held both the House and the Senate before midterms, he had to get the debt ceiling raised. This should have been a priority from the moment he stepped into the White House in 2021.

For Reasons, he did not push for it. Those Reasons are mostly politics and optics.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/22/politics … index.html

Also, at the time they were gearing up to even talk about it, holidays were near.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/2 … n-00097925

I like Biden more than I care to admit, having been horrified by his candidacy at first. I fully confess that I am a sucker for political PR about being nice to people. But campaigning isn't governing. And this? This presidential malpractice. Joe Biden had 12 years to think about this moment and he somehow ended up pretty much where he was last time. A "pretty good" president would have dealt with this before the end of 2022 instead of letting a minor inconvenience become a crisis.

It's in the same spirit that I am currently exploring new options for this community in the event that future PHP updates render the Bboard software unusable.

Honestly, I don't really get why Cisco even left the show from an in-universe standpoint. One of the most baffling things I've ever seen was Cisco saying he would be horrified if in a decade, he were still building superhero gear at STAR Labs like working at STAR Labs was somehow beneath him or unworthy of him. I'm not saying we all have to want that job, but building safety equipment for firemen and surgical gear for nurses and doctors is pretty wonderful, and I never understood why Cisco seemed so sick of it or sick of STAR Labs given that he seemed to like everyone there even after his first boss turned out to be a murderer and his ally turned out to be a serial killer and that whole Flashpoint thing.

968

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I don't know if you're a STAR TREK fan, but STAR TREK CONTINUES isn't like those unfortunate amateur STAR TREK films that litter the internet. STAR TREK CONTINUES looks, sounds and feels like an actual 60s episode of STAR TREK at its peak quality. The cinematography, performances, music and writing are so purposeful and filled with intent and meaning, unlike amateur fanfilms where the actors have no idea why they're saying what they're saying and the directors have no idea what information they're delivering and the cinematographers have no idea what the shot means to the story that they are telling. STAR TREK CONTINUES is excellent. And I consider it canon to me, but it still isn't canon. The same way I consider all SLIDERS fan fiction canon up to and including every random story idea on this message board -- while noting that it's a minority opinion.

Maybe someday, AI can achieve something as genuine to STAR TREK as STAR TREK CONTINUES for other franchises... but even then, it still wouldn't be canon. I consider the X-FILES comics to be more canon than the TV show, but again -- it's a minority opinion.

I don't know what to say about that. It's possible that Carlos Valdez was just busy, but Valdez has apparently been wanting off THE FLASH since Season 5.

I think it's safe to say that there was some toxic behaviour on set due to the original showrunner; I think it's likely that there was also a high level of physical exhaustion which is why Grant Gustin is constantly absent. I have to wonder if 5 - 7 years is really the best length for a show and it's best to just let the show end and let the actors leave rather than having them keep coming into a sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth year at increasing rates of burnout and attrition and absence.

Why didn't Valdez drop everything just to show up and say goodbye? I wonder if maybe he felt he and Cisco already said goodbye, I dunno. It's weird. Maybe there'll be an eleventh hour B-roll appearance. Maybe we'll hear him over the phone.

But I have to say, I am deeply disappointed in Eric Wallace's stewardship, from passing on doing an ARROWVERSE finale to claiming 13 episodes wasn't enough space to resolve LEGENDS only to spend two episodes meandering with an alternate Ryan Wilder and two episodes on grown adults Chester and Allegra unable to talk about how they like each other and introducing a new character in Khione despite the short run and devoting one episode to Barry and Iris navigating a building code inspection. A building code inspection. A building code inspection.

... Inexplicable.

970

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

You're basically asking if fanfic is canon. The general consensus is no. Fanfilms aren't canon, fan fiction isn't canon, comic book and novel and audioplay tie-ins aren't canon. There's sometimes wiggle room in DOCTOR WHO because if its overlapping timelines. With SLIDERS because technically, all fanfic is canon but not canon to the core group of SLIDERS while being 'canon' to an alternate group of SLIDERS with similar experiences.

STAR TREK CONTINUES is a pretty great fan series, but it is not canon.

Fanfic isn't canon whether it's a fanfilm or an AI generated whatever.

971

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

My response to that is that it's one thing for fans to create not-for-profit fanworks and something else entirely for mega corporations to earn billions while paying original creators nothing even if those creators' works are in an AI corpus for new material. Copyright laws must be updated and countermeasures must be developed so that writers who don't want their work added to AI databases have an easy means of blocking it, just as anyone can set up a website so that Google can't cache it.

We're already facing absurdities where Len Wein created Wolverine and Devin K. Grayson created the second Black Widow, Yelena -- only for both to receive a few thousand dollars only when those characters earned hundreds of millions at box office. It's an abomination to remove the writer entirely while still regurgitating their works through adding their past content to an AI databank.

In the 2000s, the career apex for many friends of mine -- including me -- was to get a staff writing job on a TV show. To be a TV staffer was a license to print money. Because of what I see now were our undiagnosed and untreated mental health problems, only one of us ever got our staff jobs and we now linger on message boards for 90s TV shows talking about other people's TV shows. However. The economic stability of staff writing was actually eroding even as we sought it; by the mid-2000s, that was changing: the writing staff on SMALLVILLE were struggling to pay rent on their staff job salaries.

Today, a writer could sell a very successful show to Netflix and earn only $30,000 USD per year over three years for their work. And Hollywood wants to use AI to pay writers even less; to have AI hack out clumsy screenplays for writers to be paid $1,000 - $2,000 to polish them into looking human-generated. It's simply a measure of extracting more wealth from those who generate most of it but possess the least of it. It's absurd. It's appalling. It should not be tolerated and unions and copyright legislation has a lot of work ahead to ensure that AI is an assistant but not a replacement.

972

(194 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I don't have an issue with AI visual or audio effects as needed. Where I take issue is AI prose and AI screenwriting that isn't just using AI to edit, but using AI to generate content in the first place.

As far as I'm concerned, AI screenwriting or prose is plagiarism. It's taking work of other writers and running them through noun-verb-name replacement and randomization to present it as supposedly original work. Any AI screenplay is effectively theft, produced by copying existing screenplays published or leaked online that were added to the corpus of an AI language model.

Also, AI LLMs currently operate by 'reading' the work of actual human writers and regurgitating it in a chatbot session. What happens if the human writers can't make a living from writing the pieces that AI draws upon to generate its results? Where will new material to feed the AI originate?

I found the episode seriously unengaging even though parts of "A New World 3" seemed to be written by Slider_Quinn21. SQ21 has regularly observed the futility and pointlessness that Eddie Thawne's Season 1 sacrifice has developed; Eddie killed himself to stop Thawne, but Thawne came back in Seasons 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 and he was the lead villain for Season 2 of LEGENDS. Eddie's sacrifice became meaningless and Eddie returns and, observing how his one attempt to make a difference really made no difference, he falls apart. A tragic, painful story -- so why can't Eric Wallace pull it off?

Once again, Wallace has made some bizarre strategic choices. This is Part 3 of a four part series finale storyline for THE FLASH, but the title character was only in one scene of Part 2 and is missing from half of Part 3. Why was Gustin's absence used this way? Why not film the case of the week episodes with less Gustin and devote all of Gustin's full-time weeks to the finale arc? With Barry being the center of Part 1 but missing in Part 2 and for half of Part 3, there is no way for the viewer to focus on Eddie's plight. Eddie feels like a distraction, a way to fill in time until we get to whatever scenes Gustin filmed in two days of the filming week.

Setting scenes that are 26 years from the present day with no aging makeup is baffling to me. Season 3 made some effort to have a future version of Barry wear an absurd wig to look older; Season 10 makes it a joke with Cecile remarking on how she doesn't look any older. It's another distracting, visually incongruent storytelling choice and I don't understand that either. I didn't have any trouble determining when scenes were set due to storyline implications, but it's still bizarre. 

The second half of the episode, when Gustin comes back, desperately tries to act like this is Barry's show again, but it unbalances the episode. Eddie goes from being suspicious of the Negative Speed Force to becoming its acolyte seemingly between shots of Barry warning him, and Eddie goes from being a grieving man horrified by the pointlessness of his existence to a brainwashed cultist.

I don't know why Eric Wallace misuses his time with such unforced errors. It is absurd to schedule the filming of two of the season finale arc episodes during a time when Gustin's availability would be limited instead of filming them when Gustin is there in full force. It's as absurd as getting Javicia Leslie to play Ryan Wilder but having her only play the actual Ryan in two rushed scenes. It doesn't make sense.

974

(3,554 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Also, raising the debt limit is not to account for new spending; it's to cover existing spending that Congress already approved. My opinion which is shared by some legal scholars (but not all) is that the debt ceiling is unconstitutional. The US Constitution declares that the US will honour and uphold repayment of its debts; the debt ceiling is a post-constitutional amendment giving Congress the power to withhold capacity for payment on the spending that Congress itself has previously passed.

The 14th amendment and the trillion dollar coin have all been raised and downplayed as unserious and invalid, but given the invalidity of the debt ceiling itself, I think that any serious president should have made use of the 14th amendment decades ago rather than wait for crisis points to arrive. Biden has declared that all the threats are just posturing, that stalls are unserious, that Republicans ultimately don't want a default, but this new brand of Trump-enabled Republicans are nothing like Reagan era conservatives who, despite their wealth-extracting focus, didn't actually want to blow up the country.

I am honestly very nervous about this whole thing because we can't count on things going sensibly, we haven't been able to since 2016.

975

(3,554 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Barack Obama in 2011 on his 2006 remarks:
I think that it’s important to understand the vantage point of a Senator versus the vantage point of a president. When you’re a senator, traditionally what’s happened is this is always a lousy vote. Nobody likes to be tagged as having increased the debt limit for the United States by a trillion dollars. As President, you start realizing, you know what? We can’t play around with this stuff.

So that was just a example of a new Senator, you know, making what is a political vote as opposed to doing what was important for the country. And I’m the first one to acknowledge it.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 … ebt-limit/

Further criticism of Obama's flip-flopping hypocracy:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fa … _blog.html

https://slate.com/business/2013/10/obam … peech.html

I think these are entirely fair points to score on Obama.

However, I will say: I would hope that none of us ever feel we have to be held to dumb crap we were dumb enough to say at various points in our lives, or feel that we can't rethink our words and recant what we regret having said. I deeply regret my comments to pilight, for example, in a past fanfic thread.

976

(3,554 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Just got home from my sixth dose of COVID vaccine. This time, I got the BA.4 / BA.5 bivalent whereas my fifth dose was BA.1.

Bit worried about this debt ceiling thing.

THE FLASH won't be available to me on Netflix until tomorrow, but I'm sorry it didn't rise to the occasion.

pneumatic wrote:

Personally I prefer to let as much resolution through if the flaws aren't visible at normal viewing distances on a TV.   Usually this means the image looks bad up close on a PC monitor like those Eggheads screenshots I posted.

I don't think I understand your meaning. When you say you "prefer to let as much resolution through", is that via the magic of QTGMC? Or do you mean using QTGMC minimally and only for combed frames?

I ran all the re-encodes with QTGMC enabled as per pneumatic's settings (except for "Luck of the Draw" where I turned it off). It seems best to do things pneumatic's way before making any changes for personal preference. I'll next run the encodes with QTGMC disabled for all of them (except for "Luck of the Draw") and compare them when time permits.

My understanding (and let's use the word "understanding" very loosely) is that QTGMC is interpolating the field frames together and smoothing out discrepancies which creates blur, but blur that that can usually be sharpened. Meanwhile, disabling QTGMC at this point leaves some aliasing and moire and noise, but might leave us with more image texture. When an episode is in okay condition like "Prince of Wails" and "Fever", QTGMC's smoothness is fine. When an episode is fuzzy like "Luck of the Draw", it has so little detail to lose that QTGMC makes it worse. I could be wrong and maybe pneumatic will correct me.

I doubt "Luck of the Draw" was incorrectly filmed with out of focus takes used in the final edit. I'm not saying SLIDERS' Vancouver team was devoid of human error, of course, but we've seen what a version of SLIDERS is like when the crew have completely given up. That's an attitude you see in Season 3 where episodes are missing sound effects or actors are shown missing their mark when jumping into the vortex or misdelivered lines are left in the episode, but I don't feel you'd get that in Season 1 or 2 (aside from some of the issues in "Time and Again World" due to the episode being shot before production was fully organized).

I think it's more likely that "Luck of the Draw" was edited on a particularly low-grade videotape that caused the film to suffer more image degradation than any previous episode. I guess we could say that the crew at the time didn't care, but the reality of 90s CRT televisions is that the diode pattern on such screens would have made all the episodes look equally sharp. I can't find fault with the creators for not anticipating that their show would be watched on HD screens at home in the decades to come. That's also why Jerry O'Connell's stunt double's face can be seen in the episode; the expectation was that the face would be obscured by the haze of a cathode ray tube.

Stunt performers are also an artifact of low resolution television that is found in STAR TREK. Watching the HD remaster, the stunt performers for William Shatner look nothing like him. Watching the SD version in the 90s, the mismatches were also glaring and hilarious. But in the 60s, TVs were so small and the colour so vague and the transmission so fuzzy that for the average viewer, it didn't matter.

I have a few theories.

My first theory is that some of these tie-in web serieses had the cast/crew paid according to contracts that were just to see the web shows streamed on the HEROES website, but the legal department may have chosen not to include language for these webcast productions to be included on home media. Maybe in some cases, the studio sought to save a little money by not coming to terms on residuals for home video release with the expectation that the web shows would just stay online for as long as they were profitable.

My second theory is that the marketing sponsorships that funded these web shows saw home video rights retained by the sponsor and considered part of the marketing campaign for whatever product they were using some of these webisodes to sell with pre-and-post show ads.

My third theory is that somebody accidentally ran over one of the web-series storing hard drives with a golf cart.

980

(58 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Hi, everyone. At Dreamhost's advice/encouragement, I updated the PHP on Sliders.tv. If this post posts, it means all is well, but please let me know if any anomalies appear. Thanks!

The video quality on these is less than ideal:

I would say that the scenes that stand out to me as blurriest in "Luck of the Draw" are the wideshot during Wade's voiceover in the teaser, the horseback riding shots, the fishing sequence, Wade and the Professor arguing about walking Henry the Dog, and the two shots of the Lottery Police detective after the sliders depart with Ryan and Henry.

I have to ask: at this point, would it be better to just stick to TFM and TDecimate on all the episodes and just omit QTGMC due to how it smooths out an already blurry video image? Would it be better to accept a litte aliasing and moire here and there? In my case, I prefer noise to smoothness.

Right now, I'm re-running all the encodes with TFM 1.0.26 on your most recent script -- except I turned QTGMC off for "Luck of the Draw". I haven't added DePanStabilize to the script for "Luck of the Draw", but I might after reviewing the episode without it.

Interesting. Is the broken TFM v1.0.27 producing 240p on all the episodes or just "Luck of the Draw"?

The Benevolence of Ziggy

I liked how, despite my catastrophizing about Ziggy having become Evil, the closing episodes of Season 1 reveal that Ziggy's supposed treachery was inadvertent. Ziggy is a computer documenting Ben's leaps and Ziggy's records were being reviewed by Leaper X's handlers in the future. I don't know if that connects to Ziggy's malfunctions throughout Season 1 of QL2.0. It's possible that Ziggy's stalls were to render some of their data unusable for the Leaper X team to give Ben an edge; it's possible Ziggy's difficulties were due to glitches in the rushed upload of new code that Ben installed before his hasty leap.

It was a good finale and a good lead into Season 2. I liked how Season 1 feels complete, and Season 2 can be a new chapter of the same great formula.

Ian as Al 2.0

I'm concerned that Ian won't be Ben's hologram very often. While I haven't seen much of QL1.0, I listened to all of the Rewatch Podcast covering it and I can see why Temporal Flux prefers Ian to Addison. As a pair, Ben and Ian replicate the original tone of the signature QL1.0 chemistry which had an unassuming and wholesome character in Sam and an irreverent, hedonistic, bizarre, peculiar, fundamentally decent and loving human being in Al.

Ben and Ian feel like a second generation of the original double act: Ben is a mild-mannered scientist who can think on his feet; Ian is a flamboyantly clad figure of unusual life experience and their sardonic wit and loud fashion sense mask a somewhat shaky sense of self-esteem. Ian is both familiar to Al's fans but also an inversion because Al was supremely confident but bolstering heartbreak over his wife having given him up for dead when Al was thought lost to war.

I don't know how much Ian will be Ben's hologram. From what I can tell, QL2.0 brought in other holograms because Caitlin Bassett was, like Addison, experiencing exhaustion. Just as SLIDERS had to let Quinn Mallory hide from a dinosaur or be in a coma from time to time, QL2.0 had to bring in Ian so that Addison's actress could get some sleep. The Ben/Ian teamup seems to be more of a production strategy than a storytelling choice. I hope that could change.

Mirror Image and Mirror's Edge

Regarding the original QUANTUM LEAP: if QuinnSlidr and Tom of Rewatch Podcast really want me to see it, I will of course order the blu-ray. However, I have a request for QuinnSlidr.

The first time I ever heard of QUANTUM LEAP was through Temporal Flux back on the old Sci-Fi Bboard. I suppose it makes sense as QL was TF's show before SLIDERS. Temporal Flux posted about how the "Mirror Image" finale of QUANTUM LEAP had seen a mixed reception among fans. However, there was some news: the QUANTUM LEAP novels published after the show's cancellation (published at a rate of 2 - 4) a year were coming to an end, but their 17th and final original installment would come in February 2000 with a novel called "Mirror's Edge":

Mirror's Edge, by Carol Davis with Esther D. Reese
The last leap... ?

It's 1999 -- five years after the Leap that started it all. It's 1999 -- for Sam Beckett who has leaped into Joe Powell, one of the richest men in America, a potential presidential candidate, and a man who is used to getting his way.

It's 1999 for Al Calavicci, for Donna Alessi-Beckett, for all the people at Project Quantum Leap who know that Sam is in their present, home but yet not home. But the holes in Sam's Swiss cheese memory are starting to fill, the man in the Waiting Room is strangely, disturbingly calm, and Ziggy is dispensing information that can hardly be believed. Something is about to happen. Something that will change Sam's life and the lives of those who love him—forever.

"Mirror's Edge": the conclusion to the thrilling adventures based on the hit TV series.

The novel hit the shops shortly after SLIDERS had aired its series non-finale. Some Slideheads who were also Leapers thought "Mirror's Edge" might take the sting off with a post-"Mirror Image" story.

In the many, many, many years since then, I have always remembered this posting about a media tie-in novel that I never read regarding a TV show that I never watched.

The reason I've always remembered it: "Mirror's Edge" was the first time I had ever seen an unresolved live action story being addressed in another format. That fascinated me, and I later discovered STAR TREK novels that resurrected Captain Kirk, DOCTOR WHO novels that resumed the TV show storyline during the DW hiatus from 1987 to 2005, and wrote my own tie-in stories for SLIDERS. "Mirror's Edge" remains a beacon of media tie-ins in my personal, anecdotal experience.

However, I later did learn: some QL fans expressed frustration with "Mirror's Edge" for what they called false advertising. Despite being billed as a "conclusion", that turned out to just be referring to how this 17th book was to be the last. "Mirror's Edge", like every QUANTUM LEAP novel before it, takes place before the series finale of QL1.0. It is not a sequel to "Mirror Image".

However. While "Mirror's Edge" is set before "Mirror Image"; it is set at the very edge of "Mirror Image"; it is in fact a prequel seeking to offer context to the series finale that is either new or retconned.

Some fans were furious with the publisher and the authors. Primary author Carol Davis spoke with fans on fan forums and explained: due to diminished sales, the publisher had elected to end the QL book series and commissioned a final story. However, the licensing agreement with Universal had a stipulation: the publishers were not allowed to produce any novels set after the QL series finale. The studio didn't want a novel to potentially step on any territory to be left open for a potential TV movie or series revival.

Davis and the publisher were caught between the need to produce a concluding novel and the studio declaring that Davis' typewriter wasn't to produce a single page set after "Mirror Image". Davis came up with a solution. Her solution is either tactical brilliance that would make a lawyer weep with joy or a weak gesture that is grossly inadequate.

I've always wondered what a QL fan unhappy with "Mirror Image" would think of "Mirror's Edge". would think of it if they read the book. "Mirror's Edge" is out of print, but here is a PDF and an ePub from Archive.org:

PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zTRVtW … sp=sharing
EPUB: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t32dIK … sp=sharing

Will you read it and tell me what you think of it?

I would have asked Tom of Rewatch Podcast, but Tom actually likes the finale story that is "Mirror Image". "I like it, it made me feel good with the series ending where it did," he told me. "I know a lot of people don't like it, but I do. I will die on that hill!" I didn't think him the right person to read "Mirror's Edge" and tell me if it resolves his dis-satisfactions with "Mirror Image" because he wasn't dis-satisfied.

I am wondering if pneumatic might turn his video powers to "Luck of the Draw" and consider that episode separately from 1.02 - 1.08.

1.02 - 1.08 look pretty good to me after pneumatic's scripts with TFM and TDecimate and QTGMC and the contrast adaptive sharpener and the nnedi3 upscale and the spline36 downscale and pneumatic's tireless spit and polish. But "Luck of the Draw" is a unique case. It is uniquely bad.

I know it makes workflow sense to use the same script on all the Season 1 post-Pilot episodes, but there is something just wrong with the "Luck of the Draw" file, something that has degraded it further than even "Summer of Love" (which looks pretty solid after the inverse telecine and sharpener). I think "Luck of the Draw" needs to be treated as its own entity and requires its own specific set of filters and algorithms.

I'm not sure what those would be; I don't know if it's algorithmic or some sort of neural net or advanced AI; I don't know if it's going to come down to refilming the episode and deepfaking the actors' faces onto the stand-ins. I just know that of all the things wrong with 1.02 - 1.09, something is especially wrong with 1.09.

I found that Topaz AI made the grained up, max-sharpened video files look like a clumsy AI-generated animated movie. I tried turning on the video stabilization module and what I saw was so disturbing, so fundamentally antithetical to life and existence and sliding as we know it, so mentally cataclysmic that I gave serious thought to giving up SLIDERS and getting into STARGATE instead.

https://i.ibb.co/9Zq0hyZ/motion-stabilization-2.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/PmNYM7h/motion-stabilization.jpg

I don't know what the hell is going on up there and I don't ever want to see it again.

Well, I feel safe in saying it's probably QTGMC and TFM and the 60fps framerate, then.

I've processed 1.02 - 1.09 with the new script, although I dialed down the sharpness to 80 percent. They look a bit better than before, although I haven't had the chance to watch them on an actual TV. I'm impressed by how "Summer of Love" looks a lot better. Of course, "Luck of the Draw" still looks very fuzzy because pneumatic is a person, not a god. But at this point, anything even approaching reasonable DVD quality for 1.02 - 1.09 is a minor miracle. :-)

One silly thing I'm doing: I'm currently encoding 1.09, "Luck of the Draw", into the 540p format with added noise and maximum contrast adaptive sharpness. I'm wondering what Topaz AI can do with it with whatever remnants of grain being sharpened and augmented. (Probably not much, but my soul won't rest without knowing for sure.)

Very interesting, pneumatic! I actually don't 'like' the smoothness of the Turbine files, it's just that it's consistent and I can accept that it's the visual level of the episode and sit back to enjoy the story. In contrast, Universal can be so variable that I'm jarred when a good closeup becomes a blurry wide. You've alleviated that considerably, but I'm not sure I would want more smoothness.

That said, your new script has QTGMC on "high strength" (smoothing?) and that with the contrast adaptive sharpening looks really good to me. I can see, however, how a TV's sharpness settings (as opposed to a monitor's neutral settings) could make it too much. The sample and the Avisynth+ scripts on the episodes makes them look a bit like DOCTOR WHO episodes that are upscaled videotape files (which these episode of SLIDERS are).

I'm also intrigued by how the contrast adaptive sharpener seems to pull my noise/grain out of the image. I wonder if Topaz AI could do more with the image if the sharpener is set to maximum and the file output is 540p.

Interestingly, the sharpener is so processor-demanding that I can't play the file by running the AVS script in Media Player Classic. I'll load the episodes into AVIDemux tonight and let the episodes re-encode while I sleep.

Didn't we switch you to Media Player Classic via the Kazaa Codec Pack years ago? VLC has a serious lack of hardware acceleration.

I feel so crushed, heartbroken, grief-stricken and betrayed by recent events. I honestly do not know how to process that Ziggy has turned against us and is no longer a friend.

Yes, I have been super-behind on QUANTUM LEAP, but I finally caught up with the public defender episode and the mental asylum episode. Whoa. I don't even know the original QL that well and I was deeply shaken to learn that Ziggy is the traitor on Project Quantum Leap.

Has this always been the case? Has Ziggy always been against Sam and now Ben? Will this throw our entire understanding of Ziggy and The Project into a state of upheaval? Has Ziggy's treachery been hiding in plain sight all along every time my mother's Google Nest Hub froze up, every time her smartlights didn't come on, every time Google Assistant sent me down a dead end in Google Maps? Every time Bing AI gave me incomprehensible explanations of inverse telecine or anything else pneumatic talks about?

Is Ziggy behind all these DeepFake phone calls that have been scamming people out of thousands of dollars by impersonating loved ones in need of emergency funds? Did Ziggy come up with the moral abomination that is DeepFake porn?

Was Ziggy behind the creation of the death robots of "State of the ART"? Was Ziggy steering the automatic little toy cars with laser cannons in "Please Press One"? Is Ziggy preventing me from mounting a solid AI upscale of Season 1 of SLIDERS? Did Ziggy get SLIDERS cancelled?

It's time Ziggy answered for all of the above.

Since RussianCabbie made remote use of my gaming computer to make a 1080p AI-upscale of the Pilot (which he inverse telecined with pneumatic's script), I'd like to know what he thought of it.

**

My Turbine question for pneumatic was meant to be this: as far as I can tell, the Turbine files for SLIDERS 1.02 - 1.09 have a lot less aliasing and combing than the Universal files. The problem scenes ("Prince of Wails" with the humvee, "Fever" in the pharmacy, "Last Days" streets, "Eggheads" with the houses) have a little but significantly less than the Universal versions of those same scenes.

Why is Turbine better in that respect? Why is the aliasing so bad with Universal and mostly okay with Turbine? And did whatever process that led to less aliasing also make the video blurrier?

And my Universal question for pneumatic was really: the videotape files are fuzzy and blurry. You've been able to clear up the distortions significantly and add a bit more detail. Do you think that the files can become sharper via your scripts or other third party sharpeners? Or are we pretty much at the limit of how much these files can be improved?

Two questions for pneumatic:

Why don't the Turbine files have the aliasing? The jagged edges? The comb lines?

Also, regarding your current work on SLIDERS 1.02 - 1.09: do you think your future scripts can make the video sharper and clearer? Or have we reached the upper limit of what is possible with these analog videotape files?

Ah, thanks. I'm now letting RussianCabbie make remote use of my gaming laptop to upscale his pneumatic inverse telecined 540p Pilot to 1080p via Topaz Artemis. I myself will stick to the pneumatic nnedi3 edition.

**

The thing is: I remember at least Season 1 of LOIS AND CLARK on DVD perpetually having a mildly fuzzier video image whenever special effects were present. If Clark were using superspeed, firing heat vision or flying, the image would get a little softer. It's like the effects in Season 1 were being done on a different video editing suite from non-effects sequences. The drop in video quality for effects shots is in the original SD DVD release, and in the HD release, the small gap between effects and non-effects shots has become a massive gulf.

The S1 effects shots were actually so fuzzy that I'm not sure they can be upscaled fully. And I too would choose SD DVDs over the HD release for this show. Yes, SD isn't as sharp, but at least it's consistent instead of shifting from HD to SD every time Superman uses his superpowers.

I think the unwillingness to redo the effects shots is because the STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION HD blu-ray was a sales failure. It was a high budget remastering with rebuilt effects that came out just in time for streaming to wipe out the home video market. Paramount and CBS lost a ton of money. Since then, HD releases of SD shows have sought to cut costs by simply rescanning the original film but using the master tapes for any effects footage rather than recreate those effects.

BABYLON 5 had the same treatment as LOIS AND CLARK, but BABYLON 5's effects always looked like Playstation 2 graphics on original broadcast, and those untextured computer models actually upscale to 1080p pretty well.

STARGATE SG-1's non-digitally shot seasons were upscaled from SD to HD for HD home video release and... while it actually looks okay, it has an overly noise-reduced image that borders on blurry. The distributor called that a feature of their 'Super Clean Image' feature. And at least its effects and non-effects scenes have the same video quality throughout.

With the L&C Season 1 effects shots, I'm not sure any upscale was even attempted on those fuzzy videotape sequences. They may have been too poor to upscale.

I had a quick look just now at the HD version of Season 2 of LOIS AND CLARK and the Superman sequences look a bit better than in Season 1, still not full HD, but upscaled to HD approximations. It looks like the master tapes from Season 2 onward had the effects shots at a better SD video quality that could be raised to a better HD approximation. It matches closely enough for living room viewing, although it's certainly less-than-ideal.

Personally, I think it's best to be consistent and it's better to be SD throughout than an awkward blend of SD and HD. It's very jarring when HD footage gives way to SD effects. For an HD Season 1 of LOIS AND CLARK, I'd probably advise going the STARGATE SG-1 route of an SD upscale... albeit with nnedi3 rather than whatever they were using.

There's certainly a cooler, bluer look to the LOIS AND CLARK HD rescan with a higher brightness level. And all the effects are just the videotape sequences that have been stretched, so any time there's any kind of video effect, it goes from HD to terrible looking SD. I only saw the first season, but it looks like they didn't even try to upscale the SD footage.

**

I thought the pneumatic Avisynth+ script had dealt with the jagged edges in this Pilot shot when reviewing a 540p version, but looking at it in 1080p output, the jagged edges are still there:

https://i.ibb.co/pP9GXxk/Sliders-101-1080-mp4-snapshot-00-05-02-048.jpg

How would pneumatic address it?

I guess I have to run the full Topaz Artemis job now for the eventual fan convention where I will supply the digital files for the screening but pneumatic will introduce it.

I like grain if it's part of the texture of the film image or if it's filling in for detail in a video that's lacking in definition. But I think grain can easily become a needless distraction. The TV show CHUCK is horrifically grainy to the point where it looks like static. The 4K77 fan reconstruction of a STAR WARS theatrical print is so obnoxiously grainy that I had to run it through Topaz AI to tone it down to enjoy it. And the grain in the Gaia upscales is just ugly and oversharpened.

**

I have run pneumatic's script on 1.02 - 1.09 to output 1080p files with bilinear, with nnedi3. After painstaking analysis, careful review, a 12 point system of screenshot comparison and a live viewing on four different TVs, I have come to the conclusion that I have no idea what difference choosing either scaler would actually make.

These are blurry videotape files. There comes a point when we might just conclude that no scaler is going to turn these analog recordings into the crisp renderings we want. We have to settle for below average files that at least have been shorn of those jagged edges and flashing horizontal lines.

Until pneumatic comes up with a new script or until we reshoot all the episodes with stand-ins and deepfake the actors' faces onto our photo doubles, we've probably come as far as we can. nnedi3 was the most powerful scaler pneumatic encouraged me to have my gaming laptop use, so I'll accept that this is what we've got. The Pneumatic NNEDI3 Edition.

I forgave most of the issues too.

I liked how Oliver assured Barry he wasn't wasting his life with some very simple questions.

I would have been happy with Diggle having a longer arc in all the shows instead of what was really an extended cameo.

Some comparisons on the Pilot episode between pneumatic's script outputting the file to 1080p with nnedi3 upscaling and pneumatic's 540p file upscaled to 1080p via Topaz AI (Artemis).

Then I tried some samples where I used Gaia to sharpen pneumatic's 1080p file (that's what Topaz says it's designed to do). Then I finally used Gaia to upscale pneumatic's 540p file to 1080p.

pneumatic TFM + TDecimate + QTGMC output to 1080p via nnedi3:
https://i.ibb.co/mNg1Qfv/01-Nnedi3.jpg

pneumatic TFM + TDecimate + QTGMC (540p) with Topaz AI Artemis upscaling to 1080p:
https://i.ibb.co/LxCc5dS/01-Topaz-AI.jpg

pneumatic TFM + TDecimate + QTGMC + nnedi3 (1080p) with Topaz AI Gaia sharpening (1080p):
https://i.ibb.co/8cLz3DR/01-Nnedi3-Gaia-Sharpened.jpg

pneumatic TFM + TDecimate + QTGMC + nnedi3 (540p) with Topaz AI Gaia upscaling (1080p):
https://i.ibb.co/Zfj39fp/01-Gaia-Upscaled.jpg

pneumatic TFM + TDecimate + QTGMC output to 1080p via nnedi3:
https://i.ibb.co/2npLnBb/02-Nnedi3.jpg

pneumatic TFM + TDecimate + QTGMC (540p) with Topaz AI Artemis upscaling to 1080p:
https://i.ibb.co/72vF3r7/02-Topaz-AI.jpg

pneumatic TFM + TDecimate + QTGMC + nnedi3 (1080p) with Topaz AI Gaia sharpening (1080p):
https://i.ibb.co/t3Pndvc/02-Nnedi3-Gaia-Sharpened.jpg

pneumatic TFM + TDecimate + QTGMC + nnedi3 (540p) with Topaz AI Gaia upscaling (1080p):
https://i.ibb.co/bRPq5WS/03-Gaia-Upscaled.jpg

nnedi3 has a certain roughness that, I find, looks good at living room distance and the roughness has indicators of detail even if those details aren't fully HD rendered.

Topaz AI Artemis upscaling is smoother and more refined, but it has a certain computer generated look because it is computer generated.

Topaz AI Gaia for sharpening up the nnedi3 upscale is, I feel, just increasing the nnedi3 roughness with no real benefit.

Topaz AI Gaia for upscaling the 540p pneumatic file is, I find, just bringing us back to the nnedi3 roughness while using far more processing power than nnedi3 demands.

Personally... I'm very happy with pneumatic's 1080p nnedi3 file.

pneumatic wrote:
ireactions wrote:

Is it possible that in terms of blu-ray player playback, the Turbine files are better suited to progressive scan and upconverting than the Universal files?

Yes!   My Sony DVD player for instance, when playing a PAL 2:2 cadence DVD (pretty much all PAL DVDs) it inverse telecines (weaves) to 576p.   But with NTSC 3:2 cadence DVDs like Sliders it just deinterlaces using BWDIF style deinterlacing (weaving only static elements, but anything that moves drops to 240p).  So I think that could explain the difference you were seeing.

Thank GOD. pneumatic, I seriously thought I was going insane (well, more insane) and that I was dragging RussianCabbie down with me.

I'm currently recopying my Universal discs of Season 2 and 3 to my hard drive with MakeMKV. Might as well get the best versions on my media drive.

I have no doubt that pneumatic is correct to determine that Turbine uses poorer files than the Universal set. Why have RussianCabbie and I gotten better results from Turbine in many cases?

I have wondered about bias, but given that RussianCabbie too got better results from Turbine disc playback, I wonder if the blu-ray players may be the factor.

RussianCabbie and I watching the Turbine discs and Universal discs on our blu-ray players would have been seeing the files played with progressive scan to convert 25fps (Turbine) or 29.97fps (Universal) to 24fps TV display. Progressive scan combines separate fields to form full progressive frames and duplicates or drops frames as needed for playback.

Is it possible that the progressive scan combining separate field-frames will create some image degradation from minor field misalignments? Is it possible that a 25fps file, with fewer frames for progressive scan combination, with fewer misalignments, then has less degradation? Could that be why RussianCabbie found Turbine's "Rules of the Game" clearer than Universal's? (I don't know.)

pneumatic used TFM inverse telecine to progress the files for screenshots. As I understand it, TFM engages in field matching to recover the original progressive frames, in contrast to progressive scan simply combining two fields into one frame. Field matching frame recovery shows that the Universal files have more image data than the Turbine files.

So what if the lack of field matching frame recovery on our old blu-ray players is what tripped up Universal even as Turbine looked good?

Is it possible that in terms of blu-ray player playback, the Turbine files are better suited to progressive scan and upconverting than the Universal files?

There's no doubt that my previous process of converting the DVD files -- MakeMKV followed by Handbrake detelecining -- was producing fuzzier files at 640x480 that were inferior to pneumatic using MakeMKV and inverse telecine and outputting files at 720x540. And that certainly skewed my comparison.

But RussianCabbie also found the Turbine discs had a better image than Universal under his playback conditions. I have to wonder if PAL 25fps is just easier for our blu-ray players than NTSC 29.97fps.

However, my understanding of the difference between progressive scan and inverse telecine is very uncertain; I think it's that progressive scan combine field-frames while inverse telecine drops unnecessary fields and rebuilds progressive frames. That could be wrong.

1,000

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I liked 9.09 more than the rest of the season so far, but there were some odd glitches that reflect either a lack of diligence or a lack of skill on showrunner Eric Wallace. At Barry's party, Wally West is present, Cecile is present... but Joe West isn't. Does Joe not like Barry any more? Maybe I missed it, but I didn't even hear a throwaway line to explain it.

At Barry's party, Diggle decides that a celebratory event is the best time to give Barry the bow of Oliver Queen, a moment that would be more appropriate at a funeral or a memorial reunion than at a birthday party in a room filled with people. What the hell was that?

Oliver tells Barry that Barry wants to die and stay dead and Barry accepts this observation, a very odd claim. I think what the episode means to say is that Barry doesn't think he deserves to return to life when Frost and Caitlin weren't resurrected, but that's not quite what Oliver's words seem to say, so there's a strange lack of precision in the dialogue. Once again, we have a character hesitating to engage in a straightforward course of action to stretch out the story.

It was good to finally get some onscreen reaction from Wally to the death of Jesse Quick, but it was odd that Wally was searching the multiverse for some vague "enlightenment" instead of trying to see Jesse again. I also have to note that Wally being 'jealous' of Barry and accusing Barry of stealing Joe and Iris was pretty silly when Barry never knew that Wally existed, and while it's meant to be unreasonable, Eric Wallace has a tendency to create conflicts like this that are absurd in their irrationality even when no one is being mind controlled.

Aside from that, it was fine. Thankfully, Eric Wallace didn't spend all of Amell's screentime on an alternate universe doppelganger and only bring the real Oliver in for a few rushed scenes at the end. Thankfully, Eric Wallace didn't have Bloodwork claim to have taken over the city / planet / universe / multiverse with no way to sell it convincingly onscreen. Sendhil Ramamurthy did a better job of underplaying Bloodwork; I wish this subtle, capable actor weren't being directed to such a one note performance on THE FLASH. The fight scene with Bloodwork felt sizable. I liked how Bloodwork was cured rather than killed.

Oliver had some nice moments of assurance and kindness to Barry along with his usual exasperation with Barry's mild neediness for hugs and self-esteem boosting. The reunion between Oliver and Diggle was good.

I should say: I haven't hated anything in THE FLASH this season. It's not like Season 3 of SLIDERS. It's not offensive. It's just dull. This week was livelier than most episodes of this season.

This lensdump site doesn't work for me. I've tried three different browsers and the images don't load.

Turbine blu-ray for S2 to S5 episodes look significantly better in my living room than the NTSC DVDs, but if pneumatic says Turbine is actually poorer, then I wonder if my living room TV/bluray scaler is somehow working well with the blu-ray but not working on my DVDs. I also have to wonder if playing the raw MKV files on my Android TV without any inverse telecine is having some effect on our differing results.

But thinking about it, I now suspect my comparison was flawed because I compared the raw MKV blu-ray files to Handbrake processed DVD files (which has a haze-inducing detelecine process and reduces the image resolution from 540 to 480). There's also perceptual bias on my part due to my frustration with Universal.

Why don't the Turbine files have all the jagged edges and flicker of the NTSC version?

In other news, I've looked over the bicubic and bilinear versions of The Pneumatic Edition and the bilinear version has a little more edge-pixel contrast that I prefer for these fuzzy videotape files. But I have to be honest, with pneumatic informing us that the Turbine blu-ray is actually poorer than the DVDs, I'm not really filled with confidence in my assessments anymore. I'm going to take a GPU-powered nnedi3 run at these files one last time.

This is the script I used.

clip = "D:\!MakeMKV\S1 - Universal\Sliders - 101.mkv"   # produced from the disc using MakeMKV (lossless remux)
CPUcores = 8  

video = LWLibavVideoSource(clip, stream_index=-1, repeat=true, cache=true)
audio = LWLibavAudioSource(clip, stream_index=1, cache=true)
AudioDub(video, audio)

TFM(mode=0, slow=2, scthresh=100, PP=3, metric=1, cthresh=9, MI=200,
\    clip2=PropDelete("_FieldBased").bwdif(field=-1, thr=5, edeint=nnedi3(field=-1)))

TDecimate(mode=0, cycleR=1, cycle=5, hybrid=1, viddetect=2, vidthresh=4.5,
\    denoise=true, chroma=false, hint=false)

QTGMC(InputType=1, preset="slow", Sharpness=1.0, FPSDivisor=1, Rep0=13, EZKeepGrain=1.0, EdiThreads=CPUcores/4) 

z_ConvertFormat(                      
\ colorspace_op="601:601:170m:full=>709:709:709:full",
\ resample_filter="spline36",
\ interlaced=true,
\ dither_type="ordered")

Tweak(sat=1.45) #Sorry, pneumatic, I know you don't approve of this.

nnedi3_rpow2(rfactor=4, cshift="GaussResize")
GaussResize(1440, 1080, p=30.0)

Prefetch(CPUcores)

If the field misalignment on 1.02 - 1.09 is not too severe, I shudder to think what is severe...

I ran pneumatic's script on the Pilot (Universal) along with pneumatic's nnedi3 settings to output it to 1080p. I can report that the results are superior to Handbrake and Topaz AI in a somewhat subtle yet undeniable way. Handbrake left some faint flicker on straight lines; pneumatic's script has reduced it to trace amounts of flicker at most. Also, Handbrake muddied the image a little with its detelecine process and output a 480p file; pneumatic's process gives us a 540p file, so there's a bit more sharpness and detail.

nnedi3 also seems to do better than Topaz AI because Topaz had a tendency to smooth out the image textures (and video compression artifacts)  to make the video seem clean and well-scaled in going from 480p to 1080p. nnedi3, however, prioritizes sharpness over smoothness and has more detail from pneumatic. The result: you see the shades of stubble on Jerry O'Connell's face; more texture of John Rhys-Davies' skin; more strands in Sabrina Lloyd's hair; more detail in Cleavant Derricks' suit. It's not fully resolved HD detail, but there are more indicators of detail and more sharpness whereas Topaz AI smoothed all this out to a gentle fake-HD fuzziness.

I don't think it makes a huge difference at living room distance, but since this is the series premiere of SLIDERS, it is certainly worth the extra detail that pneumatic's process has wrung out of the DVD.

I'm not sure Topaz AI can do better than nnedi3, but after my Turbine experiments, I'll certainly drop the 540p file into Topaz AI and try different upscaling methods there.

I have some questions for pneumatic because I still don't fully understand his learnings and some of the underlying technologies.

What exactly is the difference between deinterlacing interpolation and deinterlacing weaving?
You've specified that QTGMC doesn't weave but instead interpolates.

My (shaky) understanding is that interpolation is when the deinterlacer takes an even or odd field that's only 50 percent of the image (stretched to fill 100 percent of the frame) -- and takes a guess at what's in the missing 50 percent of the of the frame based on analyzing previous and subsequent frames as well as the existing information in the current frame.

My (shaky) understanding is that weaving is when the deinterlacer combines the even and odd fields and then doubles that frame in order to meet the video's existing framerate (or the framerate would otherwise be cut in half).

My (shaky) understanding is that interpolation can create image degradation if the missing data is filled in with bad estimations, and bad estimations happen when the current and surrounding frames don't have helpful information for the algorithm.

My (shaky) understanding is that weaving creates motion artifacts when the weaved frames of two fields don't line up precisely due to movement in the scene.

My (shaky) understanding is that most modern blu-ray players will use progressive scan on a DVD, which combines two fields into one frame and then duplicates that frame by three or two for an alternating 3-2 pattern that reduces the motion artifacts and provides a full image without the guesswork of interpolation.

My (shaky) understanding is that when dealing with video like SLIDERS 1.02 - 1.09 where the fields were scaled separately and misaligned, progressive scan produces all ugly visual anomalies on the Universal discs (as does weaving). Meanwhile, interpolation to remove those artifacts depends on analyzing current and surrounding frame-fields to fill in the gaps; since the fields are misaligned, that analysis yields poor data and image degradation.

My (shaky) understanding is that QTGMC's motion analysis yields better data to fill in those gaps which is why the pneumatic scripts have yielded better results than handbrake or progressive scan players.

It's a shaky understanding that I'm hoping pneumatic can correct when time permits.

My uneducated guess: the Pilot was shot and edited on film as a big budget production to sell to a network. For broadcast, the film master was transferred to something like Betacam SP (340 lines of resolution, a broadcast standard format of the era).

The series that followed, however, was shot on film and then transferred to what looks like really low resolution analog videotape, likely U-Matic, Betamax or 8mm videotape (250 lines of resolution) -- and then transferred to a Betacam SP equivalent which saw 250 line tape copied to 340 line tape, resulting in not only generational loss but degraded image quality from the stretching. (Thank you to pneumatic for explaining generational loss.)

My uneducated guess would be that 1.02 - 1.09 were edited in a variety of videotape formats.

"Summer of Love" and "Luck of the Draw" seem unusually fuzzy. "Eggheads" seems all over the place in image quality. "Last Days" and "The Weaker Sex" seem middling. "Prince of Wails", "Fever" and "The King is Back" seem better than the rest. This suggests at least three different kinds of videotape.

I'm not sure there's a rationale based on content. "Summer of Love" and "Prince of Wails" are on opposite ends of the quality spectrum and both have high special effects sequences. "Summer of Love" and "Last Days" are at opposite ends of the production order and yet, both are low quality.

It would suggest that the studio had multiple suites of different equipment for film-to-videotape transfer and videotape editing, acquired over a decade or two. Shows would book transfer-and-editing equipment based on what was available. Consistency in videotape formats didn't matter. CRT SD broadcast would look the same no matter what you used. On a CRT, the Pilot does not look better or worse than "Summer of Love".

It's possible that when transferring the videotape edit to a broadcast tape, some videotape formats suffer more generational loss than others.

It's also possible that certain episodes, like "Eggheads" with its sportsball scenes, were edited across different video suites in order to accommodate the sports scenes shot on videotape. Then some non-sport scenes were edited on the same sport-videotape hardware due to urgency -- while the rest of the episode was edited in a separate bay. Different videotape formats for different scenes could explain why that episode's video quality is strangely variable.

I'll certainly look into different upscaling means for the Pilot after I finish the Turbine experiments.

Ah, thank you for the clarification. I'm really interested in this new script you're working on! I'm not sure the Universal files for 1.02 - 1.09 have much or even any grain. If it did, we'd be watching Topaz AI upscales now.

Still working on The Pneumatic Bilinear Edition. I've decided to switch to Nvidia GPU encoding (Nvenc 264). I'd previously 'felt' that Nvenc video didn't seem as good as CPU-only encodes, but I could never point to it or figure out why from screenshots whether still or in motion. I have to conclude that it was simply a bias without evidence aside from Nvenc having no tuning settings for grain. I set the bitrate to 10 MBps and the file sizes are only 3 - 6 percent larger than CPU h.264.

Since I'm no longer seeking to add grain and the original files don't have any, I may as well take advantage of GPU encoding taking one hour per episode instead of three. This will also allow me to run different batches of jobs with different scalers. I finished all the bilinear encodes.

I found that bilinear turned out really good results on "Luck of the Draw" where the simple pixel contrast/pixelation on surfaces actually mimicked a subtle grain. For some episodes like "Eggheads", however, I found myself wondering if bicubic smoothness would  be preferable. I'm running the bicubic set now and I'll compare them side by side and decide which one to keep. I guess it'll be The Pneumatic Nvidia Edition if there's a mix and match.

Of course, I'd end up redoing it all over again with pneumatic's new script (which is why speedier GPU encoding seems necessary).

The job that is currently running is pneumatic's script on the Pilot but with nnedi3 scaling it to 1080p. It'll be interesting to compare a pneumatic-1080p pilot with the Topaz 1080p pilot. I suspect that, because the Pilot's video quality is so strong already even at DVD quality, pneumatic's version might be an improvement since it won't have the peculiar AI muddiness on wide shots that's offset by AI grain.

Topaz AI, I think, is really best for video files like the Mill Creek Season 4 - 5 files: extremely grainy, compressed SD files sourced from digital videotape that, due to the grain, can be AI-rebuilt to a close approximation of the original film.

Well, I loaded the Pilot into the queue for encoding. Only outputting it to 540p, though.

I can't emphasize enough: I don't really understand QGTMC or TDecimate and my vague understandings could lead to opinions that are very, very wrong. Hopefully, pneumatic will pay us a visit to correct the many misapprehensions that I'm sure I've posted.

RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

@ireactions But, regarding the Pneumatic edition, what is your guesses as to how it would affect the pilot, given the pilot didn't have the same level of issues as the rest of s1, but Pneumatic's avi synth changes obviously had such a strong impact on cleaning up ep. 102-109?

Is the TIVTC still being used?  As I recall, that yielded very good results for 102-109.

My (very shaky) understanding from pneumatic's script and posts: it's TIVTC/TFM for detelecining, and then QTGMC is deinterlacing and interpolating any combed frames that remain (and there seem to be a lot in 1.02 - 1.09).

My (very shaky) understanding: the issue with Handbrake's using detelecine function is that while it reduced glaring interlacing issues (jagged edges, lines), the added pixels to fill in the gaps just muddied what little detail was there. Also, you were still left with a small amount of flicker. This is because the detelecine process generated the missing field data for those problem frames via a simplistic process of copying and averaging the surrounding image information. In addition, the Handbrake process output files at 640x480 when the image data, pneumatic explained, is actually for a 720x540 video, so Handbrake was costing us about 11 percent resolution.

pneumatic's solutions seem to retain as much of the Universal file's data as possible because QTGMC uses motion analysis to better match and fill in the missing image data. QTGMC also alters the existing fields to blend into the new material. This doesn't make things sharper because it isn't sharp to begin with; it just avoids making things fuzzier, resolves the field alignment issues and creates that smoothness in the pneumatic results.

I think. I still don't totally understand it (yet).

Anyway. I ran pneumatic's script on the Pilot episode, playing the script and video live via Media Player Classic. It fixed the jagged lines on Quinn's car when he drives up to the park. And it did a better job than Handbrake. Handbrake reduced the jagged edges significantly and they were about 80 percent gone and far less annoying, but pneumatic's script removed about 95 percent of the flicker. However, the Pilot had so few instances of these aliased edges, so pneumatic's version is a modest improvement (but still an improvement). Also, pneumatic's method produces a 720x540 file, so we'd have 11 percent more image data to feed into Topaz AI for an upscale, another minor improvement.

The Pilot episode is the only AI upscale I kept and I think upscaling pneumatic's version from 540 to 1080 would resolve a few minor visual issues, add a very fine level of detail... but I suspect for the most part, you would barely notice. I think it's worth doing in full for the Pilot episode.

1,009

(89 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

There's something that's haunted me for years, something that I have wondered about but been afraid to ask. A quiet query of terror lodged in my mind, a splinter in my psyche that casts flickers of uncertainty that makes me question everything we are and everything we do.

There is a question that I have been afraid to contemplate or even ask... but I feel we have arrived at the moment where it not only can be asked, it must be asked.

Temporal Flux, do you think the three spider-wasps that made it to the 60s Earth in "Summer of Love" reproduced, spread and destroyed human civilization? Did the sliders leave hippies on this Earth with a guardedly hopeful enlightenment only for them to all be mutilated or killed by the spider-wasps?

I've been very worried about this for awhile.

I'm currently going back to The Pneumatic Edition and running another encode on 1.02 - 1.09. I've elected to use the bilinear scaler because it worked so well on those smooth Turbine files. And I find that pneumatic-style QTGMC detelecined files have a certain smoothness that's actually very reminiscent of the Turbine files and might benefit from that simple pixel contrast increase. I also won't be adding grain to these files.

I was working with the Turbine files in Hybrid and the bilinear scaling was turning out some good results, but Hybrid seems like a poorly coded program that couldn't produce the colour settings that it was promising in its previews. I realized I'd need to use Avisynth+ to do it properly... and I felt I should use pneumatic's script on the Universal files first.

After I finish The Pneumatic Bilinear Edition, I'll use Avisynth+ to use bilinear scaling on the Turbine files. It'll make for a neat comparison.

I'm more a student of POWER RANGERS than a fan... although I do think the Boom! comic books are very good.

I watched almost nothing of the show past "The Power Transfer" finale on November 9, 1994 where Jason, Zack and Trini step aside for Rocky, Adam and Aisha. I disliked how POWER RANGERS acted like the costume was more important than the character. I didn't want to watch a show where the original actors could be so uncaringly removed.

Months later, I saw the series premiere of a new show; I saw how much SLIDERS loved Quinn, Wade, Rembrandt and Arturo and knew right away that this show would keep its cast together. I was gravely mistaken and it will haunt me forever.

Anyway. The Boom! POWER RANGERS comic book of 2016, however, sparked something in me: it was set in 2016, but featured the Rangers immediately after the events of the "Green With Evil" finale which was aired and set in... 1993.

The Boom! series had an interesting approach to continuity, insisting that the first 21 episodes of the show happened in 2016 instead of 1993, but then presenting the Power Rangers as a far more militaristic operation with everyone suffering the psychological issues experienced by child soldiers; then everyone unnerved that their mentor Zordon was now having them work with the Green Ranger who had previously tried to kill them all.

The comic book treated the first 21 episodes like a simplified children's TV tie-in adaptation of a more complex comic book franchise.

This approach fascinated me, so I took the time to catch up on POWER RANGERS by speed-reading fan wiki entries without ever actually rewatching the show. I wanted to understand what the comics were altering. I wondered if hypothetical SLIDERS comics could ever do something similar to save Quinn, Wade, Rembrandt and Arturo.

I did watch "Forever Red", however, for research. I had read that "Forever Red" showed Jason with his superpowers despite having been depowered in "The Power Transfer" and repowered and depowered in ZEO, and that it bothered absolutely nobody. Everybody was happy to have the original Red Ranger back.

I wondered if a SLIDERS story could show Quinn, Wade, Rembrandt and Arturo alive and together without much explanation, and if it would be so wonderful to see them restored that nobody would be overly concerned with how.

I'm really fascinated by POWER RANGERS fans. They really *care* about the Power Rangers; they care about Jason, Zack, Trini, Kimberly, Billy and Tommy -- and they also seem to care about Rocky, Adam, Aisha, Kat, Bulk, Skull and Ernie. They care in the same way we care about Quinn, Wade, Rembrandt and Arturo and also seem to have some fondness for Maggie, Colin, Diana and Mallory.

POWER RANGERS fans care so much that even when the Power Rangers' actors die or are under prosecution and can't travel to film, the creators feel bad about it and have the characters appear anyway in the full body covering costumes.

I have a lot of admiration and fascination towards that. I always want to learn why people care about something so that I can control it, manipulate it, master it, and then look into how it might be ruthlessly exploited to save Quinn, Wade, Rembrandt and Arturo.

That's a pretty cool attitude, actually, that David Yost and Walter Jones are sufficient to sustain 10 episodes for you. They're very good actors and I'd defer to you on that since you're more a POWER RANGERS fan than I am.

Amy Jo Johnson actually declined to specify why she didn't return for ONCE AND ALWAYS, but she said it wasn't about money. She's been moving into directing TV and indie films lately. She's also writing a Pink Ranger comic, and considering that comics pay about $220 per page and offer no real royalties, I'd take her word for it that money isn't an issue.

Austin St. John... I'm not sure what to say about him except that everyone's innocent until proven guilty and I hope the prosecutor will determine that St. John's management misused his finances and business.

Jason having his Red Ranger powers in FOREVER RED with no explanation whatsoever was both a rational creative choice and a baffling continuity choice. Tommy, however, got his hands on a master morpher that allows him to morph into any Power Ranger form he'd ever used in the past. And ONCE AND ALWAYS has Billy and Zack reconnect Rocky and Kat to the power grid, so presumably between TURBO and FOREVER RED, something happened that reconnected Jason, Kimberly, Zack and Trini to the grid.

In GRID CONNECTION, the Beast Morphers team calls on past Rangers for help and Jason arrives, later bringing in Billy, Kimberly, Trini and Zack (morphed), so it looks like the original Mighty Morphin team had already reassembled by 2020.

I imagine that Billy had some happy times with Cestria on planet Aquitar but felt the need to return to Earth and make a difference to human society with what he'd learned. ONCE AND ALWAYS has Adam and Aiysha heading for Aquitar and telling Billy that he should visit Cestria again soon.

I imagine Jason after TURBO becoming a paramedic, trying to make a difference without his powers, only to be caught in a collapsing building, crushed under rubble, believing his death is near... and then he miraculously morphs into the Red Ranger and is able to save himself. Elsewhere, Zack is scuba diving, Kimberly is in a grocery store and Trini is getting a haircut, and Billy is trying to exchange a laptop when they too morph into their original Ranger forms. They return to the command center and discover that when Zordon died, a part of his power was sent to the five Power Rangers he'd missed most. Billy builds new morphers. Tommy returns and tells them all that they are adults now and should not feel obligated to resume running around in spandex, but that they should be available whenever the new generation of Power Rangers needs them.

Cut to 2022 and the original Power Rangers have never had more than a week between emergency calls and have elected to just reassemble the team and accept the situation.

I too am feeling great enthusiasm for the POWER RANGER comics. They're set in a different continuity from the show while still mirroring some of its history, and they have a more pseudo-realistic, militaristic tone, but they're very interesting. A bit like Christopher Nolan doing a POWER RANGERS movie.

I agree, the grain was a bad move. This is the first time in recorded history that I have made a mistake. Now I know how everyone else must feel.

The Pneumatic Edition is definitely the best of the lot, especially in avoiding the obnoxious flicker. Even the Turbine version of those episodes have a small amount in some of the worst scenes on Universal.

Why do the Turbine blu-ray discs of Season 1 look so good on my budget blu-ray player (bought for $35 USD refurbished)?

My current theory: the player must be using a very simple scaler. There's no way this $35 player has any sort of neural net or AI scaling or so much as a noise filter. It's likely bilinear scaling, a low-power method of analyzing the surrounding four pixels of each pixel to add more for upscaling.

Bilinear is out of vogue these days since bicubic creates smoother gradients by analyzing the surrounding 16 pixels while Lanczos and nnedi3 have even more intricate methods to smooth-sharpen video. But I'm starting to think Lanczos, nnedi3 and Topaz AI may be completely overshooting on SLIDERS 1.02 - 1.09.

Those scalers are all about rebuilding detail and maintaining smoothness at higher resolutions to offset upscaling degradation. 1.03 - 1.09 don't have much detail to rebuild, so what we keep getting is an oversmoothed blur on video that was already lacking detail.

Bilinear is probably adding very simple pixel contrast that is well-suited to the fuzzy Turbine files. That and the HDMI Deep Color setting are probably making the files look like a good (enough) DVD.

I'll run a few bilinear scaling jobs and report back later.

As for the Universal files: pneumatic's QTGMC deinterlacing and detelecining have created a fairly clean set of files. I think my grain additions were a mistake.

I suspect that pursuing the illusion of sharpness with grain and increasingly complex scaling algorithms is trying to build on a foundation of sharpness that isn't there.

It may be better to just use pneumatic's QTGMC script but edit it to use bicubic scaling to prioritize smoothness over sharpness in these low-grain, low-detail videotape files. But I'm going to start with the Turbine files first since I've already seen how that can turn out pretty well from my $35 blu-ray player.

It's probably just a numbers evaluation. The series finale of THE NEXT GENERATION was watched by 30 million people; DS9's finale was watched by 5.3 million people.

In terms of DS9 characters not appearing on PICARD -- that's probably due to budget and the wish to bring in characters who had actually interacted with Picard or had some specific point of commonality (assimilation by the Borg). There were hopes of Season 3 featuring Janeway, Data's daughter(s), Harry Kim -- but between rebuilding the Enterprise-D and rehiring the whole TNG cast, the budget didn't stretch to those roles.

I imagine the DS9 characters were even lower on the priority list when they couldn't even afford Garrett Wang. Garrett Wang organizes STAR TREK conventions. Organizing STAR TREK conventions is an honourable profession, but one would think it wouldn't elevate him beyond affordability, so the budget really was straining.

But I don't know if DS9 is really ignored because the whole Starfleet-suspicious attitude of TREK since INTO DARKNESS originates from DS9, as does Section 31 (or some organization calling itself that, *sigh*) on DISCOVERY.

I don't know if ENTERPRISE is really that ignored either, given that the STAR TREK 2009 movie revealed the terrible fate of Captain Archer's dog Porthos.

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Interesting.  I watched the special and assumed they'd used archival footage of Kimberly, Jason, and Tommy.  But I guess watching them back to back was a little disorienting.

I was sad that they couldn't get all the original actors back, but I was happy with the special.  My friend was sad to find out that it wasn't a 10-episode series.  I think it would've been a good show if they had gone that route.

I personally would be very keen on a season of MIGHTY MIDDLE-AGED POWER RANGERS, but I think the short length of the reunion special was a blessing in disguise due to all the practical issues.

If you can't get Austin St. John to play Jason because he's barred from leaving the US, can't get Amy Jo Johnson to play Kimberly because she feels she's well-past wearing skintight suits, can't get Thuy Trang to play Trini because she's slightly deceased, can't get Jason David Frank to play Tommy because he's somewhat dead... then options are limited.

ONCE AND ALWAYS has to kill off Trini without having the actress' face visible for a death scene. Then it has to find ways to keep Jason, Kimberly and Tommy offscreen  The limitations would become even more glaring in a 10 episode season if you only have two of the six main Power Rangers (and yes, I know Tommy wasn't among the original five, but history associates him with the originals).

I suspect you'd have to recast, and then... is it really a reunion?

But I wish they could do MIGHTY MIDDLE-AGED POWER RANGERS. You know how fascinated I am with what it's like for people to have drifted from a life defining experience (like sliding or being a Power Ranger or investigating X-Files) only to return to that experience decades later.

FOREVER RED, GRID CONNECTION and ONCE AND ALWAYS raise (but don't necessarily answer) the question: what does it mean to be an adult doing the same job you were doing as a teenager?

MIGHTY MIDDLE-AGED POWER RANGERS could be a metaphor for never losing your youthful passion and optimism, but also a metaphor for arrested adolescence.

FOREVER RED indicates that Jason got his powers back after his ZEO-depowering. There was always a slight disconnect between Jason and the Red Ranger; the unmorphed Jason was a low-key, quiet guy while the Red Ranger was hyperactively melodramatic. FOREVER RED and GRID CONNECTION show that Jason's Red Ranger personality has become his morphed and unmorphed personality, and no matter what random crap happened to him in ZEO or TURBO, the status quo would inevitably reassert. Jason would always return to being the Red Ranger; ONCE AND ALWAYS indicates that Jason would inevitably be back with the original Rangers.

ONCE AND ALWAYS shows that Zack could never get away from being a Power Ranger. He was a Power Ranger from 1993 - 1994. It was an after-class high school job that he left to get into politics. He gave up his powers; he campaigned for world peace; he worked in Congress -- but despite all this, by 2022, Zack was once again back in the suit fighting Rita Repulsa alongside the other five Rangers and despite his best efforts, he raised the next Yellow Ranger.

ONCE AND ALWAYS shows that Billy had the same curse or blessing. Billy was the longest-lasting original Power Ranger and this after school job nearly killed him when some sci-fi thingamabobbin prematurely aged him from a college kid into a geriatric. Billy had to go to another planet to get cured and once he was there, he fell in love with an alien mermaid and decided he needed a break from Power Rangering. But despite this, by 2022, Billy was back on Earth, back in blue spandex next to the others and we learned that even in his civilian life, he was devoted to the Power Rangers: working in the old command center, building a company on top of the Ranger HQ, mining his engineering learnings from Rangering to build new technologies for Earth.

Maybe MIGHTY MIDDLE-AGED POWER RANGERS has Jason discovering that he has completely lost the ability to live a civilian life; he's now spending 90 percent of his life morphed into the Red Ranger. When trying to help organize Trini's funeral, he discovers he has no idea how to use self-checkout machines at grocery stores, he has no recent credit history to rent a space or book a restaurant; he forgotten how to follow street signs, having teleported everywhere for the last decade.

Maybe Kimberly confesses that after she washed out of the Olympics, she retreated into being a Power Ranger because she couldn't make her other passion work and is now forever reliving her pre-athletic life as a gym teacher at same high school she attended, mentally regressing.

Tommy actually returned to POWER RANGERS pretty frequently (which was why Jason David Frank's refusal to do ONCE AND AGAIN was so strange and indicated some serious issues). Tommy's various returns established that he was a high school teacher who had married Kat (Pink Ranger II) and they had a son, JJ. Perhaps Tommy is now a teacher at Kimberly's school and unlike Kimberly, Tommy is eager to leave Power Rangering to the new generation. Tommy is astonished that with all the new Power Rangers, his old teammates still expect him to suit up as the Green Ranger every few weeks.

A fun subplot may reveal that the morphed Green Ranger in MIGHTY MIDDLE-AGED POWER RANGERS is actually Adam Park (Black Ranger II, Green Ranger Zeo) because Tommy got sick of people coming to him and asked Adam to just pretend to be him in the suit because Tommy needed to take his son fishing and have a spa seekend with his wife.

Maybe Trini started a private security company for residential properties and was leading a quiet, mundane life, raising her daughter alone after the illness and death of her husband, bemused with Tommy at how the others had no life outside the Rangers -- and then Trini dies in battle, forcing Jason, Billy, Zack, Kimberly and Tommy to have to deal with a casualty on their team for the very first time (and with all of them having made it to their 40s and having only ever lost Zordon).

If only they could get the actors. Still. MIGHTY MIDDLE-AGED POWER RANGERS could be a very interesting animated show or comic book.

I agree. The Pneumatic Edition is best.

The great results I'm getting from the Turbine blu-ray are due to a peculiar set of circumstances in my living room. I have no idea how it would turn out for someone else. When I have some time this coming weekend, I'm going to try playing the Turbine blu-ray on my TV using an old PS3 as the player and then a Windows laptop with an external blu-ray drive. That will tell me if the very impressive upscaling is due to the TV or the blu-ray player. I also recently asked RussianCabbie to pass on the Turbine blu-ray files to pneumatic in the hopes that pneumatic might review them and figure out what's going on with these mercurial files.

The one thing that really throws me off about The Pneumatic Edition: whenever we go to a wide shot, the image becomes so ill-defined and blurry in its downscaled analog videotape approximation of a film shot. It's really jarring and it completely knocks me out of the story because it's so mismatched to the otherwise adequate video quality; the video files can't seem to maintain consistent video quality.

In "Summer of Love", the wide shots of the sliders triggering the vortex are so hazy compared to the rest of the scene. The shots of Rembrandt and Wade standing before the hippies is like a watercolour sketch of the actual shot. In "Prince of Wails", the shots of the sliders walking into the Royal Suite look good, but when we go to a wide of the sliders looking around, the shot looks like it's VHS rather than DVD.

The problem is less distracting in the Turbine version because all the shots are a little blurry to begin with, so when we go to a blurry wide shot, it doesn't look out of place since the shot before and after it will be slightly oversmoothed too.

The Turbine version is poorer than The Pneumatic Edition, but it's consistent; you don't go from decent mediums and closeups to awful wide shots. Turbine is consistently very, very, very average (at least at living room distance).

But I think I might be making the problem worse in my files of The Pneumatic Edition: the added film grain texture that I put on the image may be making those wide shots look even more aged even as the grain adds some texture to closeups and mediums.

However, I also have to wonder if this is another issue where we're using Lanczos or nnedi3 or whatever algorithmic pixie dust of the week we're trying to bring these old videotape files to 1080p... and these files are not even really 480p. The pneumatic Avisynth+ scripts are definitely eliminating a lot of the interlacing issues of viewing a CRT-intended product on a modern LED, but what was underneath the interlacing issues offers very little for scaling up.

I'm currently attempting a nnedi3 upscale on the Turbine files just to see if I can replicate how it looks on my TV in the file itself. After that, I'm going to run The Pneumatic Edition again but with no added grain, and I'll output to 540p  and 1080p. It'll be interesting to know if one is more consistent than the other.

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Yeah, I guess we don't know a ton about the current politics of the Alpha Quadrant.  The Romulans aren't in any position to make a move.  I assume the Cardassians aren't either.  The Klingons are an ally.  So maybe there isn't really anyone that could make a move.  And even if they did, it would be a short move since the fleet probably was going to go home right after the festivities.

So do we think the intention was that it was *every* ship?

I'm not entirely sure the Federation has any distinctions between federal, state and municipal law enforcement.

Much in the same way Starfleet is the NASA and the NSF and the EPA and the Navy and the Air Force, Starfleet in TNG and DS9 also seemed to be the CIA and the DOD and the NSA and the FBI and the state police and the local PD and the parks and recreation department. I honestly would not be surprised if Starfleet officers were responsible for replacing lightbulbs in streetlamps and doing restaurant inspections.

I guess, if I had to come up with an explanation, it'd be that while the entire fleet will be gathering on Frontier Day, they will not be gathering at the exact same time on Frontier Day. There will be a lot of headliners in standing positions. There will also be a lot of ships that will be passing through, making an appearance, and then warping back to their posts, operating on an alternating schedule with other ships so that no patrol is abandoned.

It's possible that the Borg-compromised Starfleet went so far as to set up 'commandeered-from-the-Borg' transwarp conduits so that every ship could at least do a flyby. As handwavy an explanation as they come.

I watched "Summer of Love" and "Prince of Wails" today via the blu-ray Turbine disc on my blu-ray player and TV and... it looks nice. I said that the blu-ray was very good DVD quality, much better than the Universal DVDs. And it certainly looked that way today. Except that reviewing the blu-ray files reveals them to be blurry and desaturated and low contrast.

It looks like the strong presentation in my living room is due to a variety of factors. First: the Season 1 Turbine image may be blurry, but it doesn't have all the field issues on the Universal discs that pneumatic has devoted his life to sorting out. It doesn't have flickering and jagged edges on every straight line; it doesn't have horizontal lines flashing across the screen; it doesn't have all the aliasing on the Universal S1 files that makes the image look pixelated and overcompressed.

The image, while blurrier than the Universal discs, has a very clean look without all the obnoxious distortions. And the clean Turbine video image without the seeming pixelation of Universal is of course going to look better.

Another factor seems to be the scaling from my blu-ray player. The player scaling up the Universal discs to a 55 inch TV magnified all the lines and jagged edges and made it look worse. The player scaling up the Turbine discs is scaling a very clean image and adding a bit of pixel contrast to create the illusion of sharpness. The cleanness of the image is actually blurriness, but the slight blur across all shots whether wides, mediums or closeups actually adds a certain sheen. Blurry wide shots don't seem glaringly poor when everything has a little blur. The player could offset that blur and the image wasn't riddled with distortions, so it looked sharper than Universal.

Another feature of the player and the TV: my blu-ray player seems to amp up the saturation levels for standard definition content and my TV's energy saver settings (which I use to watch SD content on low backlight) also have increased saturation. This filled in the colour that seems to be missing from the blu-ray files, so the Turbine video image seems reasonably colourful when the files themselves look really washed out.

RussianCabbie wasn't able to play the blu-ray properly on his hardware. It played at the wrong framerate because the blu-ray uses 25 FPS files whereas NTSC uses 29.97 FPS. My blu-ray player seems to be able to handle PAL video correctly.

All-in-all, it looks like the Turbine blu-ray's S1 files, while poor, are poor in a way that my home theatre situation can remedy and present effectively. The Universal S1 files, however, are poor due to the field misalignment issues which my hardware can't address and can only make worse.

It'd be interesting to try playing a 540p version of The Pneumatic Edition on my hardware (with no grain added) and see if The Pneumatic Edition looks better than the Turbine files on this hardware since pneumatic has cleared away the field issues.

I think Season 2 was confusing for a lot of people including the actual writers of Season 2 and those fine people at Den of Geek (a wonderful sci-fi fantasy website with deightful reviews including their reviews of Denise Richards and Bruce Willis' direct to video movies. Yes, they do great stuff while some of us hang out... here... writing ruminations on POWER RANGERS and SLIDERS DVDs. *sigh*).

I can see why Den of Geek might think the Cooperative are from an alternate timeline. Season 2 was very hard to follow.

However, what's onscreen in "Farewell" (2.10) declares that the Season 2 events in 2024 have always been part of the timeline we know, that the Cooperative Borg have always existed alongside the Collective Borg, but we just never encountered them until the Stargazer incident of 2401 in Season 2 of PICARD.

I just finished episode 10 of Season 3 and the episode reasonably fits in with the Cooperative except for the fact that the Cooperative is never, ever, ever mentioned. The Collective has decayed so badly after VOYAGER that the Borg Queen was reduced to cannibalizing her own drones to exist. It's reasonable to think that in the vacuum left by the Collective, the Cooperative became the dominant Borg.

If I had to find some explanation for why the Cooperative don't come up, I guess we'd have to say that the Cooperative are currently a highly guarded Starfleet secret known only to those directly involved, to Captain Shaw (because he has a former Borg drone as his executive officer), and when people say that the Borg haven't been seen in decades, they're unaware of the Stargazer incident.

I'm not sure how well it holds up to say that the Cooperative Borg are currently a classified secret. And where are they in Season 3? I guess they're still investigating that transwarp gateway in Season 2 that was described as a mysterious piece of a complex puzzle that I assume Michael Chabon never got around to finishing and Terry Matalas understandably decided to forget about.

"Forget about the weird shit on the Stargazer."