Well, here's the second Daelin segment of "As Time Goes By" AI upscaled via Topaz to 1080p from Turbine.
https://mega.nz/file/PsgGnZDQ#c6oLZfbYA … PUiN8JonfQ

And here's the same segment, also Turbine, upscaled via Lanczos.
https://mega.nz/file/ysIE1JrQ#0fuecBKKR … fFptWx52gM

Your mileage may vary on which you prefer.

1,682

(3,555 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Well, I think Slider_Quinn21 is just waiting until six months after his second dose. If an improved vaccine is announced and scheduled for six months and 2.23 weeks after his second dose (my personal tipping point), that might (might!) make sense. SQ21 got his second dose and he is not an anti-vaxxer; if he's holding out, it's because he's looking to get maximum shielding from his shot. I am not a doctor; I cannot evaluate that strategy except to say it's not from a place of mistrust for vaccines.

I don't qualify for a third dose for another two weeks; my mother doesn't qualify for another nine days. I'm not going to wait and I've informed my mother that she's not waiting either.

1,683

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I've been meaning to write on BATWOMAN for weeks, but I've been so busy with upscaling Season 1 of SLIDERS and the other thing, what is it, that thing I do during the day, that job, the day job, but really upscaling Season 1 of SLIDERS.

Slider_Quinn21 is quite correct to point out the absurdities of Ryan Wilder somehow running Wayne Enterprises on Kate's say-so; it's also ridiculous that Kate was running what was described as a multibillion dollar corporation. Wayne Enterprises would not be a family business for Bruce's cousin to take and then hand over to her stepsister's roommate; there would be a shareholders' board and a hiring process.

There's also the fact that across the first two seasons of BATWOMAN, Wayne Enterprises *never* seemed like an actual business and Wayne Tower *never* came off as a workplace of any kind. I was shocked to see Tom Lenk guest-starring as the Wayne Enterprises crisis communications worker. I had been under the impression that Wayne Enterprises was just a holding company for various patents and businesses at this point that had outsourced all its work to smaller firms since Bruce had left Gotham in a fit of something or other. I didn't think anyone did any actual work there and figured that while Kate had access to the executive floors of Wayne Tower, the rest of it had probably been rented out as office space to other businesses.

Also, if we accept -- and you may not -- that superheroes are written and watched or read by predominantly left-of-center creators and viewers, then there has never been a more unfashionable time for a superhero to own or run a multinational corporation. In my head canon (and no one else's), Bruce Wayne would not run a multinational corporation. Bruce Wayne would run a not-for-profit foundation; Bruce's wealth would have come from his father having invented various small medical patents in surgical technologies and real estate investments.

The writers of BATWOMAN are obviously left-of-center creators, and they have deliberately left Wayne Enterprises vague and undefined. It's partially because Wayne Enterprises doesn't really matter except as a thin justification for how Batwoman can afford all her hardware; it's primarily because the writers don't really want to show their heroic lead character running a corporation of any kind but felt compelled to maintain that part of the mythos.

What exactly does Wayne Enterprises buy or sell or offer?

Also, what business was Queen Consolidated in, exactly? And what does STAR Labs do any more after the particle accelerator explosion? Of all the fictional 'businesses' in the Arrowverse, the only recurring ones that have ever really made sense are the dating app Upswipz, the CC Jitters coffee shop, the Big Belly Burger fast food chain and Palmertech (which at least had a self-explanatory name).

**

I find it interesting that BATWOMAN has accepted that it can't do what it set out to do in telling Kate Kane's story; BATWOMAN has become BATS OF GOTHAM: THE NEXT GENERATION, creating a second generation Batwoman, a second generation Joker, a second generation Poison Ivy and I assume that any day now, we'll get a second generation King Tut and a second generation Marsha Queen of Diamonds. It's all about the fragments and pieces left after Batman departed and... it's not the original plan and I'd have been baffled to watch the Season 1 premiere of BATWOMAN followed by the Season 3 premiere of BATWOMAN. BATWOMAN has become as alien to its starting point as SLIDERS. However, its heart is in the right place and the writers are making the best of a very strange turn on an unmapped road.

**

Caroline Dries, showrunner, worked on SMALLVILLE for many years. One of the more baffling things about SMALLVILLE: the way the manipulative, evil Lionel Luthor had a sudden redemption arc in Season 4/5 that made little sense where Clark briefly inhabited his body and suddenly, he was a good guy, trusted by Clark and treated like a father figure, welcomed at the Kents Thanksgiving dinner, etc..

Something similar but better has happened with Alice joining the team; BATWOMAN has a crazy but oddly sensible contrivance with Renee Montoya forcing the Bat-team to help her track down the villains' artifacts and making Alice help. But Dries also does a great job of showing how Alice is not accepted as a member of the team and will turn on them if it suits her; she's a ticking time bomb that still blows up when the gang least expects it.

**

I love Ryan Wilder, but with the mid-season finale of BATWOMAN, I have to ask if she is quite possibly the *worst* superhero to ever feature in the Arrowverse. She was handed the mantle of Batwoman by the original; she was given full control of Wayne Enterprises; she was given a personal physician; she was given a tech genius as her IT support; she was given a home; she was given billions in financial resources; she was given the Batcave; she was given the Batmobile. Seven episodes in, she has somehow managed to alienate her doctor and sign the rest away.

I find this highly relatable; if I were a superhero, I'd probably screw up in much the same way. I'm not knocking Ryan, but I do cringe for her self-esteem this year.

I used Topaz to clean off the rest of the grain from seven minutes of the Lanczos upscaled "Prince of Wails" -- and it isn't an improvement. The video was better with the graininess to add some weight and filler to an otherwise undetailed 250 line videotape image that, without the video noise, is simply blurry and undefined. I'd keep the grain and keep the episodes looking like low-res videotape of film as opposed to looking like low-res videotape.

**

I think this is where the upscaling journey for SLIDERS ends. The pilot looks great with AI upscaling. The rest of Season 1 looks a bit better with Lanczos scaling. Seasons 2 - 5 look great with AI upscaling, although...

I've run a few shots from the Turbine version of "As Time Goes By" through the Topaz process for 1080p. I ran the Turbine file separately through the Lanczos process for 1080p. I find that for standard definition digital videotape, Topaz is really good for medium and closeup shots, resolving the grain image into pixel detail. However, for wide shots, it's less effective. The Topaz upscaled wide shots of "As Time Goes By" turned out fine for living room distance viewing, but the AI definitely smeared the shots a bit, creating a slight oil paint look to them. It's not really a big deal and not as bad as with Season 1 episodes.

This is probably because when wide shots on film are transferred to standard definition videotape, they lose anywhere from from 50 - 60 per cent of the detail in the downscaling and even with image forming grain, that grain forms a blurry shot. Interestingly, this wasn't a problem with Seasons 1 - 3 of THE DEAD ZONE shot on 16mm film, likely because for that 2002 - 2008 show, the film was transferred to high definition digital videotape whereas SLIDERS was transferred to SD DV tape.

For the best results for Seasons 2 - 3, it would probably be best to create a Topaz upscaled version and a Lanczos upscaled version with the Topaz version used for medium and closeup shots and the Lanczos version used for wide shots. I'm not sure if there's a plug and play solution to achieve that and the wide shots won't look too bad via AI only, just a bit too smooth. Seasons 4 - 5, however, being shot on 16mm film with larger film grains, is probably fine to drag and drop into Topaz for upscaling.

That said, given how good the Turbine SD files look to begin with, it might be best just to use plain Lanczos scaling for similar but better results to the Season 1 episodes: diminished grain, slightly fuzzier compared to Topaz, but consistently above average. Topaz takes 7 - 8 hours per episode whereas Lanczos scaling just needs one hour per episode.

Well, I took a seven minute clip of "Prince of Wails" and dropped it into Topaz for upscaling. It says it'll take nine hours so I guess we'll see if it's worth it.

I watched them both on my 55 inch HDTV, played on my Android TV box.

The Topaz enhanced version looks okay/good enough in mediums and closeups, but poor/terrible in wide shots. The Lanczos version looks okay in all shots, fuzzier and with a heavy level of what seems like film grain (but is really compression noise). The wide shots are still blurry and undetailed, but the film grain look makes it look consistent with the mediums and wides. It is consistent whereas the Topaz version keeps jumping back and forth between not-bad to terrible. Even if the episode is only looking okay, at least it looks okay from beginning to end. You get used to the visual quality and then you can get into the story.

1,687

(5 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Well, I have a hypothetical Season 3 by Tucker where Tucker starts the season with "Slide Effects," a story to resurrect Quinn, Wade, Rembrandt and Arturo and roll the timeline back to "As Time Goes By." After that, Tucker did some great scripts with "The Alternateville Horror," "Lipschitz Live," "Roads Taken" and "Exodus" rewritten to feature the original cast. "Exodus" is particularly good: a bloated disaster movie with an asinine slasher villain is, under Tucker's hand, a small, intimate story of danger and survival. Charmingly, Tucker took my "Slide Effects" script for a season premiere (and it's open source, so that's precisely how it was meant to be used) and rewrote two lines of dialogue to serve this alternate Season 3.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/171b … sp=sharing

I also have an alternate Season 3 that I like where I wrote almost none of it. First, we start with my "Slide Effects" at https://docs.google.com/document/d/11KF … sp=sharing

Followed by some stories written by Nigel Mitchell, arguably the best SLIDERS writer to ever work on the property.

All For One
http://freepdfhosting.com/c2567b8241.pdf
Weightless
http://web.archive.org/web/200710140743 … tless.html
Bloodline
http://freepdfhosting.com/464c4d00fa.pdf
Double Trouble
http://web.archive.org/web/200808280600 … ouble.html
Summer's End
http://web.archive.org/web/200710140745 … ummer.html
Keep On Trekkin'
http://web.archive.org/web/200808280601 … ekkin.html
Underground
http://web.archive.org/web/200810110948 … rgrnd.html
No Smoking
http://web.archive.org/web/200810110946 … oking.html
Chase (with Jules Reynolds)
http://web.archive.org/web/200811212316 … chase.html
High Society (with Jules Reynolds)
http://web.archive.org/web/200810110948 … ciety.html
Your Ad Here
http://web.archive.org/web/200811212230 … ur_ad.html

Followed by some selections from Diana Jones:

For The Child's Sake
http://web.archive.org/web/200710241156 … dsake.html
A Second Chance
http://web.archive.org/web/200710241608 … chanc.html
Wade's Idea
http://web.archive.org/web/200710241554 … eidea.html
The Cry of the Birds
http://web.archive.org/web/200710241556 … birds.html

One story by Maureen Johnson:

To Dream of the Promised Land
http://web.archive.org/web/200710240240 … mised.html

And then some stories by the incandescently talented Jules Reynolds:

Depthcharge
http://web.archive.org/web/200710140750 … hchrg.html
Consequences
http://web.archive.org/web/200710140749 … onseq.html
The Gift
http://web.archive.org/web/200710140751 … /gift.html
Chill
http://web.archive.org/web/200710140752 … chill.html

A final two stories by Nigel Mitchell:

Slide Rulers
http://web.archive.org/web/200710140744 … ulers.html
Sliders/X-Files
http://freepdfhosting.com/2e80122e71.pdf

I think the crossover with the X-FILES makes for a great season finale and that all of the above form a very nice alternate Season 3 or Season 6. I like to imagine that right after "The Seer," the show reset itself and carried on with the original journey for Quinn, Wade, Rembrandt and Arturo. And while I think it could go on forever, there comes a point when a conclusion is longed for.

It's at this point that we move into some Season 3 episodes, first "Double Cross" (Logan St. Clair is introduced) and "The Guardian" (it's revealed that Arturo is dying). We watch all the episodes up to "The Last of Eden" (it has Rembrandt finding out that Arturo is sick). But we don't go to "The Exodus" after that.

Instead, we go to some selections from Earth 8950, all terrific stories by Mike Truman, set post-Season 3 but ignoring Arturo's death:

From Earth Prime With Love, by Mike Truman
http://www.slidersweb.net/otherworlds/8950/401.htm
Nobody Move
http://www.slidersweb.net/otherworlds/8950/403.htm
The Thriller is Gone
http://www.slidersweb.net/otherworlds/8950/405.htm
The Missiles of November
http://www.slidersweb.net/otherworlds/8950/407.htm
Checkers
http://www.slidersweb.net/otherworlds/8950/409.htm

After that, we come into the homestretch -- a final eight-episode run of stories by the brilliant Mike Truman where he brings the SLIDERS saga to a grand climax and a fitting conclusion. Truman's E317 series is meant to replace the final eight episodes of Season 3 (so nothing from "The Exodus onward happened in this continuity) and I think it serves our purposes well here.

http://slidersweb.net/otherworlds/317/

I watched two versions of "Prince of Wails" today: the version decompressed in Topaz and Lanczos scaled to 1080p, and the version scaled from the DVD file to 1080p via Lanczos on its own.

The Topaz-enhanced version is sharper in medium and closeup shots, but for wide shots, there's a painful fuzziness, blurriness and vagueness to the shots that is frustratingly jarring when the medium and closeup shots look so much better.

The Lanczos version is not as sharp in the medium and close up shots compared to the Topaz version. It's a little blurrier and the wide shots have the same lack of definition as the AI cleaned version. However, it looks better than just scaling the DVD image bicubically. Lanczos has softened the compression artifacts and now it looks like film grain. There's a sense of definition and texture. The wide shots with this noise look better; the noise partially fills in the lack of detail with some texture.

I prefer the Lanczos version because even though it isn't as sharp in the close up and medium shots, it's consistent: the haziness and noise are on all the shots, so you can get used to it as opposed to being distracted by the inconsistency of the Topaz version.

It doesn't look as good if you're watching it on a computer screen and studying the image closely, but it looks good when played on my Android TV.

1,689

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

QuinnSlidr wrote:

Thank you!! I've had my fair share of hybrids. Whenever I've had a hybrid, there has always been at least one feature of Windows 10 that either 1. Doesn't work, or 2. is severely truncated beyond usability.

By hybrid, I mean a blend between a laptop device and another device (usually a tablet).

I suspect the problem with Windows tablets is poor driver authoring and support. Windows is designed to work on the widest range of hardware possible and it's generally done well with keyboards, touchpads, external mouse control, microphones, wifi and such. However, I've found Bluetooth on Windows machines to be shaky and unreliable.

Windows tablets introduced a touchscreen and it all went to hell. Suddenly, Windows machines needed drivers for a gyroscope and a touch interface and, unlike keyboards and such, there was still way too much variability across manufacturers and no standards for these components and drivers. Even my Surface tablet had a tendency to crash at random times and the Microsoft Store's tablet-driven apps were constantly freezing up. Windows is a keyboard and mouse platform.

QuinnSlidr wrote:

Update: I am now fully boosted with my third Moderna shot. Yay! Also got my flu shot, so I am set for the winter season this year.

Yes! I don't qualify for one until December 15. It'll have been six months since my second dose. I did get my flu shot, though.

I've mostly been using Topaz Artemis HQ which is mostly about rendering film grain into pixel detail and removing compression artifacts. The medium and low quality Artemis settings are more aggressive with noise and compression artifact removal, but they create an overly airbrushed look.

The noise in the Lanczos upscaled files is compression noise, not image forming grain, so Topaz just removes it. It's not really worthwhile especially when Topaz needs 20 - 22 hours per episode. Usually, it only takes 7 - 9 hours to upscale a 480p image to 1080p in Topaz.

I watched a bit of "Prince of Wails" (Universal DVD, deinterlaced in Handbrake, upscaled to 1080p via Lanczos). The result looks good at 1080p; Lanczos deartifacted the image a little but left a layer of noise that looks like film grain. The grainy quality actually helps: the video image under all that grain is quite fuzzy and bare. I think I actually prefer this to all previous upscales of these episodes because it's the closest the low-res videotape image has come to looking like the original film. The blurry haziness is offset by the noise.

I did run a few shots of "Prince of Wails" through Topaz and -- I don't know if it's feasible because the AI needs 20 - 22 hours to denoise and deblock each 1080p scaled episode. Topaz did lift off the grain, but removing it just shows how dull and undetailed the image is without the grain.

The reduced compression texture might be best left there for these analog videotape Season 1 episodes. What's under the compression isn't very good anyway and would take almost a day per episode to unearth, at least on my hardware.

Well, I had a look at the raw Universal DVD files upscaled to 1080p via Lanczos this morning. Avidemux's deinterlacer didn't deinterlace the files properly, so they were riddled with interlace lines. However, looking at a few shots: Lanczos did a pretty nice job of scaling the video forgivingly. It scaled the DVD compression artifacts up as well, but the pixel blending toned them down slightly so it looks more like film grain (even though it isn't) and looks less like DVD compression artifacts (which is what they are). The diminished but present noise also helped on wider shots where the original fuzziness and lack of detail has some of that void filled in with admittedly filler noise. Admittedly, it's hard to tell if it's good or bad because the interlacing is such a problem.

The deinterlacing issues are too severe to run Topaz over them, so I've deleted these files. I deinterlaced the raw DVD files in Handbrake and I'll run them through Lanczos again for a better look.

Took some time to review the Topaz deblocked-denoised Universal DVD Season 1 files after scaling them to 1080p bicubically and then with Lanczos. Watched scenes from each of the eight post-pilot Season 1 episodes on my Android TV.

Lanczos worked out well with "Summer of Love," "Fever," "Last Days," "The Weaker Sex" and "The King is Back," scaling the image a little more forgivingly than bicubic and bringing out the detail a bit better than bicubic.

However, "Prince of Wails" had wide shots that looked really bad via Lanczos; it seems to be Topaz AI trying to sharpen up wide shots that weren't in soft focus and Lanczos blowing up that damage. In contrast, bicubic scaling added some pixelation at the edges that obscured the problems while also adding a bit of blockiness to medium shots while close ups looked as good as Lanczos.

"Eggheads" and "Luck of the Draw" were also blurrier than the rest on the Univeral DVD; Lanczos pixel blending made them even blurrier whereas the bicubic scaling added pixelation that made it seem sharper.

It'll be neat to see how the Universal files look when scaled via Lanczos with no Topaz deblocking/denoising, and then to find out if Topaz can do anything to improve those files.

Loading the raw Universal DVD files into AVIDemux now to try upscaling them to Lanczos at which point I'll try running them through Topaz Artemis HQ to see if that creates any improvements. My soul can't rest without knowing.

Hey, if SLIDERS comes back, will Temporal Flux resume his role as THE Temporal Flux and devote himself to infiltrating every level of SLIDERS production from crafts services to executive boardrooms? If Jerry O'Connell eats a danish, will TF have a drone taking photos of the bite marks?

If SLIDERS comes back, I would like to write one extremely mediocre licensed SLIDERS tie-in novel and get paid approximately $1,530 to hack it out in a month and I would like this extremely mediocre licensed novel to be blatantly contradicted onscreen in the TV show before the book is even released. I would like to see the novel reviewed on Amazon.com with all the reviews commenting that surely the publisher could have found a more capable fanfic writer instead of this bland formula.

Most importantly, I would like Slider_Quinn21 to not bother reading it and say so. The moment Slider_Quinn21 says he is vaguely aware that I wrote a SLIDERS novel that he will never get around to reading is the moment that I know I have made my mark on this world.

1,696

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Hunnh. BATWOMAN's seventh episode is its mid-season finale. Season 3 won't resume until January 12 and there are only six more episodes left in Season 3; BATWOMAN will only have 13 episodes this year. I guess that was to make the economics work considering its ratings and sales.

1,697

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Armageddon Part 1 was okay! Nice to see Ray again. Not sure why he was in the story. Wondered where Joe was. Watching Part 2 tomorrow when it's on Netflix.

**

I have to say: I agree with Slider_Quinn21 that BATWOMAN might have worked best if Bruce Wayne had been killed off at the start -- and maybe they should have done that even if Warner Bros. said they might be willing to someday let BATWOMAN add Bruce to the cast. BATWOMAN should have said that Bruce died in some final confrontation with the Joker that killed them both, and that it happened a decade ago (although ARROW did refer to Bruce Wayne as though he were alive). Of course, if BATWOMAN ended up getting the license to use Bruce, they could reveal that Bruce survived his off camera death.

**

Warner Bros. has never given an official statement as to why they license some characters but not others or why they withdraw licenses, so we can only observe their actions and results and infer their intentions.

My sense is that Warner Bros. considers itself a film studio that creates Serious Cinema like Christopher Nolan's Batman movies. When it comes to television, they look at it the way Paramount Studios looks at STAR TREK novels: licensed merchandising tie-ins that keep the brand present and draw in some revenue, but Paramount's core TREK content is TV and the occasional movie and they don't want their licensees interfering with Paramount's primary interests.

Historically, Warner Bros. has looked down on anything that isn't film. In 1995, the comics changed Batman's costume slightly, giving up on the light gray look with light blue mask / boots / gloves / cape / trunks in favour of dark gray with navy blue on top and no trunks. The editor got The New York Times to do a story on the costume change and according to comics veteran Mark Waid, that editor was nearly fired because the article was considered interference with the ramp up to BATMAN FOREVER.

Warner Bros. takes the attitude that they want to control the primary, mainstream, general audience image of Batman and that image is to be whatever they present in their feature films. They are possessive, proprietary, controlling -- and they consider the Arrowverse shows to be outsiders.

The Arrowverse shows are funded and produced largely by Berlanti Productions, an outside studio that licenses Warner Bros. properties for television. The Arrowverse shows air on the CW, a venture between ViacomCBS and the Studios and Networks division of Warner Media; Warner Bros. does not consider the Arrowverse shows to be in-house.

They view the Arrowverse the way FOX looks at the comic book publisher IDW when IDW licensed the X-FILES brand only for their supposedly in-continuity X-FILES comics to be displaced by an actual X-FILES Season 10 on TV. The way Marvel Studios looks at the Sony AMAZING SPIDER-MAN movies starring Andrew Garfield or the FOX movies with the Fantastic Four and the X-Men. Warner Bros. considers Berlanti to be temporarily renting Warner Bros. characters whereas Warner Bros. owns them outright. And Warner Bros. doesn't want renters renovating too much or acting like they own the place and they prefer to only rent out what Warner Bros.' film division isn't using.

I find it unlikely that Berlanti Productions would have produced ARROW and SUPERGIRL if they had been able to access Batman and Superman.

That also seems to be the rationale for why ARROW had an off-camera voice cameo from Harley Quinn but ultimately couldn't use the character. And why ARROW introduced Deathstroke and the Suicide Squad only to see both concepts removed from the show because Deathstroke was marked for a Batman feature and Suicide Squad and Harley Quinn were reserved for the SUICIDE SQUAD film. And why Superman wasn't allowed to appear on camera in SUPERGIRL.

Even the HBO Max shows, which are big budget prestige television, have limited access to the Warner Bros. library. TITANS' first season could only show Batman if Batman were largely out of frame; the second season could show Bruce Wayne but only out of costume and played by an actor in his late 50s so that the 'mainstream' image of Batman would be whoever appeared in JUSTICE LEAGUE or THE BATMAN.

When Superman was allowed to appear on camera in Season 2 of SUPERGIRL, it was at a time when Warner Bros. had decided not to move ahead with a standalone MAN OF STEEL sequel and only feature Henry Cavill as part of BATMAN and JUSTICE LEAGUE features. They didn't feel the need to control the mainstream image of Superman and ensure it was for their feature film for Superman because they weren't planning to make one. That's also why Berlanti was finally able to license Superman fully for SUPERMAN AND LOIS.

In addition, there was a period when Geoff Johns, a producer on the Arrowverse shows, had been promoted to Chief Creative Officer of Warner Bros.' DC films division. Arrowverse producers now had the option of contacting Johns directly and he signed off on Deadshot and Deathstroke returning to ARROW. However, after Johns' demotion, ARROW once again lost access to those characters.

In terms of Batman: unlike Superman, Warner Bros. has ongoing ambitions for Serious Cinema and they want people to associate Batman with their movies whether it's Affleck and Keaton in THE FLASH feature or Pattinson in the BATMAN movie. They are less than enthused about loaning out Batman to an outside licensee like Berlanti Productions; they want all attention on Batman going to Warner Bros. movies.

There's also the fact that BATWOMAN's creators are probably less than enthused about having Bruce Wayne appear and take control of a narrative that has been designed to make Ryan Wilder the star.

I don't really see 'sense' in Warner Bros.' attitude. I see controlling possessiveness. I think it was ridiculous that ARROW lost the Suicide Squad and Deadshot and Deathstroke. However, in BATWOMAN's case, it's possibly for the best; if Bruce Wayne showed up, it might not be Batwoman's show anymore. That said, it remains as clear as ever that BATWOMAN does not have the license to use Batman, Bruce Wayne, the Joker, the Mad Hatter, Killer Croc, Nightwing, Red Hood, Robin, Alfred, Commissioner Gordon, Barbara Gordon or Catwoman. So instead, we get Hush, Magpie, the Cluemaster, the Spoiler, and various people with the Mad Hatter's hat, Catwoman's whip, Killer Croc's teeth, the Joker's acid flower, Mr. Freeze's cryogenic chemicals.

I assume that Ryan will eventually be menaced by the Red Hood's dirty socks, Alfred's mop, Commissioner Gordon's glasses, Tim Drake's boots and Dick Grayson's cotton candy machine from the circus. Warner Bros. isn't planning much with those.

Lanczos upscales are complete. Bicubic upscales running now (while I sleep). Tomorrow morning, if I get up early enough, I'm going to put the Turbine files for 102 to 109 into the queue to upscale to 1080p via Lanczos as well and it ought to finish by the time I get home from the office. It's possible that one or two of the Turbine files might turn out better through Lanczos than any version of the Universal files.

**

Looking at the "Prince of Wails" wide shots, it looks like because they weren't as deliberately soft focus as wide shots in other episodes, Topaz tried to sharpen them, but the lack of film grain created an ugly stained glass effect that isn't too troubling at 480p (because Topaz wasn't adding new pixels) and is glossed over by bicubic upscaling, but the stained glass issue is unfortunately deepened by Lanczos.

**

Another thought -- I wonder if the Universal files might benefit from scaling them to 1080p via Lanczos before running Topaz over them.

Now this is interesting. "Prince of Wails," scaled to 1080p via Lanczos, had really messed up wide shots which looked like broken stained glass due to the algorithm being unable to blend in the new pixels effectively. But "Summer of Love," upscaled to 1080p via Lanczos, doesn't have the same problem; the wide shots look about the same as they would through the bicubic algorithm while the medium and close up shots look okay / forgivingly scaled from 480 to 1080.

This speaks to what RussianCabbie pointed out: the Season 1 episodes are in poor video quality, but even within being poor, there are degrees of visual failure with some episodes being worse than others. "Summer of Love"'s wide shots weren't as bad as "Prince of Wails" for pixel blending.

Avidemux only takes about an hour to encode each episode to 1080p bicubically or via Lanczos, so I'm going to set a queue to encode each of the low quality eight Season 1 episodes to 1080p twice, once bicubically, once in Lanczos. And then I can compare and see which one yields better results and whichever ones look good in Lanczos can be retained.

Not really SLIDERS-related, but RussianCabbie noted that he doesn't feel all Season 1 episodes are at the same video quality and that "Fever" and "Last Days" actually look worse than the rest. While I do think they all look bad, I've personally rated "Luck of the Draw" as being the fuzziest among them all.

I've noticed something odd in THE DEAD ZONE. I was watching "Playing God" (Season 2, Episode 12, aired in 2003) and my HD upscale looks great, the picture of a digital film scan (or rather, 16mm film transferred to digital videotape and upscaled to 1080p via AI). However -- there are a couple shots at the end that are extremely fuzzy when Anthony Michael Hall and Ally Sheedy are having an argument. The shot with Hall and Sheedy in the same frame is really blurry. This master shot is intercut with single shots of Hall and single shots of Sheedy. The singles look like 16mm film / high quality digital videotape that upscale to HD perfectly. But the master shot looks like low resolution analog videotape. It cannot be upscaled to look like an HD shot.

I assume there was some sort of mistake in transferring the master shot to digital videotape, that the bitrate was accidentally reduced. It was probably spotted but ignored because in 2003, THE DEAD ZONE was being broadcast in standard definition to cathode ray tube TVs. No viewers would have noticed.

I wonder if SLIDERS' digital videotape episodes have any such errors.

It's interesting: I was reading that the blu-ray and HD streaming re-release of THE X-FILES (Seasons 1 - 9), despite being composed of rescanned film, has many shots and entire scenes that are unfortunately fuzzy SD footage stretched to HD resolution for at least Seasons 1 - 2. Some are establishing shots, some are special effects -- but some are entire scenes that production would have shot on 35mm film. Why are these in SD videotape for an HD release? Why weren't they at least upscaled?

I imagine FOX must have lost multiple reels of film and could not fully reassemble every episode from film. Also, the effects and any stock footage are upscaled SD videotape. THE X-FILES' first two seasons were 1994 and 1995, so both would have, like SLIDERS, been film transferred to analog videotape for editing and effects. For the missing sequences, the HD versions of THE X-FILES would use SD footage that, like SLIDERS in Season 1, lacks the lines of resolution and/or film grain needed for an effective upscale.

Are there missing film sequences for Seasons 3 - 9? Possibly. But I imagine that by Season 3, THE X-FILES would have switched from analog to digital videotape and any missing sequences (as well as effects and stock footage) could be upscaled effectively, if not via AI, then through Lanczos and spline algorithms.

**

Back to SLIDERS: Just to see, I encoded the Universal-disc copied, Topaz deblocked / denoised "Prince of Wails"  from 480p to 1080p with bicubic scaling. Then I played the 1080p file on my Android TV at 55 inches and watched the first 10 minutes. Then I played the 480p file on my Android TV and watched the first 10 minutes. I couldn't tell the difference. The cleaned up DVD file at 480p looks a bit hazy, but without the compression artifacts getting in the way.

The Lanczos version looked even clearer for close-up and medium shots, but wide shots looked jagged and ugly because the SD image had no detail for effective pixel blending. The bicubic version hides these issues with a pixelated fuzziness, but that fuzziness is present on all the shots, so if you get used to it after a few minutes, it isn't jarring.

I think I'll just leave the files at 480p; there's no point inflating the file sizes from 1.5GB or so to 3 - 5GB if the video output results are the same.

In terms of process: the only reason to run Topaz AI over these fuzzy Season 1 episodes is to remove DVD compression. However, I don't think the original NTSC master tapes would suffer from DVD compression; the blurry quality is due to 250 line analog videotape and the PAL masters are blurrier due to being copied via an analog process and stretched from 480 pixels high to 576.

I don't believe there's any gain to running AI processes over non-DVD compressed masters; they aren't effective on a 250 line videotape image. If they have to be put into a 1080p video file, they could be scaled bicubically. The Lanczos version is a little nicer than the bicubic version for medium and close shots -- but really not by much.

The pilot and Seasons 2 - 5 can be dragged and dropped into Topaz and upscaled via Artemis HQ to 1080p. They have sufficient film grain in the digital videotape for the AI to render the grain detail into pixel detail at a higher resolution.

1,702

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

QuinnSlidr wrote:

For me, the plus about the LG Grams that I like is they do come with SSDs. And the quality of the screen is quite great for that kind of laptop. I guess there are always trade-offs in what you need/want/expect based on your specific situation. I wouldn't use it to play video games, but for daily work it suits me just fine.

The reviews for your model are very impressive. The thought of an incredibly lightweight 17 inch laptop screen is amazing.

I find that the market these days is split between eMMC drives and SSDs. I buy most of my hardware at deep discounts from stores that offer refurbished items that were usually released 2 - 3 years ago and none of them have spinning hard drives except for the ones running Windows 8 (they're refurbished). eMMC is ghastly, though, so laggy and slow that a spinning HDD would actually be better. eMMC storage leads to slow startup, programs taking so long to load you wonder if they ever will.

I have two laptops. One is a heavy (and cheap) gaming laptop with an i7 processor, 32GB of RAM and a 1 GB graphics card. that used to have a 256GB SSD for the operating system and programs and a 1TB HDD for storing media. I ultimately replaced the HDD with another 1TB SSD so that I could install games on it and keep the 256GB SSD just for the OS and office programs. It's permanently plugged into my desktop monitor. It is my personal laptop and I use it for work, especially video and graphics editing.

It's great, but since getting it, it became clear that in addition to a desktop workstation, I needed a lightweight laptop that I could carry around from room to room. The search for this mobile companion took quite a few years. Failed candidates included:

The Asus Transformer T100 Chi, a 10.1 inch laptop that weighed 2.4 pounds. It had an Intel Atom processor with 2GB of RAM and a 64GB eMMC drive. This computer was a disaster: dust got under the screen, bluetooth would disable wifi, the touchpad would freeze up, the screen orientation would go upside down, the keyboard would disconnect and eventually, the charging port broke.

I got a Windows Surface 3 with the same specs. While I liked the 10.8 inch screen and 2 pound form factor, there came a point where I gave up on it; it was when I was typing in Notepad and noticed that there was half a second between me hitting the keys and the letters appeared on the screen. It was time to move on. I sold it.

I got a Windows Surface Pro 3 with a 12 inch screen, 2.1 pounds, an i7 processor, 8GB of RAM and 128GB of memory. I loved it. Greatest lightweight computer I'd ever owned. I banged it into a wall and twisted the speaker grill and it looked hideous. I sold it.

I had a Samsung Chromebook 3 for awhile, but there came a point when I needed Windows office productivity software.

I had an HP Elitebook 1030 G1, a 2.25 pounder with a 12.1 inch screen, an Intel Core M processor, 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. While I was okay with it, the Core M processor was slow; websites always froze up for 2 - 3 seconds before loading, programs lagged before opening, etc.. Also, the touchpad didn't depress; there was no click. It was designed to have no tactile response, only a speaker-played click. The touchpad was odd, often reading a left click when I wanted a right click. There came a point when the battery was dead. I was told that the battery could be replaced for $150... and I just didn't think this Core M computer with its performance was worth $100 to get back into working order. I handed this model over to an electronics recycling service.

Anyway. My secondary laptop now is my work laptop, but I got to choose and customize it and will be able to pay the office to keep it if I so choose. It is a moderately lightweight 3 pound laptop with a 13 inch screen, a low-end Intel i5 processor, 16GB of RAM and a 255GB SSD. This one is more like your LG Gram and I use it solely for personal endeavours like typing all my emails and social media posts. I guess get more done with my personal laptop for work because it's plugged into an ultrawide monitor and I complete more projects when I have more screen space.

I don't see why you couldn't have a Lanczos-created 1080p file and a bicubically stretched 1080p file, made from a Topaz-cleaned version. And then assemble the best versions of each shot from both.

I just... don't have time for that. I need to go teach my mother how to use a Google Nest and an Instant Pot. And I need caulk for my windows.

Topaz Artemis HQ for removing DVD compression (noise, artifacts), but leaving it at a 480P file.

Close-up and medium shots from this denoised, deartifacted version are effectively upscaled to 1080p via Lanczos.

Wide shots are best upscaled bicubically.

1,705

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Do we think Arrowverse Bruce is incapacitated/captured somehow, or is he watching all of this happen from the sidelines like Luke from The Last Jedi?  I'm curious as to what people think.

At this point, BATWOMAN has had a CRISIS, multiple attacks on Gotham City, a mass escape from Arkham and the former Crows turning on the city. If Bruce Wayne didn't come back to help with any of those situations, it's not because he didn't care, it's not because he was embittered -- it's because he couldn't come back, he couldn't help. Whatever reason for Bruce's absence has to cover BATWOMAN not having the license to use the character, only a special dispensation for imposters and dream sequences.

I think Bruce must be incapacitated or trapped somehow. Batman has been absent before; during KNIGHTFALL, he was paralyzed and searching the world for a cure. During 52, Bruce had a nervous breakdown stemming from the death of Professor Arturo -- I mean, the death of Jason Todd -- and spent some time writing a lavishly elaborate SLIDERS fanfic -- I mean, he spent some time travelling the world with Dick Grayson and Tim Drake, revisiting the places where he'd learned all his skills to become Batman and building a post-trauma version of Batman.

During BATMAN AND ROBIN REBORN, Bruce was thought dead at Darkseid's hand; he had actually been sent backwards in history and was an Unstuck Man in a crazy, lunatic, bizarre, continuity and mind-bending story until he finally made it back to the present in THE RETURN OF BRUCE WAYNE.

I think the show will hesitate to lay out a definitive reason for awhile longer because the longer Bruce is absent / withheld by the licensing department, the more severe the reasons must be for Bruce not coming back for every season's cataclysm. In Season 1, he might have been having a nervous breakdown. In Season 2, he might have had a nervous breakdown and suffering from arm and leg injuries and a heart condition. In Season 3, he might be dealing with a nervous breakdown and paralysis. In Season 4, he might be dealing with a nervous breakdown and paralysis and severe acid reflux.

1,706

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I have really been impressed by the reviews of the LG Gram, but I see it going anywhere from $1,000 - $1,700 USD even with the older models. That seems a bit much even for a 15 - 17 inch screen in a three pound laptop body.

Yay! Vaccination! Every time someone gets vaccinated, an anti-vaxxer has a nervous breakdown.

Hmm. Lanczos proved effective for closeup and medium shots, bringing them from 480p to 1080p without degradation (and the videotape image is already pretty degraded). However, for wide shots where the actors are standing at a distance and there was no real detail in the standard definition image -- well, Lanczos can't seem to figure out what colour pixels to add and what blending and blurring is needed to make it smooth. As a result, those shots have jagged edges that are really jarring when all the closeup and medium shots look okay.

The 480 version, when played at 1080p, had a certain layer of haziness from the bicubic scaling that obscured the problems with the wide shots. Lanczos, however, makes those problems really apparent, so I think the best thing is to either let the HDTV scale the image or create the 1080p file bicubically after all.

But not everything needs to be a 1080p file, especially when the file itself is not particularly improved by being encoded at 1080p.

I might just leave the Universal files as Topaz-cleaned 480p SD files. I mean, for Seasons 2 - 5, my best versions are just the plain Turbine 576p SD files that scale to an HDTV just fine and I won't be boosting those any further.

1,708

(58 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Hi, everyone. Due to this forum being built in 2015, it was on HTTP instead of the supposedly more secure HTTPS. While nobody uses this site for private information except in the form of absurd personal oversharing, a lot of web browsers including little-used and obscure software like Google Chrome were refusing to load the forum, calling an HTTP connection a security risk. I've turned on HTTPS and updated the settings accordingly. There were some glitches at first (stylesheets not loading, directory links confused), but I believe I've corrected the issues now. However, if there are any problems you find, please post here or email ireactions (at) gmail.com. Serving you all makes my life worthwhile. I was just referring to "Prince of Wails" when saying that, but... I think it's true.

1,709

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

In my view, Kara Danvers having a very simple, straightforward, uncomplicated character meant that SUPERGIRL had a lot of range for a wide cast of characters and could incorporate a lot of identities and social justice themes into the show.

I'd consider that an asset, but I totally agree that the simplicity of Kara's character also made it impossible for SUPERGIRL to have only Kara carry the show or the season-long character arcs.

In contrast, Oliver Queen on ARROW was such a damaged, twisted, troubled story whose life was filled with such incident and trauma and grief and horror that he only ever needed one supporting character (and it didn't have to be anyone in particular, just someone he could talk to for expository purposes). Kara's character, however, could not have functioned without a large supporting cast.

Is Kara Danvers, being so simple, a boring character? I think there are plenty of people out there who consider Kara Danvers bland, uninteresting, flat and predictable. I think there are plenty of people who found Kara Danvers uplifting, inspiring, stirring, and that even if the character didn't have a lot of personal drama, the charisma of Melissa Benoist's performance made her a pleasure to have in the living room every week.

Certainly, regardless of where you fall on that scale, the Kara character was highly dependent on Melissa Benoist's performance to make a potentially dull personality into a warmly engaging onscreen presence. Kara Danvers was a total non-entity in a number of Season 4 episodes when Benoist was doing a musical and out of Vancouver. For those episodes, Kara was onscreen a lot but trapped in a lead-lined spacesuit with a helmet and Benoist filmed insert shots later of Kara's face under the helmet. Without Benoist to fully infuse the character with vulnerability and interest, there was no way to connect to the character.

A simple lead character can be handled poorly or well. I feel SUPERGIRL handled Kara's simplicity very well, but some shows don't.

SMALLVILLE's seventh season, for example, had a completely de-complicated version of the Clark Kent character: he wasn't in college studying to do anything, he had no parents onscreen anymore, he had no job beyond supposedly maintaining his farm, he had no ambitions for becoming a superhero, he wasn't actively looking for people to help, he wasn't actively looking for villains to stop. He wanted to do nothing but wake up on his farm next to Lana, harvest crops, milk cows and there was absoutely nothing there. The character seemed to drain energy from the stories when he appeared. The Season 7 Clark existed only to grant Tom Welling his contractually required screentime and Oliver and Lex became the de-facto lead characters. Thankfully, Season 8 gave Clark some actual goals again: to be come a journalist and to become a superhero.

I think Kara's lack of complexity was in SUPERGIRL's favour, but if handled poorly, it could have become a liability.

1,710

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

No worries about the spoilers. I'm about to sit down with a bottle of red wine (okay, club soda) in my private home cineplex (alright, fine, it's my tablet on a lap desk on my bed) with surround sound (okay, it's bluetooth headphones) to watch FLASH and BATWOMAN. But I would like to say something about Kara:

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

I feel like the series struggled on what to do with Kara a lot, though.  We watched her as the main character for six years, and what did we really learn about her? She's really nice?

I would say that Kara has an extremely detailed, well-considered, thoughtfully presented and calculatedly performed character. Her defining moment in the show -- well, there are two that immediately come to mind. The first is in Season 1's "Falling" when three schoolgirls are mocking a classmate for wearing a red cape and an S-shirt. "You look so stupid!" one of them snarls. "Everyone thinks so, that's why you don't have any friends."

Kara descends from the sky. "I wouldn't say that," Kara tells the cape-clad girl. "I think you look pretty awesome -- " and after X-raying the girl's backpack to read the name on her notebook, Kara adds, "Laura."

"You know Supergirl!?" the mean girl sputters.

"I'm friends with all the nice girls," Kara says, pats Laura on the shoulder and flies off.

The second is in Season 5, Episode 18 when Lena Luthor knocks on Kara's door and stands in the hallway awkwardly, Lena having recently betrayed Kara, tricked her into thinking they were still best friends, manipulated Kara into stealing for Lena, stolen stolen Kryptonian technology from Kara, sent Kara into the Phantom Zone, teamed up with Lex Luthor and stopped taking Kara's calls for deep and meaningful girltalk.

Lena, with a shaky voice and on the verge of tears, says "I have made a terrible mistake. I was hurt. I was so hurt. And I thought I could get rid of the hurt. But I was wrong. I know what I said and I know what I did, but I am... I am really hoping that you will believe me right now -- Lex is working with Leviathan, and they are going to use Obsidian to do something terrible. Using the system that I made with my project. I didn't know I was helping them, but I did. And now I want to help stop them, so please, okay? I want to help stop Lex and Leviathan."

Kara stares at Lena with suspicion. Exhaustion. Grief. And then resolve. And then Kara pulls a chair from the table and asks Lena to sit down.

Kara Danvers is not "really nice." Kara Danvers is superhumanly nice. Kara Danvers is nice to a degree that it could conceivably be some sort of mental illness.

This characterization does not necessarily lend itself to character arcs beyond giving Kara an anxiety disorder in Season 1 and a panic attack in a Season 3 episode. Kara Danvers being superhumanly nice to the point where her friendship with Lena didn't end in some GAME OF THRONES type bloodbath is something that is hard if not impossible to find in the real world. Did you read the Return of Sliders thread, did you see me blow a gasket on Transmodiar? Have you read my status updates where in a fit of rage, I told my favourite actress that I'd found someone else to be my favourite actress and replaced her? Kara Danvers would never do anything like that. It is not easy to be nice in this world.

I freely admit that this isn't a complicated character and that Kara isn't exactly Olivia Dunham from FRINGE or Wanda in WANDAVISION. But, I mean, entire religions have been founded around one character who was defined as "nice to the point of being superhumanly nice," so Kara Danvers is in rare company.

It's okay for a lead character to be very simple and straightforward. Not every character should be so simple and most characters who lead TV shows aren't, but surely in a world of Dexters and Ryan Wilders and Dr. Houses, there's room for a character as plainly defined as Kara Danvers. Kara Danvers isn't just "really nice." Kara Danvers is superhumanly nice, so nice that she's either a Mormon out to recruit or she's Supergirl.

The Lanczos algorithm turned out pretty well for taking the Topaz Artemis HQ deblocked-denoised 480p file of "Summer of Love" and increasing the resolution to 1080p (although it took a 1.8GB file and made it 5.5GB). The Lanczos 1080p video file looks a little better than my blu-ray player or Android TV bicubically scaling the 480p file to 1080p; the added pixels are smoothly integrated into the image to avoid jagged edges.

My upscaling blu-ray player, when playing the disc, toned down the DVD compression artifacts, and bicubically stretched it to 1080p, creating some pixelation at the edges of any objects or people. Topaz AI has been able to remove remove that compression from the DVD file completely. Lanczos has taken that denoised, deblocked file and smoothly stretched it to 1080p without creating any pixelation.

The cleaned-up/Lanczos stretched version doesn't look HD, but the low quality SD flaws of compression and pixelation have been removed. The AI issues of jagged, flickering edges and watercolour distortion are avoided. Admittedly, the underlying image remains a 250 line analog videotape instead of a 540 line digital videotape, but the artifacts and pixelation issues were a massive distraction from the story. Now they're gone.

I did have to turn off all Lanczos sharpening functions.

Lanczos on my old home theatre PC was fine for upscaling early 2000s standard definition TV because all those shows were shot on film or digital HD and simply downscaled to SD, so Lanczos was merely restoring the sharpness inherent to the file. SLIDERS in Season 1, unfortunately, is a pretty fuzzy image devoid of grain detail, so there isn't much for a sharpening filter to build upon.

Most blu-ray players and TVs will scale an SD video to HD with a bicubic algorithm that increases pixel contrast at any edges within the image in adding more pixels. Lanczos blends the added pixels into the image more smoothly, and is a more forgiving scaler, but because it's CPU-demanding, it's more than what a blu-ray player or Android TV box may be able to offer.

My old HTPC used an i5 processor and a dedicated GPU to make it happen. Sadly, I don't have it any more after a power surge. In most use cases, Lanczos is best applied when encoding a video so that the gains are contained within the file itself.

The AI deblock-denoise takes about seven hours per episode and Avidemux using Lanczos in stretching the video to 1080p takes about 90 minutes per episode, at least on my hardware. I wonder how much that would factor into a future upscaling effort from a home video distributor or streaming service.

Well, I deblocked/denoised "Summer of Love" off the Universal disc but kept the file at 480p. The LQ preset cleaned up the DVD damage and added a lot of sharpness to some shots, but it also created that peculiar watercolour filter effect even without increasing resolution.

The HQ preset, however, simply lifted off the DVD compression artifacts and then otherwise left the image alone. When scaled to 1080p, the image looks good enough. It's still fuzzy, but not as fuzzy as the Turbine version while having the same non-noisy clarity of the Turbine files. And it doesn't have the distorted edges like in my previous Season 1 upscales (because this isn't an upscale).

I'm going to try running this cleaned up file through Avidemux and scale it to 1080p with the Lanczos algorithm which increases image resolution by blending extra pixels into the image to avoid jagged edges. It's not an AI, however; it doesn't apply specific filters to specific classifications of imagery and texture. It's just increasing the image size while toning down the pixelation that would result with a bicubic size increase. I used to use Lanczos on my old home theatre PC to upscale standard definition TV to 720p resolution, but I've never used Lanczos on a video file as blurry as a Season 1 episode of SLIDERS.

1,713

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Bah! I don't get to see it until tomorrow when it's streaming on Netflix!

Ray is back!? Eeeek! I love Brandon Routh. I'm the man I am today because of Brandon Routh. (I've been following his diet plan, don't make it weird.)

Yes, I've seen your fanfic all over FanFiction.net. It's so insulting, no one ever steals mine.

Response to Grizzlor is here:
http://sliders.tv/bboard/viewtopic.php?pid=12226#p12226

1,715

(698 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Sorry you can't see it for awhile.

Now, responding to something Grizzlor and I were talking about over in "The Return of Sliders":
http://sliders.tv/bboard/viewtopic.php?pid=12217#p12217

Grizzlor wrote:
ireactions wrote:

Grizzlor? What's Nicole Eggert like? I've always wondered.

**

So, I guess I'll see you all in Long Island in Summer 2022. Maybe my favourite actress and her splendid boyfriend will come with me.

Eggert is your favorite actress?!?  She was fairly pleasant although has also been known to party too much at cons and not answer the bell the next day, something I have witnessed ha ha.  As for the convention, I'm going to see what details I can get before giving my two cents on that.  Tracy mentioned a trip he and his wife were supposed to take to Jordan in December was going to be delayed until next June or July, so I guess that is not when such a convention would occur.

I wouldn't say Nicole Eggert is my favourite anything. That was just me being random and silly. I have always wondered what Nicole Eggert is really like and I have been regularly asking Grizzlor what Nicole Eggert is really like because I once saw a photo of Nicole Eggert with Grizzlor:

https://i.ibb.co/gWkSCm4/26253852019-e6f81a586b-o.jpg

In the 90s, I was a pre-teen boy and like many pre-teen boys, I had a sister and we bonded over a shared love of meatloaf, club soda and a pre-teen book series called THE BABY-SITTERS CLUB. My favourite of the baby-sitters was Dawn Schaefer, a 13 year old girl from California who was vegetarian, dedicated to the environment, a staunch social crusader, a devotee of living life without makeup, and a lover of the sun and the beach who found herself out of place when her mother moved her to Connecticut.

Also like many pre-teen boys, I had a television and at one point when channel surfing, I saw possibly 10 minutes of an episode of BAYWATCH where Nicole Eggert was playing a teen girl trying to pass a lifeguarding test to get a job. I never finished watching it, but I thought Eggert looked exactly like how I pictured Dawn Schaefer in my head (even though Dawn was eternally 13 in the books and Eggert was 20).

After that, I studiously avoided BAYWATCH because all the boys at school seemed obsessed with it and I hated all the boys at school and hated anything they liked. That said, I liked the look of Nicole Eggert for Dawn Schaefer.

I have never seen a full Nicole Eggert performance in anything, but she's Dawn Schaefer to me despite having never played the role and potentially not being anything like Dawn at all. Also, in the Netflix adaptation of THE BABY-SITTERS CLUB, Dawn is Latinx which, to me, makes a lot of sense. The Club was always way too Caucasian and there are plenty of blonde, white girls in film and TV; Dawn's characteristics aren't tied to her skin or hair colour.

Fun fact: Xochitl Gomez played Dawn in the first season of the Netflix show, but then Marvel hired her to play Ms. Marvel in a new Disney+ series. In the second season, Kyndra Sanchez took over the role. In a podcast interview, BABY-SITTERS CLUB showrunner Rachel Shukert was point-blank asked why Dawn looked different and nobody was discussing it onscreen.

Shukert replied in a serious tone that after Season 1, Dawn went to visit her father in California and got in a horrific car accident that mangled her face and required extensive reconstructive surgery and her fellow baby-sitters were politely not mentioning it and that all this physical therapy and plastic surgery all very plausibly happened in the three weeks that passed between Seasons 1 and 2.

Different upscalers have different results, I guess. AI upscaling to higher resolutions isn't effective Season 1, but the really limited upscaling of my Samsung blu-ray player seems to hit the right level for both the Universal and Turbine discs.

I would be interested in running an AI upscale over the Universal Season 1 episodes that leaves them at 480p, serving only to remove the compression artifacts. This would achieve the artifact-free look of the Turbine versions but retain what little sharpness is present in the Universal release. It wouldn't be an upscale, really, just denoising and deblocking to remove the damage done by the DVD authoring.

However, I am currently running an upscale of UNIVERSAL SIGNS again, trying to get it to 1080p this time and remove all the compression damage on the Vimeo file. But I could probably run the Season 1 episodes through the AI processing again and see how it goes.

But I have learned my lesson; looking at brief stills doesn't give a sense of how well the processed file plays on an HDTV, so I won't talk about it until I've actually watched at least 10 minutes of a processed episode.

1,717

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I have been mildly impressed with Microsoft's hardware. I had a Surface 3 for awhile. I had a Surface Pro 3 for awhile. My aunt has a Surface Pro 4.

I've never had a Surface Laptop Go laptop, but the reviews were modestly impressive, mostly taking issue with the original $900 USD price being way too much for an i5 processor and 8GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD. Those are specs for a budget performer, so the price was really more for the lightweight form factor. However, the $550 that Best Buy is charging for it now is pretty reasonable. That's probably the best value on the table here.
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/microsoft- … Id=6428996

The Geek Squad warranty for this item is also interesting: it actually covers accidental damage protection. The price is a bit high for that, but it looks like you could take it scuba diving and still be entitled to one replacement.

As for storage: if you boosted the Surface Laptop Go from 128GB to 256GB, it's another $150 USD. That seems unnecessary; you could just store your files on a $45 external hard drive with 1,204GB / 1TB.
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/wd-easysto … Id=6406515

1,718

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

What's your budget?

I'm glad you asked this question, I've been meaning to draft something about computers and calculated misery.

The Expensive Side of Cheap Computers: I spent a lot of my life buying 'cheap' computers thinking I didn't need anything fancy for web browsing and word processing and such, only to discover that these computers would break down and needed to be replaced at a rate of one a year and after buying three, I reached the point where I would have been better off putting the money spent on three bad laptops into buying one good one. An inexpensive computer can, through poor quality control or lousy manufacturing, cost you more than a pricier model or prove unusable.

Calculated Misery: Past cheap computers I've bought had quirks like dust getting under the screen. Or a touchpad that would become unresponsive every 4 - 5 minutes. Or a display that would get stuck in the upside down orientation. Or a spacebar that would stop producing spaces. Or wifi that would switch off if bluetooth were on. When manufacturers aim to hit a low price point, they don't bother to ensure that their hardware functions, thinking customers will be reluctant to refund something that cost so little and grudgingly tolerate it, or that the customer will even return it and buy a more expensive model from them. The term for this is "calculated misery," deliberately making a product difficult to use so that the customer will feel inclined to spend more money for basic functionality. There are entire lines of processors and storage drives and motherboards designed specifically for laptops intended to produce calculated misery.

Specifications: While you may consider your computing demands modest, the truth is that cheap computers can be too weak even for web browsing and word processing. I have thought as you have in the past, buying Intel Atom / Pentium / Core M processor computers with 4 GB of RAM and eMMC or spinning drives, thinking I didn't need better. Then I'd discover these machines would freeze up loading web pages. Or that when typing, there would be a 1/3 delay between my finger tapping the keyboard. Or they would crash when running word processing software because of poor driver support.

Minimums: Despite your humble intentions, nobody in 2021 should buiy a computer that isn't at the very least: an Intel i3 processor with 8GB of RAM and a solid state drive (SSD). Intel Core Ms, Pentiums and Atoms are not fast enough to run Windows properly. 4GB of RAM is not enough to run meet a web browser's memory demands reliably. A spinning hard drive or an eMMC drive (cheap flash memory) is not quick enough to load applications responsively.

You can get decent AMD processors, but I'm not sufficiently familiar with AMD's product line to know which ones are okay and which ones are designed for calculated misery.

Storage: The SSD should have at least 128GB. That's not a lot for all your family photos, but it's enough to store and run Windows programs and you can store personal files on an external drive (which can be spinning). Make sure it can run Windows 11 which is coming soon.

Refurbished Computers: I've had some good(ish) experiences with buying refurbished computers off eBay. One time, what I received wasn't what was advertised; I got a refund. It's guaranteed by eBay. Another time, I got a great deal on a business laptop that arrived with a broken keyboard; I got a guaranteed exchange, but the replacement had a severely worn battery that had to be replaced. It was still a great deal, but it was troublesome and might be difficult for someone who doesn't live near a trustworthy computer repair shop that can supply and install replacement laptop batteries. At full price, this model would have cost several thousand dollars; I was able to get it for a mid three figures -- but not everyone will go to maximum effort for maximum computing and minimum cost. Not everyone will take two weeks to get the laptop, another three to get it exchanged and another week to get the new battery.

Retailers: For the average person who knows nothing about computers, your best buy is likely a Best Buy. It's more expensive than buying refurbished, but that might be best because Best Buy is a retailer that's thrived in a retail apocalypse for two reasons: they do price matching to compete with online retailers. And due to the price of retail floorspace and the need to keep products going out, Best Buy does its very, very best to avoid selling brands and products that are prone to defects.

They don't want customers constantly returning items due to buyer's remorse over buying a low quality product at a low price; they try to only sell products that are likely to leave their stores and create such buyer satisfaction that the product will never come back. That said, Best Buy can't catch everything; my Fitbit watch went dead and one laptop I bought from them cracked open when I opened it. This brings us to our next subject --

Extended Warranties: The internet is filled with articles telling you that extended warranties from big box stores are not worth it, that it's cheaper to find independent repair services. However, this is highly situational and dependent on hardware. Best Buy's return policy is that you have 15 days to get a refund on your laptop. The manufacturer will generally offer a one year warranty, but Best Buy may not facilitate returns and exchanges after the 15 days, leaving you to the calculated misery of having to set up a delivery with the manufacturer and a lengthy period without your computer.

An extended warranty can get you up to three years where you can get a refund or exchange at the store. And it can cost several hundred dollars in addition to the cost of the laptop. This extended warranty is only for hardware failure, not accidental damage.

I find it grossly exploitative for any retailer to charge you for the right to get an exchange or refund for a defective item that they've sold to you. If it won't last, they shouldn't sell it; if they sell it and it fails, they should refund or exchange it within one year, not 15 days. But the reality is that sometimes, the extended warranty may be the best option for the product or the customer.

Repairability: Some laptops are modular and designed for easy replacement of storage drives, screens, keyboards, wifi and bluetooth modules, etc.. Some laptops have all the hardware soldered onto the motherboard and may be impossible to repair, only exchanged. Not every customer can tell the difference; not every customer lives near repair stores that would be cheaper than a Geek Squad plan; not every customer can identify a capable repair service and an inept and overpriced one.

Anyway. Here's the Best Buy listing for what meets my standards:
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/searchpage … Categories

1,719

(698 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I am deeply invested in whether or not Slider_Quinn21 likes the new DEXTER.

(Never seen a single episode of it myself.)

Grizzlor? What's Nicole Eggert like? I've always wondered.

**

So, I guess I'll see you all in Long Island in Summer 2022. Maybe my favourite actress and her splendid boyfriend will come with me.

My greatest ambition for SLIDERS is to meet Slider_Quinn21 and buy him a sumptuous meal for every time someone has stolen his fanfic and put their own name on it. He has earned it.

1,721

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Didja get 'em?

Tried playing the Universal and Turbine files for "Luck of the Draw" on my Android tablet (Samsung Tab A7, 10.4 inch screen, 2000x1200 resolution). There doesn't appear to be any upscaling.

The Universal DVD file looks okay. The image's somewhat fuzzy, lightly obscured by DVD-compressed noisiness; MX Player deinterlaces the file effectively and it plays fine as an SD image that's been scaled to a high resolution on a small, personal screen. The compression noise, however, has been scaled to a higher resolution and those stretched artifacts can make the image look really rough and unpleasantly low-res. I mean, it is low-res, but it becomes hard to ignore it in some of the daylight shots.

The Turbine SD blu-ray file also looks okay. It's a little less sharp than the DVD version, but that suggests that the DVD version could even be described as sharp, which it can't. The Turbine version also doesn't have the noisiness covering the picture, so it doesn't create the rough, ugly texture of the stretched DVD file, it looks smooth and clean. That cleanness is really a lack of texture and detail, but if you can get used to it, it doesn't distract like the upscaled artifacts of the DVD file.

The 'best' version of SLIDERS' first season might be a standard definition version without all the compression artifacts, either through a new scan of the NTSC masters or running the Universal DVD files run through AI upscaling but strictly to deblock/denoise it and output a 480p file. The video would retain sharpness in the NTSC masters and could scale to larger screens without increasing all the compression artifacts. However, you can get almost pretty much the same results with an upscaling blu-ray player.

Another peculiar (and strictly anecdotal) situation: the Turbine blu-ray files offer superior results on my Android TV. I don't know why this is.

I tried playing the raw Universal DVD files and the raw Turbine blu-ray files of "Luck of the Draw" on my Android TV box (hooked up to my HDTV) with the MX Player app.

My Android TV box did something strange: it oversaturated all the colours, making Quinn and Arturo look weirdly orange. Everything was too rich. There seemed to be some oversharpening as well: the raw DVD file looked blocky, jagged and the amped up colour accentuated the DVD compression and artifacts. It looked hideous.

I tried playing the file in VLC and got the same results. It must be something within the MiBox 3's SoC and decoding settings that's adding increased saturation. I've never noticed oversaturation with my other video files on my MiBox 3. Maybe they benefit from it and Season 1 of SLIDERS doesn't.

I have no idea why it did this; my HDTV has the same colour profile for the blu-ray player. I played the raw file on my blu-ray player and my blu-ray player didn't increase the colour or sharpen the video so unflatteringly.

I played the Turbine version of "Luck of the Draw" on my MiBox 3 -- the blu-ray file as MKV. The colour saturation was increased here as well, but because the raw file was discoloured, the increase made it look normal. In addition, there seemed to be some mild sharpening and the raw blu-ray file looked okay -- certainly not HD or even at the level of the post-Season 1 episodes, but adequate and acceptable as an upscaled image on an HDTV. It looked as good as the upscaled Universal DVD on my blu-ray player.

It's very strange. Speaking only for the equipment I have here: for Android TV playback, the Turbine versions turn out best. For upscaled DVD playback, the Universal versions are best.

RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:
ireactions wrote:

Looking at the discs through MakeMKV.


Turbine likely used more modern-to-2015 video codecs to create the blu-ray files from the PAL masters.


Interesting..

Yeah, looking at the Universal DVDs (any episode): there's compression artifacts. Blockiness. Noise that isn't film grain.

Looking at the Turbine blu-ray: the compression artifacts are not there. Any noise on the image is film grain. However, the compressed Universal DVD is artifacted and blurry for post-Pilot Season 1 episodes. The uncompressed Turbine image for Season 1 is not artifacted, but a bit blurrier and missing almost half the colour.

Put the raw video files from the discs side by side and Turbine looks washed out and fuzzy while Universal looks saturated, blocky and also a bit fuzzy if you look past the blocks. Put the discs in an upscaling player and they end up looking about the same.

I'm afraid I made a mistake. You see, when I first got the blu-ray, I was raving about how great the blu-ray SD files looked for Season 1 on my HDTV. But I see now: I was ascribing to the disc all the great work that my disc player was doing. I have a feeling my job application for blu-ray.com will not be going forward.

I was trying to watch the ArtemisHQ upscaled version of "Prince of Wails" on my TV (Hisense 55H7608) via my AndroidTV box earlier today. I ended up turning it off and deleting all of my upscaled Season 1 files.

The issue I have with it: the closeups look really good, but all medium and wide shots have a distractingly inconsistent effect where the AI is trying to sharpen the outlines of all people and objects and creating jagged edges that flicker into blurriness and back into jagged edges. It's because the algorithm is seizing on what little grain there is to upscale and it doesn't have enough to work with.

Out of interest: I tried watching the DVDs and blu-ray of this episode with an upscaling blu-ray player. I started with the Mill Creek disc of "Prince of Wails" and watched Prince Harold and Wade's scenes. This is the first time I've watched SLIDERS on an HDTV with an actual blu-ray disc player (a Samsung BD-J4500R). Before, I had just a PlayStation 3. While the PlayStation 3 was DVD and blu-ray capable, its DVD 'upscaling' was little more than deinterlacing and scaling the image (like any SD DVD player) and applying various noise filters that blurred the image. And my TV is just a budget 55 inch with zero upscaling features.

The Samsung player is a bargain basement budget model, but it still extends some effort to upscale DVDs to 1080p during playback. Comparing the output and what I've seen on the raw disc files, the Samsung player employs progressive scan on DVD (an interlaced format) to blend the odd and even fields more smoothly than standard deinterlacing. The player also adds a moderate amount of pixel contrast to the edges of images to sharpen up the image for 1080p. It deblocks the video to reduce the DVD compression. It mildly tones down jagged edges that result from the scaling. It leaves film grain intact.

On the Mill Creek disc, all this is useless. The picture is blurry with no detail to sharpen. The colour is shockingly washed out due to Mill Creek compressing the file too much; the vivid blue of the boiler room where Prince Harold is locked up is instead a dull grey. Wade's purple sweater with its texture of squares looks smoothed out in the medium shots.

I switched to the Universal DVD of "Prince of Wails" and found the colours really strong: the blue of the boiler room and Quinn's sweater, Wade's purple top -- it all came through along with the texture of the clothes. My blu-ray player did a good job of scaling the image to look presentable on HDTV, sharpening edge details but leaving surfaces within any outlines alone. There remained a bit of haziness to the image, but unlike my AI upscale of "Prince of Wails," it was consistent throughout and therefore not distracting. Despite the deblocking, there was still quite a bit of noise from the DVD compression, but the blu-ray player toned it down a touch in the upscale. My blu-ray player upscaled the Universal DVD to look presentable on an HDTV.

Out of curiosity, I put on the SD Turbine blu-ray of "Prince of Wails" and found the video quality to look pretty much the same as the Universal DVD version except there were none of the DVD compression artifacts. This is very odd. I know from playing the raw file on the SD blu-ray on my comptuer: Season 1 episodes are blurrier than the Universal DVD versions and have washed out colours. But that blur and desaturation isn't showing on my HDTV.

My blu-ray player's upscaler has an automatic setting for "Deep Colour - HDMI" that may be amending that flaw by increasing saturation for blu-ray disc playback. And my player is likely blurring the Universal DVD a little in lifting off some (but not all) of the DVD compression. The SD blu-ray file has a blurriness that is native to the file. End result: my blu-ray player's upscaling improves both the Universal DVD and the Turbine blu-ray for Season 1 episodes to the point where both versions look presentable on an HDTV and both look about the same.

It's interesting. I said awhile that SLIDERS DVDs were no longer something I wanted to watch on my new 55 inch screen TV, but my blu-ray player seems to be able to improve the Universal DVDs and the Turbine blu-ray's issues. I guess my recommendation is to get a blu-ray player with a descent upscaler.

Looking at the discs through MakeMKV.

Universal: 1.6GB - 1.8GB per episode

Mill Creek: Ranging from 1GB - 1.2GB per episode

Turbine: 1.7GB - 1.8GB per episode

Why do Turbine's SD files look clearer than SD DVD (if you can access them directly off the disc)? I think it's likely that the DVD authoring techniques of 2004 and the DVD format itself created the image degradation.

Turbine likely used more modern-to-2015 video codecs to create the blu-ray files from the PAL masters.

1,727

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

THE FLASH: What has gone wrong? I was rewatching the FLASH pilot this morning and I've come to realize something: THE FLASH was fundamentally a show about transformative trauma, but that is no longer the case.

In the pilot, Central City has been traumatized by the particle accelerator explosion. Dr. Caitlin Snow has been traumatized by the death of Ronnie Raymond. Cisco has been traumatized by his prize invention blowing up and killing people. Barry Allen has been traumatized by the horrific and inexplicable murder of his mother with his innocent father jailed for the crime.

When Barry encounters the Weather Wizard, the Wizard kills a man and the sequence ends with Barry crawling out of an overturned car. Barry is reeling, spiraling, tells his foster guardian and police officer Joe what he's seen -- and Joe howls at him that he's delusional, that his father is a murderer, that there is no such thing as a superpower. He retraumatizes Barry.

Barry stumbles into STAR Labs and blames Dr. Wells for the metahuman crisis and the murder and Wells accepts all blame, but tells Barry he has no business getting involved in the situation or trying to save anyone or stop any threat whatsoever. "You're not a hero. You're just a young man who was struck by lighting." He tells Barry that he's nothing more than a trauma victim. Barry tries to run away from it.

It doesn't work: even at superspeed, he flashes back to the night he saw his father forced into the back of a police car in handcuffs. The night he found his mother's dead corpse, eyes staring vacantly at the ceiling. Then he flashes back to the present; his jacket has burst into flame from the friction of his speed. THE FLASH, at least for Seasons 1 - 2, was about trauma. About experiencing savage, violent, dangerous, threatening, disturbing and mind-breaking event which form crippling, self-destructive memories that might not ever fade. And about Barry trying to outrun them.

But even at superspeed, Barry can't escape them, so he goes to see the most damaged, disturbed, broken and traumatized human being in the Arrowverse; he goes to see Oliver Queen. Barry tells Oliver: Barry is scared, unskilled, just a random person struck by lightning. But Oliver tells Barry that he has something special, a desire to protect people and shield them, that his speed will allow him to guard others from harm.

"I don't think that bolt of lighting struck you," Oliver tells Barry. "I think it chose you."

Barry confronts the Weather Wizard again but this time with a suit to permit his speed and with a support team to advise him. He unravels the Weather Wizard's tornado and defeats him; this time, Joe is present to witness it. Joe apologizes for his outburst and pledges to help Barry locate any other criminal metahumans and to find the truth about the murder of Barry's mother; Joe will work through Barry's trauma with him.

In Season 1, Episode 12, "Crazy For You," the teaser shows a car accident with a husband and wife inside the car. Barry arrives, superspeeds the husband out. The husband turns back to the car which explodes. The husband screams for his wife -- only to find that she's standing right next to him; Barry got her out in the seconds it took for the man to turn his head.

I remember watching this scene and feeling deeply moved. I was watching it with a girlfriend who told me she found the scene bizarre; it had nothing to do with the Peek-a-Boo villain of the week and her teleportation, no relevance to the plot. Why was it there? Seeing it again now: it was about a potentially traumatic moment that Barry averted.

THE FLASH is a show about transformative trauma. Season 1: the traumatic murder of Barry's mother. Season 2: the trauma of Wells' betrayal. Season 3: the trauma of Barry's father being murdered and the Flashpoint timeline. Season 4: all of the S1 - S3 traumas collectively risking that all of Barry's progress and the life he's built since will be unraveled with his (wrongful) murder charges.

And then in Season 5: there was no trauma. Barry had recovered. Barry had his family. Barry had moved past the murder of both parents and giving him new traumatic episodes was too repetitive to keep doing. It's possible that once THE FLASH resolved its core theme, it should have ended.

Seasons 5 - 7 of THE FLASH are not about trauma. Seasons 5 - 7 of THE FLASH are not about transformative trauma. And Seasons 5 - 7 of THE FLASH are not about the wish to outrun trauma. This is why THE FLASH has lost its unique voice.

1,728

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Spoiler warning: Kara Danvers is Supergirl. Haha!




























I agree and disagree with the thought that Kara revealing her dual identity to the world was not set up earlier. But it's arguable that it was set up as early as the very first episode of SUPERGIRL.

One of the weaknesses of ARROW: for the first several episodes, Oliver had nobody to talk to, so we had that ridiculous monologue until Diggle joined the cast. THE FLASH avoided this by making sure that as of the first episode, Barry Allen had a full support staff. SUPERGIRL did the same.

However, THE FLASH and SUPERGIRL both created a new problem with the instant support staff: the secret identity seemed utterly pointless. Aside from Iris and Cat Grant, every regular cast member on THE FLASH and SUPERGIRL knew that Barry was the Flash and Kara was Supergirl.

In both shows, the Flash and Supergirl seem to be putting in excessive effort to maintain secret identities to shield the truth from exactly one person, and when that person found out, somebody else became the shielded party. Iris found out The Secret, so Patty Spivot became the person who wasn't in on The Secret for THE FLASH's second season. Then THE FLASH decided not to bother having any regular cast members who weren't on the team.

SUPERGIRL from Seasons 2 - 4 focused on hiding The Secret from Lena Luthor after Calista Flockhart left. In Season 5, Kara's secret was hidden from William and Andrea. And aside from one episode in Season 4 where Supergirl changed into Kara Danvers' identity to seem like a helpless civilian when hunted by one of Luthor's thugs, the secret identity has been pointless. Why does Kara Danvers need a day job as a journalist? The original 1938 ACTION COMICS had Superman becoming a journalist so that he could learn about all of society's problems. That has been totally unnecessary since the release of the iPhone 3G in 2008; Kara could get the news without having to actually work in the news.

Why does Kara hide her identity as Supergirl when 99.99 per cent of the people in her life already know it? Why does Kara need a day job? Her Supergirl exploits are affiliated with the Department of Extra-Normal Operations, a federal organization that would have to pay her a minimum of $65,000 a year -- not counting all the money should could earn by donating fluid and cell samples for biological research for medical treatments.

When Kara got fired from Catco in Season 2, she didn't have any trouble affording her luxuries and supplies and home, partially because the show ignored the financial issues but also because even without Catco, she was still a federal agent.

Kara Danvers' civilian life is with her co-workers, all of whom are superheroes. Kara has absolutely no hobbies, pursuits or interests that would be impeded by becoming a celebrity in both identities.

The secret identity made sense when Kara was a teenaged girl, but since the first episode of SUPERGIRL, the secret identity has been totally unnecessary. The show is fully aware that it's completely unneeded with Lena Luthor outraged that Kara would have one.

I would agree that Season 6 did not really have a lot of episodes where Kara was wondering why she even has two separate identites when everyone she hangs out with already knows. But this has been a glaring peculiarity since the first episode of SUPERGIRL.

Season 1 played it as a psychological deficiency: Kara is a deeply insecure girlchild, Kara is nervous and socially awkward and intimidated whereas Supergirl is an identity where she can be assertive and forthright. But starting with Season 2, there was really no reason for Kara to have a civilian life.

**

I wonder at what point the finale was filmed. Was it before vaccinations became available? There wasn't the sort of distancing that BATWOMAN's second season had where Ryan Wilder couldn't kiss her girlfriend, so everyone was probably quarantined for two weeks prior to filming. And it looks like Calista Flockhart filmed alone. The one shot of her and Kara sitting together is a body double with hair obscuring the face.

**

I was... put off by some of the choices with Lena and Lex this year. Making Lena a witch is, as I said, a baffling choice for a character written and characterized as a scientist.

Giving Lex a love story with Nyxly is another odd choice given how the character has been written as self-serving and unsentimental with every expression of love having been a manipulative lie. Lex might have wanted Nyxly's power, but there was absolutely no sense onscreen that they had or could have ever had any kind of emotional relationship, nor did Jon Cryer or the scripts do anything to make Lex's love for Nyxly seem real. SUPERGIRL has on two separate occasions presented Lex as loving Lena as a sister or loving Eve Tessmacher only to reveal it was a trick. Saying that Lex wrote love poems doesn't explain how or why a self-serving sociopath like Lex could have actual romantic feelings or why Nyxly would be the recipient of those feelings.

Lena being a witch and Lex being in love didn't work for me. The totems... were a silly MacGuffin of nothing and aside from being something to fight over, I had no investment in them at all. There was a lot of drama over Andrea Rojas and her morality and I didn't really see why anyone should be invested in that character; she was just Kara's civilian employer. I found all the time invested in these story elements rather puzzling and not worthwhile.

I was also puzzled again by how Lex Luthor in the series finale was a physical combatant firing ray beams at superheroes. Is that really an effective use of Lex the master planner? Lex the manipulator? Lex, the man who took over America from his prison cell by using white grievance against aliens and people of colour? Is that really making use of what makes Lex Luthor unique and distinct from the average thug?

Overall, I enjoyed Season 6, but it was flawed in many ways, some unavoidable and due to unforced errors. Season 6 is actually best understood as two separate seasons: a run of episodes with limited appearances from Melissa Benoist followed by a run of episodes where she's back full time.

The Benoist-lite episodes were extremely well done, especially with the return to Kara's teenaged years. The superfriends friendships were vibrant and charming. There was a terrific exploration of how this team functions around Supergirl by having Supergirl absent. The Kelly/Alex and Nia/Brainy romances were extremely strong and Lena had a fantastic arc in defining her place when surrounded by superheroes.

But Supergirl's return to SUPERGIRL was rather weak: a rushed shot of Kara and Alex hugging, a token episode of Kara's father being thrown out of the series. Nyxly was an effective antagonist in the Phantom Zone, but she had no real rapport with Kara once on Earth, no course in the enmity and Lex was so un-Lexlike in his characterization this year that it might have been better to not use him at all.

While the individual episodes after Kara's return were mostly strong, the core plot of pursuing totems that somehow ensure all the good in the world was a clumsy shift away from Supergirl's technology-defined reality and into fairy tale magic.

Thankfully, the character arcs were still effective admidst this framework. I really liked the use of William Dey as an imbedded journalist and his end was tragic. I was very pleased with Kelly and Alex adopting a child, a note which also touched on why Alex and Maggie Sawyer broke up in Season 3.

I think that the second half of Season 6 suffered for a variety of behind the scenes reasons. There was no specific sense, it seems, of precisely when Benoist would be back on the show. There was no clear sense of what filming could and couldn't be done at that point as the pandemic protocols were continuing to evolve. There was clearly a lot of thought put into character arcs but there seemed to be much less thought put into the villains, their plans, the threats they posed and their reasons for their actions -- which led to magic totems and Lex being in love for Reasons.

I would have liked a seventh season of Kara Danvers, Celebrity Superhero. I'm not entirely sure why SUPERGIRL is cancelled, but the reality of every TV series is that every year, costs go up with salary increases while ratings go down with viewer attrition. In addition, SUPERGIRL was budgeted (and the actors paid) with the show to air on CBS and with the expectation of a tax credit for Los Angeles filming that didn't come through. The budget was cut and the show relocated to the CW with Vancouver filming, but it's likely the actors were still getting their CBS-budgeted salaries and annual increases as part of their original contract.

SUPERGIRL performed really well for CW with 3 million viewers for the Season 2 premiere; even the most viewed episode of ARROW had about 4 million viewers. By Season 5, SUPERGIRL was at about 65 - 90 thousand viewers; about where ARROW was for its seventh season. I'm not sure live viewing figures mean anything, however, as CW shows seem to draw most of their revenue from sales to streaming services. But THE FLASH, ARROW and LEGENDS didn't start on a CBS financial model. SUPERGIRL did, and it's likely that Season 6 was the last because it had reached the point where its sales no longer justified the next round of CBS-contracted salary increases.

**

It's interesting how we have come to expect endings to TV shows. In contrast, shows up to the early 2000s were produced for indefinite renewal with conclusions / cancellations only known after the final episode had been filmed. It was rare for writers to know in advance and script accordingly. This was viewed as an unfortunate reality of how the TV business functioned.

But today, a conclusion is expected. A failure to provide one is viewed as mismanagement. If a show gets cancelled without an ending, studios and networks are called upon to order 1 - 2 more episodes to offer a finale. Shows without endings are not suited to streaming services. There was some chatter about how Netflix staff were upset and embarrassed at the bad publicity that came with cancelling LUKE CAGE, IRON FIST, THE SOCIETY, I AM NOT OKAY WITH THIS, TEENAGED BOUNTY HUNTERS, GLOW, DAYBREAK, SANTA CLARITA DIET; for the TV show TRINKETS, they renewed it for Season 2 but advertised it as the final season to avoid such issues. The CW did the same for SUPERGIRL, renewing for Season 6 but stating in advance that it was the last season. It's a shame that the pandemic and Benoist's absence made it hard to plan better.

I was just joking. But also not.

Tracy Torme is a genius. A brilliant visionary. A unique mind. He is the Vincent van Gogh of television. The Tesla of 90s broadcast. Unappreciated and undervalued in his time. But he's stubborn and difficult.

Marc Scott Zicree doesn't do stubborn, he does sweet. Zicree doesn't do difficult, he does deferentially sociable. Put him on Seasons 1 - 2 of SLIDERS and have him facing FOX executives and his approach would have been decidedly different from Torme's.

"Explosions? Absolutely, SLIDERS should have explosions! SLIDERS can tell any kind of story, some of those stories should have 10 - 20 nitroglycerin explosions so that you can have those in the trailers; but hey, that'll blow the budget, so how about next week, we save some money and do an episode where Rembrandt is like Elvis... "

"The People's Court scene is too silly? Well, how about this: we'll do a cut with it and a cut without it and you screen the version with it and if it gets no laughs, you cut it, but really, it's a great joke. Listen, it's a really good breather and it'll really set the mood so that we can have more of a car chase scene later, you like car chases, right? Walking here lets us drive faster here... "

"I was thinking we could do a dinosaur episode! SLIDERS does dinosaurs!! But again, very expensive, so next week, could we do this cheap story where the sliders think they've gotten home... "

"So, I don't see all these BAYWATCH extras fitting into many of our scripts after the credits. But before the credits, we always have a short world, and I think we could really make sure that all of our teaser parallel Earths can have lots of these women in those outfits you like, how about that? And we've got a world where most of the men died off and we've got this Vegas type episode where we could do that sort of casting and we could write some more recurring female doubles if there are any actresses you want to showcase."

"I know you're not sure about introducing these Kromagg characters, but that could lead to a lot of action sequences with spaceships firing lasers at the sliders and there could be lots of explosions, too. Great for trailers."

"I think for a 22 episode order, we could definitely do at least 11 action-heavy shows, but again, those are very expensive, so for the other 11, we really need to do more bargain bottle episodes like a world that prioritizes academics over athletics, where the gender divide favors women over men, where Mexicans rule America, where Wiccanism toppled Christianity, where psychics run government. The bottle episodes let us do the episodes with gunfights and car chases and explosions and foot races and motorcycle stunts and of course, those are our top priority, those take the bulk of our resources -- and these social satire episodes are really to pace our spending so we can get you the action that you want."

1,730

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I thought it was good. Not great, but very good. Some people are upset that Kara and Lena are just "gals being pals," as Den of Geek put it, but as I was watching it, I felt like maybe the true six season love story of SUPERGIRL has really been the love of two sisters, Kara and Alex.

Some odd choices with Lex and Lena this past year. Loved all the cameos. I was impressed at how Kara's happy ending wasn't finding a boyfriend but rather finding Supergirl.

More to say tomorrow.

I've been rewriting the first post of this thread, updating it with a summary of the video quality of each DVD set.

I've come to realize something: the Universal DVDs are not bad. I've said repeatedly that they are, but they aren't. Yes, DVD compression and interlacing can diminish video quality, but upon further review and comparison, the Universal SLIDERS DVDs don't have particularly small file sizes (1.6 - 1.8 GB per episode). The non-Pilot Season 1 episodes look terrible because the video masters are blurry, because they were film transferred to analog low resolution videotape. The DVD compression and interlacing don't do it any favours, but lifting off the compression and decombing have only further revealed the poor quality of the image underneath.

Seasons 2 - 5 on the Universal DVD sets look good. DVD compression and interlacing have marred them, but the underlying video image is sharp, detailed and defined; the film to digital videotape transfer has maintained a scaled down version of the film's crisp detail. An upscaling blu-ray player and/or HDTV upscaling can make them presentable; AI upscaling can make them look like impressive HD approximations.

Mill Creek, however, is bad; Season 1 looks terrible, blurry and artifacted from overcompression, Seasons 2 - 3 are hovering around poor to okay, looking fuzzier than the Universal versions and covered in blockiness and noise. Seasons 4 - 5 look average; the 16mm film image is grainy to begin with and a decent blu-ray player and/or HDTV upscaler can smooth out Mill Creek's damage while AI upscaling can remove it completely.

I think Season 1 looking so bad on Universal just made me feel biased against the rest of the Universal discs, but I've come to realize that SLIDERS' video quality on the Universal DVDs is as good as it can be within the limitations of DVD and the masters.

I don't think Marc Scott Zicree and Tracy Torme should be writing the same stories, but they could certainly offer each other feedback. Zicree is a science fiction writer who is very interested in the technology of sliding, having created the Slidewave and the Slidecage. Tracy Torme is a social satirist and a comedian who is very interested in using world-building to invert and skew our perspective of the world, creating worlds where Wiccans instead of Christians are the dominant religion, where 60s counterculture lasted for three decades and counting, etc..

Torme could write the social satire episodes and Zicree could write the slidetech-focused episodes. Zicree could offer Torme his view on how sliding technology works; Torme could provide Zicree with his world-building talent. Both men have a gift for visual storytelling, but judging from the scripts, Zicree is better at writing material where plot information is conveyed visually and immediately. Meanwhile, Torme is better at conveying comedy and depth of character through banter and action. Zicree is more dramatic; Torme is funny.

Torme should be the final decisionmaker, of course. SLIDERS is his show.

But in any meeting with network and studio executives, it would probably best if Torme never, ever, ever opened his mouth. In fact, I strongly recommend that Torme never speak to anyone again; from now on, whether speaking to his barber or his wife, whether ordering a pizza or visiting his mechanic or pitching a SLIDERS reboot or revival, Torme should take a vow of silence and give all his talking points for Zicree to convey with the Marc Scott Zicree warmth, positivity, charm and grace. I would happily never speak again if Zicree would do all my talking for me as well.

I have read a lot of reasonable, negative reviews of DISCOVERY and PICARD. As a writing mentor once said to me, "We are not the final arbiters of taste." I am quite happy with both shows, but if others aren't, it's because they wanted or expected different story and character elements that I either didn't need or could do without. For example, PICARD has the Federation existing in a capitalistic system with Picard being rich and Raffi being poor and shrieking at Picard about how his chateau looked so lavish and luxurious and a pilot saying he's "very expensive." That does not work for me; in my personal vision of STAR TREK, money doesn't exist. But I'm prepared to accept that IREACTIONS' STAR TREK is not PICARD and appreciate PICARD on its own terms. Others have found that a dealbreaker and so they should.

Peckinpah is a rare instance where his professional output is the direct result of his abysmal personal conduct. Marc Scott Zicree during the podcast, at least in my view, seemed to regard Peckinpah as an object of pity, a person who suffered from terrible demons that made him a pariah on his most well-known, widely broadcast project (SLIDERS) both during his life and after his death. Zicree clearly felt no need to indict Peckinpah any further; Peckinpah's work convicted his own legacy.

**

I'm not familiar with Kirk Douglas' body of work, although his reputation in recent days is deeply disturbing. It's possible your grandfather could see something in Douglas' demeanor, body language and presence that he recognized as something shared by your great-grandfather. In Season 3 of SLIDERS, there was a moment in "Season's Greedings" where Jerry is chatting with Chase Masterson and Jerry adopts this entitled smirk and preening physicality that I found deeply out of character for Quinn and reminded me of some of the more arrogant and belittling classmates I had in high school.

I started to see more of them and less of myself in Jerry's portrayal and it deeply offended me. In Season 4, I also recognized something in Jerry that I found myself associating with a number of my classmates in his empty, deadened facial expressions on camera; I would in later years recognize that as Jerry being hungover on camera. Part of this is unquestionably because David Peckinpah created a work environment where substance abuse was the norm and being inebriated when working was acceptable because the boss came into work intoxicated.

In 2005 or so, I think, Jerry stopped drinking for health and fitness reasons and viewed going to the gym to work out as part of his job as an actor. He said, and I paraphrase, "My work day didn't end when the director said cut." Since then, Jerry has been extremely professional and reliable in all his work; his acting on CARTER is in some ways overworked to the point of being unnatural, but I'd rather have Jerry trying too hard than not trying at all. I would love for this older, matured, experienced and as talented as ever Jerry O'Connell to play Quinn Mallory again and with Tracy Torme's leadership instead of David Peckinpah's.

And, as I said, if Torme and Zicree could team up, Zicree should do all the talking.

I have really only read the Mark Waid Princess Leia comic book series and the DARK EMPIRE comics. In terms of canon, STAR WARS originally took the view that all novels, comics, video games and trading cards were canon, but right from the start, there were serious contradictions. The novels HEIR TO THE EMPIRE, DARK FORCE RISING and THE LAST COMMAND had the New Republic/Rebels successfully establishing a new government after RETURN OF THE JEDI; the DARK EMPIRE comics showed the Rebels' new government collapsing almost right away after RETURN OF THE JEDI. Yet, both were declared canon despite the DARK EMPIRE author confessing he hadn't known anything about the novels.

Some awkward continuity patches were implemented with the initial novels repositioned to just before DARK EMPIRE and the latter novels re-rebuilding the government right after DARK EMPIRE, and constant patching was needed and then THE FORCE AWAKENS threw out all this content anyway in favour of a new Expanded Universe that is supposedly canon but likely has just as many problems.

The main issue is attempting to fit so much material directly into the post-RETURN OF THE JEDI time period -- and this is also common when trying to fit novels, comics, video games, audio dramas and other tie-ins between live action installments of a film or TV series. Unless there is a massive change between installments, tie in stories can't really do *anything* that doesn't put the pieces back where they found them. And, of course, there's the space constraint that tie-ins can either address or ignore.

In the STAR TREK novel, AVENGER, by William Shatner, a character remarks that for all of Captain Kirk's supposed adventures to fit into the original five year mission, it would have had to be a 100 year mission, a hilarious reference to all the novels and comics.

The key would be, I think, to seize on how Luke, Leia and Han are very different in EMPIRE than they were in STAR WARS, and how Luke is very different in RETURN OF THE JEDI than he was in EMPIRE. STAR WARS' Luke didn't have too much depth and seemed certain to always win; EMPIRE's Luke is a far more insecure and fallible character who's clearly had a lot of setbacks and failures; RETURN's Luke is so much more mature than he was in EMPIRE. STAR WARS feels a bit like a children's movie version of space opera whereas EMPIRE is Serious Drama with some jokes.

I think that in comic book publishing, the wish is to keep publishing Luke, Han and Leia's adventures infinitely and indefinitely without worrying about actors aging or dying to keep their characters perpetually at their prime and at the same ages where they originally debuted. Comics themselves are prone to time expansion where there is no sensible way for Spider-Man and Iron Man's adventures to have all taken place without Peter Parker and Tony Stark having been superheroes for 40 - 50 years while only aging 5 - 10 at most. And STAR WARS comics would be no different.

1,735

(698 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

On myth-arcs and masterpieces:

I'm trying to work out what episodes of THE DEAD ZONE (2002 - 2008) deserve to be upgraded from standard definition to high definition via the magic of AI upscaling. The thing is, the DVDs are in very good state thanks to the episodes being shot on 16mm film, edited on high definition videotape for the first three seasons -- then shot on HD digital and edited digitally for Seasons 4 - 6. Some episodes deserve to be shown in the splendor of 1080p. A lot of them... don't. I definitely want to upscale the episodes with high levels of special effects. The rest... I dunno.

Unfinished: THE DEAD ZONE is in some ways like THE X-FILES (1994 - 2002, 2016, 2018). Both shows teased an impending apocalypse. Both shows were largely standalone episodes. Both shows had specific myth-arc episodes dedicated to the apocalypse. Both shows had a lot of excellent mythology episodes. And both shows failed to bring the mythology to a climax and conclusion, making the myth-arc episodes seem disappointing and pointless in retrospect. The frustrating thing is that all of the mythology episodes of THE DEAD ZONE were really really really good -- but they were ultimately prologues and middle chapters without a conclusion.

Awakening: THE DEAD ZONE, coming into the world just as THE X-FILES was fading off the air in 2002, was an incremental improvement on THE X-FILES (to start) before falling into all of THE X-FILES' worst habits, and its only saving grace in that respect is that THE DEAD ZONE wasn't on the air long enough to  be as exasperating and disappointing as THE X-FILES. DEAD ZONE's first season starts with schoolteacher Johnny Smith waking up from a five year coma to discover that he has psychic powers; one touch of a person or an object handled by a person and Johnny sees that person's past, present and future in hallucinogenic (and special effects heavy) psychic visions.

Standalone (But Connected): The first season was largely standalone with running subplots. Each episode had a beginning, middle and end with its A plot while B-plots would run through the background and become an A-plot in a subsequent episode.

The B-plots were all personal elements; Johnny trying to rebuild a relationship with his fiancee who had married another man while Johnny was in his half a decade coma, Johnny dealing with his son, born during the coma and raised by his fiancee and her husband as their own. Johnny investigating his mother's death during his coma. Johnny discovering that his family estate was now in the control of a sinister televangelist preacher. Johnny discovering that the preacher whom he disliked and suspected of murder was actually a staunch and loyal ally who could be trusted.

Season 1's finale had Johnny encounter a rising politician, Greg Stillson. When Johnny shook his hand, Johnny saw America ravaged by nuclear hellfire with Stillson, a secretly violent, savage, psychotic man, at the center of this armageddon.

Standalone A-Plots, Running B-Plots: In Season 2, it's a running B-plot that Johnny is investigating Stillson's past and learning that Stillson's political success is due to bribery, threats, blackmail, violence, and likely outsourcing various murders, all of which will, according to Johnny's visions, somehow turn Stillson into President of the United States and lead to nuclear war. However, the Stillson arc was only the focus of two episodes in Season 2; the rest of the time, it was a B plot in standalone episodes with Johnny researching Stillson but setting it aside 'temporarily' to deal with the latest mine collapse or kidnapping or whatnot. USA Network wanted standalones; showrunner Michael Piller wrote the myth-arc as a subplot into otherwise standalone episodes.

Broken Silos: This was a mild distinction from how THE X-FILES handed its myth-arc where, despite an alien invasion coming in the future, Mulder and Scully never discussed it during their monsters of the week cases, only in the season premieres, the season finales, and the 1 - 3 myth-arc episodes in the middle of each season. THE X-FILES' monster of the week stories seemed to be taking place in a totally different TV show from the alien invasion episodes. In contrast, THE DEAD ZONE kept the myth-arc present throughout Season 2 even if it wasn't prominent.

Silos Rebuilt: Season 3 seemed to dial back the myth-arc's presence. Season 3 opens with Johnny chasing down a lead on Stillson and the nuclear apocalypse, but the three part season premiere shifted the plot away from Armageddon by the end of Part 1. Part 1 ended with Johnny being falsely accused of murder, Part 2 had him clearing his name (and being too busy to deal with Armageddon). Part 3 had Johnny dealing with the fallout of his accusation but didn't turn back to Armageddon. Episodes 4 - 10 of the third season then ceased to address Armageddon in any way, creating the siloed effect of THE X-FILES.

Ignoring Armageddon: It was bizarre that the end of the world was coming and Johnny Smith was not prioritizing it at all. We see a lot of this today with people shrugging at climate change and ignoring COVID-19, but Johnny Smith was supposed to be the hero. It was something I'd never seen before where in mid-storyline, a myth-arc episode shifted to a standalone arc and didn't go back to the myth-arc.

Standalones Win Out: Season 3's Episode 11 mentioned Armageddon briefly. Then the Season 3 finale, episode 12, revealed how the Season 3's first three episodes had tied into Armageddon after all -- only for Season 4's premiere to abruptly jettison and set aside the Armageddon plot again for another run of standalone episodes.

With Seasons 4 - 5, THE DEAD ZONE went into full X-FILES mode with the myth-arc; outside of the season premieres, finales and one middle episode, the Armageddon arc was not addressed or mentioned. It was bizarre; the premieres, finales and middle myth-arc episodes had Johnny stressed and worried about Armageddon; the episodes outside that had Johnny leisurely, lighthearted -- which diminished myth-arc episodes.

No Rewrites: All this happened because original showrunner Michael Piller had cancer, and in Season 3, became too sick to keep rewriting scripts. He had rewritten all the Season 1 - 2 episodes, and rewritten Season 2 episodes specifically to integrate the myth-arc, but his contributions to the show were limited in Season 3, near non-existent for Seasons 4 - 5, and he contributed nothing to Season 6 due to a mild case of death.

There seemed to be some peculiar situation where the studio didn't want to publicize that Piller was sick and therefore avoided hiring a replacement showrunner; only Piller seemed to be rewriting scripts to have arcs and running plots and he was rewriting less and less and then not at all. Only after Piller's death was his long illness and lack of involvement in his own show made public.

Anti-Climax: In Season 6, a new showrunner, Scott Shepherd, came aboard. In his premiere episode, THE DEAD ZONE concluded the Armageddon arc and in an offhandedly dismissive fashion. A key player in the Armageddon arc was killed off (off camera, then the death shown in a flashback) and Johnny's visions of Armageddon ceased. It was in some ways another insult to the mythology -- but it seemed unavoidable and necessary. USA Network was clearly not going to let THE DEAD ZONE focus on the Armageddon arc; the bulk of the show was going to be standalone, so Shepherd ended the arc. It was anti-climactic and disappointing; it was for the best as the subsequent standalone episodes were no longer viewed with the shadow of Armageddon haunting lightweight fun.

Last Gasp: The Season 6 finale was written to anticipate a Season 7, so the episode brought Armageddon back -- except the show got cancelled. However, given how easily Armageddon was cancelled in Season 6's premiere, the finale bringing it back didn't really seem like a big deal, like doomsday would always be infinitely delayed and kicked down the road.

Anyway. The result is that even though almost every single DEAD ZONE mythology episode is excellent, they're not really worth rewatching because they were ultimately pointless; the storyline received a hasty and unceremonious burial in the Season 6 premiere and a half-done exhumation in the Season 6 finale.

And sadly, most of the standalones in Seasons 3 - 5 are pretty garbage. Season 6 has a lot of good ones, though.

Diamonds in Dirt: I guess this has been a pretty good argument for not bothering to upscale the mythology episodes of THE DEAD ZONE to HD. I'll just upscale the special effects and/or character heavy episodes to HD. I shouldn't be using CPU and GPU cycles to refinish episodes of a TV arc that the TV show itself did not finish.

It's frustrating because so many individual episodes of THE DEAD ZONE were not only good, but great; not only great, but revolutionary; not only revolutionary, but truly masterful to the point of being a high benchmark of creative quality and technical achievement among television shows. The point of a television show is to create situations and characters with which the viewer can empathize. Johnny's powers were ultimately empathic and THE DEAD ZONE's finest hours let you feel what it meant to be Johnny Smith and those hours are masterpieces.

I suppose that to qualify as a masterpiece episode of THE DEAD ZONE, the episode must demonstrate astonishing creative and technical achievement either in terms of writing and performance and/or special effects, and it must be enjoyable as a standalone product. Despite so many excellent myth-arc episodes, they aren't standalone and didn't have a proper finale, so those are immediately discounted.

My personal masterpiece collection of THE DEAD ZONE in HD will be:

Season 1

  • "Wheel of Life" and "What it Seems": The masterful two part pilot episode which has Johnny discovering his psychic powers.

  • "Netherworld": Johnny is trapped in a vision of doom.

  • "The House": Johnny is haunted by visions of his dead mother.

  • "The Siege": Johnny must use his powers when held hostage in a bank robbery.

  • "Dinner with Dana": Johnny having sex leads to visions of every man his new girlfriend has ever been with.

  • "Shaman": Johnny discovers his visions can lead to conversations with other psychics who died centuries ago.

Seven masterpieces out of 13 episodes to upscale. The others were really good too, just not masterpieces.

Season 2

  • "Descent": Johnny must use his powers to save teenagers in a collapsed mine.

  • "Ascent": Johnny must use his powers to enter the mind of Sheriff Walt Bannerman, the husband of Johnny's fiancee who was injured saving the teenagers in the mine.

  • "Precipitate": Johnny receives blood transfusions from six different donors and starts having visions of six lives.

  • "Misbegotten": Johnny is kidnapped by three 'fans' of his psychic exploits.

  • "Cabin Pressure": Aboard a plane, Johnny has visions of a crash.

  • "The Man Who Never Was": Johnny has visions of a retired spy in a bad situation.

  • "Playing God": Johnny must choose who will live or die when his visions allow him to control who will get an organ transplant.

  • "Zion": Johnny's friend Bruce experiences a psychic vision of his own.

  • "The Storm": On a roadtrip, Johnny has a vision of a destructive storm and must save everyone he can.

  • "The Hunt": The CIA recruits Johnny to hunt Osama Bin Laden (yeah, really!).

  • "Deja Voodoo": Another date night for Johnny Smith with much trouble along the way.

11 masterpiece episodes out of a season of 19. Of the other eight... I would say five were good and three were rather weak.

Season 3

  • "Speak Now": At a wedding, Johnny must confront how his fiancee didn't wait for him and married another man.

  • "Shadows": Johnny has a vision of himself committing a murder and must find out what could drive him to kill. Admittedly, there is a reference to Armageddon, but not plot development.

My God. Season 3 only has two masterpiece episodes that aren't affected by the myth-arc? Just two!!!? Out of a season of 12!?

Season 4

  • "Double Vision": Johnny meets a lady psychic.

  • "Still Life": Johnny investigates a painter and has hallucinogenic visions of art.

  • "Babble On": Johnny has visions of his dead father in a hauntingly eerie episode.

  • "A Very Dead Zone Christmas": This episode is garbage, but the lady psychic comes back and Jennifer Finnigan is great.

Honestly, only "Babble On" is a masterpiece. The rest are just 'okay,' but the visions are impressive and technically qualify as letting you feel what it's like to be Johnny Smith. Well, truthfully, the Christmas episode has no worthwhile special effects, but Jennifer Finnigan's performance should be considered a special effect.

Pretty sad that only one -- one -- out of 12 is truly good and standalone.

Season 5

  • "Symmetry": Johnny is trapped in a set of overlapping visions. Possibly the greatest episode of THE DEAD ZONE ever made.

Oh my God. One non-myth arc episode worth watching out of a season of 11 episodes! THE DEAD ZONE was certainly in a dire situation. Notably, "Symmetry" was one of the few Season 4 & 5 episodes Michael Piller worked on (by sending in his notes and suggestions through AOL Instant Messenger).

Season 6

  • "Ego": Johnny must save a psychiatrist being hunted by a crazy person who could be any one of her patients

  • "Re-Entry": Johnny is recruited by NASA to save a space shuttle from destruction

  • "Big Top": Johnny investigates a murder at a circus

  • "Interred": Johnny has visions of being buried alive

  • "Switch": Johnny is trapped aboard a train with a femme fatale and danger all around

  • "Outcome": Johnny has visions of a bus station exploding

Only six out of 13 episodes worth upscaling! Hunnh. And I would only consider "Switch" and "Outcome" to be "masterpieces." They rest are above average and have points of greatness, but they aren't visionary works of television. Scott Shepherd was no Michael Piller. (Who is? I'm not knocking Shepherd, but if Michael Piller had lived, Shepherd would not have been running THE DEAD ZONE.)

After "Outcome," the show seemed to run out of money for any special effects or location shooting and the (myth-arc oriented) series finale was confined almost entirely to the standing sets. Jennifer Finnigan is in one of these Season 6 episodes and it was so boring I can't actually remember which one it was.

It's a shame. THE DEAD ZONE should have been a great show for all six seasons; instead, it only had a great two seasons and then fell badly into below average filler for Seasons 3 - 5. Season 6 should have been a great year, but it had obvious budget issues and despite half of the season being excellent, the other half of Season 6 has good scripts that made it to air as dull and boring hours of underbudgeted tedium.

Well, let this be a lesson to all of us: for a TV show to be good, the showrunner has to not die. All showrunners from now on must be contractually obligated to live with severe penalties incurred should they die.

1,736

(3 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Wow, that's a pretty impressive cast! Rip Torn! Michael Douglas!

1,737

(698 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

One of my favourite shows in recent years is MOM on CBS about a girl gang of recovering alcoholics. One standout character is Jaime Pressly's Jill, a high society Texan. In Season 6, Jill meets a blue collar guy, a cop, Andy. And Jill simply adores Andy. Andy is an affable, down to Earth, sincere man who looks like a pro wrestler and has the street smarts of Mallory and speaks with the gentle humour of Season 1 Rembrandt. Will Sasso plays Andy. He's great.

https://i.ibb.co/pxtqKcK/IMG-0626-1024x683.jpg

1,738

(698 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Trigger Warning: In this installment of Random Thoughts, I make fun of people who use tanning beds.

One of the weirdest things about THE DEAD ZONE is how across six seasons filmed over six years, lead actor Anthony Michael Hall seems to age about 15 years. In Season 1, Hall has a lengthy mop of hair and a smooth, clear face that seems untouched by sunlight. By Season 6, Hall's face is rough and worn and lined, his complexion has darkened, his hair is trimmed short and has lost about half its colour -- which emphasizes how deep the lines on his face have become and how ragged his complexion is even with camera makeup.

The reason for this is not age, not fitness, not health: the reason is that during the fourth/fifth seasons of THE DEAD ZONE, Hall developed a peculiar addiction to tanning beds and a determination to have his skin look as tanned as possible; he also had his hair bleached to look blonder. It looked creepily unnatural. Tanning beds attack the skin with UV light to scorch the epidermal layer (which risks skin cancer); this and Hall's choice of bronzer meant that he went through Seasons 4 & 5 looking like a giant peach on legs. He looked absurd; he looked like he'd deliberately set out to burn his own skin, acid-wash his own hair and paint himself in Sunkist-hued dye.

By Season 6, the colour had mercifully faded, but the strain on Hall's complexion remained. The tanning had left Hall's face burned and weathered with the self-inflicted damage seemingly etched into his face.

I dunno why he did this to himself. This isn't like Jerry O'Connell having his hair cut and gelled and frosted at the behest of FOX; this isn't like David Boreanaz on ANGEL looking different because his knee surgery made it impossible for him to exercise; Anthony Michael Hall wanted to look orange. In the Season 4 & 5 audio commentaries on DVD, Hall will not shut up about how "my tan looks really good in this shot." It does not.

It was a bizarre choice for the character, too; Johnny Smith on THE DEAD ZONE was a minimalist. Despite being a ridiculously wealthy grown-ass man, he worked as a schoolteacher and lived with his mother. After he developed psychic powers, he was driven out of teaching and became a full time, unpaid psychic detective. Johnny Smith was a fabulously rich man who cooked his own meals (no takeout) and did his own grocery runs (no shopper) and washed his own clothes (no maid or butler) and fixed his own car (no mechanic).

Johnny was born rich and yet, he lived like his schoolteacher's salary was all he had. Johnny thought status symbols were stupid and the only things that truly made him happy were his mother and her charity work, his fiancee, teaching high school science and saving lives. Johnny never spent his time (or money) on anything outside those pursuits. Johnny Smith would never lie in a tanning bed between episodes. It made no sense. It will never make sense.

Anyway. Hall's face seems restored in HALLOWEEN KILLS; he's aged some more, but the UV-scarred look is gone. I assume that between 2008 - 2021, he drank a few glasses of water and started using sunscreen. Thank God.

Bah! Medium quality has been a disaster on every episode aside from "Fever," it all looks like watercolour animation. I give up! Life moves on! I want 1080p versions of all the masterpiece episodes of THE DEAD ZONE!

1,740

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I think the most opportune time for SUPERGIRL to have Kara realize she had romantic feelings for Lena would have been Season 5, and that time has unfortunately passed. The Season 5 arc would have gained a lot if Kara had felt compelled to reveal her identity to Lena for reasons she couldn't articulate. Then, as the season progressed, Kara could have recalled that Kryptonians don't really think of sexual orientation; people are assumed bisexual until told otherwise, something she never had a chance to grapple with as she was sent to Earth so young.

Perhaps in the midpoint of the arc, Kara would get ready to tell Lena that she had feelings for her -- only for Lena to reveal that she'd been plotting against Kara for all of Season 5 and reject her as a lover and as an ally. Kara would be crushed and defeated and forced to confront Lena again and tell her that despite Kara still being in love with her, Lena's alliance with Lex and any villainy would force Supergirl to treat her accordingly. Then Kara would be forced to withdraw her feelings, reject everything she'd once felt, only for Lena to come to her and switch sides.

Then, just before a defeated Lex sent Kara to the Phantom Zone, Lena would try to prevent it, endangering herself. Kara would protest and tell Lena to get to safety; Lena would say that she couldn't because she loves Kara too -- and Kara would be sent to the Phantom Zone before she could reply. Season 6 would have Lena desperate to find Kara; her worst fear would be finding Kara only for Kara to refuse to acknowledge her or face her or even look at her (to allow a stunt double to perform the scene with Katie McGrath), only for the hallucination to be defeated and for the real Kara to embrace her and reciprocate her feelings.

But the moment for this has unfortunately come and gone. At this point, a Kara/Lena romance wouldn't fit into the arc of Season 6 as anything more than an afterthought.