3,901

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

So, I met this engineering student, Jenny, last week while standing in line for a play and I gave her my number and told her I was interested in a sexless friendship and this is from our most recent round of texting:

JENNY: "I wrote fanfiction at some point, and I like writing essays for classes. Back when Tumblr was still a big part of my life a few years ago, some people organised an event for people who were into CABIN PRESSURE. We got a prompt every day and we had to create fanfiction or some form of fanart. I wrote a few short stories."

ME: "Really! My fanfic magnum opus is at www.earthprime.com/reborn"

JENNY: "I have never heard of Sliders but I'm impressed by your dedication."

ME: "Sliders was a wonderful show about a boy genius and four friends who find the gateway to parallel Earths, but on his first adventure, they lose their way back home. By the finale, the boy genius had been erased from reality, the soulful ingénue had been sent to a rape camp, the wise professor had been shot and blown up after getting his brain sucked out, and the token black guy was a traumatized wreck."

JENNY: "Sliders sounds absolutely horrifying thank you for giving enough of it away that I know I should stay far far away from it oh my Jesus."

ME: "The first two seasons of Sliders are very good: a mind-expanding, life-affirming limitless adventure through alternate histories."

JENNY: "Oh man. What kind of impact did this show have on you to make you want to devote so much time writing such an extensive fanfic and wax lyric about it like this?"

ME: "The first two seasons of Sliders helped correct the poor judgement my parents infused in me. They taught me rote obedience, unquestioning fealty and that if I wasn't instantly proficient at something, it meant I wasn't talented. The lead character, Quinn Mallory, represents how all problems can be solved with knowledge, experimentation and the willingness to fail repeatedly."

JENNY: "I don't know that your parents were wrong about talent -- not becoming proficient at a new skill very quickly does seem to indicate a lack of talent."

ME: "My first driving lesson, I was a bit nervous and had trouble with the pedals, Dad declared I would and should never drive and I think back on all those years I spent not learning how to drive when it turned out I just needed a few more lessons and now I vow revenge."

JENNY: "Right, and that's a good way to view ability, but that's not talent. That's just hard work and determination. Talent is inherent to a person."

ME: "My definition of talent doesn't require that it be innate."

3,902

(421 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I liked Season 8 a lot. Season 9 was a meandering mess best exemplified by "TrustNo1" where Doggett, Reyes and Scully spend the climax running around a quarry shouting for Mulder with Mulder played by a stunt double seen at a distant and urgently running away from everyone involved in the series. The myth-arc was a mistake that even Frank Spotnitz acknowledged in a recent interview where he said that, looking back, he focused too much on plot and too little on character.

It's a symptom of TXF being an early adopter of serialized TV. The first time you do anything, especially if you're the first to do it, it will probably suck.

TheM0vieblog.com has been doing some great retrospectives of the Season 10 - 11 comic books and the revival mini-series. The comics, M0vieBlog notes, initially tried to make a big show of being a canonical revival with approval from Chris Carter because the publishers understood that fans will judge what counts and what doesn't count and getting the series creator's name on the cover would make the comics count.

M0vieBlog then notes how, even before the first comic arc was completed, the show's live action revival made it clear the comics had started out canonical but weren't anymore and how the story and the writer act out this little drama within the pages itself; the Cigarette Smoking Man in the Season 10 comics is a clone with a patchwork series of memories from documents and a telepath, a stand-in for the real thing trying to justify his own existence and argue that he has meaning and will and purpose.

The Season 11 comics end on Mulder encountering a rip in spacetime caused by the alien's reality warping vessels and seeing visions of alternate realities, one of which is the TV revival. Writer Joe Harris carefully moves his own stories out of continuity while declaring that the comic books are canonical and it's the TV show that's set in a parallel reality in which the alien conspiracy was a hoax where in the main reality, it most certainly wasn't.

M0vieBlog has a really neat take on "My Struggle," first noting that it's Chris Carter tacitly acknowledging that the mythology can't make sense. Instead, the situation will be that some of it is true and some of it is not and some of it will be blatantly ignored. The blog also notes: the Revival episodes have a very different take on the aliens from the original series.

In the original series, the aliens were evil monsters, full stop. Chris Carter's view was that aliens are external representations of evil. But in the years that passed, Carter changed and "My Struggle" reflects this with true evil being represented entirely by self-serving human beings and aliens are now innocent parties.

The two views of aliens -- external evil seeking to corrupt the human race and beneficent observers who were kidnapped and killed -- are incompatible, which is why the alien conspiracy mythos is at odds with the Spartan virus mythos. The Chris Carter of 1993 is not the Chris Carter of 2016; he now sees evil as something within ourselves rather than something outside ourselves.

It's an interesting dilemma; what if, when returning to a series you started, you don't believe what you believed when you started the series?

It's something I found myself struggling with in that I am doing a pastiche of Tracy Torme and Dan Harmon for SLIDERS REBORN and the 2015 - 2016 version of SLIDERS is more cynical than the 1995 version of SLIDERS. The 1995 version of SLIDERS believes that our world has turned out great, that everything -- the American Revolution, the World Wars, the civil rights movement, the Clinton administration, Vietnam, Wall Street -- has ultimately put us in a decent place, albeit a place filled with injustices and failures and problems -- but that any divergences would shift us from a flawed but workable situation to a nightmarish world of fascist dystopian madness.

SLIDERS REBORN is fundamentally opposed to SLIDERS on that level -- SLIDERS REBORN declares that everything has turned out terribly, that our world is in shambles, that our world has been in a mess since 1995 and well before it, that our civilization is skateboarding straight to hell and that all of this is Quinn Mallory's fault in that his invention should have changed everything, but his incompetence has doomed us all. It is a serious philosophical distinction between the two. I don't think for one moment that Tracy Torme's version of REBORN would be anything like mine -- this is the Dan Harmon version of SLIDERS, really. But there is no way that Tracy, having come out of Season 3, didn't emerge embittered and cynical.

But I think that SLIDERS REBORN is still recognizable as SLIDERS because it shifts the positivity of the original SLIDERS onto the characters. Wade Welles is a guidance counsellor, Rembrandt Brown is an award winning sound engineer, Professor Arturo is a celebrated sci-fi author and Quinn Mallory is a one-man Salvation Army. Despite all the wrong turns and dead ends and abandoned plot threads and murders and mutilations and that business with the Chasm we'd all like to forget, the journey brought them all to who they are now and that makes it worthwhile. The positivity is still there, it's just not positivity about our world.

With THE X-FILES -- I think that the only way to reconcile the two opposing views would have been to present Mulder and Scully as two people living lives that are assailed by dark forces outside of them that turn out to be humans with a dark agenda as opposed to aliens with a dark agenda. Carter chose not to do this by having Mulder and Scully split up because of his obvious discomfort with romance, so "My Struggle" is an X-FILES relaunch that's truly detached from the show from which it began.

3,903

(3,504 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Informant wrote:

I'm not sure how you're getting to the conclusion that this means that Zimmerman was in pursuit.

Zimmerman spotted Martin and called 911. Two minutes into the call, Zimmerman remarked, "He's running." The operator asked Zimmerman which way, Zimmerman got out of his car. The operator asked if he was following Martin, to which Zimmerman replied, "Yeah."

That's not jumping to a conclusion, that's a statement of fact. Zimmerman was pursuing Martin. He said so himself. As for Rachel Jeantel (not Martin's girlfriend), she lied about her age and she lied about why she didn't go to Martin's funeral, but her account of the phone call didn't change.

3,904

(3,504 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Informant wrote:

What is certain is that Zimmerman stopped Martin, Martin demanded to know why Zimmerman was following him -- followed by a series of events that led to Martin dead on the ground.

There is actually no evidence to suggest that Zimmerman confronted Martin. [...] Given the situation, what should Zimmerman have done differently? [...] So if you were walking through your neighborhood and saw someone acting strangely around the homes of other people, would you call the police? I don't think that qualifies as instigating.

According to the girl that Martin called before Zimmerman killed him, she overheard the start of the exchange between Martin and Zimmerman. Martin noticed Zimmerman following him and Zimmerman was close enough that Martin could ask him, "What are you following me for?" at which point Zimmerman demanded, "What are you doing around here?" Which means that Zimmerman wasn't observing at a distance; he got up close, he wanted a confrontation. You make it seem like all Zimmerman did was call the police as opposed to what he did, which was call the police and then pursue Martin because Zimmerman fancied himself a police officer.

And I would not call the police because I would not find it strange for an unfamiliar black teenager to be walking through the streets, even recently burglarized streets, because being unknown to me and being black are not characteristics that threaten me. The fact that Martin was high on marijuana is also not frightening to me as being high and being a teenager aren't exactly unusual circumstances and plenty of teenagers get high without breaking and entering, nor would I be bothered to call the police just because of someone's personal lifestyle decisions. I would call the police if someone were levering front doors and windows open with a crowbar.

3,905

(3,504 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

The truth is that there is no truth we can reach. George Zimmerman was and remains a deranged, abusive thug with a lengthy history of domestic violence. Trayvon Martin was most definitely a thug with a history of violent behaviour. We don't know who threatened to kill whom and Zimmerman's account most definitely cannot be trusted given the long list of incidents in his life, but we also can't declare that the opposite of Zimmerman's story is therefore the truth. We don't have any facts.

What is certain is that Zimmerman stopped Martin, Martin demanded to know why Zimmerman was following him -- followed by a series of events that led to Martin dead on the ground. It is possible that Zimmerman belittled and attacked Martin and then shot him dead; it is possible that Martin responded to an inappropriate (but not illegal) question by attacking Zimmerman and then shot him. The fact that Martin was a low-level drug dealer and a thug doesn't change the fact, however, that he was unarmed and simply walking the streets and that Zimmerman targeted him, followed him and instigated whatever led to the outcome. The fact that Martin was not the second coming of Jesus does not justify shooting him. Zimmerman was acquitted because there simply wasn't enough evidence to say one way or another if it was self-defense or not and the absence of evidence required that the jury declare him innocent.

Zimmerman has proceeded to continue his life in which he's assaulted and threatened his girlfriends but, admittedly, also saved someone from a car wreck. He is an appalling human being, but whether he murdered Martin or not isn't something we'll ever know.

3,906

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

ME: "Hmm. The new SLIDERS DVD release would truly be complete if they would put SLIDERS REBORN on it in comic book form and hired Dennis Calero to draw it. I feel he could really sell the sequence of the breeder parasites and the dragon and the rockstar vampires descending upon the merged San Francisco that I'm currently scripting."

[NOTE: Calero drew the second half of the NARCOTICA comic.]

MATT: "Why don't YOU hire Dennis Calero to draw it?"

ME: "Because I don't want to get sued. And he doesn't want to get sued. I'd have to pay him and he'd be drawing a profit from an unlicensed project."

MATT: "You live in Canada."

ME: "I drive by the NBCUniversal Canada office every morning. And look at what happened to the Star Trek fan films. Honestly, the PDF format is best for staying prominent but without any legal entanglements. The prominence of REBORN is fundamentally absurd, of course."

MATT: "Well, a private commission? Pay him to draw the best scene from each episode. It's you creating a unique piece of art for yourself. How cool would it be to get someone to professionally draw something for you?"

ME: "To me, the *real* coolness is Tom and Cory reading out passages of my scripts in their podcast and saying stuff like, 'This is SLIDERS, this is how it's supposed to be.' The real coolness is that TV Tropes page that guy made for my fan fiction. The real coolness is you making a REBORN section on your site. Honestly, typing about it right now -- if you were here in person, I would hug you and cry for a few minutes."

MATT: "Hahaha! Well, thank you, brother. I would awkwardly push you away and hand you your teddy bear."

I only ever bought the Season 1 - 2 release and its absurd foam packaging was ridiculous, as was using single layer DVD discs. I read plenty of reviews of the Season 3 disc set which stacked the discs so you had to remove whatever discs were on top of the disc you actually wanted. And the double-siding! How is that acceptable in the twenty-first century? Seasons 4 - 5 were reportedly okay. But there's really no excuse for putting the episodes in airdate order in the original release, or for simply repackaging the existing DVDs at a ridiculously marked up price with all the flaws reiterated.

These discs are a chance for a home video release to finally get it right with dual layer discs to avoid overcompression, episodes in the correct order, no missing episodes and without packaging so poorly designed that the only sensible response is to return it to NBCUniversal through their front window attached to a brick.

NBCUniversal should be ashamed of the DVD release they put out -- if they can't even put the episodes in the right order, why release it at all?

I think the best way to imagine a SLIDERS blu-ray release from Mill Creek is to put your hands over your eyes and let the empty blackness of nothing fill your sight. It's not going to happen. However, AIRWOLF is interesting in that the 1080p transfer really achieves nothing; there just isn't enough detail in the image to make it worthwhile; I suspect SLIDERS would be about the same.

I am concerned to examine Mill Creek's site and see that they are storing 88 episodes on 15 discs. The previous complete DVD set had all the episodes on 22 discs; does this mean Mill Creek is compressing the video even more than the last release? It's possible the disc count is just preliminary, of course, given that Mill Creek's customer service reps couldn't answer a single question about the DVD.

There's no way the HUB could have done the HD upscale unless they were given the raw materials from Univeral to do it in the first place.

If the HUB could get the digital materials to do a decent semi-HD upscale, I see no reason not to think Mill Creek couldn't benefit from the same. It's possible that Netflix and Universal came to the streaming arrangement before Universal had a department and a procedure for handling HD broadcast on shows only stored as standard definition on their masters. The Professor would tell you to expect nothing but hope for everything.

I emailed Mill Creek and asked about the video quality on the new set and they wrote back to spend three paragraphs saying NOTHING WHATSOEVER. I don't think they know what the video quality will be; maybe they don't have the original DVD release to make a comparison.

If the new release isn't compressing six hours of video onto one disc, I'll buy it. Netflix Canada doesn't have SLIDERS. Even American Netflix is missing some episodes for reasons unfathomable but are probably due to the Dr. Geiger's Combine experiment warping spacetime and corrupting reality into a twisted incarnation filled with horror, madness and loss.

I'd like the episodes in the correct order. I'd like a decent quality version of "As Time Goes By" to watch endlessly. I'll never watch anything past Season 2 except for research purposes. The lack of simulated HD isn't a huge problem.

I do think that Mill Creek could have done a blu-ray release with the techniques I've explained. However,  my PowerDVD software player can do the upscale for me.

A blu-ray release could store the video at the highest possible quality, but I imagine even if you maxed out the bit rate, the video quality would not be any better than video at the upper limit of DVD storage. Universal's masters are undoubtedly in standard definition. So long as Mill Creek doesn't overcompress the way Universal did, it should be fine.

The problems you describe with your stretching strike me as too high a stretching percentage on too much of the border areas with insufficient cropping to obscure the width issues of movement. My HTPC uses Cyberlink PowerDVD with their stretching algorithm called TrueTheatre Stretch: http://www.cyberlink.com/stat/technolog … _video.jsp Their technique does not create the distortion you describe.

Jim_Hall wrote:

Stretching 4:3 to 16:9 would be a tragedy for Sliders. I'd rather see 4:3 in HD rather than a stretch.

Here's an example of how SLIDERS could be upconverted to 16:9 with a plug and play solution. This is how SLIDERS looks when I watch it on my HTPC and switch on the upconvert. The upconverted version is on the right.

The algorithm isn't just chopping the top and bottom off a 4:3 image. It's stretching the edges of the image at a moderate percentage for the left and right and an even smaller percentage at the top and bottom, filling a 16:9 space while losing some detail at the border of the image, but not remotely as much as uniform cropping and it avoids distorting the image.

https://i.imgsafe.org/7d9a3d0986.jpg

Hopefully, all the episodes in the new release will be the same quality as the Pilot instead of having the Pilot in a high bit rate and all the other episodes at a low bit rate.

3,916

(927 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

You know, if you haven't read the comic, you should really shut the fuck up about it seeing as you can't possibly speak to it with any knowledge. I've read the comic, I can say with authority that it's contextual memory alteration via -- wait, what?! What? Oh.

http://www.comicbookresources.com/artic … s/pageno=2

Uh. Writer Nick Spencer did a new interview where he talked about how the Cosmic Cube has altered history -- as opposed to memory. Reality has been rewritten to rework Cap's backstory into someone who has been a HYDRA agent all along. It's not memory alteration or mind control. It's time travel. I guess I misread the issue or misunderstood something or missed a line of dialogue.

Well. That was embarrassing. I guess having read the comic didn't help me much, either. Sorry, Informant. What a screw up!

3,917

(927 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

My criticism was that it wasn't a strong cliffhanger, not that it didn't provide closure.

**

I think mind control is a completely inadequate and imprecise term to describe Steve's situation, especially in a superhero comic book context where that term is used to describe turning someone into a drone, a puppet of another consciousness. Brainwashing would be closer (and was not ruled out), but even then, it's not entirely sufficient to capture the true horror of what the Red Skull has done.

I'd call it contextual behavioural modification where all of Steve's memories now have a purely additive but horrifically insidious and violating new element: he now thinks everything he ever did in over five decades of comics was part of a HYDRA operation. I'd call it a corruption of Steve's values, purpose, identity and twisting his life and mission into the reverse of everything he ever fought for -- while leaving his personality completely intact within this new life story in order to deepen the Red Skull's sadistic satisfaction in taking everything good about Steve -- his strategic brilliance, his self-sacrificing nature, his compassion for all, his belief in the power of ideas -- and make him think that the best way to use them is and always has been to work for HYDRA.

Again, there is a lot of nuance and subtlety in the writing. The Red Skull doesn't want Steve to be a puppet on a string. The Red Skull doesn't want Steve to be a robot. The Red Skull wants to corrupt Steve's essence and everything that gives him meaning by reversing his purpose while maintaining his nature -- in order to further make him suffer. It's a nuance, that, to be quite frank, is (a) completely in line with what Spencer and Brevoort said in the interviews and (b) invisible to people who DON'T READ THE GOD DAMN STORY WHILE HAVING NO ISSUE TEARING INTO IT!!!!!!

Uh. Is your new book out yet? I think I'll need to buy it and give it a glowing review just to balance things out a bit.

3,918

(927 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

(The following RAGE is strictly for comedic purposes and should not be taken seriously.)

I see no lies. Nick Spencer said: "This is not a clone, not an imposter, not mind control, not someone else acting through Steve. This really is Steve Rogers, Captain America himself." http://www.ew.com/article/2016/05/25/ca … m-brevoort

And what he said is correct. it isn't mind control. It's memory alteration. Mind control would be someone giving Steve instructions as to what to say and how to act and turning him into a drone. That is not what's happened here; Steve has been given a different history even though his personality has been left intact. His mind is not being controlled -- his memories have been revised. Why is the story so focused on the fact that this isn't mind control? Because that way, it's still possible to explore the Steve Rogers character in this sitaution. That is key to this story. He's been rewritten -- and turned loose in an act of spite by the Red Skull.

And also: at no point -- ever -- did the writers or editors say that Cap was now a full out villain and had been all along. Instead, what Spencer said on Cap being evil was, "That question will be answered, at least for the most part, in the next issue. That wasn’t something that we wanted to drag out." http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 … llain.html

Editor Tom Brevoort also added, "No, Captain America is not a Nazi. I’m gonna say the same thing I’ve been saying. Captain America: Steve Rogers #2 will explain exactly why and exactly how we are where we are." http://www.newsarama.com/29507-marvel-o … eader.html

I take no pleasure in saying this, but it seems to me that the only people lying would be the ones who refer to non-existent quotes like those morons on Twitter who think that CAP #2 was pulped, rewritten, redrawn and reprinted inside a month.

At no points did Spencer and Brevoort say that it wasn't "a trick" or that it wasn't "brainwashing" -- those are your words. Don't put your words in their mouths!

OMG, what a crime against literature to decline to spill the outcome of a story in interviews and instead let it emerge in the course of the next issue!

Greg Berlanti should also be deeply ashamed for killing off Jay Garrick and not immediately revealing in interviews that Jay isn't really dead or really even Jay. Agatha Christie should be executed for not putting the answers to all her mysteries in the introduction. JK Rowling should be shunned for waiting until the seventh HARRY POTTER to lay out Professor Snape's secret when she had an obligation to divulge all her twists and turns in the press! ireactions should kill himself because Laurel being Quinn's daughter isn't revealed until SLIDERS REBORN: PART 3 and maybe if he'd put that on the title page of PART 1, jackass supreme RussianCabbie would have held off on saying Laurel should but cut from the story based on the first 50 pages!

Kyle Andrews should be banished to a desert island with nothing but J. Michael Straczynski comics to read because FREEDOM/HATE didn't contain a bullet-point list at the end to tell me where the story's going!

... I need to lie down.

(Just being spirited, not really angry at Informant -- well, no angrier than my general state of anger at the human race. Sorry.)

3,919

(927 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Temporal Flux wrote:

My issue with Captain America continuity right now is that they had Red Skull steal the brain from Charles Xavier's dead body and transplant part of it into his head so that Skull can have mind control powers.  Besides being outlandish, it's just sad to think that's how Xavier has ended up.

This is a strange opinion coming from the man who wrote the (brilliant) story where Quinn becomes his own timer, a story that was clearly inspired by the loose rules of superhero comic books. As for Xavier, I doubt he'll stay dead forever. I imagine his situation will be something like taking over the Red Skull's body and remaking it into his own appearance, assuming he isn't revived via time travel or an alternate universe version whose memories get merged with the 616 Xavier (not that we use 616 anymore) or revealing that the Xavier who died during AVENGERS VS. X-MEN was an impostor or revealing that Xavier faked his own death and has been hiding in the X-Mansion basement to prepare for an alien invasion (again).

Informant wrote:

They went out of their way to make it seem like this was for real and not any form of mind control, which was pretty much a lie. I don't think that did them any good.

!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

I don't understand how you could possibly ask a writer and a publishing company to work in the fashion you suggest. Cap's behaviour in CAP #1 was a mystery. This is god-damn serial fiction. Mysteries tend to be sustained over a period of time. The fact that they revealed all by #2 is already very fast.

Should CSI start putting all the answers to their mysteries in popup text at the start of every episode just in case the viewers find it too stressful to wonder who the murderer is? Should THE FLASH have had a post-credits segment after the Season 2 premiere to explain all of Jay's secrets rather than letting them come out in the story?

There's also the fact that CAP #1 was completely upfront and clear about what was going on. The issue explains that the Cosmic Cube has the power to alter reality and change people's memories. The issue shows us a version of Steve Rogers' backstory and childhood that has been altered and changed. The story could not have been any clearer THAT CAP'S MEMORIES ARE BEING ALTERED even if it only made it explicitly clear in dialogue in #2.

Again, your complaints are giving me the strong, strong indication that you have not read the comic book you're criticizing. The writers and editors were completely up front that CAP IS NOT BEING MIND CONTROLLED AND THIS IS REALLY STEVE ROGERS. His memories are being altered, which is a very different approach.

Cap's memories have been rewritten to make him think he's something he's not while leaving his free will and personality intact, so he's carrying out what he thinks is his lifelong mission (Hail HYDRA) while acting on his personal values and beliefs (teamwork, sacrifice, responsibility, freedom and protecting the innocent) -- but his tampered memories now make him think that fighting for HYDRA is the way he's always tried to fight for truth and justice.

That is what is so interesting about this story: what if Cap's heroic and admirable qualities were suddenly put on the other side of the war against Marvel's supervillains? HYDRA doesn't think of themselves as evil; they think of themselves as liberating humanity from their failings and weaknesses through technology and accepting the deaths of some innocents to save even more from themselves; what if Cap were manipulated to buy into that? Holy crap! How the hell can you critique marketing of a story properly if you don't read the story?!?!?

How can people claim it's unclear if AXANAR profits from their unlicensed STAR TREK films when the profit is shown on the AXANAR website??!!??

How can RussianCabbieLotteryFan declare that Laurel Hills should be removed from SLIDERS REBORN and isn't important to the plot when he read only 50 pages?!?!? (Spoiler alert: LAUREL IS QUINN'S DAUGHTER.)

How can ireactions claim to be paying tribute to Robert Floyd by writing a screenplay for Rob that Rob has no hope in hell of understanding!?!?!?!?

How can this bread claim to have one gram of net carbohydrates when it uses white flour!?!?!?!?

(Sorry. Sorry. Got a touch over the top here. Nothing but love for you Informant. Albeit with a touch of exasperation now and then. So it's exasperated love. I'm sure it's mutual. I'm going to go for a walk.)

3,920

(927 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

SHOCKING NAZI CAPTAIN AMERICA REVELATION!

CAP #2 reveals that the Red Skull used the Cosmic Cube to alter Steve Rogers' memories to make him think he's an agent of HYDRA. SHOCK! GASP! ASTONISHMENT!

(Except that this was clearly set up in #1 with the presence of the Cube and its reality and memory altering powers being established -- meaning that the majority of those who torched Marvel, the writer and the story for #1's tale obviously hadn't read it and were lashing out with zero context and no meaningful information on which to build an opinion.)

And now follow the dumbass reactions from people claiming Marvel have reversed course in response to backlash -- except that comics tend to be written and drawn at least a COUPLE MONTHS IN ADVANCE AND THIS ISSUE SHIPPED ON TIME FOR GOD'S SAKE.

SHOCK! GASP! ASTONISHMENT!

How is it in any way not clear that the Axanar guy really paid himself a salary? It's in his FAQ on his own website. http://www.axanarproductions.com/captai … -7th-2016/

I think it is unbelievable how people keep claiming the issue is muddy or unclear when the information is plain as day on Axanar's own website: they took crowdsourced funds for an unlicensed STAR TREK film and paid themselves.

**

I totally agree that the fan film restrictions are too extreme. The restrictions on length and what props and costumes can be used and what content can be shown are absurd -- no official TREK film could have been made under those restrictions, such as any film or episode where McCoy and Kirk share a drink.

I've said before that STAR TREK is Paramount's house and they have every right to make their rules as extreme as they like as long as they're not illegal. I will say, however, that STAR TREK is becoming a house I wouldn't visit -- but I will defend to the end their right to make their house that way.

We'll have to disagree on the quality of these fan productions, but the issue wasn't that the fan stuff endangered their new property; it was the fan stuff was being used to make money with absolutely no licensing agreement whatsoever. And they have every right to take issue with 1.1 million dollars being used to make a STAR TREK fan film without authorization, the same way you probably would not tolerate strangers using your house as a brewery without your permission and compensation. We can debate whether Paramount and CBS are being extreme, but they have every right to permit some fan films or no fan films. STAR TREK is their house.

**

Hmm. One iffy thing regarding SLIDERS REBORN, now that I think on it -- I offered SLIDERS fanfic genius Nigel Mitchell money for his services on the project. Not being a history buff or a world-builder, I asked Nigel to take my one-sentence concepts and give me an alt-history as well as visual details of daily life to work into the scripts.

I wanted to pay him for each Earth, but Nigel declined and pointed me to his Amazon page, where I bought every novel he's published and will buy every novel he ever releases, partially because I want to read them and partially to pay him something.

I wonder what kind of trouble we'd have been in if I'd paid Nigel about $500 for what I imagine would have been a couple hours of writing bullet points of whatever came to mind for the four Earths. I guess I could have written it off as a one-time gift? And what about the hotel room I rented? The hotel made money off me doing SLIDERS REBORN. But I guess they made money off me wanting a room as opposed SLIDERS REBORN.

I imagine that NBCUniversal wouldn't see the point of litigating over a matter of $680, but crowdsourcing over a million dollars raises all sorts of alerts and red flags.

I don't see what the problem is. Did GALAXY QUEST suffer because they hired Tim Allen and Alan Rickman instead of Shatner and Nimoy? Doing RENEGADES as an analogue to STAR TREK rather than a fan film is a valid and effective approach. They'll need to change the costumes and makeup. As a comic book fan, this is nothing new to me: Wildstorm comics wanted DCesque characters, so they created Apollo, Midnighter, Zealot as their versions of Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman. When DOCTOR WHO was cancelled, there were some fan productions where the actors who played the Doctor now played The Stranger.

The STAR TREK RENEGADES fan series, in response to the TREK fanfilm guidelines, has decided to carry on with their project anyway. They're just removing all the STAR TREK elements from their content. If their material is worth doing to begin with, this isn't going to be a problem.

Looking at my own stuff -- if you took LONELYGIRL15 out of LONELYJOURNAL15 and SLIDERS out of SLIDERS REBORN, they would collapse instantly. But that's why I would never want anyone to put anything but thought and typing into either of these projects; that's why they exist as PDF documents.

My thoughts on RussianCabbie's thoughts:

I can't think of anything more terrible than SLIDERS as a fan series with the clumsy non-actors and non-directors of these STAR TREK fan films to be performing scripts that were written as pastiches of Jerry, Sabrina, Cleavant and John's performances. I can't think of anything more unwatchable than poor thespians attempting to imitate these talents.

It is beyond me why you are so keen on people doing poor impressions of these actors -- a desperation for more product even if that product is utter crap. Tom and Cory's impressions of the SLIDERS are, if reviewed as serious drama, an abomination of performance -- they can't maintain the caricatures, they drop the accents, they can't seem to do a character voice and act at the same time -- which is perfect when they do their parodies and horrific when doing it seriously -- and yet you still wanted them to perform a more serious SLIDERS script in character! You said it would be "divine" which tells me you have nearly zero concern for quality (outside of hating SLIDERS REBORN based on a half-assed effort to read 50 pages of it).

But if it makes you happy, go ahead. All those STAR TREK fan films are mostly awful awful awful -- but they made their creators happy by existing.

My thoughts on Grizzlor's thoughts:

(a) With the exception of STAR TREK CONTINUES, all those fanfilms and fan serieses SUCKED. Terrible cinematography, embarrassingly poor acting (even from the professional actors) and ghastly writing. We had this lengthy debate on the old Bboard where you said the original series was cheesy too and I said the original TREK was melodramatic and funny and conversational and skillful whereas these fan films were just inept. So, no great loss on the most part.

(b) When you play in somebody else's sandbox without permission, that sand may be confiscated and the box dismantled at any time. Anyone who doesn't take the time to inform themselves of that potentiality shouldn't get into the sandbox. Nobody told them to invest the time and money into a project that used copyrighted material they didn't license and do not own.

(c) If they really want to tell their stories and make their shows and films in the way that they have, they could still do it. If NBCUniversal sent me a cease and desist notice on SLIDERS REBORN, I'd be back online within the hour. SLIDERS REBORN would become JUMPERS REBORN. Quinn would Quentin Michaels, Wade would be Willa Wallace, Rembrandt/Remmy would become Raphael/Raphi Baldwin and Professor Arturo would become Professor Allan and I'd just carry on as a parody.

As someone who works for a not-for-profit, it can be hazy to determine what counts as profiting and not profiting. I'm a staff member; I earn money, I am profiting. The not-for-profit part simply means that my organization is not seeking to earn money to enrich itself; it's seeking to accomplish other goals. But we get to operate in that gray area because we're not using unlicensed copyrighted material and intellectual property that belong to somebody else.

Paramount's restrictions seem partially focused on how nobody involved in a fan film should be making money from it, not from the sale of the film, not from tickets, and not from salaries based on working in it. However, the restricted length and the content limitations that STAR TREK itself doesn't adhere to and the requirement that fan films use Paramount sponsored props seems designed specifically to discourage all fan films. It's unfortunate -- but Paramount is entirely within its rights to say what should and shouldn't be done with its material.

If my neighbour uses my backyard barbeque without asking, I may let him or I may refuse or I may let him do it for a week or two but then declare that it's off limits for the third week. Or I may say that he's limited to using only olive oil and that no charcoal is permitted or that it's only for vegetable kebabs. It's my barbeque. If he wants to make hamburgers, he can buy his own barbeque. If Alec Peters wants to make a space opera film, he can do it without using the STAR TREK copyrights. Paramount is entirely within its rights to say what can and can't be done with its barbeque.

I sometimes wonder if EarthPrime.com and Dimension of Continuity are just one or two ceast and desist letters away from getting shut down due to us posting scripts, reviews, original writing and other uses of material that is owned by NBCUniversal and used without permission. However, we're not making any money from it aside from having portfolio pieces to show our skills to future employers. We lose money on it; SLIDERS REBORN is $180 overbudget because I had to rent a hotel room to finish the first script, Matt pays the hosting fees and for tech support due to hacks. Any financial gain will be for NBCUniversal through a DVD sale now and then.

A ROBOCOP site out there earns money by having referral ads to ROBOCOP merchandise on Amazon that earns the site a small piece of each Amazon purchase resulting from the link -- I would avoid doing even that. When we don't own a property, we have no business taking other people's money for it; even crowdsourcing to presumably pay for resources makes me wary, and people like Alec Peters have made it clear that the crowd may simply be having their funds line the fundraiser's pocket.

Alec Peters' defense of his financial arrangements and his legal position are absurd. He first claims that Paramount is giving him trouble because they want his money as though a studio that earns $300 million in profit annually would want his $1 million on crowdsourced funds. He then says that Paramount is jealous of his material and insecure that his output is better than theirs, a claim based in such petty and empty subjectivity that it should be dismissed entirely. He then says that yes, despite AXANAR being not for profit, he pays himself out of the crowdsourced funds, but he should because he works 60 hour weeks and it's less than what Paramount executives get paid. Whether it's more or less is irrelevant; he is earning money with somebody else's property which he has not licensed, which he has no right to use. And if Paramount didn't mind, that's fine, but if they do mind, they are entirely within their rights to do so. It's their house. They get to say you're not to use their barbeque.

JJ Abrams and Justin Lin protested the lawsuit; I think they were unaware that AXANAR was using crowdsourcing to build Alec Peters' studio space for other projects and to pay him five figures.

The main issue: the Axanar funds were being used to build a for profit studio and pay the producer. This was not a zero profit project; Axel Peters was earning money for himself and paying himself from the crowdsourced funds. He forced Paramount and CBS to defend their copyright. If they let this slide, they wou'd be legally vulnerable to losing their copyrights for not defending them.

3,929

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I actually think original work would be less stressful.

The absurd and ridiculous truth is that fans of LONELYGIRL15 and SLIDERS take/took my work really seriously, more seriously than any other fanbase for their own fan fiction. My fan fiction is referred to as canonical (at least until an official revival is released), my scripts get promoted in the podcasts and reviewed as actual episodes of the TV show, my readers write TV Tropes pages for my work -- it's astonishing.

It also not exactly a reflection on me. It's 90 per cent circumstance. I was/am the only game in town because both serieses ended in a way where I could step in and play what I call fantasy franchise management -- where I produce material that creates the illusion of being official.

Tom and Cory remarked, when reviewing "Slide Effects" for SLIDERS REWATCH: "This is SLIDERS. This is what it's supposed to be." It's not true. SLIDERS should be a TV show with the actors playing their roles. My scripts being able to create that in the mind is a magic trick achieved due to the other 10 per cent -- which would be what I jokingly refer to as my talent -- a talent for creating prose and print pastiches of actors' performances.

It's a lot of weight to put on work that, to be honest, I do over lunchbreaks and on weekends. There's a lot of stress and anxiety from writing for pre-existing properties. It's no big deal if Laurie's Dean/Castiel romance novel isn't a solidly professional piece of work whereas SLIDERS REBORN not meeting a professional standard would be a really painful failure -- because if it can't create the illusion of canonicity for the duration of reading it, the project is a waste of time.

On March 20, 2015, two days before the twentieth anniversary, I needed to revise the first REBORN script but a noisy party downstairs made it impossible to work. (Work. Ha!) So I rented a hotel room and didn't come out for 18 hours and posting REBORN on March 22 was just terrifying. It was also really scary when posting LONELYJOURNAL15 because it executed a grand retcon on the mythos akin to THE X-FILES saying that there is no alien conspiracy -- and I was relieved when my debunking of the LONELYGIRL15 myth-arc was well received.

A clean slate would probably be good for me.

3,930

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

So, something ridiculous has happened.

Back in 2007 - 2009, I was really into LONELYGIRL15, a fictional young-adult series told through a teenaged girl, Bree, vlogging in her bedroom, relating her life.

Bree vlogged about her friendship with a boy named Daniel, struggles with adolescence, troubles at school, her religion (called the Hymn of One), her parents' oddly controlling and inconsistent behaviour, the strange tests her parents and the Elders of her religion put her through, the peculiar injections, the preparations for a mysterious occult ritual called the Ceremony, the murder of her father, the desperate escape that sent Daniel and Bree into homelessness before they encountered a wealthy orphan named Jonas, and their eventual realization that the Hymn of One, the Order, had was a corporate entity of unmatched wealth and power that had infiltrated every level of American society and wanted to drain Bree of all her blood for some twisted death rite.

It was a very strong series for the first two seasons and it took some big risks. The series was dependent on the original writer, Mesh Flinders, putting his personal problems into Bree, his avatar. The producer, Miles Beckett, helped Mesh turn his scripts into vlogs in bedrooms -- and later, vlogs by teen fugitives delving deeper into the concept of the Order, this mysterious and powerful cult.

This became a major problem when Mesh Flinders lost interest in the teen fugitive format and how very, very distant the show had become from slice of life stories from a teen girl in her bedroom. The show also lost the actress who played Bree and the character was killed off.

While the supporting cast was strong enough to carry the show, the remaining writers began focusing stories exclusively on the Order -- a ridiculously overpowered supervillain organization that the writers and producers didn't have the creativity or budget to render onscreen or with any consistent means or goals. In the background as a plot device to create insane situations, the Order was great. Foregrounded, it was stupid. The videos became riddled with confusing plots, massive continuity errors, anti-climactic arcs and LONELYGIRL15 became more convoluted than THE X-FILES. It was largely abandoned by its fans, unable to find continued advertising sponsorship, and it ended on a cliffhanger.

As I am wont to do, I decided to come up with a fan fiction sequel, except I used the format of LiveJournal blog entries instead of vlogs. Also, my story was not ongoing: all the entries would be completed, backdated, then released all at once -- and there would be a conclusive finale to the story. However, my writing was more along the lines of the slice of life material and I only understood the Order continuity well enough to know it couldn't be understood.

I had a method of putting the Order back in the background where it belonged and also a method to explain why this super cult with its own private army couldn't track down a bunch of teenagers who posted their location on YouTube -- but I needed someone more familiar with the intricate continuity to help me match my material to previous stories.

There was a producer on LONELYGIRL15, Jenni Powell, whom I felt would be the ideal person to help plot this project, especially since she'd helped a bunch of other fans with fanfic and done her own fanfic vlog series spoofing LG15. She was often in the LG15 chat room and I had a lot of respect for her views. She had very insightful thoughts on LG15's convoluted myth-arc and how the characters were the best aspect of the show. She understood how to present complexity in a clear, compact form. She knew how to build on top of a convoluted mythos without falling into the cracks and holes of a bad foundation. She was the best choice possible to lead LONELYGIRL15 forward (although I imagined I would do bulk of the writing and she could help me edit my plot and match the continuity).

In 2009, after the show was clearly not returning, I approached Jenni and asked for her consultation and input on my LiveJournal project to do a sequel and conclusion. Jenni replied bluntly: she didn't see any point to working on any LG15 material as the show had fallen apart and was just a miserable property best left alone, she didn't think LG15 ought to have any further time or effort or creativity and that she just didn't think it was worth the work.

Jenni went on to work on other web shows: THE GUILD, THE LIZZIE BENNET DIARIES, EMMA APPROVED, THE NEW ADVENTURES OF PETER AND WENDY as a director and executive producer. I found other collaborators. One guy helped me with my plot structure. Another lady helped me reconcile my plot to the onscreen continuity. I wrote all the LiveJournal entries with their notes in mind.

We released LONELYJOURNAL15 to the fanbase in late 2009 and got a uniformly positive response with numerous fans declaring that it was canon because it made them happy. LJ15 gave any fans who read it closure. I still get fan mail on it now and then. Jenni, despite declining involvement, was really sweet about my writing and even gave me permission to integrate her material from her previous fanfic projects in LONELYJOURNAL15.

Cut to the present: LONELYGIRL15 has been revived again as an ongoing series. The series picks up eight years after the cliffhanger ending, picking up on all the previous continuity. The actress who played the original lead character has been re-hired to reprise her role. The rights to the series were purchased by a web videocompany, Discourse Productions -- it's Jenni Powell's company. Jenni Powell is the showrunner for this revival of LONELYGIRL15.

...............................

Originally, my material was considered by fans who read it to be canonical by default in that LG15's creators had abandoned the project on a cliffhanger and for a follow-up, I was the only game in town and the response was universally positive. Now, LONELYJOURNAL15 is clearly apocryphal fan fiction. A project to be put aside in favour of the true, official, canonical LONELYGIRL15 revival -- a revival led by the very person I sought out to produce new LONELYGIRL15 material in the first place.

Well. Anyway. I just want it on record somewhere that I considered this person to be the absolute best choice to manage a new incarnation of LONELYGIRL15 long before she got the job. While I am sad to be rendered apocryphal, solemn contemplation leads me to conclude that I am happy because what I wanted has come to pass. LONELYGIRL15 has returned with Jenni writing the series.

It does speak to a certain laxness of forward motion in my own life, however, that while I went from writing fanfic for LONELYGIRL15 to writing fanfic for SLIDERS, Jenni did her own material, produced her own shows, built experience and a reputation and a network and then returned to LG15 not as a fan, but as LG15's lead creator.

Matt once remarked that he found SLIDERS REBORN both heartening and depressing in that while he understood that REBORN makes me happy, he felt I should really be writing original work. Alright. After "Regenesis," it'll be onto writing about law students and their soap opera lives and homeless teen girl detectives. You can tell I'm following market research here.

3,931

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/16537 … ration.htm

Facinelli (Maxwell Lord) and Brooks (Jimmy) are promoting Season 2, so I take it they haven't left the series.

3,932

(267 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

The idea of watching shows when they air as opposed to having them recorded and then played or streamed at my convenience is just... so... alien to me.

3,933

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Thanks, I needed that. Going with the roadtrip metaphor -- I'd say that Rob was a seriously distant detour from the planned route for SLIDERS REBORN.

I didn't go to these lengths to accommodate Charlie O'Connell. And I won't, partially because it was exhausting enough to do this for Rob. Also, I feel no debt to Charlie -- he was in 21 episodes of SLIDERS: 18 of Season 4, a guest-star in "As Time Goes By" and "Dragonslide" -- and he played Jerry O'Connell's corpse in "The Young and the Relentless," the only role for which he was in any way qualified or capable. I didn't owe him any extra effort.

Mallory was extremely out of my way, but to drive past the exit to the long and winding road towards him on the grounds that it was too far would have been saying Rob wasn't worth the trouble and I couldn't do that.

I suppose that in the grand scheme of REBORN, "Revolution" is a small interlude and hopefully, it's good, but if it isn't, that shouldn't interfere with the finale being good.

3,934

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

So, I think a sufficient interval has passed that I can talk about the "Revolution" script and my anxieties over it in the hopes that Informant will tell me what's what.

I feel confident that Parts 1 - 4 of SLIDERS REBORN are a good media tie-in product for the fans. I am less certain about Part 5, "Revolution," because while I put a lot of heart and thought and love into it, I'm not convinced it worked.

The main problem: Mallory is very difficult to write and this character (as opposed to the actor) doesn't belong in SLIDERS REBORN. Originally, REBORN was just going to be the original sliders. But when writing Part 2, the opportunity to use doubles of previously seen guest-stars in supporting roles brought a lot of warmth and charm to the script and this led to realizing that Maggie Beckett could be effective in Part 3, because if you need an action girl, why create a new one when one already exists? Then came the need for a lady scientist in Part 5 that was filled by Diana Davis and omitting Mallory started to seem like it was unfair to Robert Floyd.

Which is stupid. This isn't really being filmed. But it bothered me. Rob worked really hard on the Mallory character. The character was a disastrous failure. None of that is Rob's fault: he studied Jerry O'Connell's acting, he hired an acting coach to help him turn mimicry into an identity crisis, he created a note-perfect recreation of Jerry's voice that would be a performance as well as a tribute -- and when fans told lies about him demanding the end of "New Gods for Old" or blamed him for the cancellation, he bore it gracefully and he was willing to do an hour-long EP.COM interview regarding a job he held for one year over a decade and a half ago.

When Rob received strong material like stealing Maggie's toothbrush or impersonating an orderly or finding allies in rogue journalists or having heartfelt scenes with Amanda Mallory, he shined. Mallory's flaws aren't Rob's. If SLIDERS REBORN is meant to be a celebration of everything great about SLIDERS, then Rob Floyd's omission would be an unacceptable insult.

Even more insulting, however, would be to give Mallory a role that would only reiterate the problem with this character: he's only there because Quinn isn't and a SLIDERS story with Quinn has no use for Mallory whatsoever -- because then I'd be saying the same thing about Rob. And that's not true. I would have loved for Robert Floyd to have played Quinn from the Pilot to the end of the show and I think he would have been superb.

He kept the spirit of Quinn alive as best he could. He honoured a wonderful creation, playing Quinn's inner strength, scientific brilliance and the heavy burden of his knowledge. He honoured SLIDERS. So SLIDERS REBORN needed to honour him. Except REBORN established in Part 1 that all of Quinn's doubles were erased, so how could Mallory even appear?

The main ingredients for any REBORN tale featuring Mallory, I felt: first, Quinn and Mallory should share scenes together to highlight what makes them unique. Second: Mallory should save Quinn's life somehow. I decided that Mallory's main gift is that he reads people and details very well -- a character trait that was not exactly consistent in Season 5, but prominent in "A Current Affair" where he wins Matt Drudge's allegiance and "Map of the Mind" where he convinces the asylum staff that he works there -- whereas Quinn is not quite as insightful when it comes to human nature.

I imagined a situation where Quinn is trapped in a room filling with poisonous gas, dying, hallucinating from the poison -- and then hallucinating Mallory, who helps him find some tiny detail that lets him escape -- like helping Quinn realize a secondary character is, for some character-oriented reason, always carrying a matchbook and the matches can be used to ignite the gas and blast through the walls and vent the gas.

And then came the questions. Where is this room? What is this gas? Who created this gas? What's it for? Why does Quinn, an experienced slider who is as slippery as an eel, need Mallory to show him the path to survival? The room is in a house?

The gas is a drug designed by a depressive who is dying of a terminal illness and seeking relief. Quinn is depressed over the multiverse being damaged and something this character said to him that made him lose all hope for the future. But what could a guest-character possibly say to instantly crush Quinn's spirit and why would this guest-character have this peculiar gas?

Matt wondered: why would Quinn hallucinate Mallory? Wouldn't he hallucinate Colin? I decided to highlight how Mallory literally knows Quinn inside out -- and the plot came together (as much as it would, anyway) when I remembered "Obsession" and how the return of a psychic from that episode would justify all the absurd plot devices needed to get Mallory and Quinn in the same room together with the gas being the hallucinogen from "The Dream Masters" and combining that with the VR machine of "Virtual Slide" and the cryogenics of "O Brother" and" The Chasm" could justify the resulting apparatus: an afterlife machine that creates ideal dream-state fantasies for the dying.

At the scripting stage, depending on plot devices from previous episodes of SLIDERS to justify "Revolution"'s oddities only seemed to make them odder. Seeing no way to back out, I turned into the swerve by having Mallory bring about Quinn's turnaround through flashbacks to previous episodes. At various points in the script, I found myself unable to keep the surreal tone of the script intact without making it confusing and I decided that confusion wasn't worth it.

I sent the script to Robert Floyd. I didn't think he would actually read it -- but I wanted him to have it as a keepsake -- something to print and keep on a shelf. And I wanted him to have his face at the top of the SLIDERS REBORN page for a few months. To recognize his contributions to the series, to the fans, to Quinn Mallory and to make it clear that he mattered and he counted and he was part of the SLIDERS family. This is fantasy franchise management at its most delusional, I'm sure.

He told me how touched he was at this tribute. I haven't heard from him about it since -- I assume, because this script was an incomprehensible monstrosity that only nerds can understand.

Ultimately, I did something that writers should not do -- I forced REBORN to use plot elements that don't function naturally in the series so that I could include a character who doesn't have an organic function in REBORN -- because I liked the actor who played him and I had to do this for him.

I know that it was just a job to him. One he held for a year over a decade ago. A job he has surpassed and left behind with many achievements since then. But nobody expected him to bring the level of performance that he did to Season 5 -- he could have phoned it in, but he was a professional who did a professional's job -- a detailed, skillful, attentive, wonderful job. People who go the extra mile deserve to be recognized.

But maybe they deserve a better script than I could offer. I don't know. I'm too close to this to tell if it's good, bad or just mediocre at this point. I did what I had to do. Maybe the best thing to do is to make sure the sixth and final script the best it can be.

This is yet another exercise in taking fan fiction way too seriously, I'm sure. I don't know what to think anymore. Informant, you tell me what to think.

3,935

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I keep trying to run Android apps on my Windows 10 tablet. It's stupid. Bluestacks is slow. DuOS is slow. Remix OS has no touchscreen support. Arc Welder's converted apps don't load. I really need to leave myself a note that trying to run Android on a Windows machine is an exercise in futility and that if I wanted a god-damn Android tablet, I would have bought one -- or not sold off/returned all the ones I ever had to begin with. I think it's just because Chrome apps have been so terrific at filling in the void of Windows 10 apps that I wondered if Android apps could do the same as well. It's silly.

3,936

(1,098 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

So, on the subject of how big changes to iconic characters always get rolled back --

There are two weird exceptions: Dick Grayson and Superman. Having gone on a long explanation of why replacing cultural icons never works (movies and TV will use the most popular default) -- the world at large knows Dick Grayson to be Robin, yet he's been Nightwing for decades and we've cycled through Jason Todd, Tim Drake and Damian Wayne.

Why is that? I suspect that, very simply, BATMAN comics have generally sold really well. With comics like GREEN LANTERN, THE FLASH and SPIDER-MAN, sales initially jumped when Hal Jordan, Barry Allen, Oliver Queen and Peter Parker were replaced, but sales eventually hit a catastrophically low point where drastic action was needed and the course of action chosen was to hit the reset button HARD.

I guess BATMAN comics have never been in that sort of sales crisis. Even people who don't like superhero comics tend to find something in BATMAN to enjoy.

Kyle Rayner and Wally West actually sold quite well, Kyle for a decade and Wally for two -- but they were hit by the gradual softening of the comics market over time and the need to make an event of Hal and Barry return and give sales a jolt. I don't remember where Oliver Queen's sales were when he was killed off and replaced with Connor Hawke, but anecdotally, GREEN ARROW was barely on anyone's radar until Kevin Smith resurrected Oliver and turned GREEN ARROW into a big hit again. (Take the last one with a grain of salt.)

For Batman, there's never been a desperate need to go back to basics because none of the changes to Batman's mythos prevented writers from having Batman solve murders in Gotham City. Also, any writers who wanted to write Bruce and Dick stories could do so because he was still around.

It's weird because Dick Grayson himself is not the most interesting character, and I say that as someone who reads NIGHTWING religiously. Dick's been written by brilliant writers and drawn by superb artists who created hyperkinetic experiences of John Woo-esque ballet using Dick's acrobatic skills to showcase his circus background.

He's been put in interesting situations like when he became Batman and had to mentor a homicidal 10-year-old as the new Robin and found himself struggling to impersonate his mentor. But the character is so well-adjusted, so stable, so confident that he needs to be written by a writer with a vivid and distinct style to make up for Dick's lack of vivid distinctiveness.

With Superman -- I have no idea why the rollback was rolled back where the late-thirties, married Superman, post-reboot, become a mid-twenties bachelor.

ACTION COMICS retells the origin of Superman in 18 issues -- but with a ridiculous EIGHT different artists, all with completely opposing styles within the same individual issues -- so the art shifts from loose cartoonism to crisp photo-realism to motion-oriented exaggeration and back and forth and back and forth, often within the same scenes.

There's a decent script underneath the visual confusion of an urban vigilante Superman and a slum-dwelling Clark Kent growing in power and responsibility, but it's unreadable.

SUPERMAN, set five years after the origin story, has five different writers over the course of its first 31 issues and is a mess of directions that start and then abruptly disappear in the confusion of a rotating door of writers each of whom start stories they can't seem to finish. Clark becomes disenchanted with journalism, quits the Daily Planet, becomes a blogger -- but that plot gets sidetracked with alien invasions and crossovers with SUPERGIRL and SUPERBOY.

The crossovers themselves are halfway intriguing -- a Kryptonian seeks to destroy the Earth to create fuel for a time machine to undo the destruction of Krypton. Superman is infected by a virus that transforms him into the Doomsday monster. But with five or six writers writing each crossover, the stories become an exercise in each writer writing some variant on almost indistinguishible action sequences over and over again until it's around 25 - 30 issues of motionless stalling.

It's quite clear that SUPERMAN editorial could not get their act together: hiring creators to make bold choices, second-guessing those choices, creators quitting, eventually resorting to clumsy crossovers to boost sales. There is no sense of what Superman represents or any noteworthy style, voice, perspective, insight or deeper meaning -- any writer who brought any to the table got frustrated and took it away with them.

The best that can be said of the later crossovers is that the SUPERMAN editorial office worked out how to get multi-artist books to look good. They hired artists within the same range -- mostly loose-lined, motion-oriented exaggeration -- and made sure that the colourists could keep the pages consistent enough that it wasn't jarring. Why this skillful planning was missing from ACTION COMICS is beyond me.

That said, JUSTICE LEAGUE, after an incoherent opening arc, seemed to find its feet with the distinct personalities of Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, Aquaman, the Flash and Cyborg bouncing off each other. Superman was a strong presence and his romance with Wonder Woman -- a sheltered farmboy falling for an Amazonian goddess -- was rather sweet.

JUSTICE LEAGUE also had a delightful and still ongoing arc where Luthor decides that the best way to win the acclaim and fame and wealth and regard and power he wants is to renounce Evil, become a superhero and join the League.

The SUPERMAN/WONDER WOMAN title was also excellent, featuring strong writing that explored a very complex relationship of two people who will always feel like outsiders. There was the nine-issue SUPERMAN UNCHAINED where Superman was forced to struggle with his unwillingness to interfere in global conflicts outside of relief work.

It was baffling how the people writing the outlier SUPERMAN titles without full control over the character were the ones doing their best work while the core SUPERMAN office seemed incapable of releasing a single coherent storyline without an exasperated writer quitting without finishing.

Outside of the Superman/Wonder Woman romance, the SUPERMAN office was unwilling to take any chances in committing to any creative vision whatsoever.

And then suddenly it was. Writer Greg Pak came aboard ACTION COMICS and plunged Superman into fantasy sci-fi with Superman discovering an underground population of monsters, creating civil rights allegories while keeping the book full of absurd visuals and showcasing Superman's empathy for all. DC seemed to step back and let a great team do great stories.

Then there was Geoff Johns taking over SUPERMAN for a brief arc of widescreen action matched with Superman battling an alien invasion that sought to use Superman's public persona against him. This led into Superman developing a new superpower: emitting a burst of solar energy that was highly destructive and would leave him powerless for 24 hours.

Johns was succeeded by new writer Gene Luen Yang who began having Superman deal with the delight and fragility of being human (got drunk for the first time) and the psychological mayhem of going back and forth between godlike powers and being normal. With SUPERMAN in excellent state, ACTION COMICS doing well and SUPERMAN/WONDER WOMAN a monthly delight, one wondered what had taken so long and why the writers could suddenly take chances.

The next storyline was TRUTH -- a strange story in that it was told out of order. But looking at it chronologically, it's an amazing storyline: Superman going from powered up to only human means he gets injured more often and while he heals, he begins to get sloppy in concealing his secret identity.

In BEFORE TRUTH, a villain finds out he's Clark Kent and begins blackmailing Superman into giving them bursts of his charged solar energy -- and Lois, having found out the secret as well, decides to put a stop  to it by revealing Clark's secret to the world.

Villains start attacking Superman's friends. Clark Kent is wanted by the police, the Daily Planet wants to sue him for fraud, and Perry White feels betrayed by Superman masquerading as a normal person and knocks the glasses off his face.

And problematically, Clark discovers that the villains draining him via his solar flare power have somehow damaged his ability to store solar energy: his strength is reduced to lifting a truck; he can no longer fly; his supersenses are diminished and he's down to a few thousand in cash.

In SUPERMAN/WONDER WOMAN, Clark discovers that the power imbalance between himself and Wonder Woman has left him feeling crippled and inadequate. Watching her fly off to cosmic threats is heartrending. Worse, she interferes when Clark attempts to pilot a shuttle into the sun in a failed attempt to repower himself and steps into Clark's dealings with the CIA and the DHS when Clark asked her to stay out of it. Feeling betrayed by both Lois and Wonder Woman, Clark severs ties with both of them and sets off on his motorcycle.

Returning to Metropolis, Clark finds that his former neighbours declared his district to be Superman's town and began public protests demanding Superman be acquitted of all charges, resulting in brutal police officers storming on the protests and a weakened Superman chaining himself up with his neighbours.

This whole thing is a terrific storyline. Superman loses all the things that make him Superman -- and then keeps going anyway. He gives himself a buzz-cut, buys a Superman T-shirt and a motorcycle and carries on trying to do his job -- defending the city, fighting alien invaders, tracking down who has stolen his powers, teaming up with the JLA, battling monsters -- all the while getting beaten to a bloody pulp and dragging himself back to his feet.

At one point, in a reference to George Reeves' career, Clark spends his last $20 on tacos and is reduced to fighting in boxing matches for money. At first ashamed and humiliated, Clark begins to enjoy the show and the friendships he develops with other boxers.

Throughout this arc, Superman is homeless, depowered, weak, outmatched -- but he doesn't stop trying to be Superman, partially out of ego, partially due to his inability to stop getting involved in any trouble he comes across whether it's criminal, supernatural or paranormal even when he is completely out of his league.

At times, he struggles to keep himself on the level of a fireman and paramedic while the Justice League is handling the big threats. It's a beautiful examination of what it means to be Superman -- and you wonder how DC can go to these lengths with this character, taking big chances where before, they seemed incapable of even small chances.

Even more curiously, a mini-series, SUPERMAN: LOIS & CLARK, reveals that the Superman we followed from 1985 - 2011 who married Lois -- is not the Superman whom we've been reading about since 2011. The assumption was that Clark was de-aged and his life altered by the Flashpoint reboot into the NEW 52 version -- except it turns out the 1985 - 2011 Superman has been living in the NEW 52 universe all along -- living with Lois Lane under the false identity of the Whites and raising their 10-year-old, Jon.

Furthermore, it's revealed that the 1985 Superman has been secretly interfering in all major NEW 52 events, but always hiding, always letting the Superman of this universe live his life.

And then comes THE FINAL DAYS OF SUPERMAN where Clark (NEW 52 version) uses Kryptonite to burn away the damaged cells preventing him from recharging his powers, learns that Vandal Savage is behind his depowering -- and that it's too late. The damage to his cells is irreversible; while his powers return, his body is failing. Clark is dying. Worse, the solar energy released by his body has come under the control of a madman who believes himself Superman. In a final battle, Clark just barely manages to stop the false Superman with the help of the 1985 Superman -- who brings Clark's dying body back to the JLA just in time for Wonder Woman to tell her lover good-bye.

So why did DC take such crazy chances with the NEW 52 Superman all of a sudden? Because they were going to kill him.

TRUTH is a magnificent storyline. Beautifully illustrated. Splendidly coordinated -- except for the fact that it was inexplicably released out of order. First, we get the comics with Superman depowered (why?) with his identity public (because?) and then after that, the storyline explaining how this came to pass was released. Utterly baffling. I stayed far, far away from TRUTH until it was all done and I could read it in order.

It was great. Brilliantly edited: one writer handled Superman being exposed; one writer handled a depowered Clark struggling with Wonder Woman; one writer handled Clark struggling to earn money and carry on being Superman even when diminished. And the finale -- he dies saving lives. Beautiful.

But I wondered: what now?

ACTION COMICS #952 has Luthor publicly mourning Superman's death and declaring that he will be the new Superman -- only to be confronted by the 1985 Superman flying in to reclaim his name and shield. Superman is dead. Superman has returned.

... I don't even know what to make of that last one, but I will say that the SUPERMAN titles really found their feet after two years of screwing around. It's kind of horrifying to me, however, that DC had to be willing to kill this incarnation of SUPERMAN before they could bring themselves to tell worthwhile stories with him.

I cannot fathom why they went to the trouble to make Clark in his mid-20s instead of his mid-30s only to go and bring the mid-30s version back and have him as a father. But still. This was an awkward run that suddenly became a brilliant run and leaves me eager to see what's next.

3,937

(5 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Basically, in general, what are any thoughts you have at all about publishing a book? smile

My opinion: until I get feedback from you regarding SLIDERS REBORN: "Revolution" (5), my advice to you will be limited in the extreme.










































Oh, fine. I'd say that what you seem to be looking for is manuscript critiques. This woman is pretty good -- http://www.nicolewintersauthor.com/manuscript-critiques -- although you may want to do your own research. The main problem with editors -- any editor, really -- is that you need to find an editor who will (a) understand the story you want to tell and (b) help you tell it effectively and meaningfully. Unfortunately, the industry and the Internet is filled with editors who instead find fault with your material because it is (a) not the material they themselves would produce and (b) not done in the style they themselves would use.

A good editor is able to set aside the majority of their preferences and prejudices and examine the art the artist is trying to produce instead of the art the editor wishes the artist would produce. A good editor examines target audience, readability and comprehensibility within that audience and for every criticism raised, they offer a specific, actionable solution.

I admit that my own experience with editors have been someone troubled. Some have provided vague, theoretical advice that is impossible to apply in any concrete way. Some provide advice that consists largely of seeking to replace my story with their story. Some protest that my material does not voice their personal views and opinions with the perspective that any work that doesn't reinforce their beliefs is inherently deficient.

Some editors have provided specific, clear thoughts on how to make plots, exposition, dialogue and scenes clearer, simpler, more effective and more impactful. Some have provided suggestions on how to reorganize material in order to prevent confusion and achieve immersion in the content. Some have simply provided content to be integrated into the story. And some have read 10 pages and declared that all 350 should be rewritten. So, when dealing with opinions coming from people who are not necessarily skilled in editing, one has to pick and choose but with a clear set of criteria as to what advice is helpful and what advice is not.

There is also a heavy responsibility on the writer to be clear in communicating what it is they want to achieve, because if they can't explain that they want to do a comic book version of SLIDERS that recognizes every aspect of the series including the TV episodes, the comics, the trading cards, the fanfic and the unused pitches and scripts, one cannot fault the editor for looking at a plot outline of incomprehensible continuity references and empty action setpieces and advising the route of a clean reboot with no continuity at all. I trust you understand.

3,938

(354 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

We could probably just read the transcripts of story conferences we've had out loud -- like where you say that SLIDERS REBORN is not canon, cannot possibly be canon, will never be canon and that Wade is dead god damn it and I say that technically every fanfic is canon, all co-existing on the same multidimensional axis in some form and "Requiem" point-blank establishes that Wade is alive.

3,939

(19 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I must confess that I am deeply displeased with how my appearance on the LOIS & CLARK podcast turned out. Discussions of great import were cut from the final product, discussions that were edited out. As a responsible message board poster, I feel I must share these passages that were hidden from you all for reasons too insidious to contemplate.

TOM: " ... welcome, ireactions!"
ME: "Thanks, Tom, thanks for having me here."

[ ... ]

TOM: "So what's your take on how Lois and Lex get engaged and have their wedding so suddenly and so soon?"
ME: "Well -- I think it's something that's peculiar to 90s shows. If you look at SLIDERS, 'Luck of the Draw' has Rembrandt as a goofy, silly, funny everyman who doesn't have a lot of dark edges. But then with Season 2's premiere, he's suddenly firing shotguns, fending off swords, threatening to kill bounty hunters -- even Cleavant Derricks was a bit put off by that. But it goes to show how with 90s shows, development had to take place abruptly because there was no controlling what order in which the show would be aired."
CORY: "Right, right. But getting to back to Lois and Lex -- I mean, they've dated in a few episodes, but Lex popping the question is so sudden."
ME: "It really brings to mind the episode 'Obsession' where Derek Bond immediately asks Wade to marry him. It's a story that ideally would take several episodes, but in the 90s, you have to get to the point -- get into the story and get yourself out within a single episode. It's also a format where sometimes, subplots don't really develop as much as they're reiterated, put in sleep mode, then reiterated, then brought to the forefront. For example, the Quinn/Wade romance was a really big deal in Season 1 -- but then between episodes, Wade and Quinn are suddenly platonic and there's no jealousy or longing until "Obsession" -- when Quinn is crazy jealous over Derek Bond -- but even then, it could just be construed as Quinn not wanting Wade to leave sliding. But I think SLIDERS did a really nice job of handling it where even if the episodes couldn't do progressive, sequential, ongoing character development, every episode finds insight into the characters."
CORY: "What the fuck is going on?"
TOM: "I dunno -- I dunno! Look, man -- we're talking LOIS & CLARK here -- "
ME: "Oh. Oh, yeah! Yeah! Well, this is still relevant to the format of 90s shows, but yeah, okay -- I'm ready to give my total and undivided attention to LOIS & CLARK.
CORY: "Jesus Christ."
TOM: "Relax! Relax! We'll sort this out in editing. So, now on Lois and Lex... "

[...]

CORY: " ... and the thing is with the investigation into Lex, they do so well with finding out everything they need to arrest him, you wonder why they never did it sooner."
TOM: "I know, right? I mean, this whole time, the untouchable Luthor was totally touchable, they just need to retcon in a couple people Luthor's bribed and blackmail them into testifying."
ME: "Well, not all retcons are bad. Some can be quite beneficial. For example, in the Pilot, it's established that Quinn's dad died when he was a teenager. But as the series progressed, this shifted with Quinn's dad having died when Quinn was 10 - 11. And I think the reason why -- Quinn was scripted as a socially awkward geek, but Jerry didn't play that at all -- instead playing Quinn with full force charisma. So the script is saying that Quinn is socially isolated, but the acting is saying the opposite. And it leads to a really multi-faceted character because it means that Quinn is alone because he wants to be alone. And that's why 'The Guardian,' written by the creator of the show, the same guy who wrote the Pilot to say Quinn's dad died when he was in his late teens -- changed it to say Quinn's dad died when he was 10 - 11 -- to make it really traumatizing and to justify why Quinn chooses isolation. And that's the product of many 90s shows where they don't have the benefit of long-term planning and they often need to retroactively declare the plan was there all along."
TOM: "What?!"
CORY: "You know we're done with the SLIDERS podcasts, right? I mean, you heard the last one, didn't you?"
TOM: "Why does everything come back to SLIDERS with you? I mean, we did it, we liked it, but come on! We've moved on! We move on!"
ME: "Yeah, the concept of moving on is something SLIDERS always seemed to struggle with, like the character exits where they made it impossible to watch subsequent episodes without seeing how they reflected on the Professor's death and Wade's off-camera exit -- "
TOM: "Oh for fuck's sake."
ME: "The difficulty of writing characters out while in episodic television is that they chose methods that demanded reversal or follow-up whereas -- "
CORY: "So, I figure we can cut him off now or we can cut him off in the editing stage."
TOM: "Has he said ANYTHING related to LOIS & CLARK?"
CORY: "Uh. I think I could probably edit the bits and pieces of his stuff involving LOIS & CLARK into something halfway coherent and then -- "
TOM: "ireactions! Thanks for being here! We'll talk to you real soon."
ME: "Oh, thanks, guys! Thanks for having me. Can't wait to come on again!"
CORY: " ... yeah... "

And they cut out all that stuff! I've never been so offended in all my life.


























(I'm kidding.)

3,940

(1,098 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

For me, the character of Batman is fundamentally optimistic, declaring that our traumas and tragedies will not overwhelm and destroy us but in fact inspire us to do good. In contrast, Frank Miller subsumed Batman into his own miserably self-loathing personality, using Batman to personify Miller's own mindset -- Miller's fetishism for prostitutes, Miller's obsession with violence, Miller's addictions.

The real Batman would not become a bitter old drunk who gets off on violence and dominating others in some pointless fight. The real Batman would accept that he had gotten old and find a successor, a new generation of heroes to inspire and tutor with his knowledge, experience and wisdom. I don't dispute that Miller is a talented visual storyteller, but he doesn't tell Batman stories, he tells Frank Miller stories and the world at large doesn't really know the difference. Sadly.

3,941

(4 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Informant wrote:

That said, some of the lessons on the show are pretty horrible. Explaining elections is fine, but arguing for lowering the voting age without teaching kids why voting is for adults is just sloppy.

This criticism is complete and total horseshit. Shame on GIRL MEETS WORLD for having characters who do not share your values and political perspectives! My God, it's so uncharacteristic for children to feel they should have the right to vote. How dare any TV show not reflect Informant's views! You god-damn egomaniac.

But upon sedate contemplation, I must concede that there's a fair point in this. Senator Davis Graham, whom Eric is running against, is shown to have the political skills of a cabbage and given all the depth of a junk mail pamphlet. By reducing him to a complete villain (guy who stole government funds to give to his country club pals, wants to charge children for using public parks), the episode missed out on a chance to examine pragmatic realism versus Eric Matthews being an idealistic nutjob.

A more nuanced, Dan Harmon-esque approach to this episode might have been to have Graham portrayed as a completely reasonable, even mostly ethical politician who has settled for doing some good in exchange for doing some bad while Eric is portrayed as a pie-in-the-sky ineffectual whose campaign team of children wins the election based on the cutesy novelty of a public image where the kids are fighting a corrupt old man when the truth is this is as cynical a media manipulation as any political campaign.

Informant wrote:

I just watched an episode where arts programs are being cut and the kids face off against the evil adults who want to cut them. They win in the end, but I still don't like the lesson. In the real world, money has to come from somewhere. Hard decisions have to be made, whether we like them or not. Keeping arts programs might mean taking money from books, school suppies or even food for less privileged kids. I know it is a kid show, but why tell these stories dishonestly? It is a bad lesson at that point.

This criticism is complete and total horseshit. Oh, so a show isn't being honest if it doesn't represent YOUR pet themes and YOUR particular ideals. Shame on a show for having characters who aren't mouthpieces for you and your belief that arts aren't worth money.

But upon sedate contemplation, I must concede that there's a fair point in this. The episode never actually offers a financial solution to a financial problem, only the sentiment that arts education is WORTH IT and that SOMETHING has to be done.

A more nuanced, Dan Harmon-esque solution would have been to have the school administrators raise all of Informant's points -- that keeping art means losing lunch -- and for the kids to come up with examples of how the art projects actually require a grasp of math, science, history, politics, engineering and social studies in order to be meaningful -- in which case, an art component is built into each of the hard academic sections of their education, taking a small portion from each of those budgets to keep the art classes going, albeit with the grade requirements necessitating the participation of the language, history, math and science teachers.

3,942

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I think it is CRAZY premature to start saying that anyone other than Calista Flockhart is going to be on the show less. There have been no announcements whatsoever for the rest and three of these new hires are recurring, not regular. I'm not saying it won't happen because we don't know, but talking about it like it's a certainty as opposed to a theory is too far. I know Informant WANTS to see less of Chyler Leigh, but that's a different discussion. ;-)

3,943

(1,098 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

GIRL MEETS WORLD is one of my favourite shows although I don't see it as a TV series as much as a junior high stageplay that for some reason has a professional crew and soundstage. Therefore, my standards for it are extremely low.

I don't think that Marvel has ever produced anything that is sold in bookstores with the same cache and cultural penetration as THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS or WATCHMEN. I mean, I love NEW X-MEN and Matt Fraction's IRON MAN and J. Michael Straczynski's AMAZING SPIDER-MAN and Mark Waid's FANTASTIC FOUR and NEW AVENGERS and CIVIL WAR and SPIDER-ISLAND, and I do think you could analyze all of them deeply and meaningfully, but DARK KNIGHT RETURNS is renowned and famous in a way most comics and Marvel's arent.

That said, I think THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS sucks. I think it completely fails to understand Batman at all and was just significant because it was such a well-promoted contrast to the sixties TV show. A far better portrayal of Batman in old age is BATMAN BEYOND.

3,944

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I really can't see Tom playing the same Superman he did on SMALLVILLE. If he played Clark on Superman, I think it'd be a bit like how THE FLASH portrays an older Barry Allen (Henry) looking like the same actor who played Barry in the 1990s or how the SUPERMAN comics use Christopher Reeve's likeness now and then. I wouldn't mix the aesthetics of using Tom with the continuity of Tom's previous SUPERMAN series.

3,945

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Hey, I'm not trying to sort out Tom Welling's career here, Informant! I just want a good Superman and Tom is available!

Sorry. I forgot I don't work on this show.

On a side note -- Brandon Routh was almost Superman in MAN OF STEEL. If they'd retained him, every supporting actor around him would have changed. I wonder how that would have felt.

3,946

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Informant wrote:

Having Tom play Superman would be weird. Kara doesn't just look different. His Kara looks like Indigo. His Lara looks like Eliza Danvers. His Curtis Knox (who was pretty much Vandal Savage) looks like Jeremiah Danvers. Jimmy Olsen is suddenly black. Cat Grant, Lucy Lane and the General have new faces.

Despite being someone who obsessed over finding a solid explanation for why Jerry O'Connell and Robert Floyd both play Quinn Mallory without looking the same -- I just wouldn't worry about this. At all.

3,947

(5 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

LAURIE: "Mom, open his gift for you -- "
ME: "Yeah, open mine!"
HENRIETTA: "Oh my -- this is my favourite wine! How did you know this is my favourite wine?"
LAURIE: "I asked you and texted him and he bought it."
HENRIETTA: "How did you FIND it!?"
ME: "The Internet. And driving. I'm glad you're happy with it!"
HENRIETTA: "You don't know how happy this makes me -- "
ME: "Yeah, but that's only because I don't understand anything about alcohol."
HENRIETTA: "Well. Imagine your favourite SLIDERS."
ME: "Huh?"
LAURIE: "Imagine your favourite episode -- that fucking episode you never shut up about, the one where time runs backwards or some shit -- and think of it with a high-definition transfer on blu-ray with all the effects redone seamlessly and with some extended scenes and also a director and writer's commentary and imagine getting it for Christmas. That's how my mom feels now."
ME: "I get it."

3,948

(1,683 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I'd love to see Tom Welling play Superman on SUPERGIRL not in a continuity-oriented sense -- just that I think the actor does a good job of being Superman/Clark Kent (as opposed to acting) and I think he'd do an amazing job. I'd be less in favour of Brandon Routh or Henry Cavill largely because I feel those are two actors who need the special effects -- the hairstyling, the rigs, the lighting, the costume -- to be Superman. In contrast, Tom comes off as Superman just from his affable, earnest, compassionate screen presence matched with his intensely commanding physical persona.

If they can't get Tom Welling, I would like them to hire Gregory Smith who is already working on ARROW as a director. He wouldn't be the traditional image of Superman as a muscled, six foot tall figure, however -- Smith is a toothpick sort of fellow, but Superman's strength doesn't come from his muscles anyway and he could capture Superman's earnest, heartfelt sincerity and love for all.

Sliders Reborn: Revolution (5)
Trapped in a deadly situation, Quinn Mallory is confronted by a spectre of the past -- an old friend from whom he has no secrets. This interlude screenplay features the return of Mallory (Robert Floyd).

www.earthprime.com/reborn

**

This is not the finale of SLIDERS REBORN -- it's an additional chapter that I decided to add because it just felt wrong to omit the character of Mallory from REBORN after everything Robert Floyd did for the series. It was, I confess, a struggle to find some way to justify the presence of Mallory and to find a way for Mallory and Quinn to share scenes together and to figure out what it is they'd talk about. I hope it works.

I tried posting the script in this thread just as an experiment, but the word wraps didn't translate well.

3,950

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

... so, this was meant as a tribute to the actor who played Mallory -- except I doubt he'd be able to appreciate it because the story makes absolutely no sense unless you remember the Season 2 episode, "Obsession."

Well. It's called fan fiction for a reason!!!

3,951

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I have no idea how, but I imagined the Quinn/Mallory script, "Revolution," to be a very short interlude. But I fed my plain text file into the screenwriting software and it's 46 pages exactly -- the length of a 90s TV episode. How does this keep happening?

3,952

(50 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I barely remember it. I remember that I didn't hate it, that it wasn't a disaster, but that still left it quite a distance from being good.

3,953

(45 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

http://www.blastr.com/2015-2-16/matthew … -wolverine

According to Vaughn, had he stayed aboard X-MEN for a second film, that second film wouldn't have even been DAYS OF FUTURE PAST. It would have been FIRST CLASS II with a recast Wolverine, a younger actor playing him in the 70s. The plot would have involved Magneto assassinating John F. Kennedy (for real). Then his third X-MEN film would be DAYS OF FUTURE PAST with the recast Wolverine meeting Hugh Jackman.

From what I can tell, Vaughn made FIRST CLASS as a reboot, not a prequel. Hugh Jackman and Rebecca Romijn's cameos were simply easter eggs; just because SMALLVILLE uses an ice fortress and the John Williams score doesn't mean it's in continuity with Richard Donner's SUPERMAN.

However, FOX marketed the film as a prequel instead of a reboot. Vaughn intended to continue treating his sequel as a reboot, unconcerned that Wolverine joining the X-Men in the 70s would contradict him joining the gang in 2000. But then Vaughn decided to leave FIRST CLASS II to do KINGSMAN. Singer decided to do DAYS OF FUTURE PAST, the studio supported him, and the result was X-MEN: THE LAST STAND: WE TAKE IT BACK.

3,954

(45 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I guess, to me, Apocalypse seemed like someone who would be perfectly happy ruling over corpses and rubble. It struck me as a failing of the villain rather than the plot, although I suppose it could just be the latter. While I might theorize that Apocalypse planned on using Rogue, Multiple Man and Wolverine to find and heal all the injured mutants, that's not in the film.

Sebastian Shaw's plan for nuclear war in FIRST CLASS seems to have the same problem.

**

I wonder what can be done with you're a director of a film budgeted at several hundred million and you're burnt out. I wonder if Singer could have asked someone like Roland Emmerich, a veteran of mass destruction films, to work with him as a co-director to devise the big action sequences while Singer focused on the detailed characterization he's so good at. Finding a collaborator when you're tapped out isn't a bad idea.

Another response is to demote yourself, which Allison Mack did for Season 10 of SMALLVILLE where she was so exhausted from playing Chloe that she wanted to back off before her lack of interest in the role became apparent onscreen (at least that's my read on her from a podcast interview where she talked about having a midlife crisis during SMALLVILLE) -- and doing six episodes instead of 22 meant she could fake it without phoning it in.

I don't know if Singer is the sort to do that. Judging from FIRST CLASS and DAYS OF FUTURE PAST, Singer either takes full control of a project or benches himself. FIRST CLASS was more a reboot of X-MEN than a prequel. Singer was disinclined to interfere and just offered thoughts on how to make the mutant powers awe inspiring and exciting. DAYS OF FUTURE PAST was a FIRST CLASS PART II until Vaughn quit and Singer took over and decided to make it X-MEN: THE LAST STAND: PART II; he wasn't going to facilitate Vaughn's vision.

A third route is to accept that you are tired and just hack out the material, knowing that due to rushing, it will lack detail, subtext, purpose and clarity -- and then go back later and put that stuff in afterwards. Probably not an option for a film director.

3,955

(45 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Singer said in interviews that he doesn't want to do the next X-MEN movie and that he needs to do a different genre and refresh himself -- and APOCALYPSE gives me the impression that this burnout took place during as opposed to after APOCALYPSE. As for the Wolverine plot from DOFP -- the original plan was that APOCALYPSE would have Wolverine in a very central role as the team leader, much as he was central in the first three X-MEN films and DOFP.

However, scheduling and the desire to elevate Jennifer Lawrence resulted in Singer deciding to isolate Wolverine to one sequence where the kids are imprisoned in Weapon X and Wolverine helps them escape. This resulted in setting aside the idea that Mystique had saved Wolverine from Weapon X -- so presumably, she failed or was found out and had to escape without him.

**

Apocalypse's motives seemed pretty clear to me? He wanted the strongest of mutants to be the dominant species (which is in contrast to Magneto simply wanting mutants to kill their exterminators) and destroying the world would leave only the most powerful. Those who weren't equipped to survive weren't of any interest to Apocalypse anyway. A bit like Amara on SUPERNATURAL being appalled by these human rodents ruling existence instead of gods like herself.

3,956

(45 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Having rewatched X-MEN and DAYS OF FUTURE PAST -- I think the problem is that Bryan Singer is just burnt out on X-MEN but perhaps didn't realize it until APOCALYPSE was underway and it was too late to quit.

DAYS OF FUTURE PAST comes off as Singer's final statement on the series, specifically in the scene where Patrick Stewart and James McAvoy meet. The Professor tells Charles that strength comes not from refusing to feel pain but being able to bear both your own and the pain of others and that it will make Charles stronger than ever.

Then there's the blatant metatextual moments where young Charles reads Wolverine's mind, sees flashes of THE LAST STAND and ORIGINS and starts screaming, "I don't want your suffering! I don't want your future!" with compassion and empathy proving to be powerful enough to change that future to Jean Grey and Scott Summers alive and well in a future where the X-Men and their students thrive in a world without Sentinels.

And APOCALYPSE ultimately feels like it's trying to say what DAYS OF FUTURE PAST says with Xavier declaring: "Those of you are strong -- protect those who are not" -- except Singer seems to have used up all the different variations with which he used physical action, mutant superpowers and vivid fight scenes to express those values and that mindset -- or he somehow lost his sense of how to fine-tune the action to reflect these views. It feels like half the film is action and it's largely detached from characterization.

But I think, in addition to being burnt out and having already said everything he had to say about and with X-MEN, Singer also wanted to change his style for APOCALYPSE.

Having done X-MEN, X2 and DOFP as the more intimate action thrillers, he declared in Variety that for APOCALYPSE, he wanted to do a "mass destruction" superhero film that X-MEN movies had never done before. I think he wanted to do a TRANSFORMERS style X-MEN film with his skill and characters -- except this style is simply not suited to Singer's strengths as a director. He was tired out on X-MEN, he tried to reinvigorate himself with a new approach, but he's deeply unsuited to it.

Maybe he should have quit while he was ahead. It's really sad to me, because my fondness for Bryan Singer's work on THE WOLVERINE's tag scene and DAYS OF FUTURE PAST really fuelled SLIDERS REBORN. I'm currently finishing up a script featuring Quinn and Mallory and it's basically inspired by the Charles/Professor scene of DOFP. Singer's been an inspiration.

3,957

(45 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I've been re-reading X-MEN comics and I've hit the Xorn era -- really the Grant Morrison era where the civil rights metaphor of X-MEN was updated to being about youth versus age. Xorn was a fascinating creation and revealing him to be Magneto was a serious gut-punch. It's funny how this era of X-MEN wasn't really that different from a storytelling perspective.

While all the characters cast off their costumes for movie-inspired black leather and the X-Men were outed as mutants now operating in public as part of the X-Corporation -- in the end, Grant Morrison wrote his one series, NEW X-MEN, and the other titles simply carried on as they had in the past, albeit with the NEW X-MEN costumes. Wolverine continued with his solo adventures, UNCANNY X-MEN was an incoherent mess as it had been since the 90s, X-TREME X-MEN had veteran X-writer Chris Claremont doing his usual stuff -- Grant Morrison's radical reinvention of X-MEN seemed entirely restricted to NEW X-MEN.

And yet, when Morrison left the book, he seemed to have effectively told the final chapter of the X-MEN. The issues that followed struggled to reverse Morrison's finale and then floundered cluelessly for years with no direction. Xorn was particularly baffling; UNCANNY later had the X-Men find Xorn -- the real one -- suggesting that there was a real Xorn whom Magneto had been impersonating. Except this Xorn claimed to be the brother of the Xorn who'd betrayed the X-Men -- except how could Magneto's false identity have a brother? EXCALIBUR later showed that Magneto had been trapped on his island during the entire Xorn storyline, meaning the Magneto impersonating Xorn had also been impersonating Magneto.

In an issue of HOUSE OF M, Dr. Strange wondered if the Scarlet Witch's reality warping powers had caused some of the confusion here.

An issue of NEW AVENGERS later revealed, quite incomprehensibly, that Xorn (brother of Xorn-2) had joined the X-Men but then decided to falsely reveal himself as Magneto in order to unite the mutants in an army -- a line of logic so confusing that Marvel just gave up and used the HOUSE OF M explanation in the Marvel Handbook. Magneto would later declare that he wasn't Xorn, but he liked people being afraid of him and knowing that he was capable of all the things Xorn did even if Magneto hadn't done them.

Comics.

3,958

(45 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

Watching the first X-MEN movie, I'm reminded of the complaints about Bryan Singer clearly not liking the fantasy elements of X-MEN comics, eschewing the yellow spandex, the sci-fi fantasy world building, the hyperstylized action spectacle. It was incredibly ignorant; the costumes needed texture and weight to work in live action and yellow was a flickery, ugly colour on film. The grounded tone of the film made the X-Men feel like they existed in our world as opposed to a superhero universe. The combat had a sense of brutal intimacy and were expressions of the characters. The first X-MEN film also didn't have the money to do widescreen fantasy action; it was made like it was a low-budget TV drama that required imagination and creativity to work past any shortages of resources.

Looking at X-MEN APOCALYPSE, most of what made the first X-MEN special is absent. The budget has rocketed to the point where Cairo can be reduced to rubble and the X-Men battle in a devastated cityscape and the costumes can look comic book crazy now without looking like cheap Halloween costumes -- and the result is that APOCALYPSE, despite some good location shooting and Singer showing normal people react, seems to take place in an exaggerated superhero universe. The limitations that made the first X-MEN film oddly plausible in its absurdities are gone.

I still enjoyed APOCALYPSE plenty, of course, but I would have preferred that Bryan Singer stick to what he's good at -- intimate character pieces. He's not really a crazy action director.

3,959

(759 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

My friend Ellie asked me to drive her to a fashion show. I agreed but, due to a miscommunication, gave the impression that I would be joining her in the audience as models traipsed down the runway. I made it 20 minutes before the sheer tedium of this experience became too much to bear and I realized that I'd only agreed to drive her home at the end of this -- so I relocated to the hotel lobby and pulled out my computer and worked on polishing Quinn's dialogue and then remembered in "Luck of the Draw," Quinn gets bored at a fashion show and proceeds to walk out in favour of going to the library instead. He would be so proud of me.

3,960

(45 replies, posted in Sliders Bboard)

I dunno. Having read quite a bit of your writing, you seem very good at sudden tonal shifts where you can integrate absurdity into your story. I don't know if Bryan Singer is as good at it. The X-MEN films he's helmed along with the FIRST CLASS film were largely grounded in a realistic setting that just happened to have mutants. Any advanced technology existed in relation to mutants. The idea of Magneto raising a chunk of rock into orbit with a breathable atmosphere and converting it into a full fledged space station is something I would find very difficult to justify myself.

That said, Singer wants the next film in space, so you may be onto something.

Mark Millar, in ULTIMATE X-MEN, had Magneto subjected to a mindwipe where he lived as a normal human, a teacher at a school for handicapped children -- and Xavier would visit him once a month to reinforce the telepathic blocks that prevented him from accessing his memories or powers.

The only way I can justify the onscreen events -- Xavier letting Magneto traipse off into the world to have another nervous breakdown of deadly consequence -- is that Xavier let everyone think Magneto went off to his happy ending except Xavier planted a hypnotic suggestion for Magneto to return to the campus later under cover of night, hook himself up to an IV drip and remain sedated and under lock and key in the basement infirmary indefinitely. I have plenty of sympathy for Magneto, but the X-Men are crazy irresponsible to let him off the hook so easily.

I love X-23, the female Wolverine. For anyone not familiar with her -- she's River Tam from FIREFLY. With Wolverine's claws.