Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

DVD's were fine, for about a decade.  When Blu-Ray came out, many studios began intentionally degrading their DVD releases on the same product.  Disney was notorious for this, as a way of showing off how much "better" BRD was.  In fact, it wasn't THAT much better.  The bit rate, sure, but given that 4K televisions did not become the "standard" until somewhat recently, there was often not a huge reason to have blu-ray's for close to a decade themselves, on older content.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Grizzlor wrote:

DVD's were fine, for about a decade.  When Blu-Ray came out, many studios began intentionally degrading their DVD releases on the same product.  Disney was notorious for this, as a way of showing off how much "better" BRD was.  In fact, it wasn't THAT much better.  The bit rate, sure, but given that 4K televisions did not become the "standard" until somewhat recently, there was often not a huge reason to have blu-ray's for close to a decade themselves, on older content.

I wasn't aware that Disney was releasing poor bit rate DVDs (if I understand you correctly). Where can we read more about this?

Jim_Hall wrote:

I loved Early Edition too when it was running. It's been out a while on DVD. I bought it directly through the manufacturer, https://www.visualentertainment.tv/ a few weeks ago. Honestly the DVDs looks even worse than Sliders. The packaging has the DVDs in a flip book binder just setting in a large DVD case. But at least it's been released. There's the shows Roar (Heath Ledger) and Lazarus Man (Robert Urich) that are out only on DVD. Last time I look, Lazarus Man was made to order. I watched them when they aired, but I can't even remember how well I liked them. Early Edition along with Christy which I have a website for, are shows that people aren't being exposed to through streaming. Anyway, I may have to muster the no strength I have left for a 3rd fan website, for Early Edition.

I like EARLY EDITION a lot. I miss it so much. Kyle Chandler once remarked (and I'm paraphrasing), "EARLY EDITION isn't a crime show or a scary show. It's just a nice show that tells nice stories." There's something quite wonderful about the concept of a man who receives tomorrow's newspaper today and wants to do nothing more than prevent as many horrible things as he can in all the time he has.

Four seasons was a good run, and while I would have liked a fifth season, the fourth season finale of Gary learning why he was chosen to receive the paper and declaring that he wouldn't be the last -- that was a really nice way to end the series. I'm looking forward to checking out the DVD and am so glad that you randomly brought it up. Even if the video quality is less than awesome, it'd still be great to have it close by.

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

I usually go see movies with my buddy.  I will buy the tickets and then he'll buy the next ones.  Looking at my credit card bill, it looks like I spend $30.08 for two tickets including whatever fees and tax or whatever.  He and I live on opposite sides of the city so we have to sorta find a theater that works geographically and we've settled on that one.  I don't get any concessions (I will have already eaten dinner and I don't need anything that will make me have to pee in the middle).

Budgets are different for each person, but I think $15 for the opportunity to hang out with my friend and see a new release is okay with me.  Especially for situations like a) getting to experience the surprises of Deadpool and Wolverine without being spoiled or b) getting to see George Miller action on the big screen or c) experiencing a new Alien film on the big screen in a silent theater.

To me, $15 was an acceptable price for me to see MISSION IMPOSSIBLE and THE MARVELS and DEADPOOL AND WOLVERINE. There were a bunch of movies I wanted to see in theatres, but didn't muster the energy to make it: MARIO, BARBIE, LADY FRANKENSTEIN. $15 made going to those movies feel like work I was doing at my own expense whereas $8 feels like the movie theatre is meeting me halfway.

Also, while I'm sure THE SUBSTANCE with Demi Moore, MY OLD ASS with Aubrey Plaza and NEVER LET GO with Halle Berry will have interesting performances, I can't say these low to mid-budget dramas are something I need to see on a big screen for $15. But to see them upon release instead of waiting for them to reach VOD? That's worth $8 each to me.

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

I think that's a good experience.  I've also found myself watching a lot of things while I'm working or even getting my phone out while something is on.

I've had a lot of trouble watching TV I'm eager to see because I keep using it as background noise. Sometimes, I prefer to have something I don't like all that much so that I don't need to give it too much attention. During a particularly tiring bout of data entry recently, I watched two Aurora Teagarden Hallmark Mystery movies which have such poor dramatic range and a total lack of subtextual scripting... which is great because I can follow the story despite missing one out of three lines of dialogue.

As a result, it somehow took me a year to watch the final season of THE MARVELOUS MRS. MAISEL because I only wanted to watch it when I was giving it my undivided attention.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

ireactions wrote:
Grizzlor wrote:

DVD's were fine, for about a decade.  When Blu-Ray came out, many studios began intentionally degrading their DVD releases on the same product.  Disney was notorious for this, as a way of showing off how much "better" BRD was.  In fact, it wasn't THAT much better.  The bit rate, sure, but given that 4K televisions did not become the "standard" until somewhat recently, there was often not a huge reason to have blu-ray's for close to a decade themselves, on older content.

I wasn't aware that Disney was releasing poor bit rate DVDs (if I understand you correctly). Where can we read more about this?

Well, the first thing to look at would be what "extras" are on the discs?  For several years, DVD's mostly were sold with simple audio commentary track(s), trailers, a limited menu, and maybe a few deleted scenes.  This required minimal disc space.  Some studios like Warner Brothers often printed double-sided discs, one for widescreen and one for pan & scan.  After that first "wave," studios decided that they could start releasing other editions like director's cut, blah blah blah.  Yet, these would need to be additional discs in the case, so really no change.  With the advent of the blu-ray, and its well over 5x capacity increase from DVD, you could fit a larger film file (1080p) encoded at a higher bit rate.  However, you could also offer additional cuts, extras, and newly produced bonus content like interviews and documentaries, all on a single disc.  Well, when the studios go to sell them early on, they can't simply sell a blu-ray release, especially of a new film, you had to release a DVD or you'd lose out on millions of customers.  Since the DVD now needed to fit some (not all) of the litany of BRD extras, the studio would often sacrifice DVD bit rate to squeeze it on there.   Granted, many releases simply put the extras onto a second disc, but that's a cost associated.  Frankly, producing new bonus content wound up being a waste of money, as studies found the vast majority of it went unwatched. 

Now, obviously how the particularly movie you bought on DVD 15 years ago was shipped, in terms of extras and # of discs, etc., varied on a case by case basis. 

There are videophiles complaining incessantly on Reddit about 4K releases, and the type of BluRay disc being used.  They go crazy about whether a studio compresses to fit on a cheaper disc, when in fact the human eye is never going to discern the difference.  Perhaps in a screen capture, but who cares?  In fact, when they came out, people were screaming about how the studios often just took the DVD stream, and upscaled it, and sold you a 1080p version of an old film that your TV probably could have upscaled similarly, ha ha ha. 

The other issue is that many of the old forums and websites have vanished, but here's one where a customer was annoyed that Disney cheaped out and stuck too much on a single disc, and fouled up the video quality.

https://www.avsforum.com/threads/disney … tby=newest

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

To be honest I'm surprised so many 4K discs are still being produced, especially when the 4K players are outrageously priced. I bought two players, one $420 and the other $250. I figure 4K is the last resolution that will be ever be adopted. However I'm using a 5K iMac and the difference between reading text is like night and day. That's at desktop viewing distance though. I don't think many people would even watch a 5K TV that close. It'd be useless anyway because lack of content.

I've been buying 4K discs saying, yep, that'll be the last time I ever buy that movie again. One of the pros of buying a 4K disc is a wider color gamut than blu-ray. I don't see how they can improve on it anymore, because as Grizzlor stated your eye can only perceive so much.

slidecage.com
Twitter @slidersfanblog
Instagram slidersfanblog

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Grizzlor wrote:

DVD now needed to fit some (not all) of the litany of BRD extras, the studio would often sacrifice DVD bit rate to squeeze it on there.   Granted, many releases simply put the extras onto a second disc, but that's a cost associated.  Frankly, producing new bonus content wound up being a waste of money, as studies found the vast majority of it went unwatched.

That's unfortunate!

To me, I think of how the Universal DVD release of SLIDERS looks shockingly poor on DVD for Episodes 102 - 109, but if played on a CRT television, I don't think anyone could tell that those episodes looked any blurrier than the pilot or the subsequent seasons. I also doubt poor DVD bit rate was a problem until HD televisions started reaching 75 percent of homes by 2013, at which point DVD was already too low a resolution for the screen, and overcompression would make it worse. However, by 2015, it was pretty clear that DVD was going to fade in favour of streaming and, if anyone really wanted physical media, blu-ray for collectors.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Jim_Hall wrote:

To be honest I'm surprised so many 4K discs are still being produced, especially when the 4K players are outrageously priced. I bought two players, one $420 and the other $250. I figure 4K is the last resolution that will be ever be adopted. However I'm using a 5K iMac and the difference between reading text is like night and day. That's at desktop viewing distance though. I don't think many people would even watch a 5K TV that close. It'd be useless anyway because lack of content.

There's still revenue to be had there, and the studios want it, particularly on new releases.  I still don't even own a 4K television!

ireactions wrote:
Grizzlor wrote:

DVD now needed to fit some (not all) of the litany of BRD extras, the studio would often sacrifice DVD bit rate to squeeze it on there.   Granted, many releases simply put the extras onto a second disc, but that's a cost associated.  Frankly, producing new bonus content wound up being a waste of money, as studies found the vast majority of it went unwatched.

That's unfortunate!

To me, I think of how the Universal DVD release of SLIDERS looks shockingly poor on DVD for Episodes 102 - 109, but if played on a CRT television, I don't think anyone could tell that those episodes looked any blurrier than the pilot or the subsequent seasons. I also doubt poor DVD bit rate was a problem until HD televisions started reaching 75 percent of homes by 2013, at which point DVD was already too low a resolution for the screen, and overcompression would make it worse. However, by 2015, it was pretty clear that DVD was going to fade in favour of streaming and, if anyone really wanted physical media, blu-ray for collectors.

Don't knock the CRT!  HA HA HA.  Oh there are entire communities, of which I am part of one on Fartbook, devoted to our oversized, aging, yet reliable friends.  Mainly their preservation, so when we find one on the curb or a curb-listing, we try to get them, and offer them up to others.  As with arcade monitors, there are no CRT factories remaining on the planet.  There is nothing quite like playing old school video games in front of the glow of the cathode ray tube!  Many of those aficionados watch literally everything on them, ha ha, something I myself would not dare.  But if you can find one of the "HD" CRT's that were sold in the 2000s, and were widescreen, they are very popular with those folks.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Last night, in the depths of despair over how I can't properly upscale "Summer of Love" to "Luck of the Draw", I started looking on Kijiji for used CRTs. I saw one for $15 USD. Then I realized that while I have $15 USD, I have absolutely nowhere sensible to put a CRT television set because anywhere it could go is already occupied by a modern TV.

I've a really interesting program called ShaderGlass. https://mausimus.itch.io/shaderglass

It casts an overlay over the screen of a Windows PC, which you can apply to different windows or make fullscreen. It makes your screen mimic a cathode ray tube television with the dot pattern and the screen curvature and the crushed blacks. ShaderGlass made "Luck of the Draw" look like it did in 1995 for the first time since I'd thrown out my old CRT. And unlike an actual CRT, ShaderGlass doesn't cost or weigh anything or take up any physical space.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

ireactions wrote:

Awhile ago, Temporal Flux recommended this 2020 series called ZOEY'S EXTRAORDINARY PLAYLIST, a musical series set in San Francisco featuring one of my favourite actresses, the assertive and sardonic Jane Levy. I watched the first episode and... refused to watch more. Mainly because it was such a lavishly shot, high budget series that I did not want to watch it on my little 10.4 inch Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 tablet at the time, the screen on which I was watching most TV shows. Something as elaborate and visually sumptuous as ZOEY'S EXTRAORDINARY PLAYLIST needed to be watched on a full-size television.

I'm trying to find some time to watch it now, over two years since it was cancelled on a cliffhanger and resolved in a movie length special.

Eight months later, I finally finished ZOEY'S EXTRAORDINARY PLAYLIST, which was cancelled on its Season 2 cliffhanger finale and then resolved in a feature length Roku-streamed Christmas special, ZOE'S EXTRAORDINARY PLAYLIST.

It was really good. It provided both a climax and conclusion to the ongoing threads of the series, while simultaneously leaving some room for development should there ever be a follow up in the future.

I wonder what SLIDERS would have been like if Robert K. Weiss' 2000-era bid for a feature film had ever come to pass.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Anyone watch Terminator Zero on Netflix?

I don't love anime, but I think it's a pretty interesting story.  Almost all of Terminator is set in Los Angeles, and it's interesting to see the perspective of another location.  I have three episodes left, but I like it so far.

I also rewatched the original Terminator.  I forgot how much damage the Terminator takes.  He's not invincible, and he's pretty roughed up even before he gets blown up.  It ended up being a bit more realistic than I remembered - he's strong and doesn't stop, but he takes damage from car wrecks and falls.  I feel like some of that got lost as the series continued.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Afraid not, the last anime I watched, needed to force myself to get through it, which was the one for Supernatural.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Yeah I have trouble connecting with the artwork, but I can get through it if the story is good.  And this story is pretty solid - after 40 years of Terminator stuff, it's a fresh look at the franchise.  They also take advantage of the fact that the Terminator is in a place where it isn't as easy to get guns.  So he has to improvise a bit more.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I thoroughly enjoy the artwork, animation style, effects they use.  The problem is the pacing.  Everything is so dark, and ultra slow.  Often the translations don't work well with the scenes, although I could assume this one is alright considering the production value.  The pacing is kind of what has soured my viewing of most of the Star Wars saga on Disney+.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Yeah I understand that.  I do think they can be slow.

This one is 8 25-minute episodes.  I guess some of it could probably be cut but they try to do character development, and that means situations like the movies where the terminator shows up and then they escape.

I don't know, give it a shot if you're interested.  I'm curious what people think about it.

614 (edited by ireactions 2024-09-11 19:22:52)

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I'm looking forward to seeing it. I mean, having sat through all of the TERMINATOR movies, I might as well weather through whatever this is, although I've heard good things.

Another piece of TERMINATOR writing I'd like to finish reading: a fan wrote 28 (!!) screenplays wrapping up THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES with a virtual Season 3 of 22 episodes and a virtual Season 4 of five episodes and a feature length finale screenplay. I've read the first one and it's precisely the show I remember, from Josh Friedman's sardonic and militaristic tone to the omnipresent shadow of war and violence over every scene.

https://tib.cjcs.com/terminator-the-con … c-project/

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I didn't know where to put this (maybe we need to rename the DC Threads to CW/Arrowverse and DCU) but I decided to put this here because it's technically not DC related.  But I watched Rebel Ridge on Netflix, and the star of that (Aaron Pierre) has been cast as John Stewart in the Lanterns show.  Not only is the movie really engrossing and entertaining, but I think he's great in it.  I think he also has really powerful eyes that almost look "Green Lantern-y" in certain angles, and I think he's gonna be really good.  I know there's some criticism that he's not a dark-skinned person like John Stewart is traditionally, but I think he's gonna do great.

If you're interested in Lanterns, I think checking out some of the movie will make you feel great about the casting.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Which threads do you want renamed to what?

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

We have two DC threads:

DC Superheroes on TV (CW & HBO Max)
DC Superheroes in Film (Theatrical and Streaming)

This is just one stupid man's opinion, but I worry that there might be some confusion with the HBO Max part of that because Lanterns is DCU but is TV and will air on Max.  I think it makes more organizational sense to have all the James Gunn stuff in one place particularly since they'll all tie together.  So my recommendation would be to have one thread for Arrowverse/non-DCU and the other for the DCU (Theatrical and Streaming) but as I'm typing this out that might not be any less confusing.

Like I said I'm a stupid man big_smile

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Well, I just started a new thread for the James Gunn era: https://sliders.tv/bboard/viewtopic.php?id=487

All DC TV shows and animated productions from 1966 - 2024 can be discussed in the newly named DC Superheroes on TV & Streaming (1966 - 2024) thread: https://sliders.tv/bboard/viewtopic.php?id=67

All DC feature films from 1943 - 2024 can be discussed in the DC Superheroes in Film (1943 - 2024) thread: https://sliders.tv/bboard/viewtopic.php?id=60

We can talk about SMALLVILLE here: https://sliders.tv/bboard/viewtopic.php?id=167

I hope that isn't too confusing. I'm already having to make exceptions:

  • The 1966 BATMAN film is discussed in the 1966 - 2024 TV thread (because it launched from the TV show)

  • THE BATMAN (2022) is discussed in the 2025 thread (because its sequel will be produced by James Gunn and we may as well cover the first installment in the same thread)

  • THE SUICIDE SQUAD (2021) and PEACEMAKER's first season in 2022 are also part of the 2025 thread (because both are James Gunn projects).

If someone has a better idea, lay it out and I'll see what can be done.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I'm not sure if the old Continuum thread was lost but I was pleasantly surprised to find it on tubi in the u.s. tonight. All four seasons.  It has been elusive to find since leaving Netflix 6 or 7 years ago.  But it's streaming for free in the u.s. now on tubi.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I would appreciate it if you would watch Season 3 and tell me what the hell is going on because I could not understand it.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

ireactions wrote:

I would appreciate it if you would watch Season 3 and tell me what the hell is going on because I could not understand it.


Ha.  Well you've always been much better on details as me.

I never finished the series when it was streaming on netflix, so I can't recall how far I got.  I just remember feeling like I was watching a believable world, with fully thought out, well-constructed logic that was very much grounded in a speculative sort of reality.   It didn't feel artificial or convenient.  It felt real, despite the drama and the science fiction.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I liked the show too. I just... got lost with Season 3. I couldn't understand it.

Season 4 was more coherent and good, but I'm still very confused about year 3.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

did anyone know about this?

https://uk.strangerthingsonstage.com

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Posting for grizzled
https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/1 … hollywood/

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

Posting for grizzled
https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/1 … hollywood/

Ha, yes she's into "psychedelic-assisted therapy" now, and campaigned to legalize psychedelics in some manner in Mass, which did not pass.  Her socials basically came to life after years of inactivity, a month ago.  The career path is not a surprise, as she's wanted to go in that direction for as long as I've known her, which was partly what her mother's group was doing in Africa, minus the mushrooms.  Obviously I'm happy that she's happy and seems to be going strong.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Grizzlor wrote:
RussianCabbie_Lotteryfan wrote:

Posting for grizzled
https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/1 … hollywood/

Ha, yes she's into "psychedelic-assisted therapy" now, and campaigned to legalize psychedelics in some manner in Mass, which did not pass.  Her socials basically came to life after years of inactivity, a month ago.  The career path is not a surprise, as she's wanted to go in that direction for as long as I've known her, which was partly what her mother's group was doing in Africa, minus the mushrooms.  Obviously I'm happy that she's happy and seems to be going strong.

I'm glad she's independently wealthy now and could pursue her interests.  At least she doesn't have the financial pressure to have to act anymore, and can explore stuff like this.  It does seem like she's had quite a life.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

THE BIG BANG THEORY had a prequel series, YOUNG SHELDON, which now has a spinoff, GEORGIE AND MANDY'S FIRST MARRIAGE. Georgie, a cheery Southern mechanic, first appeared on THE BIG BANG THEORY played by Jerry O'Connell.

On YOUNG SHELDON, Georgie is a teenager played by Montana Jackson, who now is the lead of GEORGIE AND MANDY'S FIRST MARRIAGE. Georgie is a 19 year old high school dropout who gets the late 20s Mandy (Emily Osment) pregnant in a one night stand. Georgie immediately drops every frivolous pursuit in life to support his baby and Mandy, for whom Georgie is head over heels in love. One of their supports is Jim, the father of Mandy who is played by Will Sasso (Gomez Calhoun).

So, if you ever felt the need to watch young Quinn and Gomez as pseudo father and son, here you are. Emily Osment is splendid too.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

So, we now know how Dexter is alive and how the ending of NEW BLOOD is undone.

Spoilers: https://www.tvinsider.com/1166482/dexte … n-preview/

I wonder what Slider_Quinn21 makes of this. I have never seen the show, but this whole situation fascinates me.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I desperately need to know what Slider_Quinn21 thinks of how NEW BLOOD has been undone.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Ha I've spent no time thinking about it, but I'll give it some thought and get back to you tomorrow smile

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I can only hope that so many of our favorite actors, actresses, directors, writers, producers, and crew members, who have brought us so many wonderful movies and television shows, will be safe through this horrendous Los Angeles area fires.  Many prominent celebrities have already lost their homes in a matter of moments.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I was writing some fanfic for the MTV TV show SCREAM and I had... a painful moment with the series lead, Emma Duval (Willa Fitzgerald).

EMMA: "You've been playing me, this entire time; you've been playing with me!"

ME: "No. No, that's not true. You're my friend, Emma. I care about you, I wouldn't hurt you."

EMMA: "You killed my mother! You killed Audrey! You killed Noah and Gina and Stavo's father and all those cops! You had the power to stop that; you had the power to change all of it! The first go around with Piper Shaw! The legacy she left that Kieran kept going! You let me think Audrey was out to kill me; you let Riley and Zoe and Rachel die and for what? Entertainment? Because, what, I'm your favorite show? Why didn't you just snap your fingers and end it? Or reverse it!?"

ME: "That. Is not. And never has been how it works."

EMMA: "Oh, isn't it? What about SLIDERS? Quinn Mallory was gone. Wade Welles was dead. Professor Arturo was dead! Rembrandt Brown, fate unknown! I've read SLIDERS REBORN. You helped write those fanfics. You saved the sliders. You brought them all back to life and you brought them all home! How could you love me as much as you say you do and not do all of that for me!? You can bring all my friends back to life! You owe me that! You owe us all that!"

ME: (oddly calm detachment) "I... don't. I can't give you that... and I don't owe you that."

(Emma is disgusted.)

ME: "I am... a fan fiction writer. I examine a fictional reality and I observe its rules and bindings and I must operate within them. (very cautiously) And in your world... get stabbed? Shock, organ damage and blood loss. (carefully) Cut in the throat? Asphyxia and air embolism. (soft) Caught in an explosion? Burns if not complete immolation. (gentle) Return to the town where the local serial killer has been biding his time and waiting? The risk of death increases exponentially. (sad) Targeted by four serial killers over the span of six years? The risk of death increases even more. I can change things within the rules of your reality... but I can't... I can't change the rules themselves. And for that... I am truly sorry."

(Emma slaps me in the face. I stare at Emma sadly, refusing to flinch or look away. Emma slaps me again and walks away.)

ME: (quietly) "I'm counting myself lucky she didn't shoot me or throw me off a balcony."

(Quinn Mallory approaches.)

QUINN: "Are you alright?"

ME: "No."

QUINN: "You know what I'm going to tell you."

ME: "I don't."

QUINN: "Yes you do. I'm going to remind you that I exist in a science fiction fantasy where reality is malleable and changeable. You can create reality-warping machines that alter life and death and reverse the course of events and roll them back to an earlier point of reality. You can create new universes to restore what's been lost. You can use every loophole in every clause to bring me back. And I'm going to remind you that Emma Duval exists in the world of a somewhat meta-aware slasher horror television series called SCREAM where those loopholes that you use to save your fictional friends are significantly more limited and highly curtailed by physical realities that my world can set aside."

ME: "I know."

QUINN: "So... I'm going to ask you to remember all of that."

ME: "Please... please forgive me."

QUINN: "I'm going to ask you to forgive yourself for not being a god."

**

ME: "Emma, please. It's not like that. With Quinn... there are so many levers of power and strings to pull. Combines and alternate realities. With you... I don't have as many. I stacked the deck in your favour in every way I could. I didn't kill your friends. I failed to save them. There's a difference."

EMMA: "I know. I know."

ME: "Forgive me?"

EMMA: "Okay."

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

ME: "As a fanfic author, I'd like to bring something to your attention."

EMMA: "Oh God."

ME: "What was the last thing you ate before you engaged in your current quest to take down a serial killer once and for all?"

EMMA: "Toast."

ME: "What was the last thing you drank?"

EMMA: "Coffee. One cup."

ME: "Are you aware that this one slice of toast and this one cup of coffee was 60 hours ago? And that you haven't eaten since then and you haven't had so much as a glass of water as you've run around Pennsylvania and Louisiana hunting the Lakewood Slasher?"

EMMA: "Wait, what?"

ME: "Also -- the last time you performed your ablutions, how long did you spend brushing your hair and applying makeup?"

EMMA: "Like ten minutes. Hey, what do you mean -- "

ME: "So: 60 hours ago, you combed your hair and applied makeup and you had one peace of toast and one cup of coffee; you then began searching for the Lakewood Slasher and dodged several attacks and fought him twice and during all this time, your 10 minutes of hair and skin care remains completely intact without a single touchup. You haven't eaten a single meal or drank any fluids in two and a half days, and yet, you haven't collapsed from hunger or dehydration. You haven not slept for 60 hours; you're as energetic as though you just woke up. You were in a car crash at the 45 hour mark and emerged with the full agility of an Olympic athlete and your hair and makeup have not changed. Have you even needed to go to the washroom since breakfast?"

EMMA: "No!"

ME: "And you're aware; you look like Willa Fitzgerald. You have almost no body fat to draw on for reserves, so the fact that you're in perfect fighting trim on no food or water or sleep and don't have a hair out of place -- well, it might suggest that your fanfic author is excusing you from certain human fragilities. And that your writer is more on your side than you think."

EMMA: "Okay, okay. But you realize: even if I never get tired, being awake for 60 hours of mayhem and violence has driven me pretty close to insane."

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

my heart skipped a beat

https://twitter.com/DocBrownLloyd/statu … 2137244880

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Has anyone seen NBC's Siberia?

I loved this show!

https://www.cancelledscifi.com/2025/03/ … eria-2013/

https://tubitv.com/tv-shows/527529/s01-e101-pilot

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

No in depth analysis here. No spoilers. Just a 'what has DMD watched lately.' Not an exhaustive list. I've had a lot of time to watch TV lately.

The Good
Severance - love this series, but no idea where they can go with it next season
The Pitt - A+ no ER clone, not that ER wasn't a great series in its own right
Paradise - I'd heard there was a twist at the end of episode 1 and still had no idea what it would be
Slow Horses - I'd read the first book. Enjoyed the season based on that book to binge the series

The Fine
Black Doves
Cross
Will Trent
Reacher

The Meh
Tracker
Watson
Captain America: Brave New World

The Not Good
The Gorge
Kraven the Hunter (I was on a plane, honest)

Looking Forward To
Thunderbolts*
Superman
Fantastic 4 First Steps


Yes, I said no analysis, but Watson and Tracker reminded me of a problem I see developing in some current series. Strong lead characters with mind-numbingly insipid supporting characters. I've seen it in the just-mentioned series, but also in the new Matlock and the Irrational, neither of which qualify as things I've watched recently. Decent to good premises with decent actors, but man, the lesser recurring characters are hard to watch.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

DieselMickyDolenz wrote:

Slow Horses - I'd read the first book. Enjoyed the season based on that book to binge the series.

I recently watched this series myself.  Really liked the characters, and Gary Oldman is incredible as the lead.  Maybe the most fun I've had watching a series in a while.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I find the TV show YOU really instructive, albeit in what NOT to ever do.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I really enjoyed this season of Black Mirror.  A lot of attention, I assume, has been on the sequel to USS Callister and the semi-sequel to Bandersnatch, but my favorite episode was "Common People."  A terrifying look at a super-realistic way that technology would both really help people and potentially hamstring working class families.  I think the others were generally pretty good.  I think "Bete Noire" is a really fun episode that I think has an ending that was maybe a little too ridiculous, even for this show.  "Hotel Reverie" has some good character work, and I assume is one of the ways movie production could go.  "Plaything" was a bit of fun, but also maybe a bit of a mess.  "Eulogy" was a great character piece starring Paul Giamatti.  And USS Callister: Into Infinity is still great, although probably not as great as the original.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I don't think I've seen Black Mirror since before "Bandersnatch."

I started Presumed Innocent. I've read the book and seen the Harrison Ford film. A twist at the end of episode 1 tells me they won't be resolving things the same way. It's ok so far.

The Studio has been recommended to me. I'm not really a Seth Rogen fan (though I prefer him infinitely to Joe Rogan) and haven't really been up for comedies lately, so I haven't started.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

DieselMickyDolenz wrote:

I don't think I've seen Black Mirror since before "Bandersnatch."

It can be hit or miss.  I recently rewatched Bandersnatch and think it was a fun concept.  The story itself isn't super Black Mirror-y.  I think some of it strays a bit from the stuff that I like the most ("how would people react if *insert technology* was introduced?") and that's what I liked about Common People.  If you wanted to try it again, there's probably some lists that would do better at picking which episodes to watch and which to skip than me.  But I think, since Bandersnatch, my favorites are:

Season 6
Beyond the Sea
Demon 79 (although technically this is "Red Mirror" - an attempt at horror)

Season 7
Common People
USS Callister: Into Infinity (if you've seen the original - obviously watch that one first)

In season 5 (which I didn't pick any), I think all three are pretty good but all flawed in their own way.  "Joan Is Awful" is very entertaining and I really wanted to like Bete Noire more than I ended up liking it.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Thanks. I'll give it a watch. Well, not Bandersnatch, as Netflix has removed it.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Interesting.  I watched it a couple of weeks ago.  Because of the interactive nature, I know it doesn't work on all devices so you might just not be able to see it?

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

https://deadline.com/2025/05/black-mirr … 236391435/
Netflix Pulling Its Last Two Interactive Specials – ‘Black Mirror: Bandersnatch’ & ‘Kimmy Schmidt’

Gone as of yesterday.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Well I'm glad I watched it when I did, then.  That's crazy.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I wonder why Netflix is doing that. I mean, they already made the title. Are they really losing money by keeping it up... ? Or are the shifting to a technology platform and building in branching pathways or maintaining that functionality doesn't make sense if they don't plan to make any more interactive titles?

647 (edited by DieselMickyDolenz 2025-05-20 08:15:33)

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I saw someone suggest (don't recall where) that Netflix is updating their UI. Maybe the new system doesn't support interactivity?

I saw Thunderbolts* last night. More on that in the Marvel thread, but I thought it was better than much of what has been put out since Endgame.

Just finished Presumed Innocent. It was fair. Can't say I saw the real murderer coming.

I still need to finish Daredevil Born Again.

Considering The Studio and Murderbot.

I see The Day the Earth Blew Up: A Looney Tunes Movie is being released on (HBO)Max on June 27. If you're a looney tunes fan, it's worth catching. I wasn't at all sure Porky and Daffy could carry a full-length film, but they did. I think it's horrible the way Zaslav has treated this property, so show it some love if it's at all your thing.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Just got home from MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: THE FINAL RECKONING. I liked it, but I didn't love it. It was good enough.

One thing I did note: it's always rankled with me that the 1996 MISSION IMPOSSIBLE made Jim Phelps (the hero of the TV show) into a villain. THE FINAL RECKONING attempts to repair this distantly, and I appreciated it.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I wanted to like MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: THE FINAL RECKONING more than I did.

I guess the thing that bothered me most: DEAD RECKONING started a new storyline: the dark past of Ethan Hunt. We learn that before Ethan joined the Impossible Missions Force, he was facing murder charges. The villain of DEAD RECKONING and FINAL RECKONING, Gabriel, apparently murdered a woman Ethan cared about, someone named Marie, played by Mariela Garriga. We only glimpsed Marie in a flashback and Ethan finding her body, and could intuit that Gabriel, a villainous spy, had killed her and framed Ethan.

THE FINAL RECKONING does not elaborate any further on Marie or Ethan's origin story or what relationship or enmity Ethan and Gabriel had or how they met or why they turned against each other or why Marie died or why Ethan was facing murder charges. Marie only appears in the same footage of her death that was seen in DEAD RECKONING.

Something clearly went wrong here, and it really disappoints me because I came into the theatre eager to learn more about Ethan's past and emerged with nothing new about his history.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I haven't seen Mission Impossible: Final Reckoning yet.  But I'll hopefully see it in the next couple of weeks so I can read and respond.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I deliberately didn't give details about what's in the movie.

I would say... the movie is strangely overburdened with exposition. I have no idea why. Christopher McQuarrie has talked a lot about how he never wants the audience to have to remember too much; he doesn't like overlong exposition. But FINAL RECKONING boasts one of the most overexplained plots I've ever seen. The 1996 movie had a plot that nobody could understand. The second one had a plot that nobody needed to understand. The seventh film has a plot that that I found myself understanding to the point of wondering how much I really needed to understand it.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

So I saw it.  I wanted to give some thoughts:

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

So I know the director has talked about filming the prequel scenes and de-aging Cruise and filming it like a Mission Impossible movie that would've been made in the 80s.  And they decided, I believe, it was too distracting.  But I think you're right - even if they didn't go all out, they probably still could've explained a bit more.

I think, overall, the movie is really good.  I thought it was fun and engaging.  But at the same time, I struggled with some things.  I think the ending was a bit bizarre.  The whole movie is set up as a culmination of 8 movies, and the movie goes out of its way to show clips from previous movies.  This was a love note to fans of the franchise, but the movie doesn't really sell itself as a farewell to Ethan at all.  The movie keeps talking about it as "one last mission" or whatever, but what's stopping Ethan from continuing the work?  He doesn't talk about retiring, and he's not injured in any significant way.  I thought for a few minutes that the movie would end with Ethan falling out of the plane to his death, sacrificing himself to kill the Entity.  And that's almost exactly what happened.

But it didn't.  And if, immediately after everyone walks way, someone calls Ethan and tells him that Benji has been kidnapped, Ethan would go right back to work.  So what ended?

I also thought it was a bit crazy on two levels:

1. The movie says multiple times that "cyberspace" will end if they kill the Entity.  Did that not happen because they captured the Entity?  Or did it happen?  The movie simply doesn't say.  If there's somehow no Internet anymore, that's a giant change to the universe that the movie simply doesn't address

2. The movie ends with the Entity intact.  Shouldn't someone smash that box?  What's the point of capturing the Entity and holding it?  That doesn't save the world, it just delays the inevitable.  I figured Grace or Benji would smash it immediately, but then they just give it to Ethan?  And he just holds on to it?  I don't understand.

Then there's some other stuff that goes unaddressed.  They talk about martial law across the world, but that doesn't really play into anything.  Ethan and company are able to pretty freely cross borders and get through places and have chases without running into any problems.  I also found Grace's character to be a bit frustrating.  In Dead Reckoning, she was pretty clearly in it for herself, shifting a bit at the end.  In Final Reckoning, she starts off seemingly in it for herself, but at some point she's all in.  I don't know if that was earned.

I also think the dialogue was a bit clunky.  They used the word reckoning way more than it's usually used in normal conversation, and I think some of the flashback stuff was very distracting.  I have recently seen all eight movies, and I did some homework to remember some things.  So maybe it was useful to people who haven't seen any of these movies since they came out.  But to me it was distracting.

And I was also a bit blown away that the movie only had one big returning character.  Where was Jeremy Renner or Michelle Monaghan or Sean Harris or Vanessa Kirby?  I really expected that Renner would show up in a surprise appearance, and he certainly would've been helpful in this mission.  And if they wanted to make this the final movie, I sorta expected some sort of "Endgame" sequences where people showed up to help.  I know that Renner stepped away from the role and turned down something, and I don't know if there's animosity, but Renner almost took over this franchise.  And for him not to be dead but also never be mentioned or even shown in flashback just feels super weird.

And the Jim Phelps Jr stuff....I didn't think that was earned at all, and I'd be interested in seeing whether or not this satisfies people who were turned off by Phelps being the bad guy in the original.

I know that was a lot of negative, but the negative just sort of stands out.  I think the movie is really good.  It might be one of my least favorite movies of the series, but this is a series of extremely strong movies.  And this one, I think, bit off a bit more than it could chew.  But, man, Cruise knows how to make a movie, even a movie this long, super fun and engaging.  The action was fun and clear and didn't make my eyes gloss over.  And the stunts he does at his age are so impressive and memorable.

All in all, I would love to see this series continue.  And I think the way they actually ended it, this isn't really the end for Ethan, right?  There's gonna be another one, I gotta think.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Spoilers for MI:8


















I was satisfied by the Jim Phelps Jr. reveal; I thought it addressed the damage done by the 1996 film by situating the movies in a separate continuity from the TV show. It was an easter egg, not a huge moment of drama. I was fine with it.

The warning was that the Entity, if destroyed, would take down every digital system in its cascading death throes reverberating through every system it controlled and had infected. Luther's Poison Pill therefore only threatens to destroy the Entity, which seeks to evade the Poison Pill by retreating into the doomsday bunker and which the IMF has rigged to offer only one digital storage space for the Entity: the crystalline five-dimension optical drive which will hold the Entity indefinitely.

This prevents the Entity from disrupting and destroying digital infrastructures in its own termination; it isn't destroyed, but instead cut off and contained, preventing the destructive feedback loop while removing its continued influence over any technology outside the 5D crystal.

654 (edited by Slider_Quinn21 2025-06-16 07:26:27)

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

These spoilers will self destruct in 5 seconds.

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

Hmmm, did Ethan not share the poison pill plan with the president, or did I just miss that?  I did feel like some of the motivations seemed a little weird.  Like how the president almost nuked everyone, but that seemed like the most temporary of temporary solutions.  If the president had gone through with the nuclear strikes, the Entity would've still taken control of the American nuclear weapons.  Which, on their own, would've been enough to accomplish the Entity's plan to wipe out humanity.

I do feel like if the president had known that Ethan's plan to capture the Entity would've resulted in no harm to the internet, she would've gone along with it.  It seemed like, at least to me, that the government didn't seem as concerned with controlling the Entity as just staying alive.  The argument seemed to be about the fallout from destroying the Entity, and if Ethan had a plan that didn't cause that fallout, they would've gone along with it.

But why do you think Ethan, at least until the second the movie ended, kept the Entity intact?  Is it not possible to destroy the Entity by destroying the crystal?  Would destroying the contained Entity end up destroying the internet?

And I guess my biggest question, as someone who knows nothing about AI or computers or any technology I guess....I would assume that the Entity would be not one being but infinity beings working together in harmony.  To use an analogy, I see the Entity as being the Borg.  If you capture one drone, even if it's an important drone, the rest of the Borg are still out there.  And that the Entity was trying to get a single drone (or even the Queen) into the secure servers to save itself, but that the rest of the drones would still be out in the world causing chaos.

The idea that the Entity would remove itself from every system in the world and hide all of itself in the servers seems wild to me.  Is that really how it would work?

NOTE: I still really liked this movie, but I do think the script needed another rewrite for some of this stuff that seemed less than polished.

655 (edited by ireactions 2025-06-16 16:38:56)

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Spoilers for MISSION IMPOSSIBLE:














Every government in the world, including the States, wanted to possess and control the Entity, and nobody believed Ethan would hand it over. Ethan states outright that his plan is to destroy the Entity, which he can do safely when it can't control anything outside the 5D crystal. The president ultimately follows Ethan's plan, but prepares to launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike should he fail, only to decide she will try to give Ethan more time.

Regarding Jasper Briggs: while he doesn't affect the plot, his presence points out certain ironies. Jim Phelps in the 1996 film was a rogue spy, a traitor who co-opted IMF resources and turned against his own government to pursue his own agenda. As far as the CIA and the IMF are concerned, that is an exact description of Ethan Hunt in 2025: Ethan is a rogue agent who is operating without sanction or approval from the agency that supposedly employs him. Briggs is furious that Ethan took Phelps down for what Ethan himself seems to do, and the IMF and the CIA generally think Ethan is out for money or revenge.

Briggs' confrontation with Ethan also sets up a later arc: when Ethan's team depends on William Donloe, the agent whom Ethan unwittingly humiliated and saw sent off to the Arctic in the 1996 film. Briggs' refusal to aid Ethan sets up the likelihood that the other person Ethan pissed off in 1996 is also unlikely to be an ally, building some uncertainty, except Donloe turns out to have a different view.

On the subject of the 5D crystal and Ethan's custody of it: in the middle of the film, Grace tells Ethan to think of the power that the Entity would give any wielder who could threaten its existence and dictate its actions. Ethan says he would trust no one with that power. Grace says she would trust Ethan, and hands it over to him at the end. He may run it over with a car; he may keep it for some purpose.

And about the Entity:

We need to note, before we get into the mechanics of how the Entity works: the Entity is not a realistic depiction of even a malicious AI. The Entity's plan across two films has been to corrupt and destroy information and data and replace it with fraudulent or altered versions that serve its ends; if the Entity is replacing the information on which it depends its assessments and decisions, it can no longer make reliable calculations or strategies. AI systems depend on reliable data to function and constantly glitch because of untrustworthy intel.

In addition, the Entity's plan is to contain itself within the doomsday bunker while exterminating the human face. This is foolish and counter to its stated goals: any AI system, even the Entity, depends on human action to generate the data on which the Entity acts and to maintain the equipment on which the Entity exists.

A server farm like the doomsday bunker is not something that anyone can set and forget: the electrical resistance of cables will degrade; fan coils wear out; power systems need fuel; solar panels need cleaning -- the Entity has killed or driven away all human staff and has no capacity to maintain its operating equipment or engage in repairs. It clearly has no robotics operation because it uses human agents.

Your question is why entrapping one instance of the Entity would affect all the others out there. The Entity, in its evasive and elusive maneuvers and its vulnerability to source code attacks via the Poison Pill, appears to operate on a centralized if mobile dataset from which its actions and decisions originate.

All instances are ultimately linked to the source code core in order to retain operational control and to, presumably, distinguish fabricated and altered data from the original data and to synchronize the actions across multiple instances. When the Entity is contained to the 5D crystal, the IMF has effectively removed the AI brain from the rest of its digital body.

This is not a realistic picture of a likely decentralized AI system, but within the fictional logic of a MISSION IMPOSSIBLE film, it's what we've been shown. The Entity's core data, if confined to the 5D crystal, prevents it from having any further influence over any other nodes of its function.

All this verbiage to defend a movie I wasn't that crazy about...

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Ha, that all makes sense to me.  I'm genuinely curious where, if anywhere, this franchise goes next.  It's a little crazy that there are 8 movies, of wildly different styles at times, that were all good to great.  I'm not sure enough people appreciate that this might be the overall best franchise we've ever had.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

Ha, that all makes sense to me.

Good, please explain it to me.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

KARATE KID: LEGENDS.

As a huge KARATE KID and COBRA KAI fan who is always interested in any KARATE KID product, this movie is better than the worst of the films -- and yet comes off purely as a product to slam an existing copyright into movie theatres because the Netflix COBRA KAI TV show has revitalized the brand. But despite being a film made to get some revenue out of the KARATE KID brand because the TV show was a hit, LEGENDS is crippled by the show. It legally cannot use any of the characters or plotlines that originated in the TV show. As a result, LEGENDS is both brought into being and defeated by the show that enables its existence.

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

I don't know how or why, but I completely missed the Karate Kid franchise.  It feels up my alley (I gravitated towards both 3 Ninjas and Surf Ninjas instead).  I watched the original a couple years ago, but while I enjoyed it, I felt like it had passed me by.  So while I want to watch all the movies and Cobra Kai, I just can't find the energy to put into actually doing that.

But I'm interested in how the rights work that the movie and show can use the same character but not share other pieces?

Re: Random Thoughts about TV, Film and Media

Slider_Quinn21 wrote:

I don't know how or why, but I completely missed the Karate Kid franchise.  It feels up my alley (I gravitated towards both 3 Ninjas and Surf Ninjas instead).  I watched the original a couple years ago, but while I enjoyed it, I felt like it had passed me by.  So while I want to watch all the movies and Cobra Kai, I just can't find the energy to put into actually doing that.

But I'm interested in how the rights work that the movie and show can use the same character but not share other pieces?

THE KARATE KID is one of the most interesting franchises America has ever produced, arguably demonstrating the worst and best aspects of any film and TV franchise. The original movie, while dated and limited in by the filming and fight choreography of 1984, is a minor masterpiece: bullied teenager Daniel LaRusso (Ralph Macchio) is fleeing a local gang of karate students and their abusive mentor, John Kreese, who runs the Cobra Kai dojo.

Daniel discovers that his apartment building's handyman, Mr. Miyagi, a serene, quiet, humble blue-collar worker, is in fact a master of karate and willing to train Daniel in martial arts to compete in a tournament against his oppressors. Miyagi's lessons are frustrating, bizarre and indirect, prioritizing harmony, peace, balance and serenity, with Daniel discovering that the karate Miyagi offers is not based in dominance or violence but masterful minimalism. The film sets up a tournament where Daniel must find out if his limited skill and ability to react and redirect can match the muscular aggression of Cobra Kai and their lead bully, Johnny Lawrence.

THE KARATE KID, despite being an action movie, is more of a gentle dramedy. Due to the limitations of the lead actors who weren't really martial artists, the action that is there may not have aged well.

The sequel, made in 1986, is (at least to me) almost everything a sequel should be if there has to be one. The story shifts to Okinawa, Japan, the fishing village home of Mr. Miyagi where this time, Daniel learns about his mentor's family history and a troubled and violent conflict that Miyagi fled home to escape, only to be drawn back by the death of his father. PART II is an incredibly stirring exploration of Miyagi's past through Daniel's perspective as Daniel is swept into a deadly confrontation with a karate master that sees Daniel not in a tournament but a duel to the death. PART II achieves almost every possible success one could hope for from a sequel.

And then with PART III in 1989, THE KARATE KID franchise crashed into every possible failure a sequel could have. PART III is a formulaic rehash of the original film where Daniel is yet again dragged into another karate tournament and is inexplicably as unskilled and incompetent as he was before Miyagi trained him in the first movie. As a result, PART III undermines everything Daniel and Miyagi accomplished in the previous two films and makes Miyagi look inept and Daniel look ridiculous.

With the fourth film in 1994, Ralph Macchio declined to return and we have Miyagi mentoring a teeanged Hilary Swank in THE NEXT KARATE KID -- except where Miyagi was previously a complex, humble man of past violence and present serenity,  Miyagi in the fourth film is a clumsy caricature of 'Asian' 'wisdom' reciting inane proverbs, and the villains of the fourth film are cartoonish figures without any of the troubled personhood of the villains in the original two. THE NEXT KARATE KID is so visually dull that it looks more like a direct to video cheapquel than a motion picture.

After this crash and burn, the franchise went into hibernation for 16 years until Sony Pictures decided to wheel out the brand again in 2010, this time electing to reboot the series with a reimagining where Jaden Smith plays Dre, a young American boy transplanted to China where he flees the local kung fu wielding bullies and is rescued and trained by Mr. Han, a Miyagi-like figure played by Jackie Chan. Inexplicably, despite the martial art being kung fu, Sony insisted on calling the film THE KARATE KID just to get the brand into theatres. Despite this foolishness with the title, the 2010 reimagining is a beautifully shot film with heartfelt performances and a gentle warmth and earnest sense of tragedy matched with Jackie Chan's martial arts excellence vastly surpassing the fight choreography of the original film.

For various reasons -- directors dropping out, Jaden Smith aging by the time Sony found a director who stuck -- the 2010 film never saw a direct sequel with Dre and Han. However, from 2013 - 2014, the original bully character from the 1984 film was referred to by the Barney Stinson character on the sitcom HOW I MET YOUR MOTHER, with Ralph Macchio and Johnny's actor William Zabka playing themselves in guest-appearances. The joke was that Barney considered Zabka's bully character, Johnny, to be the true hero and protagonist of THE KARATE KID.

With this renewed prominence, TV producers Josh Heald, Jon Hurwitz, and Hayden Schlossberg, whose production company had a deal with Sony TV, pitched a Daniel LaRusso and Johnny Lawrence TV show in 2017 to various streamers and networks. YouTube Red picked it up, with Sony licensing the TV and streaming rights for a show that the TV team decided to name COBRA KAI in order to emphasize that Johnny's perspective would be receiving equal emphasis in this sequel.

COBRA KAI's first season in 2018 shows Johnny Lawrence 34 years after Daniel defeated him at the high school karate tournament. Johnny is an alcoholic, underemployed handyman, estranged from his son and the mother of his child, at odds with his stepfather, missing his dead mother, and increasingly frustrated as he sees that Daniel LaRusso is a successful and popular car dealership owner. Now in his 50s, Johnny continues to be haunted by his high school humiliation and his lost glory. One night, as Johnny eats a cold dinner outside a shopping plaza, Johnny sees a teenaged boy, Miguel, attacked by a gang of bullies.

Johnny ignores them until the bullies throw Miguel into his car, at which point an incensed Johnny attacks the bullies, trounces them easily with his karate, and is inspired to reopen the Cobra Kai dojo and regain his lost pride with Miguel as his first student. The reopening of Cobra Kai puts Johnny on a collision course with Daniel as these two grown men begin to re-engage with the high drama and critical conflict of a petty high school squabble that began in 1984.

COBRA KAI, to me, is a hilarious demonstration of how all drama is two people who do not like each other, forced to be in the same room together. Zabka excels at playing the boorish, aggressive, yet strangely good-hearted Johnny whose bullying masked deep-seated abandonment issues, turning Johnny into an oddly relatable character dealing with a long history of failure and embarrassment. Meanwhile, Macchio is brilliant at portraying Daniel's exasperated astonishment that his high school bully continues to be a problem over three decades after they first met.

COBRA KAI proved so successful that when YouTube Red shut down, Netflix bought the show and it ran for a total of six seasons over seven years as Johnny and Daniel deal with rivaling karate dojos, the war between their children and students, and the bleak resignation as Johnny and Daniel become reluctantly adjusted to how they are hopelessly entangled in each other's lives and make the horrifying discovery that they may in fact be friends. COBRA KAI was such a cultural phenomenon that Sony Pictures saw that the KARATE KID brand was on the rise... and nonsensically released a statement in 2022 shortly after COBRA KAI's Season 5 had been released, announcing "The return of the original KARATE KID franchise" on June 7, 2024.

There was no cast, director or writer attached; Sony Pictures had simply seen that with the KARATE KID brand revitalized via the COBRA KAI TV show, they were going to have a movie with the KARATE KID brand in theatres in the summer of 2024... and would figure out what would be in the movie later. The COBRA KAI producers released a statement clarifying that they had no involvement in the KARATE KID film for 2024 but wished it well. Over a year after the original announcement, Sony Pictures finally announced a director, Jonathan Entwistle and also that the film would feature both Jackie Chan and Ralph Macchio, despite the Mr. Han character appearing to exist in a separate continuity. The COBRA KAI producers also said that they had offered notes on the movie script, but that there was no tie in between the film and the TV show beyond Daniel LaRusso appearing in both.

Macchio further clarified that he would be filming the sixth season of COBRA KAI and then appear in the new KARATE KID movie, and that at his urging, Sony Pictures had moved the release date to May 30, 2025, rather than see it come out before COBRA KAI had finished its sixth and final season.

COBRA KAI had a grand finale in February 2025. KARATE KID: LEGENDS came out at the end of May. And...

The movie is not terrible. It's not bad. It's absolutely fine. The opening starts with a reprise of THE KARATE KID II where Miyagi shares his family history; we hear again how his 17th ancestor, Shimpo, was a fisherman who vanished in a storm, thought to have been washed out to sea. Shimpo vanished, but returned by ship 10 years later with a Chinese wife, two children, and what Miyagi calls "the secret of Miyagi-Do Karate."

In this reprise, however, Miyagi tells an extended version of his story, where he reveals that Shimpo washed ashore in China and was taken in by the Han family, who shared their kung fu with Shimpo, and that the Han and Miyagi families remain close even in the present day. Immediately at the outset, LEGENDS explains how the Miyagi characters and the Jackie Chan-portrayed Mr. Han character can exist in the same universe and why their styles of karate and kung fu are so similar. The movie then shifts to China briefly, focusing on Chinese teenager and kung fu student Li Fong, played by the charming and affable Ben Wang. Li is Mr. Han's grand-nephew, and Li's mother moves with Li to New York City, away from Han's kung fu academy where Ben encounters an MMA-trained bully named Conor and a love interest named Mia whose father's pizza restaurant is struggling.

Through a somewhat tangled plot, Li must compete in a karate tournament against Conor to save Mia's pizza shop; Han visits New York to train Li -- and elects to travel to Reseda to find Daniel LaRusso, asking Daniel to help him train Li in Miyagi-Do Karate to win the tournament.

It's at this point that the legal issues become clear: LEGENDS makes absolutely no reference to Daniel's life for most of the film. We see him living in Miyagi's house: there is no reference to Daniel's job, family, wife, children, business, whether or not he's maintained his karate training, or what he's been doing with his life since THE KARATE KID III in 1989. LEGENDS brings in the Daniel character but presents him as a complete blank aside from offering good-natured karate mentorship to Li.

Why? Because LEGENDS cannot use any characters or plot elements from COBRA KAI. The COBRA KAI series was made under television license and developed original characters that are held by the Sony TV division in collaboration with Hurwitz & Schlossberg Productions and Netflix, with Netflix effectively owning the majority of the show. Sony Pictures, the film branch, cannot use any characters that first appeared in COBRA KAI without entering some agreement with Netflix: they have no access to COBRA KAI's cast and cannot feature Daniel's wife, Daniel's business, Daniel's friends, Daniel's students, Daniel's kids. It's not impossible that Sony Pictures could have licensed them back from Netflix, but the convolutions and cost were likely seen counter to getting the KARATE KID brand back in theatres as opposed to promoting a Netflix property, effectively a rival.

As a result, Daniel LaRusso is nearly a cipher in LEGENDS. The movie makes no effort to define Daniel's life. Ralph Macchio refused to allow the film to contradict COBRA KAI in any way, but it also can't make any significant references or explicit tie-ins. They can't even show Daniel using any of the karate techniques that were first shown in COBRA KAI.

This also cripples LEGENDS' depiction of Daniel further: it's unclear why Han wants Daniel to teach Li anything; Li is already a capable martial artist and Ralph Macchio's above average athleticism and passable karate are clearly a lesser level of skill than Jackie Chan's Han or Ben Wang's Li.

The fiction declares that Daniel LaRusso is a martial arts master equal to the legendary; the obvious onscreen reality is that Ralph Macchio is a reasonably athletic man with limited martial arts training who can fake it for the camera -- but because Jackie Chan and Ben Wang are actual martial artists, Macchio looks like an imposter next to them, and all the points of karate that COBRA KAI developed for Daniel: his minimalism, his defense-only, his pressure point manipulation -- all of it is inaccessible and off-limits to LEGENDS.

LEGENDS comes off as simply an exercise in managing the KARATE KID IP: unifying the two separate timelines, making it possible to continue in the future as an anthology movie series whether the next film features Ben Wang or a new Karate Kid who can be either from Daniel's end or Mr. Han's end of the universe. Where THE KARATE KID and COBRA KAI had a lot to say about violence, aggression, pacifism, passivity, self-defense and physical offense, LEGENDS seems to simply run through the old formula. Li Fong is already a martial artist, so any training he receives seems trivial. The Conor villain has no backstory or personality beyond superficial savagery. LEGENDS is a film without a point or a purpose beyond rearranging the IP elements. It is not art. It is a product.

Spoiler warning.











Hilariously, the final scene of the film features Daniel back at home and hanging out with Johnny Lawrence with William Zabka making a cameo, validating the COBRA KAI continuity, and permissible because Johnny first appeared in the 1984 film. In this single scene, largely improvised by the actors, LEGENDS seems to accidentally concede that THE KARATE KID, even if going by another name on Netflix, is the franchise of Daniel LaRusso and Johnny Lawrence, and a KARATE KID film, even this mediocrity, is unable to get to the end without Daniel and Johnny reclaiming the narrative. COBRA KAI ended with Johnny and Daniel sharing a meal. LEGENDS ends the same way, which only serves to indicate how pointless LEGENDS really was.

This was probably more than what you really needed or wanted to know.